test(e2e): fix propagation race in status-config resource-count asserts - #797

Merged
jarvis9443 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/status-config-e2e-count-race
Jul 21, 2026
Merged

test(e2e): fix propagation race in status-config resource-count asserts#797
jarvis9443 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/status-config-e2e-count-race

Conversation

@jarvis9443

@jarvis9443jarvis9443 commented Jul 21, 2026•
edited by coderabbitai Bot
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Main's CI run for 7295ff9 failed status-config-e2e > clean config reports synced with revisions and resource counts with expected undefined to be 1: the test waits only for state === "synced", but synced flips on an early revision before all three seeded resources are applied — the count asserts then race propagation on a loaded runner.

Fold the resource counts into the waitConfigPropagation condition (the asserts below keep pinning the exact values). Same class as #795's fix; verified locally (file's 7 tests pass).

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Improved end-to-end test reliability by waiting for configuration resources to be fully applied before validating clean synchronization.
    • Reduced race conditions when confirming synced models, provider keys, and API keys.

@jarvis9443
test(e2e): wait for seeded resource counts in status-config, not bare…
bc7f135
… synced
'synced' flips on an early revision before all three seeded resources
are applied, so the eager count asserts raced propagation and failed
with 'expected undefined to be 1' on a loaded runner (seen on the main
CI run for 7295ff9). Fold the counts into the wait condition; the
asserts below keep pinning the values. Same class as #795.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Jul 21, 2026•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: f2758a51-5b8b-4242-a26e-3773afeb8dff

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d14c454 and bc7f135.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/e2e/src/cases/status-config-e2e.test.ts
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The status-config end-to-end test now waits for synchronized state and applied counts of one model, provider key, and API key before running assertions.

Changes

Status config synchronization

Layer / File(s)Summary
Wait for applied resource counts
tests/e2e/src/cases/status-config-e2e.test.ts		The propagation wait now requires cfg.state to be "synced" and each seeded resource count to equal 1 before assertions execute.

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~5 minutes

Possibly related issues

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 2

❌ Failed checks (2 inconclusive)

Check nameStatusExplanationResolution
E2e Test Quality Review❓ InconclusiveRepository clone failed, so this custom check could not run with code access.Retry the review run. If this persists, inspect pre-merge custom-check logs for infrastructure or agent runtime failures.
Security Check❓ InconclusiveRepository clone failed, so this custom check could not run with code access.Retry the review run. If this persists, inspect pre-merge custom-check logs for infrastructure or agent runtime failures.
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Description Check✅ PassedCheck skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check✅ PassedThe title clearly matches the main change: fixing an E2E propagation race in status-config resource-count assertions.
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  • Create stacked PR
  • Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/status-config-e2e-count-race

Warning

Review ran into problems

🔥 Problems

Git: Failed to clone repository. Please run the @coderabbitai full review command to re-trigger a full review. If the issue persists, set path_filters to include or exclude specific files.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@jarvis9443
jarvis9443 merged commit 7f6a96a into mainJul 21, 2026
9 checks passed
@jarvis9443
jarvis9443 deleted the fix/status-config-e2e-count-race branch July 21, 2026 13:25
@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot mentioned this pull request Jul 23, 2026
Open
This was referenced Aug 4, 2026
Closed
Closed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@jarvis9443
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

Skip to content
test(e2e): fix propagation race in status-config resource-count asserts - #797
Merged
jarvis9443 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
fix/status-config-e2e-count-race
Jul 21, 2026
Merged
test(e2e): fix propagation race in status-config resource-count asserts#797
jarvis9443 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
fix/status-config-e2e-count-race
Conversation
@jarvis9443
@jarvis9443jarvis9443
commented
Jul 21, 2026•

edited by coderabbitai
Bot
Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Main's CI run for 7295ff9 failed status-config-e2e > clean config reports synced with revisions and resource counts with expected undefined to be 1: the test waits only for state === "synced", but synced flips on an early revision before all three seeded resources are applied — the count asserts then race propagation on a loaded runner.
Fold the resource counts into the waitConfigPropagation condition (the asserts below keep pinning the exact values). Same class as #795's fix; verified locally (file's 7 tests pass).
Summary by CodeRabbit
  • Tests
    • Improved end-to-end test reliability by waiting for configuration resources to be fully applied before validating clean synchronization.
    • Reduced race conditions when confirming synced models, provider keys, and API keys.
@jarvis9443
test(e2e): wait for seeded resource counts in status-config, not bare…
bc7f135
… synced
'synced' flips on an early revision before all three seeded resources
are applied, so the eager count asserts raced propagation and failed
with 'expected undefined to be 1' on a loaded runner (seen on the main
CI run for 7295ff9). Fold the counts into the wait condition; the
asserts below keep pinning the values. Same class as #795.
@coderabbitai
coderabbitaiBot
commented
Jul 21, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉
ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: f2758a51-5b8b-4242-a26e-3773afeb8dff
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d14c454 and bc7f135.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/e2e/src/cases/status-config-e2e.test.ts
📝 Walkthrough
Walkthrough
The status-config end-to-end test now waits for synchronized state and applied counts of one model, provider key, and API key before running assertions.
Changes
Status config synchronization
Layer / File(s)Summary
Wait for applied resource counts
tests/e2e/src/cases/status-config-e2e.test.ts		The propagation wait now requires cfg.state to be "synced" and each seeded resource count to equal 1 before assertions execute.
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~5 minutes
Possibly related issues
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 2
❌ Failed checks (2 inconclusive)
Check nameStatusExplanationResolution
E2e Test Quality Review❓ InconclusiveRepository clone failed, so this custom check could not run with code access.Retry the review run. If this persists, inspect pre-merge custom-check logs for infrastructure or agent runtime failures.
Security Check❓ InconclusiveRepository clone failed, so this custom check could not run with code access.Retry the review run. If this persists, inspect pre-merge custom-check logs for infrastructure or agent runtime failures.
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Description Check✅ PassedCheck skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check✅ PassedThe title clearly matches the main change: fixing an E2E propagation race in status-config resource-count assertions.
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  •  Create stacked PR
  •  Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  •  Create PR with unit tests
  •  Commit unit tests in branch fix/status-config-e2e-count-race
Warning
Review ran into problems
🔥 Problems
Git: Failed to clone repository. Please run the @coderabbitai full review command to re-trigger a full review. If the issue persists, set path_filters to include or exclude specific files.
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
@jarvis9443
jarvis9443
merged commit 7f6a96a
into
mainJul 21, 2026

9 checks passed

@jarvis9443
jarvis9443
deleted the

fix/status-config-e2e-count-race

branch
July 21, 2026 13:25
@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot
mentioned this pull request
Jul 23, 2026

Open


This was referenced Aug 4, 2026

Closed


Closed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@jarvis9443

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
test(e2e): fix propagation race in status-config resource-count asserts - #797
Merged
jarvis9443 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
fix/status-config-e2e-count-race
Jul 21, 2026
Merged
test(e2e): fix propagation race in status-config resource-count asserts#797
jarvis9443 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
fix/status-config-e2e-count-race
Conversation
@jarvis9443
@jarvis9443jarvis9443
commented
Jul 21, 2026•

edited by coderabbitai
Bot
Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Main's CI run for 7295ff9 failed status-config-e2e > clean config reports synced with revisions and resource counts with expected undefined to be 1: the test waits only for state === "synced", but synced flips on an early revision before all three seeded resources are applied — the count asserts then race propagation on a loaded runner.
Fold the resource counts into the waitConfigPropagation condition (the asserts below keep pinning the exact values). Same class as #795's fix; verified locally (file's 7 tests pass).
Summary by CodeRabbit
  • Tests
    • Improved end-to-end test reliability by waiting for configuration resources to be fully applied before validating clean synchronization.
    • Reduced race conditions when confirming synced models, provider keys, and API keys.
@jarvis9443
test(e2e): wait for seeded resource counts in status-config, not bare…
bc7f135
… synced
'synced' flips on an early revision before all three seeded resources
are applied, so the eager count asserts raced propagation and failed
with 'expected undefined to be 1' on a loaded runner (seen on the main
CI run for 7295ff9). Fold the counts into the wait condition; the
asserts below keep pinning the values. Same class as #795.
@coderabbitai
coderabbitaiBot
commented
Jul 21, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉
ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: f2758a51-5b8b-4242-a26e-3773afeb8dff
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d14c454 and bc7f135.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/e2e/src/cases/status-config-e2e.test.ts
📝 Walkthrough
Walkthrough
The status-config end-to-end test now waits for synchronized state and applied counts of one model, provider key, and API key before running assertions.
Changes
Status config synchronization
Layer / File(s)Summary
Wait for applied resource counts
tests/e2e/src/cases/status-config-e2e.test.ts		The propagation wait now requires cfg.state to be "synced" and each seeded resource count to equal 1 before assertions execute.
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~5 minutes
Possibly related issues
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 2
❌ Failed checks (2 inconclusive)
Check nameStatusExplanationResolution
E2e Test Quality Review❓ InconclusiveRepository clone failed, so this custom check could not run with code access.Retry the review run. If this persists, inspect pre-merge custom-check logs for infrastructure or agent runtime failures.
Security Check❓ InconclusiveRepository clone failed, so this custom check could not run with code access.Retry the review run. If this persists, inspect pre-merge custom-check logs for infrastructure or agent runtime failures.
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Description Check✅ PassedCheck skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check✅ PassedThe title clearly matches the main change: fixing an E2E propagation race in status-config resource-count assertions.
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  •  Create stacked PR
  •  Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  •  Create PR with unit tests
  •  Commit unit tests in branch fix/status-config-e2e-count-race
Warning
Review ran into problems
🔥 Problems
Git: Failed to clone repository. Please run the @coderabbitai full review command to re-trigger a full review. If the issue persists, set path_filters to include or exclude specific files.
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
@jarvis9443
jarvis9443
merged commit 7f6a96a
into
mainJul 21, 2026

9 checks passed

@jarvis9443
jarvis9443
deleted the

fix/status-config-e2e-count-race

branch
July 21, 2026 13:25
@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot
mentioned this pull request
Jul 23, 2026

Open


This was referenced Aug 4, 2026

Closed


Closed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@jarvis9443

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
test(e2e): fix propagation race in status-config resource-count asserts - #797
Merged
jarvis9443 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
fix/status-config-e2e-count-race
Jul 21, 2026
Merged
test(e2e): fix propagation race in status-config resource-count asserts#797
jarvis9443 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
fix/status-config-e2e-count-race
Conversation
@jarvis9443
@jarvis9443jarvis9443
commented
Jul 21, 2026•

edited by coderabbitai
Bot
Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Main's CI run for 7295ff9 failed status-config-e2e > clean config reports synced with revisions and resource counts with expected undefined to be 1: the test waits only for state === "synced", but synced flips on an early revision before all three seeded resources are applied — the count asserts then race propagation on a loaded runner.
Fold the resource counts into the waitConfigPropagation condition (the asserts below keep pinning the exact values). Same class as #795's fix; verified locally (file's 7 tests pass).
Summary by CodeRabbit
  • Tests
    • Improved end-to-end test reliability by waiting for configuration resources to be fully applied before validating clean synchronization.
    • Reduced race conditions when confirming synced models, provider keys, and API keys.
@jarvis9443
test(e2e): wait for seeded resource counts in status-config, not bare…
bc7f135
… synced
'synced' flips on an early revision before all three seeded resources
are applied, so the eager count asserts raced propagation and failed
with 'expected undefined to be 1' on a loaded runner (seen on the main
CI run for 7295ff9). Fold the counts into the wait condition; the
asserts below keep pinning the values. Same class as #795.
@coderabbitai
coderabbitaiBot
commented
Jul 21, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉
ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: f2758a51-5b8b-4242-a26e-3773afeb8dff
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d14c454 and bc7f135.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/e2e/src/cases/status-config-e2e.test.ts
📝 Walkthrough
Walkthrough
The status-config end-to-end test now waits for synchronized state and applied counts of one model, provider key, and API key before running assertions.
Changes
Status config synchronization
Layer / File(s)Summary
Wait for applied resource counts
tests/e2e/src/cases/status-config-e2e.test.ts		The propagation wait now requires cfg.state to be "synced" and each seeded resource count to equal 1 before assertions execute.
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~5 minutes
Possibly related issues
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 2
❌ Failed checks (2 inconclusive)
Check nameStatusExplanationResolution
E2e Test Quality Review❓ InconclusiveRepository clone failed, so this custom check could not run with code access.Retry the review run. If this persists, inspect pre-merge custom-check logs for infrastructure or agent runtime failures.
Security Check❓ InconclusiveRepository clone failed, so this custom check could not run with code access.Retry the review run. If this persists, inspect pre-merge custom-check logs for infrastructure or agent runtime failures.
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Description Check✅ PassedCheck skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check✅ PassedThe title clearly matches the main change: fixing an E2E propagation race in status-config resource-count assertions.
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  •  Create stacked PR
  •  Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  •  Create PR with unit tests
  •  Commit unit tests in branch fix/status-config-e2e-count-race
Warning
Review ran into problems
🔥 Problems
Git: Failed to clone repository. Please run the @coderabbitai full review command to re-trigger a full review. If the issue persists, set path_filters to include or exclude specific files.
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
@jarvis9443
jarvis9443
merged commit 7f6a96a
into
mainJul 21, 2026

9 checks passed

@jarvis9443
jarvis9443
deleted the

fix/status-config-e2e-count-race

branch
July 21, 2026 13:25
@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot
mentioned this pull request
Jul 23, 2026

Open


This was referenced Aug 4, 2026

Closed


Closed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@jarvis9443

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

Skip to content
test(e2e): fix propagation race in status-config resource-count asserts - #797
Merged
jarvis9443 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
fix/status-config-e2e-count-race
Jul 21, 2026
Merged
test(e2e): fix propagation race in status-config resource-count asserts#797
jarvis9443 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
fix/status-config-e2e-count-race
Conversation
@jarvis9443
@jarvis9443jarvis9443
commented
Jul 21, 2026•

edited by coderabbitai
Bot
Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Main's CI run for 7295ff9 failed status-config-e2e > clean config reports synced with revisions and resource counts with expected undefined to be 1: the test waits only for state === "synced", but synced flips on an early revision before all three seeded resources are applied — the count asserts then race propagation on a loaded runner.
Fold the resource counts into the waitConfigPropagation condition (the asserts below keep pinning the exact values). Same class as #795's fix; verified locally (file's 7 tests pass).
Summary by CodeRabbit
  • Tests
    • Improved end-to-end test reliability by waiting for configuration resources to be fully applied before validating clean synchronization.
    • Reduced race conditions when confirming synced models, provider keys, and API keys.
@jarvis9443
test(e2e): wait for seeded resource counts in status-config, not bare…
bc7f135
… synced
'synced' flips on an early revision before all three seeded resources
are applied, so the eager count asserts raced propagation and failed
with 'expected undefined to be 1' on a loaded runner (seen on the main
CI run for 7295ff9). Fold the counts into the wait condition; the
asserts below keep pinning the values. Same class as #795.
@coderabbitai
coderabbitaiBot
commented
Jul 21, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉
ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: f2758a51-5b8b-4242-a26e-3773afeb8dff
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d14c454 and bc7f135.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/e2e/src/cases/status-config-e2e.test.ts
📝 Walkthrough
Walkthrough
The status-config end-to-end test now waits for synchronized state and applied counts of one model, provider key, and API key before running assertions.
Changes
Status config synchronization
Layer / File(s)Summary
Wait for applied resource counts
tests/e2e/src/cases/status-config-e2e.test.ts		The propagation wait now requires cfg.state to be "synced" and each seeded resource count to equal 1 before assertions execute.
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~5 minutes
Possibly related issues
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 2
❌ Failed checks (2 inconclusive)
Check nameStatusExplanationResolution
E2e Test Quality Review❓ InconclusiveRepository clone failed, so this custom check could not run with code access.Retry the review run. If this persists, inspect pre-merge custom-check logs for infrastructure or agent runtime failures.
Security Check❓ InconclusiveRepository clone failed, so this custom check could not run with code access.Retry the review run. If this persists, inspect pre-merge custom-check logs for infrastructure or agent runtime failures.
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Description Check✅ PassedCheck skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check✅ PassedThe title clearly matches the main change: fixing an E2E propagation race in status-config resource-count assertions.
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  •  Create stacked PR
  •  Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  •  Create PR with unit tests
  •  Commit unit tests in branch fix/status-config-e2e-count-race
Warning
Review ran into problems
🔥 Problems
Git: Failed to clone repository. Please run the @coderabbitai full review command to re-trigger a full review. If the issue persists, set path_filters to include or exclude specific files.
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
@jarvis9443
jarvis9443
merged commit 7f6a96a
into
mainJul 21, 2026

9 checks passed

@jarvis9443
jarvis9443
deleted the

fix/status-config-e2e-count-race

branch
July 21, 2026 13:25
@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot
mentioned this pull request
Jul 23, 2026

Open


This was referenced Aug 4, 2026

Closed


Closed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@jarvis9443

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
test(e2e): fix propagation race in status-config resource-count asserts - #797
Merged
jarvis9443 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
fix/status-config-e2e-count-race
Jul 21, 2026
Merged
test(e2e): fix propagation race in status-config resource-count asserts#797
jarvis9443 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
fix/status-config-e2e-count-race
Conversation
@jarvis9443
@jarvis9443jarvis9443
commented
Jul 21, 2026•

edited by coderabbitai
Bot
Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Main's CI run for 7295ff9 failed status-config-e2e > clean config reports synced with revisions and resource counts with expected undefined to be 1: the test waits only for state === "synced", but synced flips on an early revision before all three seeded resources are applied — the count asserts then race propagation on a loaded runner.
Fold the resource counts into the waitConfigPropagation condition (the asserts below keep pinning the exact values). Same class as #795's fix; verified locally (file's 7 tests pass).
Summary by CodeRabbit
  • Tests
    • Improved end-to-end test reliability by waiting for configuration resources to be fully applied before validating clean synchronization.
    • Reduced race conditions when confirming synced models, provider keys, and API keys.
@jarvis9443
test(e2e): wait for seeded resource counts in status-config, not bare…
bc7f135
… synced
'synced' flips on an early revision before all three seeded resources
are applied, so the eager count asserts raced propagation and failed
with 'expected undefined to be 1' on a loaded runner (seen on the main
CI run for 7295ff9). Fold the counts into the wait condition; the
asserts below keep pinning the values. Same class as #795.
@coderabbitai
coderabbitaiBot
commented
Jul 21, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉
ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: f2758a51-5b8b-4242-a26e-3773afeb8dff
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d14c454 and bc7f135.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/e2e/src/cases/status-config-e2e.test.ts
📝 Walkthrough
Walkthrough
The status-config end-to-end test now waits for synchronized state and applied counts of one model, provider key, and API key before running assertions.
Changes
Status config synchronization
Layer / File(s)Summary
Wait for applied resource counts
tests/e2e/src/cases/status-config-e2e.test.ts		The propagation wait now requires cfg.state to be "synced" and each seeded resource count to equal 1 before assertions execute.
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~5 minutes
Possibly related issues
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 2
❌ Failed checks (2 inconclusive)
Check nameStatusExplanationResolution
E2e Test Quality Review❓ InconclusiveRepository clone failed, so this custom check could not run with code access.Retry the review run. If this persists, inspect pre-merge custom-check logs for infrastructure or agent runtime failures.
Security Check❓ InconclusiveRepository clone failed, so this custom check could not run with code access.Retry the review run. If this persists, inspect pre-merge custom-check logs for infrastructure or agent runtime failures.
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Description Check✅ PassedCheck skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check✅ PassedThe title clearly matches the main change: fixing an E2E propagation race in status-config resource-count assertions.
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  •  Create stacked PR
  •  Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  •  Create PR with unit tests
  •  Commit unit tests in branch fix/status-config-e2e-count-race
Warning
Review ran into problems
🔥 Problems
Git: Failed to clone repository. Please run the @coderabbitai full review command to re-trigger a full review. If the issue persists, set path_filters to include or exclude specific files.
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
@jarvis9443
jarvis9443
merged commit 7f6a96a
into
mainJul 21, 2026

9 checks passed

@jarvis9443
jarvis9443
deleted the

fix/status-config-e2e-count-race

branch
July 21, 2026 13:25
@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot
mentioned this pull request
Jul 23, 2026

Open


This was referenced Aug 4, 2026

Closed


Closed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@jarvis9443

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
test(e2e): fix propagation race in status-config resource-count asserts - #797
Merged
jarvis9443 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
fix/status-config-e2e-count-race
Jul 21, 2026
Merged
test(e2e): fix propagation race in status-config resource-count asserts#797
jarvis9443 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
fix/status-config-e2e-count-race
Conversation
@jarvis9443
@jarvis9443jarvis9443
commented
Jul 21, 2026•

edited by coderabbitai
Bot
Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Main's CI run for 7295ff9 failed status-config-e2e > clean config reports synced with revisions and resource counts with expected undefined to be 1: the test waits only for state === "synced", but synced flips on an early revision before all three seeded resources are applied — the count asserts then race propagation on a loaded runner.
Fold the resource counts into the waitConfigPropagation condition (the asserts below keep pinning the exact values). Same class as #795's fix; verified locally (file's 7 tests pass).
Summary by CodeRabbit
  • Tests
    • Improved end-to-end test reliability by waiting for configuration resources to be fully applied before validating clean synchronization.
    • Reduced race conditions when confirming synced models, provider keys, and API keys.
@jarvis9443
test(e2e): wait for seeded resource counts in status-config, not bare…
bc7f135
… synced
'synced' flips on an early revision before all three seeded resources
are applied, so the eager count asserts raced propagation and failed
with 'expected undefined to be 1' on a loaded runner (seen on the main
CI run for 7295ff9). Fold the counts into the wait condition; the
asserts below keep pinning the values. Same class as #795.
@coderabbitai
coderabbitaiBot
commented
Jul 21, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉
ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: f2758a51-5b8b-4242-a26e-3773afeb8dff
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d14c454 and bc7f135.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/e2e/src/cases/status-config-e2e.test.ts
📝 Walkthrough
Walkthrough
The status-config end-to-end test now waits for synchronized state and applied counts of one model, provider key, and API key before running assertions.
Changes
Status config synchronization
Layer / File(s)Summary
Wait for applied resource counts
tests/e2e/src/cases/status-config-e2e.test.ts		The propagation wait now requires cfg.state to be "synced" and each seeded resource count to equal 1 before assertions execute.
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~5 minutes
Possibly related issues
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 2
❌ Failed checks (2 inconclusive)
Check nameStatusExplanationResolution
E2e Test Quality Review❓ InconclusiveRepository clone failed, so this custom check could not run with code access.Retry the review run. If this persists, inspect pre-merge custom-check logs for infrastructure or agent runtime failures.
Security Check❓ InconclusiveRepository clone failed, so this custom check could not run with code access.Retry the review run. If this persists, inspect pre-merge custom-check logs for infrastructure or agent runtime failures.
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Description Check✅ PassedCheck skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check✅ PassedThe title clearly matches the main change: fixing an E2E propagation race in status-config resource-count assertions.
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  •  Create stacked PR
  •  Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  •  Create PR with unit tests
  •  Commit unit tests in branch fix/status-config-e2e-count-race
Warning
Review ran into problems
🔥 Problems
Git: Failed to clone repository. Please run the @coderabbitai full review command to re-trigger a full review. If the issue persists, set path_filters to include or exclude specific files.
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
@jarvis9443
jarvis9443
merged commit 7f6a96a
into
mainJul 21, 2026

9 checks passed

@jarvis9443
jarvis9443
deleted the

fix/status-config-e2e-count-race

branch
July 21, 2026 13:25
@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot
mentioned this pull request
Jul 23, 2026

Open


This was referenced Aug 4, 2026

Closed


Closed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@jarvis9443

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

Skip to content
test(e2e): fix propagation race in status-config resource-count asserts - #797
Merged
jarvis9443 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
fix/status-config-e2e-count-race
Jul 21, 2026
Merged
test(e2e): fix propagation race in status-config resource-count asserts#797
jarvis9443 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
fix/status-config-e2e-count-race
Conversation
@jarvis9443
@jarvis9443jarvis9443
commented
Jul 21, 2026•

edited by coderabbitai
Bot
Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Main's CI run for 7295ff9 failed status-config-e2e > clean config reports synced with revisions and resource counts with expected undefined to be 1: the test waits only for state === "synced", but synced flips on an early revision before all three seeded resources are applied — the count asserts then race propagation on a loaded runner.
Fold the resource counts into the waitConfigPropagation condition (the asserts below keep pinning the exact values). Same class as #795's fix; verified locally (file's 7 tests pass).
Summary by CodeRabbit
  • Tests
    • Improved end-to-end test reliability by waiting for configuration resources to be fully applied before validating clean synchronization.
    • Reduced race conditions when confirming synced models, provider keys, and API keys.
@jarvis9443
test(e2e): wait for seeded resource counts in status-config, not bare…
bc7f135
… synced
'synced' flips on an early revision before all three seeded resources
are applied, so the eager count asserts raced propagation and failed
with 'expected undefined to be 1' on a loaded runner (seen on the main
CI run for 7295ff9). Fold the counts into the wait condition; the
asserts below keep pinning the values. Same class as #795.
@coderabbitai
coderabbitaiBot
commented
Jul 21, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉
ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: f2758a51-5b8b-4242-a26e-3773afeb8dff
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d14c454 and bc7f135.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/e2e/src/cases/status-config-e2e.test.ts
📝 Walkthrough
Walkthrough
The status-config end-to-end test now waits for synchronized state and applied counts of one model, provider key, and API key before running assertions.
Changes
Status config synchronization
Layer / File(s)Summary
Wait for applied resource counts
tests/e2e/src/cases/status-config-e2e.test.ts		The propagation wait now requires cfg.state to be "synced" and each seeded resource count to equal 1 before assertions execute.
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~5 minutes
Possibly related issues
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 2
❌ Failed checks (2 inconclusive)
Check nameStatusExplanationResolution
E2e Test Quality Review❓ InconclusiveRepository clone failed, so this custom check could not run with code access.Retry the review run. If this persists, inspect pre-merge custom-check logs for infrastructure or agent runtime failures.
Security Check❓ InconclusiveRepository clone failed, so this custom check could not run with code access.Retry the review run. If this persists, inspect pre-merge custom-check logs for infrastructure or agent runtime failures.
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Description Check✅ PassedCheck skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check✅ PassedThe title clearly matches the main change: fixing an E2E propagation race in status-config resource-count assertions.
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  •  Create stacked PR
  •  Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  •  Create PR with unit tests
  •  Commit unit tests in branch fix/status-config-e2e-count-race
Warning
Review ran into problems
🔥 Problems
Git: Failed to clone repository. Please run the @coderabbitai full review command to re-trigger a full review. If the issue persists, set path_filters to include or exclude specific files.
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
@jarvis9443
jarvis9443
merged commit 7f6a96a
into
mainJul 21, 2026

9 checks passed

@jarvis9443
jarvis9443
deleted the

fix/status-config-e2e-count-race

branch
July 21, 2026 13:25
@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot
mentioned this pull request
Jul 23, 2026

Open


This was referenced Aug 4, 2026

Closed


Closed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@jarvis9443