test(e2e): use managed memory for CUSTOM_JWT harness invoke#1627

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
aidandaly24 wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

test(e2e): use managed memory for CUSTOM_JWT harness invoke #1627

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 3 additions & 1 deletion e2e-tests/harness-custom-jwt.test.ts
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -135,7 +135,9 @@ describe.sequential('e2e: harness with CUSTOM_JWT auth', () => {
harnessName,
'--model-provider',
'bedrock',
'--no-memory',
// Use the default managed memory (no --no-memory): a disabled-memory harness still
// calls bedrock-agentcore:ListEvents at invoke, but the CDK only grants that action on
// the execution role when memory is managed — so --no-memory invokes fail with AccessDenied.

@agentcore-cli-automationagentcore-cli-automationJun 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change masks (rather than fixes) a real user-facing bug: any user who runs add harness --no-memory and then invoke will hit the same AccessDeniedException on ListEvents at runtime, because the harness still calls ListEvents on a service-managed memory even when the CLI/CDK has skipped the IAM grant.

The PR description acknowledges this ("the harness still calls ListEvents on a service-managed memory at invoke time, so it 403s"), but #1626 is being closed by this fix and there's no follow-up tracking the actual product bug. After this merges, the only E2E coverage we had for the --no-memory invoke path is gone, and the next time someone reports this from the field there'll be no signal in CI.

A few ways to handle this — please pick one before merging:

  1. (Preferred) Open a follow-up bug for "harness with --no-memory fails at invoke with AccessDenied on ListEvents" (CDK should grant the action even when memory is disabled, or the harness runtime should not call ListEvents when memory is disabled — that's for the harness/CDK owners to decide), reference it from CI Failure: harness-custom-jwt bearer-token invoke fails with AccessDenied on ListEvents #1626 so CI Failure: harness-custom-jwt bearer-token invoke fails with AccessDenied on ListEvents #1626 isn't closed without the underlying issue being tracked, and link it from the inline comment here (lines 138–140) so future readers see it.
  2. Keep one E2E case on --no-memory — e.g., split the suite so the deploy/auth-config assertions still run against a --no-memory harness (those don't invoke and won't 403), and only the invoke-based assertions use managed memory. That preserves coverage of the --no-memory add/deploy path.
  3. If the harness runtime calling ListEvents under --no-memory is considered expected and the user-facing remediation is "don't use --no-memory with a harness" (or --no-memory is being deprecated for harnesses), document that in the --no-memory flag help text on add harness so users discover it at CLI time rather than at AccessDenied time.

The cheapest thing is probably (1) — it costs nothing in this PR and keeps the bug visible.

Tangential nit on the PR description (not a blocker): the quoted CDK snippet (const managedMemory = props.spec ? props.spec.memory?.mode !== 'disabled' : harness.managedMemory;) doesn't exist in AgentCoreHarnessEnvironment.ts in agentcore-l3-cdk-constructs on main. The actual ListEvents grant is in AgentCoreApplication.wireMemoriesToHarnesses (src/cdk/constructs/l3/AgentCoreApplication.ts:235-262), gated on harness.memoryName being set — which --no-memory doesn't set, so the effective behavior matches your description, just citing the wrong source location.

'--authorizer-type',
'CUSTOM_JWT',
'--discovery-url',
Expand Down
Loading
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

Skip to content
test(e2e): use managed memory for CUSTOM_JWT harness invoke#1627

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

 Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and
privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?
Sign in
to your account

 Closed

aidandaly24
wants to merge
1
commit into

from

 Closed


test(e2e): use managed memory for CUSTOM_JWT harness invoke
#1627
 Changes from all commits
Commits

Show all changes


1 commit


Select commit


File filter

Filter by extension
Filter by extension
Conversations

Failed to load comments. 
Loading
Jump to

Jump to file


Failed to load files. 
Loading
 Diff view

 Diff view


4 changes: 3 additions & 1 deletion
e2e-tests/harness-custom-jwt.test.ts

View file


Open in desktop

Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -135,7 +135,9 @@ describe.sequential('e2e: harness with CUSTOM_JWT auth', () => {
 harnessName,
 '--model-provider',
 'bedrock',
 '--no-memory',
 // Use the default managed memory (no --no-memory): a disabled-memory harness still
 // calls bedrock-agentcore:ListEvents at invoke, but the CDK only grants that action on
 // the execution role when memory is managed — so --no-memory invokes fail with AccessDenied.
@agentcore-cli-automationagentcore-cli-automationJun 23, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change masks (rather than fixes) a real user-facing bug: any user who runs add harness --no-memory and then invoke will hit the same AccessDeniedException on ListEvents at runtime, because the harness still calls ListEvents on a service-managed memory even when the CLI/CDK has skipped the IAM grant.
The PR description acknowledges this ("the harness still calls ListEvents on a service-managed memory at invoke time, so it 403s"), but #1626 is being closed by this fix and there's no follow-up tracking the actual product bug. After this merges, the only E2E coverage we had for the --no-memory invoke path is gone, and the next time someone reports this from the field there'll be no signal in CI.
A few ways to handle this — please pick one before merging:
  1. (Preferred) Open a follow-up bug for "harness with --no-memory fails at invoke with AccessDenied on ListEvents" (CDK should grant the action even when memory is disabled, or the harness runtime should not call ListEvents when memory is disabled — that's for the harness/CDK owners to decide), reference it from CI Failure: harness-custom-jwt bearer-token invoke fails with AccessDenied on ListEvents #1626 so CI Failure: harness-custom-jwt bearer-token invoke fails with AccessDenied on ListEvents #1626 isn't closed without the underlying issue being tracked, and link it from the inline comment here (lines 138–140) so future readers see it.
  2. Keep one E2E case on --no-memory — e.g., split the suite so the deploy/auth-config assertions still run against a --no-memory harness (those don't invoke and won't 403), and only the invoke-based assertions use managed memory. That preserves coverage of the --no-memory add/deploy path.
  3. If the harness runtime calling ListEvents under --no-memory is considered expected and the user-facing remediation is "don't use --no-memory with a harness" (or --no-memory is being deprecated for harnesses), document that in the --no-memory flag help text on add harness so users discover it at CLI time rather than at AccessDenied time.
The cheapest thing is probably (1) — it costs nothing in this PR and keeps the bug visible.
Tangential nit on the PR description (not a blocker): the quoted CDK snippet (const managedMemory = props.spec ? props.spec.memory?.mode !== 'disabled' : harness.managedMemory;) doesn't exist in AgentCoreHarnessEnvironment.ts in agentcore-l3-cdk-constructs on main. The actual ListEvents grant is in AgentCoreApplication.wireMemoriesToHarnesses (src/cdk/constructs/l3/AgentCoreApplication.ts:235-262), gated on harness.memoryName being set — which --no-memory doesn't set, so the effective behavior matches your description, just citing the wrong source location.
 '--authorizer-type',
 'CUSTOM_JWT',
 '--discovery-url',
Expand Down
Loading

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
test(e2e): use managed memory for CUSTOM_JWT harness invoke#1627

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

 Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and
privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?
Sign in
to your account

 Closed

aidandaly24
wants to merge
1
commit into

from

 Closed


test(e2e): use managed memory for CUSTOM_JWT harness invoke
#1627
 Changes from all commits
Commits

Show all changes


1 commit


Select commit


File filter

Filter by extension
Filter by extension
Conversations

Failed to load comments. 
Loading
Jump to

Jump to file


Failed to load files. 
Loading
 Diff view

 Diff view


4 changes: 3 additions & 1 deletion
e2e-tests/harness-custom-jwt.test.ts

View file


Open in desktop

Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -135,7 +135,9 @@ describe.sequential('e2e: harness with CUSTOM_JWT auth', () => {
 harnessName,
 '--model-provider',
 'bedrock',
 '--no-memory',
 // Use the default managed memory (no --no-memory): a disabled-memory harness still
 // calls bedrock-agentcore:ListEvents at invoke, but the CDK only grants that action on
 // the execution role when memory is managed — so --no-memory invokes fail with AccessDenied.
@agentcore-cli-automationagentcore-cli-automationJun 23, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change masks (rather than fixes) a real user-facing bug: any user who runs add harness --no-memory and then invoke will hit the same AccessDeniedException on ListEvents at runtime, because the harness still calls ListEvents on a service-managed memory even when the CLI/CDK has skipped the IAM grant.
The PR description acknowledges this ("the harness still calls ListEvents on a service-managed memory at invoke time, so it 403s"), but #1626 is being closed by this fix and there's no follow-up tracking the actual product bug. After this merges, the only E2E coverage we had for the --no-memory invoke path is gone, and the next time someone reports this from the field there'll be no signal in CI.
A few ways to handle this — please pick one before merging:
  1. (Preferred) Open a follow-up bug for "harness with --no-memory fails at invoke with AccessDenied on ListEvents" (CDK should grant the action even when memory is disabled, or the harness runtime should not call ListEvents when memory is disabled — that's for the harness/CDK owners to decide), reference it from CI Failure: harness-custom-jwt bearer-token invoke fails with AccessDenied on ListEvents #1626 so CI Failure: harness-custom-jwt bearer-token invoke fails with AccessDenied on ListEvents #1626 isn't closed without the underlying issue being tracked, and link it from the inline comment here (lines 138–140) so future readers see it.
  2. Keep one E2E case on --no-memory — e.g., split the suite so the deploy/auth-config assertions still run against a --no-memory harness (those don't invoke and won't 403), and only the invoke-based assertions use managed memory. That preserves coverage of the --no-memory add/deploy path.
  3. If the harness runtime calling ListEvents under --no-memory is considered expected and the user-facing remediation is "don't use --no-memory with a harness" (or --no-memory is being deprecated for harnesses), document that in the --no-memory flag help text on add harness so users discover it at CLI time rather than at AccessDenied time.
The cheapest thing is probably (1) — it costs nothing in this PR and keeps the bug visible.
Tangential nit on the PR description (not a blocker): the quoted CDK snippet (const managedMemory = props.spec ? props.spec.memory?.mode !== 'disabled' : harness.managedMemory;) doesn't exist in AgentCoreHarnessEnvironment.ts in agentcore-l3-cdk-constructs on main. The actual ListEvents grant is in AgentCoreApplication.wireMemoriesToHarnesses (src/cdk/constructs/l3/AgentCoreApplication.ts:235-262), gated on harness.memoryName being set — which --no-memory doesn't set, so the effective behavior matches your description, just citing the wrong source location.
 '--authorizer-type',
 'CUSTOM_JWT',
 '--discovery-url',
Expand Down
Loading

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
test(e2e): use managed memory for CUSTOM_JWT harness invoke#1627

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

 Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and
privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?
Sign in
to your account

 Closed

aidandaly24
wants to merge
1
commit into

from

 Closed


test(e2e): use managed memory for CUSTOM_JWT harness invoke
#1627
 Changes from all commits
Commits

Show all changes


1 commit


Select commit


File filter

Filter by extension
Filter by extension
Conversations

Failed to load comments. 
Loading
Jump to

Jump to file


Failed to load files. 
Loading
 Diff view

 Diff view


4 changes: 3 additions & 1 deletion
e2e-tests/harness-custom-jwt.test.ts

View file


Open in desktop

Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -135,7 +135,9 @@ describe.sequential('e2e: harness with CUSTOM_JWT auth', () => {
 harnessName,
 '--model-provider',
 'bedrock',
 '--no-memory',
 // Use the default managed memory (no --no-memory): a disabled-memory harness still
 // calls bedrock-agentcore:ListEvents at invoke, but the CDK only grants that action on
 // the execution role when memory is managed — so --no-memory invokes fail with AccessDenied.
@agentcore-cli-automationagentcore-cli-automationJun 23, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change masks (rather than fixes) a real user-facing bug: any user who runs add harness --no-memory and then invoke will hit the same AccessDeniedException on ListEvents at runtime, because the harness still calls ListEvents on a service-managed memory even when the CLI/CDK has skipped the IAM grant.
The PR description acknowledges this ("the harness still calls ListEvents on a service-managed memory at invoke time, so it 403s"), but #1626 is being closed by this fix and there's no follow-up tracking the actual product bug. After this merges, the only E2E coverage we had for the --no-memory invoke path is gone, and the next time someone reports this from the field there'll be no signal in CI.
A few ways to handle this — please pick one before merging:
  1. (Preferred) Open a follow-up bug for "harness with --no-memory fails at invoke with AccessDenied on ListEvents" (CDK should grant the action even when memory is disabled, or the harness runtime should not call ListEvents when memory is disabled — that's for the harness/CDK owners to decide), reference it from CI Failure: harness-custom-jwt bearer-token invoke fails with AccessDenied on ListEvents #1626 so CI Failure: harness-custom-jwt bearer-token invoke fails with AccessDenied on ListEvents #1626 isn't closed without the underlying issue being tracked, and link it from the inline comment here (lines 138–140) so future readers see it.
  2. Keep one E2E case on --no-memory — e.g., split the suite so the deploy/auth-config assertions still run against a --no-memory harness (those don't invoke and won't 403), and only the invoke-based assertions use managed memory. That preserves coverage of the --no-memory add/deploy path.
  3. If the harness runtime calling ListEvents under --no-memory is considered expected and the user-facing remediation is "don't use --no-memory with a harness" (or --no-memory is being deprecated for harnesses), document that in the --no-memory flag help text on add harness so users discover it at CLI time rather than at AccessDenied time.
The cheapest thing is probably (1) — it costs nothing in this PR and keeps the bug visible.
Tangential nit on the PR description (not a blocker): the quoted CDK snippet (const managedMemory = props.spec ? props.spec.memory?.mode !== 'disabled' : harness.managedMemory;) doesn't exist in AgentCoreHarnessEnvironment.ts in agentcore-l3-cdk-constructs on main. The actual ListEvents grant is in AgentCoreApplication.wireMemoriesToHarnesses (src/cdk/constructs/l3/AgentCoreApplication.ts:235-262), gated on harness.memoryName being set — which --no-memory doesn't set, so the effective behavior matches your description, just citing the wrong source location.
 '--authorizer-type',
 'CUSTOM_JWT',
 '--discovery-url',
Expand Down
Loading

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

Skip to content
test(e2e): use managed memory for CUSTOM_JWT harness invoke#1627

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

 Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and
privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?
Sign in
to your account

 Closed

aidandaly24
wants to merge
1
commit into

from

 Closed


test(e2e): use managed memory for CUSTOM_JWT harness invoke
#1627
 Changes from all commits
Commits

Show all changes


1 commit


Select commit


File filter

Filter by extension
Filter by extension
Conversations

Failed to load comments. 
Loading
Jump to

Jump to file


Failed to load files. 
Loading
 Diff view

 Diff view


4 changes: 3 additions & 1 deletion
e2e-tests/harness-custom-jwt.test.ts

View file


Open in desktop

Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -135,7 +135,9 @@ describe.sequential('e2e: harness with CUSTOM_JWT auth', () => {
 harnessName,
 '--model-provider',
 'bedrock',
 '--no-memory',
 // Use the default managed memory (no --no-memory): a disabled-memory harness still
 // calls bedrock-agentcore:ListEvents at invoke, but the CDK only grants that action on
 // the execution role when memory is managed — so --no-memory invokes fail with AccessDenied.
@agentcore-cli-automationagentcore-cli-automationJun 23, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change masks (rather than fixes) a real user-facing bug: any user who runs add harness --no-memory and then invoke will hit the same AccessDeniedException on ListEvents at runtime, because the harness still calls ListEvents on a service-managed memory even when the CLI/CDK has skipped the IAM grant.
The PR description acknowledges this ("the harness still calls ListEvents on a service-managed memory at invoke time, so it 403s"), but #1626 is being closed by this fix and there's no follow-up tracking the actual product bug. After this merges, the only E2E coverage we had for the --no-memory invoke path is gone, and the next time someone reports this from the field there'll be no signal in CI.
A few ways to handle this — please pick one before merging:
  1. (Preferred) Open a follow-up bug for "harness with --no-memory fails at invoke with AccessDenied on ListEvents" (CDK should grant the action even when memory is disabled, or the harness runtime should not call ListEvents when memory is disabled — that's for the harness/CDK owners to decide), reference it from CI Failure: harness-custom-jwt bearer-token invoke fails with AccessDenied on ListEvents #1626 so CI Failure: harness-custom-jwt bearer-token invoke fails with AccessDenied on ListEvents #1626 isn't closed without the underlying issue being tracked, and link it from the inline comment here (lines 138–140) so future readers see it.
  2. Keep one E2E case on --no-memory — e.g., split the suite so the deploy/auth-config assertions still run against a --no-memory harness (those don't invoke and won't 403), and only the invoke-based assertions use managed memory. That preserves coverage of the --no-memory add/deploy path.
  3. If the harness runtime calling ListEvents under --no-memory is considered expected and the user-facing remediation is "don't use --no-memory with a harness" (or --no-memory is being deprecated for harnesses), document that in the --no-memory flag help text on add harness so users discover it at CLI time rather than at AccessDenied time.
The cheapest thing is probably (1) — it costs nothing in this PR and keeps the bug visible.
Tangential nit on the PR description (not a blocker): the quoted CDK snippet (const managedMemory = props.spec ? props.spec.memory?.mode !== 'disabled' : harness.managedMemory;) doesn't exist in AgentCoreHarnessEnvironment.ts in agentcore-l3-cdk-constructs on main. The actual ListEvents grant is in AgentCoreApplication.wireMemoriesToHarnesses (src/cdk/constructs/l3/AgentCoreApplication.ts:235-262), gated on harness.memoryName being set — which --no-memory doesn't set, so the effective behavior matches your description, just citing the wrong source location.
 '--authorizer-type',
 'CUSTOM_JWT',
 '--discovery-url',
Expand Down
Loading

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
test(e2e): use managed memory for CUSTOM_JWT harness invoke#1627

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

 Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and
privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?
Sign in
to your account

 Closed

aidandaly24
wants to merge
1
commit into

from

 Closed


test(e2e): use managed memory for CUSTOM_JWT harness invoke
#1627
 Changes from all commits
Commits

Show all changes


1 commit


Select commit


File filter

Filter by extension
Filter by extension
Conversations

Failed to load comments. 
Loading
Jump to

Jump to file


Failed to load files. 
Loading
 Diff view

 Diff view


4 changes: 3 additions & 1 deletion
e2e-tests/harness-custom-jwt.test.ts

View file


Open in desktop

Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -135,7 +135,9 @@ describe.sequential('e2e: harness with CUSTOM_JWT auth', () => {
 harnessName,
 '--model-provider',
 'bedrock',
 '--no-memory',
 // Use the default managed memory (no --no-memory): a disabled-memory harness still
 // calls bedrock-agentcore:ListEvents at invoke, but the CDK only grants that action on
 // the execution role when memory is managed — so --no-memory invokes fail with AccessDenied.
@agentcore-cli-automationagentcore-cli-automationJun 23, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change masks (rather than fixes) a real user-facing bug: any user who runs add harness --no-memory and then invoke will hit the same AccessDeniedException on ListEvents at runtime, because the harness still calls ListEvents on a service-managed memory even when the CLI/CDK has skipped the IAM grant.
The PR description acknowledges this ("the harness still calls ListEvents on a service-managed memory at invoke time, so it 403s"), but #1626 is being closed by this fix and there's no follow-up tracking the actual product bug. After this merges, the only E2E coverage we had for the --no-memory invoke path is gone, and the next time someone reports this from the field there'll be no signal in CI.
A few ways to handle this — please pick one before merging:
  1. (Preferred) Open a follow-up bug for "harness with --no-memory fails at invoke with AccessDenied on ListEvents" (CDK should grant the action even when memory is disabled, or the harness runtime should not call ListEvents when memory is disabled — that's for the harness/CDK owners to decide), reference it from CI Failure: harness-custom-jwt bearer-token invoke fails with AccessDenied on ListEvents #1626 so CI Failure: harness-custom-jwt bearer-token invoke fails with AccessDenied on ListEvents #1626 isn't closed without the underlying issue being tracked, and link it from the inline comment here (lines 138–140) so future readers see it.
  2. Keep one E2E case on --no-memory — e.g., split the suite so the deploy/auth-config assertions still run against a --no-memory harness (those don't invoke and won't 403), and only the invoke-based assertions use managed memory. That preserves coverage of the --no-memory add/deploy path.
  3. If the harness runtime calling ListEvents under --no-memory is considered expected and the user-facing remediation is "don't use --no-memory with a harness" (or --no-memory is being deprecated for harnesses), document that in the --no-memory flag help text on add harness so users discover it at CLI time rather than at AccessDenied time.
The cheapest thing is probably (1) — it costs nothing in this PR and keeps the bug visible.
Tangential nit on the PR description (not a blocker): the quoted CDK snippet (const managedMemory = props.spec ? props.spec.memory?.mode !== 'disabled' : harness.managedMemory;) doesn't exist in AgentCoreHarnessEnvironment.ts in agentcore-l3-cdk-constructs on main. The actual ListEvents grant is in AgentCoreApplication.wireMemoriesToHarnesses (src/cdk/constructs/l3/AgentCoreApplication.ts:235-262), gated on harness.memoryName being set — which --no-memory doesn't set, so the effective behavior matches your description, just citing the wrong source location.
 '--authorizer-type',
 'CUSTOM_JWT',
 '--discovery-url',
Expand Down
Loading

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
test(e2e): use managed memory for CUSTOM_JWT harness invoke#1627

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

 Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and
privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?
Sign in
to your account

 Closed

aidandaly24
wants to merge
1
commit into

from

 Closed


test(e2e): use managed memory for CUSTOM_JWT harness invoke
#1627
 Changes from all commits
Commits

Show all changes


1 commit


Select commit


File filter

Filter by extension
Filter by extension
Conversations

Failed to load comments. 
Loading
Jump to

Jump to file


Failed to load files. 
Loading
 Diff view

 Diff view


4 changes: 3 additions & 1 deletion
e2e-tests/harness-custom-jwt.test.ts

View file


Open in desktop

Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -135,7 +135,9 @@ describe.sequential('e2e: harness with CUSTOM_JWT auth', () => {
 harnessName,
 '--model-provider',
 'bedrock',
 '--no-memory',
 // Use the default managed memory (no --no-memory): a disabled-memory harness still
 // calls bedrock-agentcore:ListEvents at invoke, but the CDK only grants that action on
 // the execution role when memory is managed — so --no-memory invokes fail with AccessDenied.
@agentcore-cli-automationagentcore-cli-automationJun 23, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change masks (rather than fixes) a real user-facing bug: any user who runs add harness --no-memory and then invoke will hit the same AccessDeniedException on ListEvents at runtime, because the harness still calls ListEvents on a service-managed memory even when the CLI/CDK has skipped the IAM grant.
The PR description acknowledges this ("the harness still calls ListEvents on a service-managed memory at invoke time, so it 403s"), but #1626 is being closed by this fix and there's no follow-up tracking the actual product bug. After this merges, the only E2E coverage we had for the --no-memory invoke path is gone, and the next time someone reports this from the field there'll be no signal in CI.
A few ways to handle this — please pick one before merging:
  1. (Preferred) Open a follow-up bug for "harness with --no-memory fails at invoke with AccessDenied on ListEvents" (CDK should grant the action even when memory is disabled, or the harness runtime should not call ListEvents when memory is disabled — that's for the harness/CDK owners to decide), reference it from CI Failure: harness-custom-jwt bearer-token invoke fails with AccessDenied on ListEvents #1626 so CI Failure: harness-custom-jwt bearer-token invoke fails with AccessDenied on ListEvents #1626 isn't closed without the underlying issue being tracked, and link it from the inline comment here (lines 138–140) so future readers see it.
  2. Keep one E2E case on --no-memory — e.g., split the suite so the deploy/auth-config assertions still run against a --no-memory harness (those don't invoke and won't 403), and only the invoke-based assertions use managed memory. That preserves coverage of the --no-memory add/deploy path.
  3. If the harness runtime calling ListEvents under --no-memory is considered expected and the user-facing remediation is "don't use --no-memory with a harness" (or --no-memory is being deprecated for harnesses), document that in the --no-memory flag help text on add harness so users discover it at CLI time rather than at AccessDenied time.
The cheapest thing is probably (1) — it costs nothing in this PR and keeps the bug visible.
Tangential nit on the PR description (not a blocker): the quoted CDK snippet (const managedMemory = props.spec ? props.spec.memory?.mode !== 'disabled' : harness.managedMemory;) doesn't exist in AgentCoreHarnessEnvironment.ts in agentcore-l3-cdk-constructs on main. The actual ListEvents grant is in AgentCoreApplication.wireMemoriesToHarnesses (src/cdk/constructs/l3/AgentCoreApplication.ts:235-262), gated on harness.memoryName being set — which --no-memory doesn't set, so the effective behavior matches your description, just citing the wrong source location.
 '--authorizer-type',
 'CUSTOM_JWT',
 '--discovery-url',
Expand Down
Loading

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

Skip to content
test(e2e): use managed memory for CUSTOM_JWT harness invoke#1627

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

 Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and
privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?
Sign in
to your account

 Closed

aidandaly24
wants to merge
1
commit into

from

 Closed


test(e2e): use managed memory for CUSTOM_JWT harness invoke
#1627
 Changes from all commits
Commits

Show all changes


1 commit


Select commit


File filter

Filter by extension
Filter by extension
Conversations

Failed to load comments. 
Loading
Jump to

Jump to file


Failed to load files. 
Loading
 Diff view

 Diff view


4 changes: 3 additions & 1 deletion
e2e-tests/harness-custom-jwt.test.ts

View file


Open in desktop

Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -135,7 +135,9 @@ describe.sequential('e2e: harness with CUSTOM_JWT auth', () => {
 harnessName,
 '--model-provider',
 'bedrock',
 '--no-memory',
 // Use the default managed memory (no --no-memory): a disabled-memory harness still
 // calls bedrock-agentcore:ListEvents at invoke, but the CDK only grants that action on
 // the execution role when memory is managed — so --no-memory invokes fail with AccessDenied.
@agentcore-cli-automationagentcore-cli-automationJun 23, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change masks (rather than fixes) a real user-facing bug: any user who runs add harness --no-memory and then invoke will hit the same AccessDeniedException on ListEvents at runtime, because the harness still calls ListEvents on a service-managed memory even when the CLI/CDK has skipped the IAM grant.
The PR description acknowledges this ("the harness still calls ListEvents on a service-managed memory at invoke time, so it 403s"), but #1626 is being closed by this fix and there's no follow-up tracking the actual product bug. After this merges, the only E2E coverage we had for the --no-memory invoke path is gone, and the next time someone reports this from the field there'll be no signal in CI.
A few ways to handle this — please pick one before merging:
  1. (Preferred) Open a follow-up bug for "harness with --no-memory fails at invoke with AccessDenied on ListEvents" (CDK should grant the action even when memory is disabled, or the harness runtime should not call ListEvents when memory is disabled — that's for the harness/CDK owners to decide), reference it from CI Failure: harness-custom-jwt bearer-token invoke fails with AccessDenied on ListEvents #1626 so CI Failure: harness-custom-jwt bearer-token invoke fails with AccessDenied on ListEvents #1626 isn't closed without the underlying issue being tracked, and link it from the inline comment here (lines 138–140) so future readers see it.
  2. Keep one E2E case on --no-memory — e.g., split the suite so the deploy/auth-config assertions still run against a --no-memory harness (those don't invoke and won't 403), and only the invoke-based assertions use managed memory. That preserves coverage of the --no-memory add/deploy path.
  3. If the harness runtime calling ListEvents under --no-memory is considered expected and the user-facing remediation is "don't use --no-memory with a harness" (or --no-memory is being deprecated for harnesses), document that in the --no-memory flag help text on add harness so users discover it at CLI time rather than at AccessDenied time.
The cheapest thing is probably (1) — it costs nothing in this PR and keeps the bug visible.
Tangential nit on the PR description (not a blocker): the quoted CDK snippet (const managedMemory = props.spec ? props.spec.memory?.mode !== 'disabled' : harness.managedMemory;) doesn't exist in AgentCoreHarnessEnvironment.ts in agentcore-l3-cdk-constructs on main. The actual ListEvents grant is in AgentCoreApplication.wireMemoriesToHarnesses (src/cdk/constructs/l3/AgentCoreApplication.ts:235-262), gated on harness.memoryName being set — which --no-memory doesn't set, so the effective behavior matches your description, just citing the wrong source location.
 '--authorizer-type',
 'CUSTOM_JWT',
 '--discovery-url',
Expand Down
Loading