Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
[SPARK-9928][SQL] Removal of LogicalLocalTable - #9717
Conversation
…icalLocalTable merge.
SparkQA
commented
Nov 14, 2015
Test build #45933 has finished for PR 9717 at commit
|
gatorsmile
commented
Nov 14, 2015
The failure of this test case is not related to the code changes. It sounds like the other PR also hit the same issue. For example, in #9642, the same failure: |
gatorsmile
commented
Nov 14, 2015
Anybody can help me trigger the retest, please? |
gatorsmile
commented
Nov 14, 2015
@srowen Could you review the changes? Thanks! |
SparkQA
commented
Nov 14, 2015
Test build #45935 has finished for PR 9717 at commit
|
gatorsmile
commented
Nov 14, 2015
Another case failed due to the same reasons. This is not related to the code changes made in this PR. Timing issues? Or introduced by a recent merge? |
cloud-fan
commented
Nov 16, 2015
retest this please. |
cloud-fan
commented
Nov 16, 2015
the tests are quite flaky now, we are fixing it. |
SparkQA
commented
Nov 16, 2015
Test build #45969 has finished for PR 9717 at commit
|
cloud-fan
commented
Nov 16, 2015
LGTM cc @yhuai |
yhuai
commented
Nov 16, 2015
Merging to master and branch 1.6. |
LogicalLocalTable in ExistingRDD.scala is replaced by localRelation in LocalRelation.scala? Do you know any reason why we still keep this class? Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com> Closes#9717 from gatorsmile/LogicalLocalTable. (cherry picked from commit b58765c) Signed-off-by: Yin Huai <yhuai@databricks.com>
gatorsmile
commented
Nov 16, 2015
Thanks! |
LogicalLocalTable in ExistingRDD.scala is replaced by localRelation in LocalRelation.scala?
Do you know any reason why we still keep this class?