Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
[SPARK-39740][UI]: Upgrade vis timeline to 7.7.2 to fix CVE-2020-28487 - #41613
[SPARK-39740][UI]: Upgrade vis timeline to 7.7.2 to fix CVE-2020-28487#41613shrprasa wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
21376f9 to
aa7143eCompareshrprasa
commented
Jun 16, 2023
@sarutak@gengliangwang Can you please review this PR? |
srowen
commented
Jun 18, 2023
Looks OK; try rerunning tests to be sure |
sarutak
commented
Jun 18, 2023
@shrprasa Sorry for the late reply. |
@sarutak I didn't find any performance issue with newer version of vis. I had tested the same operation which was mentioned in the PR to downgrade vis last time(#28811) Even after following operation: |
shrprasa
commented
Jun 19, 2023
@srowen All tests passed on retry. |
shrprasa
commented
Jun 22, 2023
srowen
commented
Jun 24, 2023
Merged to master |
shrprasa
commented
Jun 28, 2023
Thanks @srowen |
…020-28487 ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? Upgrade vis timeline to 7.7.2 Have to add xss option with whitelisting to make the timeline work after the xss protection was added in vis-timeline. (Refer to visjs/vis-timeline#1010) ### Why are the changes needed? To remediate CVE-2020-28487GHSA-9mrv-456v-pf22 ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? Manually by running spark-shell and checking History Server UI. Timeline rendered successfully and no change in style. Even after following operation: (1 to 1000).foreach(_ => sc.parallelize(1 to 10).collect) UI loaded in 3 seconds faster than it loaded with 4.21. Closesapache#41613 from shrprasa/upgrade_vis. Authored-by: Shrikant Prasad <shrprasa@visa.com> Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit a8ea35f)
…020-28487 ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? Upgrade vis timeline to 7.7.2 Have to add xss option with whitelisting to make the timeline work after the xss protection was added in vis-timeline. (Refer to visjs/vis-timeline#1010) ### Why are the changes needed? To remediate CVE-2020-28487GHSA-9mrv-456v-pf22 ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? Manually by running spark-shell and checking History Server UI. Timeline rendered successfully and no change in style. Even after following operation: (1 to 1000).foreach(_ => sc.parallelize(1 to 10).collect) UI loaded in 3 seconds faster than it loaded with 4.21. Closesapache#41613 from shrprasa/upgrade_vis. Authored-by: Shrikant Prasad <shrprasa@visa.com> Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit a8ea35f)
…020-28487 ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? Upgrade vis timeline to 7.7.2 Have to add xss option with whitelisting to make the timeline work after the xss protection was added in vis-timeline. (Refer to visjs/vis-timeline#1010) ### Why are the changes needed? To remediate CVE-2020-28487GHSA-9mrv-456v-pf22 ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? Manually by running spark-shell and checking History Server UI. Timeline rendered successfully and no change in style. Even after following operation: (1 to 1000).foreach(_ => sc.parallelize(1 to 10).collect) UI loaded in 3 seconds faster than it loaded with 4.21. Closesapache#41613 from shrprasa/upgrade_vis. Authored-by: Shrikant Prasad <shrprasa@visa.com> Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit a8ea35f)
…020-28487 ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? Upgrade vis timeline to 7.7.2 Have to add xss option with whitelisting to make the timeline work after the xss protection was added in vis-timeline. (Refer to visjs/vis-timeline#1010) ### Why are the changes needed? To remediate CVE-2020-28487GHSA-9mrv-456v-pf22 ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? Manually by running spark-shell and checking History Server UI. Timeline rendered successfully and no change in style. Even after following operation: (1 to 1000).foreach(_ => sc.parallelize(1 to 10).collect) UI loaded in 3 seconds faster than it loaded with 4.21. Closesapache#41613 from shrprasa/upgrade_vis. Authored-by: Shrikant Prasad <shrprasa@visa.com> Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit a8ea35f)
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Upgrade vis timeline to 7.7.2
Have to add xss option with whitelisting to make the timeline work after the xss protection was added in vis-timeline.
(Refer to visjs/vis-timeline#1010)
Why are the changes needed?
To remediate CVE-2020-28487
GHSA-9mrv-456v-pf22
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
How was this patch tested?
Manually by running spark-shell and checking History Server UI.
Timeline rendered successfully and no change in style.
Even after following operation:
(1 to 1000).foreach(_ => sc.parallelize(1 to 10).collect)
UI loaded in 3 seconds faster than it loaded with 4.21.