Skip to content

[TESTING] Mark x86 specific test - #10672

Merged
masahi merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
Mousius:x86-test-marker
Mar 19, 2022
Merged

[TESTING] Mark x86 specific test#10672
masahi merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
Mousius:x86-test-marker

Conversation

@Mousius

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Currently this test crashes pytest on any other architecture, this introduces a decorator which can be used to mark future x86 tests.

Currently this test crashes pytest on any other architecture, this introduces a decorator which can be used to mark future x86 tests.
Mousius added a commit to Mousius/tvm that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2022
As part of this any failing tests have been marked for follow up as part of apache#10673.
This depends on fixes in apache#10659, apache#10672 and apache#10674 to scope other tests correctly.
Mousius added a commit to Mousius/tvm that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2022
As part of this any failing tests have been marked for follow up as part of apache#10673.
This depends on fixes in apache#10659, apache#10672 and apache#10674 to scope other tests correctly.
@masahi
masahi merged commit e1af228 into apache:mainMar 19, 2022
Mousius added a commit to Mousius/tvm that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2022
As part of this any failing tests have been marked for follow up as part of apache#10673.
This depends on fixes in apache#10659, apache#10672 and apache#10674 to scope other tests correctly.
Mousius added a commit to Mousius/tvm that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2022
As part of this any failing tests have been marked for follow up as part of apache#10673.
This depends on fixes in apache#10659, apache#10672 and apache#10674 to scope other tests correctly.
manupak pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2022
As part of this any failing tests have been marked for follow up as part of #10673.
This depends on fixes in #10659, #10672 and #10674 to scope other tests correctly.
pfk-beta pushed a commit to pfk-beta/tvm that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2022
Currently this test crashes pytest on any other architecture, this introduces a decorator which can be used to mark future x86 tests.
pfk-beta pushed a commit to pfk-beta/tvm that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2022
As part of this any failing tests have been marked for follow up as part of apache#10673.
This depends on fixes in apache#10659, apache#10672 and apache#10674 to scope other tests correctly.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Mousius@masahi
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
[TESTING] Mark x86 specific test by Mousius · Pull Request #10672 · apache/tvm · GitHub
Skip to content

[TESTING] Mark x86 specific test - #10672

Merged
masahi merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
Mousius:x86-test-marker
Mar 19, 2022
Merged

[TESTING] Mark x86 specific test#10672
masahi merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
Mousius:x86-test-marker

Conversation

@Mousius

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Currently this test crashes pytest on any other architecture, this introduces a decorator which can be used to mark future x86 tests.

Currently this test crashes pytest on any other architecture, this introduces a decorator which can be used to mark future x86 tests.
Mousius added a commit to Mousius/tvm that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2022
As part of this any failing tests have been marked for follow up as part of apache#10673.
This depends on fixes in apache#10659, apache#10672 and apache#10674 to scope other tests correctly.
Mousius added a commit to Mousius/tvm that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2022
As part of this any failing tests have been marked for follow up as part of apache#10673.
This depends on fixes in apache#10659, apache#10672 and apache#10674 to scope other tests correctly.
@masahi
masahi merged commit e1af228 into apache:mainMar 19, 2022
Mousius added a commit to Mousius/tvm that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2022
As part of this any failing tests have been marked for follow up as part of apache#10673.
This depends on fixes in apache#10659, apache#10672 and apache#10674 to scope other tests correctly.
Mousius added a commit to Mousius/tvm that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2022
As part of this any failing tests have been marked for follow up as part of apache#10673.
This depends on fixes in apache#10659, apache#10672 and apache#10674 to scope other tests correctly.
manupak pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2022
As part of this any failing tests have been marked for follow up as part of #10673.
This depends on fixes in #10659, #10672 and #10674 to scope other tests correctly.
pfk-beta pushed a commit to pfk-beta/tvm that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2022
Currently this test crashes pytest on any other architecture, this introduces a decorator which can be used to mark future x86 tests.
pfk-beta pushed a commit to pfk-beta/tvm that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2022
As part of this any failing tests have been marked for follow up as part of apache#10673.
This depends on fixes in apache#10659, apache#10672 and apache#10674 to scope other tests correctly.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Mousius@masahi
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [TESTING] Mark x86 specific test by Mousius · Pull Request #10672 · apache/tvm · GitHub
Skip to content

[TESTING] Mark x86 specific test - #10672

Merged
masahi merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
Mousius:x86-test-marker
Mar 19, 2022
Merged

[TESTING] Mark x86 specific test#10672
masahi merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
Mousius:x86-test-marker

Conversation

@Mousius

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Currently this test crashes pytest on any other architecture, this introduces a decorator which can be used to mark future x86 tests.

Currently this test crashes pytest on any other architecture, this introduces a decorator which can be used to mark future x86 tests.
Mousius added a commit to Mousius/tvm that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2022
As part of this any failing tests have been marked for follow up as part of apache#10673.
This depends on fixes in apache#10659, apache#10672 and apache#10674 to scope other tests correctly.
Mousius added a commit to Mousius/tvm that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2022
As part of this any failing tests have been marked for follow up as part of apache#10673.
This depends on fixes in apache#10659, apache#10672 and apache#10674 to scope other tests correctly.
@masahi
masahi merged commit e1af228 into apache:mainMar 19, 2022
Mousius added a commit to Mousius/tvm that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2022
As part of this any failing tests have been marked for follow up as part of apache#10673.
This depends on fixes in apache#10659, apache#10672 and apache#10674 to scope other tests correctly.
Mousius added a commit to Mousius/tvm that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2022
As part of this any failing tests have been marked for follow up as part of apache#10673.
This depends on fixes in apache#10659, apache#10672 and apache#10674 to scope other tests correctly.
manupak pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2022
As part of this any failing tests have been marked for follow up as part of #10673.
This depends on fixes in #10659, #10672 and #10674 to scope other tests correctly.
pfk-beta pushed a commit to pfk-beta/tvm that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2022
Currently this test crashes pytest on any other architecture, this introduces a decorator which can be used to mark future x86 tests.
pfk-beta pushed a commit to pfk-beta/tvm that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2022
As part of this any failing tests have been marked for follow up as part of apache#10673.
This depends on fixes in apache#10659, apache#10672 and apache#10674 to scope other tests correctly.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Mousius@masahi
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [TESTING] Mark x86 specific test by Mousius · Pull Request #10672 · apache/tvm · GitHub
Skip to content

[TESTING] Mark x86 specific test - #10672

Merged
masahi merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
Mousius:x86-test-marker
Mar 19, 2022
Merged

[TESTING] Mark x86 specific test#10672
masahi merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
Mousius:x86-test-marker

Conversation

@Mousius

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Currently this test crashes pytest on any other architecture, this introduces a decorator which can be used to mark future x86 tests.

Currently this test crashes pytest on any other architecture, this introduces a decorator which can be used to mark future x86 tests.
Mousius added a commit to Mousius/tvm that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2022
As part of this any failing tests have been marked for follow up as part of apache#10673.
This depends on fixes in apache#10659, apache#10672 and apache#10674 to scope other tests correctly.
Mousius added a commit to Mousius/tvm that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2022
As part of this any failing tests have been marked for follow up as part of apache#10673.
This depends on fixes in apache#10659, apache#10672 and apache#10674 to scope other tests correctly.
@masahi
masahi merged commit e1af228 into apache:mainMar 19, 2022
Mousius added a commit to Mousius/tvm that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2022
As part of this any failing tests have been marked for follow up as part of apache#10673.
This depends on fixes in apache#10659, apache#10672 and apache#10674 to scope other tests correctly.
Mousius added a commit to Mousius/tvm that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2022
As part of this any failing tests have been marked for follow up as part of apache#10673.
This depends on fixes in apache#10659, apache#10672 and apache#10674 to scope other tests correctly.
manupak pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2022
As part of this any failing tests have been marked for follow up as part of #10673.
This depends on fixes in #10659, #10672 and #10674 to scope other tests correctly.
pfk-beta pushed a commit to pfk-beta/tvm that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2022
Currently this test crashes pytest on any other architecture, this introduces a decorator which can be used to mark future x86 tests.
pfk-beta pushed a commit to pfk-beta/tvm that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2022
As part of this any failing tests have been marked for follow up as part of apache#10673.
This depends on fixes in apache#10659, apache#10672 and apache#10674 to scope other tests correctly.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Mousius@masahi
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' [TESTING] Mark x86 specific test by Mousius · Pull Request #10672 · apache/tvm · GitHub
Skip to content

[TESTING] Mark x86 specific test - #10672

Merged
masahi merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
Mousius:x86-test-marker
Mar 19, 2022
Merged

[TESTING] Mark x86 specific test#10672
masahi merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
Mousius:x86-test-marker

Conversation

@Mousius

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Currently this test crashes pytest on any other architecture, this introduces a decorator which can be used to mark future x86 tests.

Currently this test crashes pytest on any other architecture, this introduces a decorator which can be used to mark future x86 tests.
Mousius added a commit to Mousius/tvm that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2022
As part of this any failing tests have been marked for follow up as part of apache#10673.
This depends on fixes in apache#10659, apache#10672 and apache#10674 to scope other tests correctly.
Mousius added a commit to Mousius/tvm that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2022
As part of this any failing tests have been marked for follow up as part of apache#10673.
This depends on fixes in apache#10659, apache#10672 and apache#10674 to scope other tests correctly.
@masahi
masahi merged commit e1af228 into apache:mainMar 19, 2022
Mousius added a commit to Mousius/tvm that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2022
As part of this any failing tests have been marked for follow up as part of apache#10673.
This depends on fixes in apache#10659, apache#10672 and apache#10674 to scope other tests correctly.
Mousius added a commit to Mousius/tvm that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2022
As part of this any failing tests have been marked for follow up as part of apache#10673.
This depends on fixes in apache#10659, apache#10672 and apache#10674 to scope other tests correctly.
manupak pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2022
As part of this any failing tests have been marked for follow up as part of #10673.
This depends on fixes in #10659, #10672 and #10674 to scope other tests correctly.
pfk-beta pushed a commit to pfk-beta/tvm that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2022
Currently this test crashes pytest on any other architecture, this introduces a decorator which can be used to mark future x86 tests.
pfk-beta pushed a commit to pfk-beta/tvm that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2022
As part of this any failing tests have been marked for follow up as part of apache#10673.
This depends on fixes in apache#10659, apache#10672 and apache#10674 to scope other tests correctly.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Mousius@masahi
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [TESTING] Mark x86 specific test by Mousius · Pull Request #10672 · apache/tvm · GitHub
Skip to content

[TESTING] Mark x86 specific test - #10672

Merged
masahi merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
Mousius:x86-test-marker
Mar 19, 2022
Merged

[TESTING] Mark x86 specific test#10672
masahi merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
Mousius:x86-test-marker

Conversation

@Mousius

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Currently this test crashes pytest on any other architecture, this introduces a decorator which can be used to mark future x86 tests.

Currently this test crashes pytest on any other architecture, this introduces a decorator which can be used to mark future x86 tests.
Mousius added a commit to Mousius/tvm that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2022
As part of this any failing tests have been marked for follow up as part of apache#10673.
This depends on fixes in apache#10659, apache#10672 and apache#10674 to scope other tests correctly.
Mousius added a commit to Mousius/tvm that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2022
As part of this any failing tests have been marked for follow up as part of apache#10673.
This depends on fixes in apache#10659, apache#10672 and apache#10674 to scope other tests correctly.
@masahi
masahi merged commit e1af228 into apache:mainMar 19, 2022
Mousius added a commit to Mousius/tvm that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2022
As part of this any failing tests have been marked for follow up as part of apache#10673.
This depends on fixes in apache#10659, apache#10672 and apache#10674 to scope other tests correctly.
Mousius added a commit to Mousius/tvm that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2022
As part of this any failing tests have been marked for follow up as part of apache#10673.
This depends on fixes in apache#10659, apache#10672 and apache#10674 to scope other tests correctly.
manupak pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2022
As part of this any failing tests have been marked for follow up as part of #10673.
This depends on fixes in #10659, #10672 and #10674 to scope other tests correctly.
pfk-beta pushed a commit to pfk-beta/tvm that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2022
Currently this test crashes pytest on any other architecture, this introduces a decorator which can be used to mark future x86 tests.
pfk-beta pushed a commit to pfk-beta/tvm that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2022
As part of this any failing tests have been marked for follow up as part of apache#10673.
This depends on fixes in apache#10659, apache#10672 and apache#10674 to scope other tests correctly.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Mousius@masahi
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); })(); [TESTING] Mark x86 specific test by Mousius · Pull Request #10672 · apache/tvm · GitHub
Skip to content

[TESTING] Mark x86 specific test - #10672

Merged
masahi merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
Mousius:x86-test-marker
Mar 19, 2022
Merged

[TESTING] Mark x86 specific test#10672
masahi merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
Mousius:x86-test-marker

Conversation

@Mousius

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Currently this test crashes pytest on any other architecture, this introduces a decorator which can be used to mark future x86 tests.

Currently this test crashes pytest on any other architecture, this introduces a decorator which can be used to mark future x86 tests.
Mousius added a commit to Mousius/tvm that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2022
As part of this any failing tests have been marked for follow up as part of apache#10673.
This depends on fixes in apache#10659, apache#10672 and apache#10674 to scope other tests correctly.
Mousius added a commit to Mousius/tvm that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2022
As part of this any failing tests have been marked for follow up as part of apache#10673.
This depends on fixes in apache#10659, apache#10672 and apache#10674 to scope other tests correctly.
@masahi
masahi merged commit e1af228 into apache:mainMar 19, 2022
Mousius added a commit to Mousius/tvm that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2022
As part of this any failing tests have been marked for follow up as part of apache#10673.
This depends on fixes in apache#10659, apache#10672 and apache#10674 to scope other tests correctly.
Mousius added a commit to Mousius/tvm that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2022
As part of this any failing tests have been marked for follow up as part of apache#10673.
This depends on fixes in apache#10659, apache#10672 and apache#10674 to scope other tests correctly.
manupak pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2022
As part of this any failing tests have been marked for follow up as part of #10673.
This depends on fixes in #10659, #10672 and #10674 to scope other tests correctly.
pfk-beta pushed a commit to pfk-beta/tvm that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2022
Currently this test crashes pytest on any other architecture, this introduces a decorator which can be used to mark future x86 tests.
pfk-beta pushed a commit to pfk-beta/tvm that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2022
As part of this any failing tests have been marked for follow up as part of apache#10673.
This depends on fixes in apache#10659, apache#10672 and apache#10674 to scope other tests correctly.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Mousius@masahi