[TIR] Improved error message if tir.Schedule passed to lower/build - #11913

Merged
junrushao merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
Lunderberg:lower_stir_schedule_error_message
Jun 27, 2022
Merged

[TIR] Improved error message if tir.Schedule passed to lower/build#11913
junrushao merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
Lunderberg:lower_stir_schedule_error_message

Conversation

@Lunderberg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Previously, if a TIR Schedule is passed to tvm.lower, the error message is returned ValueError: ('Expected input to be an IRModule, PrimFunc or Schedule, but got, ', <class 'tvm.tir.schedule.schedule.Schedule'>). This can cause user confusion, as the expected class name in the error message does not differentiate between between a tvm.te.Schedule and a tvm.tir.Schedule. Updated error message to explicitly state that this should be a te.Schedule.

Previously, if a TIR Schedule is passed to `tvm.lower`, the error
message is returned `ValueError: ('Expected input to be an IRModule,
PrimFunc or Schedule, but got, ', <class
'tvm.tir.schedule.schedule.Schedule'>)`. This can cause user
confusion, as the expected class name in the error message does not
differentiate between between a `tvm.te.Schedule` and a
`tvm.tir.Schedule`. Updated error message to explicitly state that
this should be a `te.Schedule`.
@driazati

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@tvm-bot rerun

@junrushao
junrushao merged commit 45568c9 into apache:mainJun 27, 2022
@junrushao

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks @Lunderberg!!

@Lunderberg
Lunderberg deleted the lower_stir_schedule_error_message branch June 27, 2022 19:44
blackkker pushed a commit to blackkker/tvm that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2022
…pache#11913)
Previously, if a TIR Schedule is passed to `tvm.lower`, the error
message is returned `ValueError: ('Expected input to be an IRModule,
PrimFunc or Schedule, but got, ', <class
'tvm.tir.schedule.schedule.Schedule'>)`. This can cause user
confusion, as the expected class name in the error message does not
differentiate between between a `tvm.te.Schedule` and a
`tvm.tir.Schedule`. Updated error message to explicitly state that
this should be a `te.Schedule`.
mikeseven pushed a commit to mikeseven/tvm that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2023
…pache#11913)
Previously, if a TIR Schedule is passed to `tvm.lower`, the error
message is returned `ValueError: ('Expected input to be an IRModule,
PrimFunc or Schedule, but got, ', <class
'tvm.tir.schedule.schedule.Schedule'>)`. This can cause user
confusion, as the expected class name in the error message does not
differentiate between between a `tvm.te.Schedule` and a
`tvm.tir.Schedule`. Updated error message to explicitly state that
this should be a `te.Schedule`.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@Lunderberg@driazati@junrushao
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

[TIR] Improved error message if tir.Schedule passed to lower/build - #11913

Merged
junrushao merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
Lunderberg:lower_stir_schedule_error_message
Jun 27, 2022
Merged

[TIR] Improved error message if tir.Schedule passed to lower/build#11913
junrushao merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
Lunderberg:lower_stir_schedule_error_message

Conversation

@Lunderberg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Previously, if a TIR Schedule is passed to tvm.lower, the error message is returned ValueError: ('Expected input to be an IRModule, PrimFunc or Schedule, but got, ', <class 'tvm.tir.schedule.schedule.Schedule'>). This can cause user confusion, as the expected class name in the error message does not differentiate between between a tvm.te.Schedule and a tvm.tir.Schedule. Updated error message to explicitly state that this should be a te.Schedule.

Previously, if a TIR Schedule is passed to `tvm.lower`, the error
message is returned `ValueError: ('Expected input to be an IRModule,
PrimFunc or Schedule, but got, ', <class
'tvm.tir.schedule.schedule.Schedule'>)`. This can cause user
confusion, as the expected class name in the error message does not
differentiate between between a `tvm.te.Schedule` and a
`tvm.tir.Schedule`. Updated error message to explicitly state that
this should be a `te.Schedule`.
@driazati

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@tvm-bot rerun

@junrushao
junrushao merged commit 45568c9 into apache:mainJun 27, 2022
@junrushao

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks @Lunderberg!!

@Lunderberg
Lunderberg deleted the lower_stir_schedule_error_message branch June 27, 2022 19:44
blackkker pushed a commit to blackkker/tvm that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2022
…pache#11913)
Previously, if a TIR Schedule is passed to `tvm.lower`, the error
message is returned `ValueError: ('Expected input to be an IRModule,
PrimFunc or Schedule, but got, ', <class
'tvm.tir.schedule.schedule.Schedule'>)`. This can cause user
confusion, as the expected class name in the error message does not
differentiate between between a `tvm.te.Schedule` and a
`tvm.tir.Schedule`. Updated error message to explicitly state that
this should be a `te.Schedule`.
mikeseven pushed a commit to mikeseven/tvm that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2023
…pache#11913)
Previously, if a TIR Schedule is passed to `tvm.lower`, the error
message is returned `ValueError: ('Expected input to be an IRModule,
PrimFunc or Schedule, but got, ', <class
'tvm.tir.schedule.schedule.Schedule'>)`. This can cause user
confusion, as the expected class name in the error message does not
differentiate between between a `tvm.te.Schedule` and a
`tvm.tir.Schedule`. Updated error message to explicitly state that
this should be a `te.Schedule`.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@Lunderberg@driazati@junrushao
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[TIR] Improved error message if tir.Schedule passed to lower/build - #11913

Merged
junrushao merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
Lunderberg:lower_stir_schedule_error_message
Jun 27, 2022
Merged

[TIR] Improved error message if tir.Schedule passed to lower/build#11913
junrushao merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
Lunderberg:lower_stir_schedule_error_message

Conversation

@Lunderberg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Previously, if a TIR Schedule is passed to tvm.lower, the error message is returned ValueError: ('Expected input to be an IRModule, PrimFunc or Schedule, but got, ', <class 'tvm.tir.schedule.schedule.Schedule'>). This can cause user confusion, as the expected class name in the error message does not differentiate between between a tvm.te.Schedule and a tvm.tir.Schedule. Updated error message to explicitly state that this should be a te.Schedule.

Previously, if a TIR Schedule is passed to `tvm.lower`, the error
message is returned `ValueError: ('Expected input to be an IRModule,
PrimFunc or Schedule, but got, ', <class
'tvm.tir.schedule.schedule.Schedule'>)`. This can cause user
confusion, as the expected class name in the error message does not
differentiate between between a `tvm.te.Schedule` and a
`tvm.tir.Schedule`. Updated error message to explicitly state that
this should be a `te.Schedule`.
@driazati

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@tvm-bot rerun

@junrushao
junrushao merged commit 45568c9 into apache:mainJun 27, 2022
@junrushao

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks @Lunderberg!!

@Lunderberg
Lunderberg deleted the lower_stir_schedule_error_message branch June 27, 2022 19:44
blackkker pushed a commit to blackkker/tvm that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2022
…pache#11913)
Previously, if a TIR Schedule is passed to `tvm.lower`, the error
message is returned `ValueError: ('Expected input to be an IRModule,
PrimFunc or Schedule, but got, ', <class
'tvm.tir.schedule.schedule.Schedule'>)`. This can cause user
confusion, as the expected class name in the error message does not
differentiate between between a `tvm.te.Schedule` and a
`tvm.tir.Schedule`. Updated error message to explicitly state that
this should be a `te.Schedule`.
mikeseven pushed a commit to mikeseven/tvm that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2023
…pache#11913)
Previously, if a TIR Schedule is passed to `tvm.lower`, the error
message is returned `ValueError: ('Expected input to be an IRModule,
PrimFunc or Schedule, but got, ', <class
'tvm.tir.schedule.schedule.Schedule'>)`. This can cause user
confusion, as the expected class name in the error message does not
differentiate between between a `tvm.te.Schedule` and a
`tvm.tir.Schedule`. Updated error message to explicitly state that
this should be a `te.Schedule`.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@Lunderberg@driazati@junrushao
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[TIR] Improved error message if tir.Schedule passed to lower/build - #11913

Merged
junrushao merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
Lunderberg:lower_stir_schedule_error_message
Jun 27, 2022
Merged

[TIR] Improved error message if tir.Schedule passed to lower/build#11913
junrushao merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
Lunderberg:lower_stir_schedule_error_message

Conversation

@Lunderberg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Previously, if a TIR Schedule is passed to tvm.lower, the error message is returned ValueError: ('Expected input to be an IRModule, PrimFunc or Schedule, but got, ', <class 'tvm.tir.schedule.schedule.Schedule'>). This can cause user confusion, as the expected class name in the error message does not differentiate between between a tvm.te.Schedule and a tvm.tir.Schedule. Updated error message to explicitly state that this should be a te.Schedule.

Previously, if a TIR Schedule is passed to `tvm.lower`, the error
message is returned `ValueError: ('Expected input to be an IRModule,
PrimFunc or Schedule, but got, ', <class
'tvm.tir.schedule.schedule.Schedule'>)`. This can cause user
confusion, as the expected class name in the error message does not
differentiate between between a `tvm.te.Schedule` and a
`tvm.tir.Schedule`. Updated error message to explicitly state that
this should be a `te.Schedule`.
@driazati

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@tvm-bot rerun

@junrushao
junrushao merged commit 45568c9 into apache:mainJun 27, 2022
@junrushao

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks @Lunderberg!!

@Lunderberg
Lunderberg deleted the lower_stir_schedule_error_message branch June 27, 2022 19:44
blackkker pushed a commit to blackkker/tvm that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2022
…pache#11913)
Previously, if a TIR Schedule is passed to `tvm.lower`, the error
message is returned `ValueError: ('Expected input to be an IRModule,
PrimFunc or Schedule, but got, ', <class
'tvm.tir.schedule.schedule.Schedule'>)`. This can cause user
confusion, as the expected class name in the error message does not
differentiate between between a `tvm.te.Schedule` and a
`tvm.tir.Schedule`. Updated error message to explicitly state that
this should be a `te.Schedule`.
mikeseven pushed a commit to mikeseven/tvm that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2023
…pache#11913)
Previously, if a TIR Schedule is passed to `tvm.lower`, the error
message is returned `ValueError: ('Expected input to be an IRModule,
PrimFunc or Schedule, but got, ', <class
'tvm.tir.schedule.schedule.Schedule'>)`. This can cause user
confusion, as the expected class name in the error message does not
differentiate between between a `tvm.te.Schedule` and a
`tvm.tir.Schedule`. Updated error message to explicitly state that
this should be a `te.Schedule`.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@Lunderberg@driazati@junrushao
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

[TIR] Improved error message if tir.Schedule passed to lower/build - #11913

Merged
junrushao merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
Lunderberg:lower_stir_schedule_error_message
Jun 27, 2022
Merged

[TIR] Improved error message if tir.Schedule passed to lower/build#11913
junrushao merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
Lunderberg:lower_stir_schedule_error_message

Conversation

@Lunderberg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Previously, if a TIR Schedule is passed to tvm.lower, the error message is returned ValueError: ('Expected input to be an IRModule, PrimFunc or Schedule, but got, ', <class 'tvm.tir.schedule.schedule.Schedule'>). This can cause user confusion, as the expected class name in the error message does not differentiate between between a tvm.te.Schedule and a tvm.tir.Schedule. Updated error message to explicitly state that this should be a te.Schedule.

Previously, if a TIR Schedule is passed to `tvm.lower`, the error
message is returned `ValueError: ('Expected input to be an IRModule,
PrimFunc or Schedule, but got, ', <class
'tvm.tir.schedule.schedule.Schedule'>)`. This can cause user
confusion, as the expected class name in the error message does not
differentiate between between a `tvm.te.Schedule` and a
`tvm.tir.Schedule`. Updated error message to explicitly state that
this should be a `te.Schedule`.
@driazati

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@tvm-bot rerun

@junrushao
junrushao merged commit 45568c9 into apache:mainJun 27, 2022
@junrushao

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks @Lunderberg!!

@Lunderberg
Lunderberg deleted the lower_stir_schedule_error_message branch June 27, 2022 19:44
blackkker pushed a commit to blackkker/tvm that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2022
…pache#11913)
Previously, if a TIR Schedule is passed to `tvm.lower`, the error
message is returned `ValueError: ('Expected input to be an IRModule,
PrimFunc or Schedule, but got, ', <class
'tvm.tir.schedule.schedule.Schedule'>)`. This can cause user
confusion, as the expected class name in the error message does not
differentiate between between a `tvm.te.Schedule` and a
`tvm.tir.Schedule`. Updated error message to explicitly state that
this should be a `te.Schedule`.
mikeseven pushed a commit to mikeseven/tvm that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2023
…pache#11913)
Previously, if a TIR Schedule is passed to `tvm.lower`, the error
message is returned `ValueError: ('Expected input to be an IRModule,
PrimFunc or Schedule, but got, ', <class
'tvm.tir.schedule.schedule.Schedule'>)`. This can cause user
confusion, as the expected class name in the error message does not
differentiate between between a `tvm.te.Schedule` and a
`tvm.tir.Schedule`. Updated error message to explicitly state that
this should be a `te.Schedule`.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@Lunderberg@driazati@junrushao
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[TIR] Improved error message if tir.Schedule passed to lower/build - #11913

Merged
junrushao merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
Lunderberg:lower_stir_schedule_error_message
Jun 27, 2022
Merged

[TIR] Improved error message if tir.Schedule passed to lower/build#11913
junrushao merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
Lunderberg:lower_stir_schedule_error_message

Conversation

@Lunderberg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Previously, if a TIR Schedule is passed to tvm.lower, the error message is returned ValueError: ('Expected input to be an IRModule, PrimFunc or Schedule, but got, ', <class 'tvm.tir.schedule.schedule.Schedule'>). This can cause user confusion, as the expected class name in the error message does not differentiate between between a tvm.te.Schedule and a tvm.tir.Schedule. Updated error message to explicitly state that this should be a te.Schedule.

Previously, if a TIR Schedule is passed to `tvm.lower`, the error
message is returned `ValueError: ('Expected input to be an IRModule,
PrimFunc or Schedule, but got, ', <class
'tvm.tir.schedule.schedule.Schedule'>)`. This can cause user
confusion, as the expected class name in the error message does not
differentiate between between a `tvm.te.Schedule` and a
`tvm.tir.Schedule`. Updated error message to explicitly state that
this should be a `te.Schedule`.
@driazati

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@tvm-bot rerun

@junrushao
junrushao merged commit 45568c9 into apache:mainJun 27, 2022
@junrushao

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks @Lunderberg!!

@Lunderberg
Lunderberg deleted the lower_stir_schedule_error_message branch June 27, 2022 19:44
blackkker pushed a commit to blackkker/tvm that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2022
…pache#11913)
Previously, if a TIR Schedule is passed to `tvm.lower`, the error
message is returned `ValueError: ('Expected input to be an IRModule,
PrimFunc or Schedule, but got, ', <class
'tvm.tir.schedule.schedule.Schedule'>)`. This can cause user
confusion, as the expected class name in the error message does not
differentiate between between a `tvm.te.Schedule` and a
`tvm.tir.Schedule`. Updated error message to explicitly state that
this should be a `te.Schedule`.
mikeseven pushed a commit to mikeseven/tvm that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2023
…pache#11913)
Previously, if a TIR Schedule is passed to `tvm.lower`, the error
message is returned `ValueError: ('Expected input to be an IRModule,
PrimFunc or Schedule, but got, ', <class
'tvm.tir.schedule.schedule.Schedule'>)`. This can cause user
confusion, as the expected class name in the error message does not
differentiate between between a `tvm.te.Schedule` and a
`tvm.tir.Schedule`. Updated error message to explicitly state that
this should be a `te.Schedule`.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@Lunderberg@driazati@junrushao
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[TIR] Improved error message if tir.Schedule passed to lower/build - #11913

Merged
junrushao merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
Lunderberg:lower_stir_schedule_error_message
Jun 27, 2022
Merged

[TIR] Improved error message if tir.Schedule passed to lower/build#11913
junrushao merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
Lunderberg:lower_stir_schedule_error_message

Conversation

@Lunderberg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Previously, if a TIR Schedule is passed to tvm.lower, the error message is returned ValueError: ('Expected input to be an IRModule, PrimFunc or Schedule, but got, ', <class 'tvm.tir.schedule.schedule.Schedule'>). This can cause user confusion, as the expected class name in the error message does not differentiate between between a tvm.te.Schedule and a tvm.tir.Schedule. Updated error message to explicitly state that this should be a te.Schedule.

Previously, if a TIR Schedule is passed to `tvm.lower`, the error
message is returned `ValueError: ('Expected input to be an IRModule,
PrimFunc or Schedule, but got, ', <class
'tvm.tir.schedule.schedule.Schedule'>)`. This can cause user
confusion, as the expected class name in the error message does not
differentiate between between a `tvm.te.Schedule` and a
`tvm.tir.Schedule`. Updated error message to explicitly state that
this should be a `te.Schedule`.
@driazati

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@tvm-bot rerun

@junrushao
junrushao merged commit 45568c9 into apache:mainJun 27, 2022
@junrushao

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks @Lunderberg!!

@Lunderberg
Lunderberg deleted the lower_stir_schedule_error_message branch June 27, 2022 19:44
blackkker pushed a commit to blackkker/tvm that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2022
…pache#11913)
Previously, if a TIR Schedule is passed to `tvm.lower`, the error
message is returned `ValueError: ('Expected input to be an IRModule,
PrimFunc or Schedule, but got, ', <class
'tvm.tir.schedule.schedule.Schedule'>)`. This can cause user
confusion, as the expected class name in the error message does not
differentiate between between a `tvm.te.Schedule` and a
`tvm.tir.Schedule`. Updated error message to explicitly state that
this should be a `te.Schedule`.
mikeseven pushed a commit to mikeseven/tvm that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2023
…pache#11913)
Previously, if a TIR Schedule is passed to `tvm.lower`, the error
message is returned `ValueError: ('Expected input to be an IRModule,
PrimFunc or Schedule, but got, ', <class
'tvm.tir.schedule.schedule.Schedule'>)`. This can cause user
confusion, as the expected class name in the error message does not
differentiate between between a `tvm.te.Schedule` and a
`tvm.tir.Schedule`. Updated error message to explicitly state that
this should be a `te.Schedule`.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@Lunderberg@driazati@junrushao
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

[TIR] Improved error message if tir.Schedule passed to lower/build - #11913

Merged
junrushao merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
Lunderberg:lower_stir_schedule_error_message
Jun 27, 2022
Merged

[TIR] Improved error message if tir.Schedule passed to lower/build#11913
junrushao merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
Lunderberg:lower_stir_schedule_error_message

Conversation

@Lunderberg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Previously, if a TIR Schedule is passed to tvm.lower, the error message is returned ValueError: ('Expected input to be an IRModule, PrimFunc or Schedule, but got, ', <class 'tvm.tir.schedule.schedule.Schedule'>). This can cause user confusion, as the expected class name in the error message does not differentiate between between a tvm.te.Schedule and a tvm.tir.Schedule. Updated error message to explicitly state that this should be a te.Schedule.

Previously, if a TIR Schedule is passed to `tvm.lower`, the error
message is returned `ValueError: ('Expected input to be an IRModule,
PrimFunc or Schedule, but got, ', <class
'tvm.tir.schedule.schedule.Schedule'>)`. This can cause user
confusion, as the expected class name in the error message does not
differentiate between between a `tvm.te.Schedule` and a
`tvm.tir.Schedule`. Updated error message to explicitly state that
this should be a `te.Schedule`.
@driazati

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@tvm-bot rerun

@junrushao
junrushao merged commit 45568c9 into apache:mainJun 27, 2022
@junrushao

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks @Lunderberg!!

@Lunderberg
Lunderberg deleted the lower_stir_schedule_error_message branch June 27, 2022 19:44
blackkker pushed a commit to blackkker/tvm that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2022
…pache#11913)
Previously, if a TIR Schedule is passed to `tvm.lower`, the error
message is returned `ValueError: ('Expected input to be an IRModule,
PrimFunc or Schedule, but got, ', <class
'tvm.tir.schedule.schedule.Schedule'>)`. This can cause user
confusion, as the expected class name in the error message does not
differentiate between between a `tvm.te.Schedule` and a
`tvm.tir.Schedule`. Updated error message to explicitly state that
this should be a `te.Schedule`.
mikeseven pushed a commit to mikeseven/tvm that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2023
…pache#11913)
Previously, if a TIR Schedule is passed to `tvm.lower`, the error
message is returned `ValueError: ('Expected input to be an IRModule,
PrimFunc or Schedule, but got, ', <class
'tvm.tir.schedule.schedule.Schedule'>)`. This can cause user
confusion, as the expected class name in the error message does not
differentiate between between a `tvm.te.Schedule` and a
`tvm.tir.Schedule`. Updated error message to explicitly state that
this should be a `te.Schedule`.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@Lunderberg@driazati@junrushao