Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
[SPARK-5135][SQL] Add support for describe [extended] table to DDL in SQLContext - #3935
[SPARK-5135][SQL] Add support for describe [extended] table to DDL in SQLContext#3935OopsOutOfMemory wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
AmplabJenkins
commented
Jan 7, 2015
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
OopsOutOfMemory
commented
Jan 7, 2015
e.g. |
marmbrus
commented
Jan 7, 2015
ok to test |
marmbrus
commented
Jan 7, 2015
you'll also need to add test cases |
SparkQA
commented
Jan 7, 2015
Test build #25179 has started for PR 3935 at commit
|
SparkQA
commented
Jan 7, 2015
Test build #25179 has finished for PR 3935 at commit
|
AmplabJenkins
commented
Jan 7, 2015
Test FAILed. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nit: a :: b :: c :: Nil is exact the same with Seq(a, b, c). :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yeah, I just make this same as hive context way.
@chenghao-intel
This test failed with Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
no rights to CL server ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Seems a bug of error reporting, anyway, the root reason is it failed in the code style checking./home/jenkins/workspace/SparkPullRequestBuilder/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/commands.scala:198:21: Insert a space after the start of the comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we revert SQLContext in this PR? Since the change is equivalent.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think it's ok, it can at least save some space since :: is 2 chars, , is 1 char.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As @chenghao-intel said, do you mind not changing this part? It would be great if the PR focuses on what it does.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@chenghao-intel@rxin
ok, got it. I will change this.
chenghao-intel
commented
Jan 8, 2015
That's a nice feature in general, I agree with @marmbrus , we do need a test suite for this. |
OopsOutOfMemory
commented
Jan 8, 2015
@chenghao-intel@marmbrus |
OopsOutOfMemory
commented
Jan 8, 2015
ok to test |
SparkQA
commented
Jan 8, 2015
Test build #25198 has started for PR 3935 at commit
|
SparkQA
commented
Jan 8, 2015
Test build #25198 has finished for PR 3935 at commit
|
AmplabJenkins
commented
Jan 8, 2015
Test PASSed. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
"# col_name", "data_type", "comment" is the output field name, we'd better not take that as part of the output.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@chenghao-intel
ok, I will remove it.
If future support partition table here, I will add it like hive does:
# Partition Information # col_name data_type comment patition_col_name string None SparkQA
commented
Jan 8, 2015
Test build #25216 has started for PR 3935 at commit
|
SparkQA
commented
Jan 8, 2015
Test build #25216 has finished for PR 3935 at commit
|
AmplabJenkins
commented
Jan 8, 2015
Test PASSed. |
SparkQA
commented
Jan 8, 2015
Test build #25226 has started for PR 3935 at commit
|
SparkQA
commented
Jan 8, 2015
Test build #25226 has finished for PR 3935 at commit
|
AmplabJenkins
commented
Jan 8, 2015
Test FAILed. |
OopsOutOfMemory
commented
Jan 8, 2015
@scwf@chenghao-intel |
OopsOutOfMemory
commented
Jan 8, 2015
test this please. |
SparkQA
commented
Jan 8, 2015
Test build #25227 has started for PR 3935 at commit
|
SparkQA
commented
Jan 8, 2015
Test build #25229 has started for PR 3935 at commit
|
SparkQA
commented
Jan 16, 2015
Test build #25639 has started for PR 3935 at commit
|
SparkQA
commented
Jan 16, 2015
Test build #25639 has finished for PR 3935 at commit
|
AmplabJenkins
commented
Jan 16, 2015
Test FAILed. |
OopsOutOfMemory
commented
Jan 16, 2015
@rxin The rebase may have some problems, cause changed 278 files ? how do I revert it ? |
rxin
commented
Jan 16, 2015
Not sure - do you have a backup? Maybe just take a diff and apply the diff on master. |
SparkQA
commented
Jan 16, 2015
Test build #25651 has started for PR 3935 at commit
|
SparkQA
commented
Jan 16, 2015
Test build #25651 has finished for PR 3935 at commit
|
AmplabJenkins
commented
Jan 16, 2015
Test FAILed. |
9efdf35 to
9d22708CompareSparkQA
commented
Jan 16, 2015
Test build #25654 has started for PR 3935 at commit
|
scwf
commented
Jan 16, 2015
@OopsOutOfMemory, you need revert unnecessary changes |
9d22708 to
5b7ae19CompareSparkQA
commented
Jan 16, 2015
Test build #25655 has started for PR 3935 at commit
|
OopsOutOfMemory
commented
Jan 16, 2015
SparkQA
commented
Jan 16, 2015
Test build #25654 has finished for PR 3935 at commit
|
AmplabJenkins
commented
Jan 16, 2015
Test PASSed. |
SparkQA
commented
Jan 16, 2015
Test build #25655 has finished for PR 3935 at commit
|
AmplabJenkins
commented
Jan 16, 2015
Test PASSed. |
SparkQA
commented
Jan 16, 2015
Test build #25665 has started for PR 3935 at commit
|
SparkQA
commented
Jan 16, 2015
Test build #25665 has finished for PR 3935 at commit
|
AmplabJenkins
commented
Jan 16, 2015
Test PASSed. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
actually it's ok i will fix it myself
[SPARK-5135][SQL] Add support for describe [extended] table to DDL in SQLContext Conflicts: sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/dataTypes.scala
rxin
commented
Jan 21, 2015
Thanks. I resolved the conflict and pushed a PR #4127 |
OopsOutOfMemory
commented
Jan 21, 2015
Thanks @rxin |
rxin
commented
Jan 21, 2015
Yea we can close this one. Will merge that one when tests pass. |
RT.
issue is here : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-5135