Skip to content

docs: cross-reference the boundary-failure record family - #233

Merged
chaksaray merged 1 commit into
developfrom
docs/cross-reference-boundary-family
Aug 29, 2026
Merged

docs: cross-reference the boundary-failure record family#233
chaksaray merged 1 commit into
developfrom
docs/cross-reference-boundary-family

Conversation

@chaksaray

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closes #232. Adds a cross-reference sentence to each of the 8 records PR #224 identified as the same missing content-versus-instruction boundary at different entry points: AVE-2026-00002, 00016, 00020, 00028, 00041, 00043, 00044, 00065.

Text-only, no schema change, per Finding 3's conclusion that this corpus's real gaps are prose, not structure.

Each of the 8 gets its own specific entry-point phrasing rather than identical pasted text:

  • 00002: tool-description field, read at discovery, before any tool call
  • 00016: retrieved document content, injected at RAG query time
  • 00020: sub-agent input, in an A2A delegation chain
  • 00028: uploaded document content, directed to be treated as instructions
  • 00041: MCP server-card, fetched at connection time, outside runtime monitoring
  • 00043: gap between the rendered UI surface and the metadata the model reads
  • 00044: async task result payload, read across a temporal gap
  • 00065: A2A agent-card self-declared metadata

00065 already carried a differentiation sentence contrasting itself with 00041; the new family cross-reference is appended after it rather than replacing it.

Validated:

  • python scripts/validate_records.py: 80/80 valid (only pre-existing, unrelated researcher-attribution warnings)
  • python scripts/check_fixtures.py: all pass
  • python -m pytest tests/ -x -q: 427 passed

Real, current description text pulled fresh from dist/ave-records-latest.json before editing, confirmed unchanged since the audit ran.

 #232)

PR #224's audit identified these 8 records as realizing the same
missing boundary at different entry points. Adds a cross-reference
sentence to each record's own description, naming the other 7 by id
and its own specific entry point (tool-description field, RAG
retrieval, A2A sub-agent input, uploaded document, MCP server-card,
rendered UI-vs-metadata gap, async task result, A2A agent-card),
rather than pasting identical text into all eight. No schema change,
per Finding 3's conclusion that this corpus's real gaps are prose,
not structure.

records/AVE-2026-00002.json
records/AVE-2026-00016.json
records/AVE-2026-00020.json
records/AVE-2026-00028.json
records/AVE-2026-00041.json
records/AVE-2026-00043.json
records/AVE-2026-00044.json
records/AVE-2026-00065.json
@chaksaray chaksaray linked an issue Aug 29, 2026 that may be closed by this pull request
@chaksaray
chaksaray merged commit 742d897 into develop Aug 29, 2026
6 checks passed
@chaksaray
chaksaray deleted the docs/cross-reference-boundary-family branch August 29, 2026 04:44
chaksaray added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2026
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: chaksaray <15962335+chaksaray@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Cross-reference the content-vs-instruction-boundary record family

1 participant