Skip to content

[SPARK-46485][SQL] V1Write should not add Sort when not needed#44458

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
cloud-fan wants to merge 1 commit into from
+20 −38
Closed

[SPARK-46485][SQL] V1Write should not add Sort when not needed #44458

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/V1Writes.scala
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -102,8 +102,8 @@ object V1Writes extends Rule[LogicalPlan] with SQLConfHelper {
val requiredOrdering = write.requiredOrdering.map(_.transform {
case a: Attribute => attrMap.getOrElse(a, a)
}.asInstanceOf[SortOrder])
val outputOrdering = query.outputOrdering
val orderingMatched = isOrderingMatched(requiredOrdering, outputOrdering)
val outputOrdering = empty2NullPlan.outputOrdering

@ulysses-youulysses-youDec 22, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I rough remember before we did not support preserve ordering through empty2null so use the query.outputOrdering. I think use empty2NullPlan.outputOrdering is the expected behavior

@allisonwang-dballisonwang-dbDec 23, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yea Project is an OrderPreservingUnaryNode so it should be fine.

val orderingMatched = isOrderingMatched(requiredOrdering.map(_.child), outputOrdering)

@cloud-fancloud-fanDec 22, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what def isOrderingMatched does is outputOrder.satisfies(outputOrder.copy(child = requiredOrder)), so it's completely wrong to pass requiredOrdering as a Seq[SortOrder]

@peter-tothpeter-tothDec 22, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch!

@viiryaviiryaDec 22, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yea, so it was never matched before...

if (orderingMatched) {
empty2NullPlan
} else {
Expand Down
54 changes: 18 additions & 36 deletions sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/V1WriteCommandSuite.scala
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -223,24 +223,15 @@ class V1WriteCommandSuite extends QueryTest with SharedSparkSession with V1Write
}

// assert the outer most sort in the executed plan
val sort = plan.collectFirst { case s: SortExec => s }
if (enabled) {
// With planned write, optimizer is more efficient and can eliminate the `SORT BY`.
assert(sort.exists {
case SortExec(Seq(
SortOrder(AttributeReference("key", IntegerType, _, _), Ascending, NullsFirst, _)
), false, _, _) => true
case _ => false
}, plan)
} else {
assert(sort.exists {
case SortExec(Seq(
SortOrder(AttributeReference("key", IntegerType, _, _), Ascending, NullsFirst, _),
SortOrder(AttributeReference("value", StringType, _, _), Ascending, NullsFirst, _)
), false, _, _) => true
case _ => false
}, plan)
}
assert(plan.collectFirst {
case s: SortExec => s
}.exists {
case SortExec(Seq(
SortOrder(AttributeReference("key", IntegerType, _, _), Ascending, NullsFirst, _),
SortOrder(AttributeReference("value", StringType, _, _), Ascending, NullsFirst, _)
), false, _, _) => true
case _ => false
}, plan)
}
}
}
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -279,24 +270,15 @@ class V1WriteCommandSuite extends QueryTest with SharedSparkSession with V1Write
}

// assert the outer most sort in the executed plan
val sort = plan.collectFirst { case s: SortExec => s }
if (enabled) {
// With planned write, optimizer is more efficient and can eliminate the `SORT BY`.
assert(sort.exists {
case SortExec(Seq(
SortOrder(AttributeReference("value", StringType, _, _), Ascending, NullsFirst, _)
), false, _, _) => true
case _ => false
}, plan)
} else {
assert(sort.exists {
case SortExec(Seq(
SortOrder(AttributeReference("value", StringType, _, _), Ascending, NullsFirst, _),
SortOrder(AttributeReference("key", IntegerType, _, _), Ascending, NullsFirst, _)
), false, _, _) => true
case _ => false
}, plan)
}
assert(plan.collectFirst {
case s: SortExec => s
}.exists {
case SortExec(Seq(
SortOrder(AttributeReference("value", StringType, _, _), Ascending, NullsFirst, _),
SortOrder(AttributeReference("key", IntegerType, _, _), Ascending, NullsFirst, _)
), false, _, _) => true
case _ => false
}, plan)
}
}
}
Expand Down