Update pom.xml

[hash-X]

What is this PR for?

improving pom.xml

What type of PR is it

Improvement

Todos

• - Update pom.xml

Is there a relevant Jira issue?

May not require issue

How should this be tested?

I use mvn clean package -Pspark-1.4 -Phadoop-2.6 -DskipTests can cause the module Phoenix error and I think this should not appear. Reason about this issue is sqlline:sqlline:jar:1.1.8 is served from conjar repo. But sqlline:sqlline:jar:1.1.9 is served from maven repo. So add the dependency of sqlline1.1.9 can solve it. Of course, you can fix this issue by another way, but this way may be in common use.
http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/sqlline/sqlline/1.1.9

Screenshots (if appropriate)

Before
BUILD FAILURE

When you add this dependency
After

[INFO] Zeppelin: Apache Phoenix Interpreter ............... SUCCESS [ 2.497 s]
[INFO] Zeppelin: PostgreSQL interpreter ................... SUCCESS [ 0.572 s]
[INFO] Zeppelin: Tajo interpreter ......................... SUCCESS [ 0.557 s]
[INFO] Zeppelin: Flink .................................... SUCCESS [ 4.695 s]
[INFO] Zeppelin: Apache Ignite interpreter ................ SUCCESS [ 0.536 s]
[INFO] Zeppelin: Kylin interpreter ........................ SUCCESS [ 0.520 s]
[INFO] Zeppelin: Lens interpreter ......................... SUCCESS [ 1.592 s]
[INFO] Zeppelin: Cassandra ................................ SUCCESS [ 35.948 s]
[INFO] Zeppelin: Elasticsearch interpreter ................ SUCCESS [ 1.323 s]
[INFO] Zeppelin: web Application .......................... SUCCESS [ 52.998 s]
[INFO] Zeppelin: Server ................................... SUCCESS [ 11.377 s]
[INFO] Zeppelin: Packaging distribution ................... SUCCESS [ 1.054 s]
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 03:03 min
[INFO] Finished at: 2016-01-14T14:53:26+08:00
[INFO] Final Memory: 160M/1060M
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------

Questions:

• Does the licenses files need update? No
• Is there breaking changes for older versions? No
• Does this needs documentation? No

[gallenvara]

Good to merge.

[Leemoonsoo]

LGTM and merge if there're no more discussions.

[hash-X]

@Leemoonsoo thanks for your review.