Prune stored history to max_items per user - #40

Open
MACscr wants to merge 1 commit into
awcodes:3.xfrom
MACscr:feature/prune-history-to-max-items
Open

Prune stored history to max_items per user#40
MACscr wants to merge 1 commit into
awcodes:3.xfrom
MACscr:feature/prune-history-to-max-items

Conversation

@MACscr

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Problem

Recently::add() writes one row per (user, distinct URL) and never removes any. max_items only caps what the menu and global search display, so recent_entries grows unbounded — an active user accumulates a row for every distinct record they've ever viewed.

Change

After recording an entry, prune the user's rows down to the most-recent max_items (the config value). Ties on updated_at are broken by id so the newest insert wins when timestamps collide. Pruning is scoped per user, so other users' history is untouched.

Notes

  • No public API change — add()'s signature is unchanged.
  • Independent of any other change; based on 3.x.
  • Tests added (tests/src/RetentionTest.php): stored count stays at max_items, the oldest entry is dropped and the newest kept, and a second user's history is untouched. composer test is green.
  • README updated with a "Retention" section.

`Recently::add()` writes one row per (user, distinct URL) and never
removes any — `max_items` only caps the display, so recent_entries grows
unbounded, accumulating a row for every distinct record a user views.
After recording an entry, prune the user's rows down to the most-recent
`max_items` (config value), breaking ties by id so the newest insert
wins when timestamps collide. Pruning is scoped per user, leaving other
users' history untouched.
@awcodes

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Can you target this to the 2.x branch?

I think it should have Filament v4 support as well.

I'll merge it to 3.x once everything is green.

@awcodesawcodes left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this — the table growing unbounded is a real problem and the prune query itself is the right shape. The two-step pluck/delete sidesteps the MySQL DELETE ... WHERE id IN (subquery with LIMIT) restriction, and the id tiebreak is a good call. Merges cleanly on 3.x and the suite is green.

One blocking issue and a couple of things to consider.

max_items is read from the wrong place

prune() uses config('recently.max_items'), but the menu reads RecentlyPlugin::getMaxItems(), which lets a panel override the config:

publicfunctiongetMaxItems(): int
{
return$this->evaluate($this->maxItems) ?? config('recently.max_items');
}

So anyone using RecentlyPlugin::make()->maxItems(50) with the default config of 20 now permanently loses entries 21–50. Confirmed with a throwaway test against this branch:

Filament::getCurrentOrDefaultPanel()->plugins([RecentlyPlugin::make()->maxItems(50)]);
for ($i = 0; $i < 30; $i++) {
Recently::add("https://example.test/page/{$i}", '', "Page {$i}");
}
expect(livewire(RecentlyMenu::class)->instance()->records)->toHaveCount(30);
Failed asserting that actual size 20 matches expected size 30.

The user asked for a 50-item menu, viewed 30 records, and sees 20 — with the other 10 deleted, not just hidden. Multi-panel setups are worse: the lowest configured limit anywhere wins, destructively, for every panel.

Worth adding a test that covers a panel-level maxItems() larger than the config value, since that's the case that regresses.

Default-on data deletion

max_items is currently documented as a display cap, so deleting rows on upgrade is a behavior change for anyone who set it low and later intended to raise it, or who queries recent_entries directly. Would you consider making retention opt-in — a separate 'max_stored' (or 'prune' => false) config key — so the destructive part is a choice rather than something that happens on composer update? That would also sidestep the display-vs-storage coupling above.

Minor

add() now issues two extra queries on every non-Livewire page render. Cheap, but you could skip the delete entirely when the stored count is already at or under the limit.

If #39 also lands

The two changes interact: this PR prunes to max_items counting entries whose record has since been deleted, while #39 hides those from the menu. A user who deletes a lot of records ends up with a near-empty menu while N rows sit in the table. Dropping non-existing entries first inside prune() would resolve it.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@MACscr@awcodes
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Prune stored history to max_items per user - #40

Open
MACscr wants to merge 1 commit into
awcodes:3.xfrom
MACscr:feature/prune-history-to-max-items
Open

Prune stored history to max_items per user#40
MACscr wants to merge 1 commit into
awcodes:3.xfrom
MACscr:feature/prune-history-to-max-items

Conversation

@MACscr

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Problem

Recently::add() writes one row per (user, distinct URL) and never removes any. max_items only caps what the menu and global search display, so recent_entries grows unbounded — an active user accumulates a row for every distinct record they've ever viewed.

Change

After recording an entry, prune the user's rows down to the most-recent max_items (the config value). Ties on updated_at are broken by id so the newest insert wins when timestamps collide. Pruning is scoped per user, so other users' history is untouched.

Notes

  • No public API change — add()'s signature is unchanged.
  • Independent of any other change; based on 3.x.
  • Tests added (tests/src/RetentionTest.php): stored count stays at max_items, the oldest entry is dropped and the newest kept, and a second user's history is untouched. composer test is green.
  • README updated with a "Retention" section.

`Recently::add()` writes one row per (user, distinct URL) and never
removes any — `max_items` only caps the display, so recent_entries grows
unbounded, accumulating a row for every distinct record a user views.
After recording an entry, prune the user's rows down to the most-recent
`max_items` (config value), breaking ties by id so the newest insert
wins when timestamps collide. Pruning is scoped per user, leaving other
users' history untouched.
@awcodes

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Can you target this to the 2.x branch?

I think it should have Filament v4 support as well.

I'll merge it to 3.x once everything is green.

@awcodesawcodes left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this — the table growing unbounded is a real problem and the prune query itself is the right shape. The two-step pluck/delete sidesteps the MySQL DELETE ... WHERE id IN (subquery with LIMIT) restriction, and the id tiebreak is a good call. Merges cleanly on 3.x and the suite is green.

One blocking issue and a couple of things to consider.

max_items is read from the wrong place

prune() uses config('recently.max_items'), but the menu reads RecentlyPlugin::getMaxItems(), which lets a panel override the config:

publicfunctiongetMaxItems(): int
{
return$this->evaluate($this->maxItems) ?? config('recently.max_items');
}

So anyone using RecentlyPlugin::make()->maxItems(50) with the default config of 20 now permanently loses entries 21–50. Confirmed with a throwaway test against this branch:

Filament::getCurrentOrDefaultPanel()->plugins([RecentlyPlugin::make()->maxItems(50)]);
for ($i = 0; $i < 30; $i++) {
Recently::add("https://example.test/page/{$i}", '', "Page {$i}");
}
expect(livewire(RecentlyMenu::class)->instance()->records)->toHaveCount(30);
Failed asserting that actual size 20 matches expected size 30.

The user asked for a 50-item menu, viewed 30 records, and sees 20 — with the other 10 deleted, not just hidden. Multi-panel setups are worse: the lowest configured limit anywhere wins, destructively, for every panel.

Worth adding a test that covers a panel-level maxItems() larger than the config value, since that's the case that regresses.

Default-on data deletion

max_items is currently documented as a display cap, so deleting rows on upgrade is a behavior change for anyone who set it low and later intended to raise it, or who queries recent_entries directly. Would you consider making retention opt-in — a separate 'max_stored' (or 'prune' => false) config key — so the destructive part is a choice rather than something that happens on composer update? That would also sidestep the display-vs-storage coupling above.

Minor

add() now issues two extra queries on every non-Livewire page render. Cheap, but you could skip the delete entirely when the stored count is already at or under the limit.

If #39 also lands

The two changes interact: this PR prunes to max_items counting entries whose record has since been deleted, while #39 hides those from the menu. A user who deletes a lot of records ends up with a near-empty menu while N rows sit in the table. Dropping non-existing entries first inside prune() would resolve it.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@MACscr@awcodes
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Prune stored history to max_items per user - #40

Open
MACscr wants to merge 1 commit into
awcodes:3.xfrom
MACscr:feature/prune-history-to-max-items
Open

Prune stored history to max_items per user#40
MACscr wants to merge 1 commit into
awcodes:3.xfrom
MACscr:feature/prune-history-to-max-items

Conversation

@MACscr

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Problem

Recently::add() writes one row per (user, distinct URL) and never removes any. max_items only caps what the menu and global search display, so recent_entries grows unbounded — an active user accumulates a row for every distinct record they've ever viewed.

Change

After recording an entry, prune the user's rows down to the most-recent max_items (the config value). Ties on updated_at are broken by id so the newest insert wins when timestamps collide. Pruning is scoped per user, so other users' history is untouched.

Notes

  • No public API change — add()'s signature is unchanged.
  • Independent of any other change; based on 3.x.
  • Tests added (tests/src/RetentionTest.php): stored count stays at max_items, the oldest entry is dropped and the newest kept, and a second user's history is untouched. composer test is green.
  • README updated with a "Retention" section.

`Recently::add()` writes one row per (user, distinct URL) and never
removes any — `max_items` only caps the display, so recent_entries grows
unbounded, accumulating a row for every distinct record a user views.
After recording an entry, prune the user's rows down to the most-recent
`max_items` (config value), breaking ties by id so the newest insert
wins when timestamps collide. Pruning is scoped per user, leaving other
users' history untouched.
@awcodes

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Can you target this to the 2.x branch?

I think it should have Filament v4 support as well.

I'll merge it to 3.x once everything is green.

@awcodesawcodes left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this — the table growing unbounded is a real problem and the prune query itself is the right shape. The two-step pluck/delete sidesteps the MySQL DELETE ... WHERE id IN (subquery with LIMIT) restriction, and the id tiebreak is a good call. Merges cleanly on 3.x and the suite is green.

One blocking issue and a couple of things to consider.

max_items is read from the wrong place

prune() uses config('recently.max_items'), but the menu reads RecentlyPlugin::getMaxItems(), which lets a panel override the config:

publicfunctiongetMaxItems(): int
{
return$this->evaluate($this->maxItems) ?? config('recently.max_items');
}

So anyone using RecentlyPlugin::make()->maxItems(50) with the default config of 20 now permanently loses entries 21–50. Confirmed with a throwaway test against this branch:

Filament::getCurrentOrDefaultPanel()->plugins([RecentlyPlugin::make()->maxItems(50)]);
for ($i = 0; $i < 30; $i++) {
Recently::add("https://example.test/page/{$i}", '', "Page {$i}");
}
expect(livewire(RecentlyMenu::class)->instance()->records)->toHaveCount(30);
Failed asserting that actual size 20 matches expected size 30.

The user asked for a 50-item menu, viewed 30 records, and sees 20 — with the other 10 deleted, not just hidden. Multi-panel setups are worse: the lowest configured limit anywhere wins, destructively, for every panel.

Worth adding a test that covers a panel-level maxItems() larger than the config value, since that's the case that regresses.

Default-on data deletion

max_items is currently documented as a display cap, so deleting rows on upgrade is a behavior change for anyone who set it low and later intended to raise it, or who queries recent_entries directly. Would you consider making retention opt-in — a separate 'max_stored' (or 'prune' => false) config key — so the destructive part is a choice rather than something that happens on composer update? That would also sidestep the display-vs-storage coupling above.

Minor

add() now issues two extra queries on every non-Livewire page render. Cheap, but you could skip the delete entirely when the stored count is already at or under the limit.

If #39 also lands

The two changes interact: this PR prunes to max_items counting entries whose record has since been deleted, while #39 hides those from the menu. A user who deletes a lot of records ends up with a near-empty menu while N rows sit in the table. Dropping non-existing entries first inside prune() would resolve it.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@MACscr@awcodes
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Prune stored history to max_items per user - #40

Open
MACscr wants to merge 1 commit into
awcodes:3.xfrom
MACscr:feature/prune-history-to-max-items
Open

Prune stored history to max_items per user#40
MACscr wants to merge 1 commit into
awcodes:3.xfrom
MACscr:feature/prune-history-to-max-items

Conversation

@MACscr

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Problem

Recently::add() writes one row per (user, distinct URL) and never removes any. max_items only caps what the menu and global search display, so recent_entries grows unbounded — an active user accumulates a row for every distinct record they've ever viewed.

Change

After recording an entry, prune the user's rows down to the most-recent max_items (the config value). Ties on updated_at are broken by id so the newest insert wins when timestamps collide. Pruning is scoped per user, so other users' history is untouched.

Notes

  • No public API change — add()'s signature is unchanged.
  • Independent of any other change; based on 3.x.
  • Tests added (tests/src/RetentionTest.php): stored count stays at max_items, the oldest entry is dropped and the newest kept, and a second user's history is untouched. composer test is green.
  • README updated with a "Retention" section.

`Recently::add()` writes one row per (user, distinct URL) and never
removes any — `max_items` only caps the display, so recent_entries grows
unbounded, accumulating a row for every distinct record a user views.
After recording an entry, prune the user's rows down to the most-recent
`max_items` (config value), breaking ties by id so the newest insert
wins when timestamps collide. Pruning is scoped per user, leaving other
users' history untouched.
@awcodes

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Can you target this to the 2.x branch?

I think it should have Filament v4 support as well.

I'll merge it to 3.x once everything is green.

@awcodesawcodes left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this — the table growing unbounded is a real problem and the prune query itself is the right shape. The two-step pluck/delete sidesteps the MySQL DELETE ... WHERE id IN (subquery with LIMIT) restriction, and the id tiebreak is a good call. Merges cleanly on 3.x and the suite is green.

One blocking issue and a couple of things to consider.

max_items is read from the wrong place

prune() uses config('recently.max_items'), but the menu reads RecentlyPlugin::getMaxItems(), which lets a panel override the config:

publicfunctiongetMaxItems(): int
{
return$this->evaluate($this->maxItems) ?? config('recently.max_items');
}

So anyone using RecentlyPlugin::make()->maxItems(50) with the default config of 20 now permanently loses entries 21–50. Confirmed with a throwaway test against this branch:

Filament::getCurrentOrDefaultPanel()->plugins([RecentlyPlugin::make()->maxItems(50)]);
for ($i = 0; $i < 30; $i++) {
Recently::add("https://example.test/page/{$i}", '', "Page {$i}");
}
expect(livewire(RecentlyMenu::class)->instance()->records)->toHaveCount(30);
Failed asserting that actual size 20 matches expected size 30.

The user asked for a 50-item menu, viewed 30 records, and sees 20 — with the other 10 deleted, not just hidden. Multi-panel setups are worse: the lowest configured limit anywhere wins, destructively, for every panel.

Worth adding a test that covers a panel-level maxItems() larger than the config value, since that's the case that regresses.

Default-on data deletion

max_items is currently documented as a display cap, so deleting rows on upgrade is a behavior change for anyone who set it low and later intended to raise it, or who queries recent_entries directly. Would you consider making retention opt-in — a separate 'max_stored' (or 'prune' => false) config key — so the destructive part is a choice rather than something that happens on composer update? That would also sidestep the display-vs-storage coupling above.

Minor

add() now issues two extra queries on every non-Livewire page render. Cheap, but you could skip the delete entirely when the stored count is already at or under the limit.

If #39 also lands

The two changes interact: this PR prunes to max_items counting entries whose record has since been deleted, while #39 hides those from the menu. A user who deletes a lot of records ends up with a near-empty menu while N rows sit in the table. Dropping non-existing entries first inside prune() would resolve it.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@MACscr@awcodes
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Prune stored history to max_items per user - #40

Open
MACscr wants to merge 1 commit into
awcodes:3.xfrom
MACscr:feature/prune-history-to-max-items
Open

Prune stored history to max_items per user#40
MACscr wants to merge 1 commit into
awcodes:3.xfrom
MACscr:feature/prune-history-to-max-items

Conversation

@MACscr

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Problem

Recently::add() writes one row per (user, distinct URL) and never removes any. max_items only caps what the menu and global search display, so recent_entries grows unbounded — an active user accumulates a row for every distinct record they've ever viewed.

Change

After recording an entry, prune the user's rows down to the most-recent max_items (the config value). Ties on updated_at are broken by id so the newest insert wins when timestamps collide. Pruning is scoped per user, so other users' history is untouched.

Notes

  • No public API change — add()'s signature is unchanged.
  • Independent of any other change; based on 3.x.
  • Tests added (tests/src/RetentionTest.php): stored count stays at max_items, the oldest entry is dropped and the newest kept, and a second user's history is untouched. composer test is green.
  • README updated with a "Retention" section.

`Recently::add()` writes one row per (user, distinct URL) and never
removes any — `max_items` only caps the display, so recent_entries grows
unbounded, accumulating a row for every distinct record a user views.
After recording an entry, prune the user's rows down to the most-recent
`max_items` (config value), breaking ties by id so the newest insert
wins when timestamps collide. Pruning is scoped per user, leaving other
users' history untouched.
@awcodes

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Can you target this to the 2.x branch?

I think it should have Filament v4 support as well.

I'll merge it to 3.x once everything is green.

@awcodesawcodes left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this — the table growing unbounded is a real problem and the prune query itself is the right shape. The two-step pluck/delete sidesteps the MySQL DELETE ... WHERE id IN (subquery with LIMIT) restriction, and the id tiebreak is a good call. Merges cleanly on 3.x and the suite is green.

One blocking issue and a couple of things to consider.

max_items is read from the wrong place

prune() uses config('recently.max_items'), but the menu reads RecentlyPlugin::getMaxItems(), which lets a panel override the config:

publicfunctiongetMaxItems(): int
{
return$this->evaluate($this->maxItems) ?? config('recently.max_items');
}

So anyone using RecentlyPlugin::make()->maxItems(50) with the default config of 20 now permanently loses entries 21–50. Confirmed with a throwaway test against this branch:

Filament::getCurrentOrDefaultPanel()->plugins([RecentlyPlugin::make()->maxItems(50)]);
for ($i = 0; $i < 30; $i++) {
Recently::add("https://example.test/page/{$i}", '', "Page {$i}");
}
expect(livewire(RecentlyMenu::class)->instance()->records)->toHaveCount(30);
Failed asserting that actual size 20 matches expected size 30.

The user asked for a 50-item menu, viewed 30 records, and sees 20 — with the other 10 deleted, not just hidden. Multi-panel setups are worse: the lowest configured limit anywhere wins, destructively, for every panel.

Worth adding a test that covers a panel-level maxItems() larger than the config value, since that's the case that regresses.

Default-on data deletion

max_items is currently documented as a display cap, so deleting rows on upgrade is a behavior change for anyone who set it low and later intended to raise it, or who queries recent_entries directly. Would you consider making retention opt-in — a separate 'max_stored' (or 'prune' => false) config key — so the destructive part is a choice rather than something that happens on composer update? That would also sidestep the display-vs-storage coupling above.

Minor

add() now issues two extra queries on every non-Livewire page render. Cheap, but you could skip the delete entirely when the stored count is already at or under the limit.

If #39 also lands

The two changes interact: this PR prunes to max_items counting entries whose record has since been deleted, while #39 hides those from the menu. A user who deletes a lot of records ends up with a near-empty menu while N rows sit in the table. Dropping non-existing entries first inside prune() would resolve it.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@MACscr@awcodes
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Prune stored history to max_items per user - #40

Open
MACscr wants to merge 1 commit into
awcodes:3.xfrom
MACscr:feature/prune-history-to-max-items
Open

Prune stored history to max_items per user#40
MACscr wants to merge 1 commit into
awcodes:3.xfrom
MACscr:feature/prune-history-to-max-items

Conversation

@MACscr

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Problem

Recently::add() writes one row per (user, distinct URL) and never removes any. max_items only caps what the menu and global search display, so recent_entries grows unbounded — an active user accumulates a row for every distinct record they've ever viewed.

Change

After recording an entry, prune the user's rows down to the most-recent max_items (the config value). Ties on updated_at are broken by id so the newest insert wins when timestamps collide. Pruning is scoped per user, so other users' history is untouched.

Notes

  • No public API change — add()'s signature is unchanged.
  • Independent of any other change; based on 3.x.
  • Tests added (tests/src/RetentionTest.php): stored count stays at max_items, the oldest entry is dropped and the newest kept, and a second user's history is untouched. composer test is green.
  • README updated with a "Retention" section.

`Recently::add()` writes one row per (user, distinct URL) and never
removes any — `max_items` only caps the display, so recent_entries grows
unbounded, accumulating a row for every distinct record a user views.
After recording an entry, prune the user's rows down to the most-recent
`max_items` (config value), breaking ties by id so the newest insert
wins when timestamps collide. Pruning is scoped per user, leaving other
users' history untouched.
@awcodes

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Can you target this to the 2.x branch?

I think it should have Filament v4 support as well.

I'll merge it to 3.x once everything is green.

@awcodesawcodes left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this — the table growing unbounded is a real problem and the prune query itself is the right shape. The two-step pluck/delete sidesteps the MySQL DELETE ... WHERE id IN (subquery with LIMIT) restriction, and the id tiebreak is a good call. Merges cleanly on 3.x and the suite is green.

One blocking issue and a couple of things to consider.

max_items is read from the wrong place

prune() uses config('recently.max_items'), but the menu reads RecentlyPlugin::getMaxItems(), which lets a panel override the config:

publicfunctiongetMaxItems(): int
{
return$this->evaluate($this->maxItems) ?? config('recently.max_items');
}

So anyone using RecentlyPlugin::make()->maxItems(50) with the default config of 20 now permanently loses entries 21–50. Confirmed with a throwaway test against this branch:

Filament::getCurrentOrDefaultPanel()->plugins([RecentlyPlugin::make()->maxItems(50)]);
for ($i = 0; $i < 30; $i++) {
Recently::add("https://example.test/page/{$i}", '', "Page {$i}");
}
expect(livewire(RecentlyMenu::class)->instance()->records)->toHaveCount(30);
Failed asserting that actual size 20 matches expected size 30.

The user asked for a 50-item menu, viewed 30 records, and sees 20 — with the other 10 deleted, not just hidden. Multi-panel setups are worse: the lowest configured limit anywhere wins, destructively, for every panel.

Worth adding a test that covers a panel-level maxItems() larger than the config value, since that's the case that regresses.

Default-on data deletion

max_items is currently documented as a display cap, so deleting rows on upgrade is a behavior change for anyone who set it low and later intended to raise it, or who queries recent_entries directly. Would you consider making retention opt-in — a separate 'max_stored' (or 'prune' => false) config key — so the destructive part is a choice rather than something that happens on composer update? That would also sidestep the display-vs-storage coupling above.

Minor

add() now issues two extra queries on every non-Livewire page render. Cheap, but you could skip the delete entirely when the stored count is already at or under the limit.

If #39 also lands

The two changes interact: this PR prunes to max_items counting entries whose record has since been deleted, while #39 hides those from the menu. A user who deletes a lot of records ends up with a near-empty menu while N rows sit in the table. Dropping non-existing entries first inside prune() would resolve it.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@MACscr@awcodes
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Prune stored history to max_items per user - #40

Open
MACscr wants to merge 1 commit into
awcodes:3.xfrom
MACscr:feature/prune-history-to-max-items
Open

Prune stored history to max_items per user#40
MACscr wants to merge 1 commit into
awcodes:3.xfrom
MACscr:feature/prune-history-to-max-items

Conversation

@MACscr

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Problem

Recently::add() writes one row per (user, distinct URL) and never removes any. max_items only caps what the menu and global search display, so recent_entries grows unbounded — an active user accumulates a row for every distinct record they've ever viewed.

Change

After recording an entry, prune the user's rows down to the most-recent max_items (the config value). Ties on updated_at are broken by id so the newest insert wins when timestamps collide. Pruning is scoped per user, so other users' history is untouched.

Notes

  • No public API change — add()'s signature is unchanged.
  • Independent of any other change; based on 3.x.
  • Tests added (tests/src/RetentionTest.php): stored count stays at max_items, the oldest entry is dropped and the newest kept, and a second user's history is untouched. composer test is green.
  • README updated with a "Retention" section.

`Recently::add()` writes one row per (user, distinct URL) and never
removes any — `max_items` only caps the display, so recent_entries grows
unbounded, accumulating a row for every distinct record a user views.
After recording an entry, prune the user's rows down to the most-recent
`max_items` (config value), breaking ties by id so the newest insert
wins when timestamps collide. Pruning is scoped per user, leaving other
users' history untouched.
@awcodes

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Can you target this to the 2.x branch?

I think it should have Filament v4 support as well.

I'll merge it to 3.x once everything is green.

@awcodesawcodes left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this — the table growing unbounded is a real problem and the prune query itself is the right shape. The two-step pluck/delete sidesteps the MySQL DELETE ... WHERE id IN (subquery with LIMIT) restriction, and the id tiebreak is a good call. Merges cleanly on 3.x and the suite is green.

One blocking issue and a couple of things to consider.

max_items is read from the wrong place

prune() uses config('recently.max_items'), but the menu reads RecentlyPlugin::getMaxItems(), which lets a panel override the config:

publicfunctiongetMaxItems(): int
{
return$this->evaluate($this->maxItems) ?? config('recently.max_items');
}

So anyone using RecentlyPlugin::make()->maxItems(50) with the default config of 20 now permanently loses entries 21–50. Confirmed with a throwaway test against this branch:

Filament::getCurrentOrDefaultPanel()->plugins([RecentlyPlugin::make()->maxItems(50)]);
for ($i = 0; $i < 30; $i++) {
Recently::add("https://example.test/page/{$i}", '', "Page {$i}");
}
expect(livewire(RecentlyMenu::class)->instance()->records)->toHaveCount(30);
Failed asserting that actual size 20 matches expected size 30.

The user asked for a 50-item menu, viewed 30 records, and sees 20 — with the other 10 deleted, not just hidden. Multi-panel setups are worse: the lowest configured limit anywhere wins, destructively, for every panel.

Worth adding a test that covers a panel-level maxItems() larger than the config value, since that's the case that regresses.

Default-on data deletion

max_items is currently documented as a display cap, so deleting rows on upgrade is a behavior change for anyone who set it low and later intended to raise it, or who queries recent_entries directly. Would you consider making retention opt-in — a separate 'max_stored' (or 'prune' => false) config key — so the destructive part is a choice rather than something that happens on composer update? That would also sidestep the display-vs-storage coupling above.

Minor

add() now issues two extra queries on every non-Livewire page render. Cheap, but you could skip the delete entirely when the stored count is already at or under the limit.

If #39 also lands

The two changes interact: this PR prunes to max_items counting entries whose record has since been deleted, while #39 hides those from the menu. A user who deletes a lot of records ends up with a near-empty menu while N rows sit in the table. Dropping non-existing entries first inside prune() would resolve it.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@MACscr@awcodes
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Prune stored history to max_items per user - #40

Open
MACscr wants to merge 1 commit into
awcodes:3.xfrom
MACscr:feature/prune-history-to-max-items
Open

Prune stored history to max_items per user#40
MACscr wants to merge 1 commit into
awcodes:3.xfrom
MACscr:feature/prune-history-to-max-items

Conversation

@MACscr

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Problem

Recently::add() writes one row per (user, distinct URL) and never removes any. max_items only caps what the menu and global search display, so recent_entries grows unbounded — an active user accumulates a row for every distinct record they've ever viewed.

Change

After recording an entry, prune the user's rows down to the most-recent max_items (the config value). Ties on updated_at are broken by id so the newest insert wins when timestamps collide. Pruning is scoped per user, so other users' history is untouched.

Notes

  • No public API change — add()'s signature is unchanged.
  • Independent of any other change; based on 3.x.
  • Tests added (tests/src/RetentionTest.php): stored count stays at max_items, the oldest entry is dropped and the newest kept, and a second user's history is untouched. composer test is green.
  • README updated with a "Retention" section.

`Recently::add()` writes one row per (user, distinct URL) and never
removes any — `max_items` only caps the display, so recent_entries grows
unbounded, accumulating a row for every distinct record a user views.
After recording an entry, prune the user's rows down to the most-recent
`max_items` (config value), breaking ties by id so the newest insert
wins when timestamps collide. Pruning is scoped per user, leaving other
users' history untouched.
@awcodes

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Can you target this to the 2.x branch?

I think it should have Filament v4 support as well.

I'll merge it to 3.x once everything is green.

@awcodesawcodes left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this — the table growing unbounded is a real problem and the prune query itself is the right shape. The two-step pluck/delete sidesteps the MySQL DELETE ... WHERE id IN (subquery with LIMIT) restriction, and the id tiebreak is a good call. Merges cleanly on 3.x and the suite is green.

One blocking issue and a couple of things to consider.

max_items is read from the wrong place

prune() uses config('recently.max_items'), but the menu reads RecentlyPlugin::getMaxItems(), which lets a panel override the config:

publicfunctiongetMaxItems(): int
{
return$this->evaluate($this->maxItems) ?? config('recently.max_items');
}

So anyone using RecentlyPlugin::make()->maxItems(50) with the default config of 20 now permanently loses entries 21–50. Confirmed with a throwaway test against this branch:

Filament::getCurrentOrDefaultPanel()->plugins([RecentlyPlugin::make()->maxItems(50)]);
for ($i = 0; $i < 30; $i++) {
Recently::add("https://example.test/page/{$i}", '', "Page {$i}");
}
expect(livewire(RecentlyMenu::class)->instance()->records)->toHaveCount(30);
Failed asserting that actual size 20 matches expected size 30.

The user asked for a 50-item menu, viewed 30 records, and sees 20 — with the other 10 deleted, not just hidden. Multi-panel setups are worse: the lowest configured limit anywhere wins, destructively, for every panel.

Worth adding a test that covers a panel-level maxItems() larger than the config value, since that's the case that regresses.

Default-on data deletion

max_items is currently documented as a display cap, so deleting rows on upgrade is a behavior change for anyone who set it low and later intended to raise it, or who queries recent_entries directly. Would you consider making retention opt-in — a separate 'max_stored' (or 'prune' => false) config key — so the destructive part is a choice rather than something that happens on composer update? That would also sidestep the display-vs-storage coupling above.

Minor

add() now issues two extra queries on every non-Livewire page render. Cheap, but you could skip the delete entirely when the stored count is already at or under the limit.

If #39 also lands

The two changes interact: this PR prunes to max_items counting entries whose record has since been deleted, while #39 hides those from the menu. A user who deletes a lot of records ends up with a near-empty menu while N rows sit in the table. Dropping non-existing entries first inside prune() would resolve it.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@MACscr@awcodes