Skip to content

Adfa 603 - #89

Closed
yaturner wants to merge 2 commits into
stagefrom
ADFA-603
Closed

Adfa 603#89
yaturner wants to merge 2 commits into
stagefrom
ADFA-603

Conversation

@yaturner

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@jatezzzjatezzz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good

@hal-eisen-adfa

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Something's wrong with this branch. Joel will start over fresh.

@hal-eisen-adfa
hal-eisen-adfa deleted the ADFA-603 branch April 29, 2025 01:29
fryanpan added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2026
The page proposed that #87, #89, #91 and the relink-crash gap go to v1.1,
then left the table's "Blocks v1?" column reading TBD on all four rows. A
proposal in a title and a TBD in a table say different things to a reader,
and CodeRabbit flagged the pair as an internal inconsistency.
Decision confirmed 2026-08-25: none of the four block v1. The four cells now
read "No - v1.1", the title states the answer rather than asking it, and the
prose no longer describes itself as awaiting confirmation.
No change to any gap's evidence, root cause, or fix.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FstXxJ5cwWPcvmhZ9vJgJ7
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@yaturner@hal-eisen-adfa@jatezzz