Refactor specification expressions - #185

Merged
ardalis merged 1 commit into
ardalis:mainfrom
devbased:spec-expressions-refactoring
Dec 13, 2021
Merged

Refactor specification expressions#185
ardalis merged 1 commit into
ardalis:mainfrom
devbased:spec-expressions-refactoring

Conversation

@devbased

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closes#182.

…ecs (for in-memory evaluators); minor cleanup
@ardalis
ardalis merged commit 9e8c7eb into ardalis:mainDec 13, 2021
@fiseni

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thanks @devbased, it looks great.

Now that we refactored the types in ISpecification, can you please revise the evaluators in the plugin packages (EFCore and EF6) too? For instance, we might not need the Select here. You can refactor the input of the Search extension method too. There is Order evaluator in EF6 too.

namespaceArdalis.Specification.EntityFrameworkCore{publicclassSearchEvaluator:IEvaluator{privateSearchEvaluator(){}publicstaticSearchEvaluatorInstance{get;}=newSearchEvaluator();publicboolIsCriteriaEvaluator{get;}=true;publicIQueryable<T>GetQuery<T>(IQueryable<T>query,ISpecification<T>specification)whereT:class{foreach(varsearchCriteriainspecification.SearchCriterias.GroupBy(x =>x.SearchGroup)){varcriterias=searchCriteria.Select(x =>(x.Selector,x.SearchTerm));query=query.Search(criterias);}returnquery;}}}

@fiseni

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Ok, Steve was faster than me :) My bad, I noticed these details after approving the PR.
@devbased would you like to make those changes in an additional PR?

@ardalis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Sorry! I was going to just approve but then thought "why should I make Fati have to come back and merge it..."

@fiseni

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No big deal. Everything works, it's more of cleanup work. We can do it in an additional PR.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Improving specification evaluation performance

3 participants

@devbased@fiseni@ardalis
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Refactor specification expressions - #185

Merged
ardalis merged 1 commit into
ardalis:mainfrom
devbased:spec-expressions-refactoring
Dec 13, 2021
Merged

Refactor specification expressions#185
ardalis merged 1 commit into
ardalis:mainfrom
devbased:spec-expressions-refactoring

Conversation

@devbased

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closes#182.

…ecs (for in-memory evaluators); minor cleanup
@ardalis
ardalis merged commit 9e8c7eb into ardalis:mainDec 13, 2021
@fiseni

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thanks @devbased, it looks great.

Now that we refactored the types in ISpecification, can you please revise the evaluators in the plugin packages (EFCore and EF6) too? For instance, we might not need the Select here. You can refactor the input of the Search extension method too. There is Order evaluator in EF6 too.

namespaceArdalis.Specification.EntityFrameworkCore{publicclassSearchEvaluator:IEvaluator{privateSearchEvaluator(){}publicstaticSearchEvaluatorInstance{get;}=newSearchEvaluator();publicboolIsCriteriaEvaluator{get;}=true;publicIQueryable<T>GetQuery<T>(IQueryable<T>query,ISpecification<T>specification)whereT:class{foreach(varsearchCriteriainspecification.SearchCriterias.GroupBy(x =>x.SearchGroup)){varcriterias=searchCriteria.Select(x =>(x.Selector,x.SearchTerm));query=query.Search(criterias);}returnquery;}}}

@fiseni

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Ok, Steve was faster than me :) My bad, I noticed these details after approving the PR.
@devbased would you like to make those changes in an additional PR?

@ardalis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Sorry! I was going to just approve but then thought "why should I make Fati have to come back and merge it..."

@fiseni

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No big deal. Everything works, it's more of cleanup work. We can do it in an additional PR.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Improving specification evaluation performance

3 participants

@devbased@fiseni@ardalis
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Refactor specification expressions - #185

Merged
ardalis merged 1 commit into
ardalis:mainfrom
devbased:spec-expressions-refactoring
Dec 13, 2021
Merged

Refactor specification expressions#185
ardalis merged 1 commit into
ardalis:mainfrom
devbased:spec-expressions-refactoring

Conversation

@devbased

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closes#182.

…ecs (for in-memory evaluators); minor cleanup
@ardalis
ardalis merged commit 9e8c7eb into ardalis:mainDec 13, 2021
@fiseni

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thanks @devbased, it looks great.

Now that we refactored the types in ISpecification, can you please revise the evaluators in the plugin packages (EFCore and EF6) too? For instance, we might not need the Select here. You can refactor the input of the Search extension method too. There is Order evaluator in EF6 too.

namespaceArdalis.Specification.EntityFrameworkCore{publicclassSearchEvaluator:IEvaluator{privateSearchEvaluator(){}publicstaticSearchEvaluatorInstance{get;}=newSearchEvaluator();publicboolIsCriteriaEvaluator{get;}=true;publicIQueryable<T>GetQuery<T>(IQueryable<T>query,ISpecification<T>specification)whereT:class{foreach(varsearchCriteriainspecification.SearchCriterias.GroupBy(x =>x.SearchGroup)){varcriterias=searchCriteria.Select(x =>(x.Selector,x.SearchTerm));query=query.Search(criterias);}returnquery;}}}

@fiseni

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Ok, Steve was faster than me :) My bad, I noticed these details after approving the PR.
@devbased would you like to make those changes in an additional PR?

@ardalis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Sorry! I was going to just approve but then thought "why should I make Fati have to come back and merge it..."

@fiseni

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No big deal. Everything works, it's more of cleanup work. We can do it in an additional PR.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Improving specification evaluation performance

3 participants

@devbased@fiseni@ardalis
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Refactor specification expressions - #185

Merged
ardalis merged 1 commit into
ardalis:mainfrom
devbased:spec-expressions-refactoring
Dec 13, 2021
Merged

Refactor specification expressions#185
ardalis merged 1 commit into
ardalis:mainfrom
devbased:spec-expressions-refactoring

Conversation

@devbased

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closes#182.

…ecs (for in-memory evaluators); minor cleanup
@ardalis
ardalis merged commit 9e8c7eb into ardalis:mainDec 13, 2021
@fiseni

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thanks @devbased, it looks great.

Now that we refactored the types in ISpecification, can you please revise the evaluators in the plugin packages (EFCore and EF6) too? For instance, we might not need the Select here. You can refactor the input of the Search extension method too. There is Order evaluator in EF6 too.

namespaceArdalis.Specification.EntityFrameworkCore{publicclassSearchEvaluator:IEvaluator{privateSearchEvaluator(){}publicstaticSearchEvaluatorInstance{get;}=newSearchEvaluator();publicboolIsCriteriaEvaluator{get;}=true;publicIQueryable<T>GetQuery<T>(IQueryable<T>query,ISpecification<T>specification)whereT:class{foreach(varsearchCriteriainspecification.SearchCriterias.GroupBy(x =>x.SearchGroup)){varcriterias=searchCriteria.Select(x =>(x.Selector,x.SearchTerm));query=query.Search(criterias);}returnquery;}}}

@fiseni

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Ok, Steve was faster than me :) My bad, I noticed these details after approving the PR.
@devbased would you like to make those changes in an additional PR?

@ardalis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Sorry! I was going to just approve but then thought "why should I make Fati have to come back and merge it..."

@fiseni

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No big deal. Everything works, it's more of cleanup work. We can do it in an additional PR.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Improving specification evaluation performance

3 participants

@devbased@fiseni@ardalis
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Refactor specification expressions - #185

Merged
ardalis merged 1 commit into
ardalis:mainfrom
devbased:spec-expressions-refactoring
Dec 13, 2021
Merged

Refactor specification expressions#185
ardalis merged 1 commit into
ardalis:mainfrom
devbased:spec-expressions-refactoring

Conversation

@devbased

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closes#182.

…ecs (for in-memory evaluators); minor cleanup
@ardalis
ardalis merged commit 9e8c7eb into ardalis:mainDec 13, 2021
@fiseni

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thanks @devbased, it looks great.

Now that we refactored the types in ISpecification, can you please revise the evaluators in the plugin packages (EFCore and EF6) too? For instance, we might not need the Select here. You can refactor the input of the Search extension method too. There is Order evaluator in EF6 too.

namespaceArdalis.Specification.EntityFrameworkCore{publicclassSearchEvaluator:IEvaluator{privateSearchEvaluator(){}publicstaticSearchEvaluatorInstance{get;}=newSearchEvaluator();publicboolIsCriteriaEvaluator{get;}=true;publicIQueryable<T>GetQuery<T>(IQueryable<T>query,ISpecification<T>specification)whereT:class{foreach(varsearchCriteriainspecification.SearchCriterias.GroupBy(x =>x.SearchGroup)){varcriterias=searchCriteria.Select(x =>(x.Selector,x.SearchTerm));query=query.Search(criterias);}returnquery;}}}

@fiseni

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Ok, Steve was faster than me :) My bad, I noticed these details after approving the PR.
@devbased would you like to make those changes in an additional PR?

@ardalis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Sorry! I was going to just approve but then thought "why should I make Fati have to come back and merge it..."

@fiseni

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No big deal. Everything works, it's more of cleanup work. We can do it in an additional PR.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Improving specification evaluation performance

3 participants

@devbased@fiseni@ardalis
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Refactor specification expressions - #185

Merged
ardalis merged 1 commit into
ardalis:mainfrom
devbased:spec-expressions-refactoring
Dec 13, 2021
Merged

Refactor specification expressions#185
ardalis merged 1 commit into
ardalis:mainfrom
devbased:spec-expressions-refactoring

Conversation

@devbased

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closes#182.

…ecs (for in-memory evaluators); minor cleanup
@ardalis
ardalis merged commit 9e8c7eb into ardalis:mainDec 13, 2021
@fiseni

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thanks @devbased, it looks great.

Now that we refactored the types in ISpecification, can you please revise the evaluators in the plugin packages (EFCore and EF6) too? For instance, we might not need the Select here. You can refactor the input of the Search extension method too. There is Order evaluator in EF6 too.

namespaceArdalis.Specification.EntityFrameworkCore{publicclassSearchEvaluator:IEvaluator{privateSearchEvaluator(){}publicstaticSearchEvaluatorInstance{get;}=newSearchEvaluator();publicboolIsCriteriaEvaluator{get;}=true;publicIQueryable<T>GetQuery<T>(IQueryable<T>query,ISpecification<T>specification)whereT:class{foreach(varsearchCriteriainspecification.SearchCriterias.GroupBy(x =>x.SearchGroup)){varcriterias=searchCriteria.Select(x =>(x.Selector,x.SearchTerm));query=query.Search(criterias);}returnquery;}}}

@fiseni

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Ok, Steve was faster than me :) My bad, I noticed these details after approving the PR.
@devbased would you like to make those changes in an additional PR?

@ardalis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Sorry! I was going to just approve but then thought "why should I make Fati have to come back and merge it..."

@fiseni

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No big deal. Everything works, it's more of cleanup work. We can do it in an additional PR.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Improving specification evaluation performance

3 participants

@devbased@fiseni@ardalis
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Refactor specification expressions - #185

Merged
ardalis merged 1 commit into
ardalis:mainfrom
devbased:spec-expressions-refactoring
Dec 13, 2021
Merged

Refactor specification expressions#185
ardalis merged 1 commit into
ardalis:mainfrom
devbased:spec-expressions-refactoring

Conversation

@devbased

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closes#182.

…ecs (for in-memory evaluators); minor cleanup
@ardalis
ardalis merged commit 9e8c7eb into ardalis:mainDec 13, 2021
@fiseni

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thanks @devbased, it looks great.

Now that we refactored the types in ISpecification, can you please revise the evaluators in the plugin packages (EFCore and EF6) too? For instance, we might not need the Select here. You can refactor the input of the Search extension method too. There is Order evaluator in EF6 too.

namespaceArdalis.Specification.EntityFrameworkCore{publicclassSearchEvaluator:IEvaluator{privateSearchEvaluator(){}publicstaticSearchEvaluatorInstance{get;}=newSearchEvaluator();publicboolIsCriteriaEvaluator{get;}=true;publicIQueryable<T>GetQuery<T>(IQueryable<T>query,ISpecification<T>specification)whereT:class{foreach(varsearchCriteriainspecification.SearchCriterias.GroupBy(x =>x.SearchGroup)){varcriterias=searchCriteria.Select(x =>(x.Selector,x.SearchTerm));query=query.Search(criterias);}returnquery;}}}

@fiseni

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Ok, Steve was faster than me :) My bad, I noticed these details after approving the PR.
@devbased would you like to make those changes in an additional PR?

@ardalis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Sorry! I was going to just approve but then thought "why should I make Fati have to come back and merge it..."

@fiseni

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No big deal. Everything works, it's more of cleanup work. We can do it in an additional PR.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Improving specification evaluation performance

3 participants

@devbased@fiseni@ardalis
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Refactor specification expressions - #185

Merged
ardalis merged 1 commit into
ardalis:mainfrom
devbased:spec-expressions-refactoring
Dec 13, 2021
Merged

Refactor specification expressions#185
ardalis merged 1 commit into
ardalis:mainfrom
devbased:spec-expressions-refactoring

Conversation

@devbased

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closes#182.

…ecs (for in-memory evaluators); minor cleanup
@ardalis
ardalis merged commit 9e8c7eb into ardalis:mainDec 13, 2021
@fiseni

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thanks @devbased, it looks great.

Now that we refactored the types in ISpecification, can you please revise the evaluators in the plugin packages (EFCore and EF6) too? For instance, we might not need the Select here. You can refactor the input of the Search extension method too. There is Order evaluator in EF6 too.

namespaceArdalis.Specification.EntityFrameworkCore{publicclassSearchEvaluator:IEvaluator{privateSearchEvaluator(){}publicstaticSearchEvaluatorInstance{get;}=newSearchEvaluator();publicboolIsCriteriaEvaluator{get;}=true;publicIQueryable<T>GetQuery<T>(IQueryable<T>query,ISpecification<T>specification)whereT:class{foreach(varsearchCriteriainspecification.SearchCriterias.GroupBy(x =>x.SearchGroup)){varcriterias=searchCriteria.Select(x =>(x.Selector,x.SearchTerm));query=query.Search(criterias);}returnquery;}}}

@fiseni

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Ok, Steve was faster than me :) My bad, I noticed these details after approving the PR.
@devbased would you like to make those changes in an additional PR?

@ardalis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Sorry! I was going to just approve but then thought "why should I make Fati have to come back and merge it..."

@fiseni

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No big deal. Everything works, it's more of cleanup work. We can do it in an additional PR.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Improving specification evaluation performance

3 participants

@devbased@fiseni@ardalis