Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
TEZ-4577: SortSpan could be created real small, resulting in eventual job failure - #367
Conversation
tez-yetus
commented
Aug 21, 2024
💔 -1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
zhengchenyu
commented
Aug 21, 2024
@abstractdog@yigress@rbalamohan Can you please review this pr? |
zhengchenyu
commented
Aug 22, 2024
@abstractdog I see TEZ-4542 have merged to release-0.10.4-rc0. I think this pr should also be merged into release-0.10.4-rc0. |
yigress
commented
Aug 23, 2024
+1 LGTM |
zhengchenyu
commented
Dec 12, 2024
@abstractdog Hi, how about review this PR? Since TEZ-4542 may cause performance degradation in some scenarios, we should merge this to fix. |
thanks a lot @zhengchenyu for taking care of this can you please check if this can be easily solved in the scope of this patch? (or can you see the same on your machine?) |
zhengchenyu
commented
Dec 12, 2024
@abstractdog In my pc, without TEZ-4542 and TEZ-4577, |
abstractdog
commented
Dec 12, 2024
okay, thanks for clarifying, in this case, problem is on my side :) +1 |
… job failure (apache#367) (Chenyu Zheng reviewed by Laszlo Bodor) (cherry picked from commit d84fdca)
After TEZ-4542, app may run into an issue of real small sortspan (per record in this case), eventually the job failed due to timeout.
Here, fix int overflow problem in another way.