Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
[SPARK-9390][SQL] create a wrapper for array type - #7724
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
the generic get and array method is useful in interpreted mode, but it's a lot painful to handle Any between scala and java, so I put this interface in scala.
cloud-fan
commented
Jul 28, 2015
cc @rxin |
SparkQA
commented
Jul 28, 2015
Test build #38685 has finished for PR 7724 at commit
|
cloud-fan
commented
Jul 28, 2015
cc @rxin, I underestimated this work, It took me a lot of time to cover all corner cases... |
SparkQA
commented
Jul 28, 2015
Test build #38707 has finished for PR 7724 at commit
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think we should avoid using InternalRow in test directly, which means we are manually converting external type to internal type. Using Row and let converter do this work seems better.
SparkQA
commented
Jul 28, 2015
Test build #38708 has finished for PR 7724 at commit
|
SparkQA
commented
Jul 28, 2015
Test build #38710 has finished for PR 7724 at commit
|
SparkQA
commented
Jul 28, 2015
Test build #38718 has finished for PR 7724 at commit
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
can you move this into its own file
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think we need specialized version of toArray, and get rid of calling generic getter inside it. We can do it after adding special getter for map and removing generic getter.
SparkQA
commented
Jul 29, 2015
Test build #38790 has finished for PR 7724 at commit
|
SparkQA
commented
Jul 29, 2015
Test build #38797 has finished for PR 7724 at commit
|
SparkQA
commented
Jul 29, 2015
Test build #38804 has finished for PR 7724 at commit
|
SparkQA
commented
Jul 29, 2015
Test build #38818 has finished for PR 7724 at commit
|
SparkQA
commented
Jul 29, 2015
Test build #38824 has finished for PR 7724 at commit
|
cloud-fan
commented
Jul 29, 2015
retest this please. |
SparkQA
commented
Jul 29, 2015
Test build #145 has finished for PR 7724 at commit
|
SparkQA
commented
Jul 29, 2015
Test build #38831 has finished for PR 7724 at commit
|
0772ca0 to
e9f2fc6CompareSparkQA
commented
Jul 29, 2015
Test build #38846 has finished for PR 7724 at commit
|
SparkQA
commented
Jul 29, 2015
Test build #38844 has finished for PR 7724 at commit
|
SparkQA
commented
Jul 30, 2015
Test build #38931 has finished for PR 7724 at commit
|
cloud-fan
commented
Jul 30, 2015
cc @rxin I think it's close, there is still a pyspark doc string test failue: Does any body have an idea on it? One possible reason I guess is: before ArrayData, we use |
rxin
commented
Jul 30, 2015
cc @davies can you take a look? |
rxin
commented
Jul 30, 2015
SparkQA
commented
Jul 30, 2015
Test build #38981 has finished for PR 7724 at commit
|
cloud-fan
commented
Jul 30, 2015
retest this please. |
SparkQA
commented
Jul 30, 2015
Test build #153 has finished for PR 7724 at commit
|
SparkQA
commented
Jul 30, 2015
Test build #38990 has finished for PR 7724 at commit
|
cloud-fan
commented
Jul 30, 2015
retest this please. |
SparkQA
commented
Jul 30, 2015
Test build #157 has finished for PR 7724 at commit
|
SparkQA
commented
Jul 30, 2015
Test build #39007 has finished for PR 7724 at commit
|
SparkQA
commented
Jul 30, 2015
Test build #39025 has finished for PR 7724 at commit
|
cloud-fan
commented
Jul 30, 2015
cc @rxin, I'll specialize |
rxin
commented
Jul 30, 2015
Thanks - I've merged this. |
No description provided.