Skip to content

fix: add explicit permissions to CI workflows - #309

Merged
notgitika merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/workflow-permissions
Feb 12, 2026
Merged

fix: add explicit permissions to CI workflows#309
notgitika merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/workflow-permissions

Conversation

@tejaskash

@tejaskashtejaskash commented Feb 12, 2026•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Add top-level permissions: contents: read to build-and-test.yml and lint.yml
  • Restricts GITHUB_TOKEN scope to least-privilege for all jobs
  • The coverage job in build-and-test.yml already has job-level permissions (pull-requests: write) which override the workflow-level default as needed

Resolves code scanning alerts #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9.

Test plan

  • Verify build-and-test workflow passes (build + coverage jobs)
  • Verify lint workflow passes (all 6 jobs)
  • Confirm code scanning alerts are resolved after merge

@tejaskash
fix: add explicit permissions to CI workflows
a402b48
Add top-level `permissions: contents: read` to build-and-test and lint
workflows to restrict GITHUB_TOKEN scope. Resolves code scanning alerts
for missing workflow permissions.
@tejaskash
tejaskash requested a review from a teamFebruary 12, 2026 22:25
@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Feb 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Coverage Report

StatusCategoryPercentageCovered / Total
🔵Lines8.32%532 / 6392
🔵Statements7.99%543 / 6793
🔵Functions5.61%73 / 1300
🔵Branches6.14%230 / 3743
Generated in workflow #339 for commit a402b48 by the Vitest Coverage Report Action

@notgitika
notgitika merged commit 0c03dc4 into mainFeb 12, 2026
16 checks passed
@notgitika
notgitika deleted the fix/workflow-permissions branch February 12, 2026 22:53
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@notgitikanotgitikanotgitika approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@tejaskash@notgitika
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
fix: add explicit permissions to CI workflows by tejaskash · Pull Request #309 · aws/agentcore-cli · GitHub
Skip to content
fix: add explicit permissions to CI workflows - #309
Merged
notgitika merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
fix/workflow-permissions
Feb 12, 2026
Merged
fix: add explicit permissions to CI workflows#309
notgitika merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
fix/workflow-permissions
Conversation
@tejaskash
@tejaskashtejaskash
commented
Feb 12, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
  • Add top-level permissions: contents: read to build-and-test.yml and lint.yml
  • Restricts GITHUB_TOKEN scope to least-privilege for all jobs
  • The coverage job in build-and-test.yml already has job-level permissions (pull-requests: write) which override the workflow-level default as needed
Resolves code scanning alerts #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9.
Test plan
  •  Verify build-and-test workflow passes (build + coverage jobs)
  •  Verify lint workflow passes (all 6 jobs)
  •  Confirm code scanning alerts are resolved after merge
@tejaskash
fix: add explicit permissions to CI workflows
a402b48
Add top-level `permissions: contents: read` to build-and-test and lint
workflows to restrict GITHUB_TOKEN scope. Resolves code scanning alerts
for missing workflow permissions.
@tejaskash
tejaskash
requested a review
from a teamFebruary 12, 2026 22:25
@github-actions
github-actionsBot
commented
Feb 12, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Coverage Report
StatusCategoryPercentageCovered / Total
🔵Lines8.32%532 / 6392
🔵Statements7.99%543 / 6793
🔵Functions5.61%73 / 1300
🔵Branches6.14%230 / 3743
Generated in workflow #339 for commit a402b48 by the Vitest Coverage Report Action
@notgitika
notgitika
merged commit 0c03dc4
into
mainFeb 12, 2026

16 checks passed

@notgitika
notgitika
deleted the

fix/workflow-permissions

branch
February 12, 2026 22:53
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@notgitikanotgitikanotgitika approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@tejaskash@notgitika

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode
(function() {
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '
.markdown-body {
color-scheme: dark light;
}
.markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }
.markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }
.markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }
.markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }
.markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }
.markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }
';
document.head.appendChild(style);
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
fix: add explicit permissions to CI workflows by tejaskash · Pull Request #309 · aws/agentcore-cli · GitHub
Skip to content
fix: add explicit permissions to CI workflows - #309
Merged
notgitika merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
fix/workflow-permissions
Feb 12, 2026
Merged
fix: add explicit permissions to CI workflows#309
notgitika merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
fix/workflow-permissions
Conversation
@tejaskash
@tejaskashtejaskash
commented
Feb 12, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
  • Add top-level permissions: contents: read to build-and-test.yml and lint.yml
  • Restricts GITHUB_TOKEN scope to least-privilege for all jobs
  • The coverage job in build-and-test.yml already has job-level permissions (pull-requests: write) which override the workflow-level default as needed
Resolves code scanning alerts #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9.
Test plan
  •  Verify build-and-test workflow passes (build + coverage jobs)
  •  Verify lint workflow passes (all 6 jobs)
  •  Confirm code scanning alerts are resolved after merge
@tejaskash
fix: add explicit permissions to CI workflows
a402b48
Add top-level `permissions: contents: read` to build-and-test and lint
workflows to restrict GITHUB_TOKEN scope. Resolves code scanning alerts
for missing workflow permissions.
@tejaskash
tejaskash
requested a review
from a teamFebruary 12, 2026 22:25
@github-actions
github-actionsBot
commented
Feb 12, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Coverage Report
StatusCategoryPercentageCovered / Total
🔵Lines8.32%532 / 6392
🔵Statements7.99%543 / 6793
🔵Functions5.61%73 / 1300
🔵Branches6.14%230 / 3743
Generated in workflow #339 for commit a402b48 by the Vitest Coverage Report Action
@notgitika
notgitika
merged commit 0c03dc4
into
mainFeb 12, 2026

16 checks passed

@notgitika
notgitika
deleted the

fix/workflow-permissions

branch
February 12, 2026 22:53
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@notgitikanotgitikanotgitika approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@tejaskash@notgitika

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer
(function() {
var ref = document.referrer;
var terms = [];
if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {
var url = new URL(ref);
var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');
if (q) {
terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });
}
}
if (terms.length === 0) return;
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';
document.head.appendChild(style);
function highlight(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node
var text = node.textContent;
var found = false;
terms.forEach(function(term) {
var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi');
if (regex.test(text)) {
found = true;
var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();
var parts = text.split(regex);
parts.forEach(function(part, i) {
if (i % 2 === 0) {
frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));
} else {
var span = document.createElement('span');
span.className = 'userscript-highlight';
span.textContent = part;
frag.appendChild(span);
}
});
node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);
}
});
} else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element
var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];
if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {
Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);
}
}
}
highlight(document.body);
// Re-highlight on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
fix: add explicit permissions to CI workflows by tejaskash · Pull Request #309 · aws/agentcore-cli · GitHub
Skip to content
fix: add explicit permissions to CI workflows - #309
Merged
notgitika merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
fix/workflow-permissions
Feb 12, 2026
Merged
fix: add explicit permissions to CI workflows#309
notgitika merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
fix/workflow-permissions
Conversation
@tejaskash
@tejaskashtejaskash
commented
Feb 12, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
  • Add top-level permissions: contents: read to build-and-test.yml and lint.yml
  • Restricts GITHUB_TOKEN scope to least-privilege for all jobs
  • The coverage job in build-and-test.yml already has job-level permissions (pull-requests: write) which override the workflow-level default as needed
Resolves code scanning alerts #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9.
Test plan
  •  Verify build-and-test workflow passes (build + coverage jobs)
  •  Verify lint workflow passes (all 6 jobs)
  •  Confirm code scanning alerts are resolved after merge
@tejaskash
fix: add explicit permissions to CI workflows
a402b48
Add top-level `permissions: contents: read` to build-and-test and lint
workflows to restrict GITHUB_TOKEN scope. Resolves code scanning alerts
for missing workflow permissions.
@tejaskash
tejaskash
requested a review
from a teamFebruary 12, 2026 22:25
@github-actions
github-actionsBot
commented
Feb 12, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Coverage Report
StatusCategoryPercentageCovered / Total
🔵Lines8.32%532 / 6392
🔵Statements7.99%543 / 6793
🔵Functions5.61%73 / 1300
🔵Branches6.14%230 / 3743
Generated in workflow #339 for commit a402b48 by the Vitest Coverage Report Action
@notgitika
notgitika
merged commit 0c03dc4
into
mainFeb 12, 2026

16 checks passed

@notgitika
notgitika
deleted the

fix/workflow-permissions

branch
February 12, 2026 22:53
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@notgitikanotgitikanotgitika approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@tejaskash@notgitika

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page
(function() {
var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',
'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',
'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];
function cleanUrl(url) {
try {
var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);
var changed = false;
trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {
if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {
u.searchParams.delete(p);
changed = true;
}
});
return changed ? u.toString() : url;
} catch (e) {
return url;
}
}
function cleanLinks() {
document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
cleanLinks();
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1) {
if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();
node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
fix: add explicit permissions to CI workflows by tejaskash · Pull Request #309 · aws/agentcore-cli · GitHub
Skip to content
fix: add explicit permissions to CI workflows - #309
Merged
notgitika merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
fix/workflow-permissions
Feb 12, 2026
Merged
fix: add explicit permissions to CI workflows#309
notgitika merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
fix/workflow-permissions
Conversation
@tejaskash
@tejaskashtejaskash
commented
Feb 12, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
  • Add top-level permissions: contents: read to build-and-test.yml and lint.yml
  • Restricts GITHUB_TOKEN scope to least-privilege for all jobs
  • The coverage job in build-and-test.yml already has job-level permissions (pull-requests: write) which override the workflow-level default as needed
Resolves code scanning alerts #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9.
Test plan
  •  Verify build-and-test workflow passes (build + coverage jobs)
  •  Verify lint workflow passes (all 6 jobs)
  •  Confirm code scanning alerts are resolved after merge
@tejaskash
fix: add explicit permissions to CI workflows
a402b48
Add top-level `permissions: contents: read` to build-and-test and lint
workflows to restrict GITHUB_TOKEN scope. Resolves code scanning alerts
for missing workflow permissions.
@tejaskash
tejaskash
requested a review
from a teamFebruary 12, 2026 22:25
@github-actions
github-actionsBot
commented
Feb 12, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Coverage Report
StatusCategoryPercentageCovered / Total
🔵Lines8.32%532 / 6392
🔵Statements7.99%543 / 6793
🔵Functions5.61%73 / 1300
🔵Branches6.14%230 / 3743
Generated in workflow #339 for commit a402b48 by the Vitest Coverage Report Action
@notgitika
notgitika
merged commit 0c03dc4
into
mainFeb 12, 2026

16 checks passed

@notgitika
notgitika
deleted the

fix/workflow-permissions

branch
February 12, 2026 22:53
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@notgitikanotgitikanotgitika approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@tejaskash@notgitika

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube
(function() {
function tryTheater() {
var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]');
if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {
btn.click();
}
}
// Try immediately
tryTheater();
// Try after navigation (SPA)
var lastUrl = location.href;
setInterval(function() {
if (location.href !== lastUrl) {
lastUrl = location.href;
setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);
}
}, 1000);
// Also try on player load
var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
fix: add explicit permissions to CI workflows by tejaskash · Pull Request #309 · aws/agentcore-cli · GitHub
Skip to content
fix: add explicit permissions to CI workflows - #309
Merged
notgitika merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
fix/workflow-permissions
Feb 12, 2026
Merged
fix: add explicit permissions to CI workflows#309
notgitika merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
fix/workflow-permissions
Conversation
@tejaskash
@tejaskashtejaskash
commented
Feb 12, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
  • Add top-level permissions: contents: read to build-and-test.yml and lint.yml
  • Restricts GITHUB_TOKEN scope to least-privilege for all jobs
  • The coverage job in build-and-test.yml already has job-level permissions (pull-requests: write) which override the workflow-level default as needed
Resolves code scanning alerts #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9.
Test plan
  •  Verify build-and-test workflow passes (build + coverage jobs)
  •  Verify lint workflow passes (all 6 jobs)
  •  Confirm code scanning alerts are resolved after merge
@tejaskash
fix: add explicit permissions to CI workflows
a402b48
Add top-level `permissions: contents: read` to build-and-test and lint
workflows to restrict GITHUB_TOKEN scope. Resolves code scanning alerts
for missing workflow permissions.
@tejaskash
tejaskash
requested a review
from a teamFebruary 12, 2026 22:25
@github-actions
github-actionsBot
commented
Feb 12, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Coverage Report
StatusCategoryPercentageCovered / Total
🔵Lines8.32%532 / 6392
🔵Statements7.99%543 / 6793
🔵Functions5.61%73 / 1300
🔵Branches6.14%230 / 3743
Generated in workflow #339 for commit a402b48 by the Vitest Coverage Report Action
@notgitika
notgitika
merged commit 0c03dc4
into
mainFeb 12, 2026

16 checks passed

@notgitika
notgitika
deleted the

fix/workflow-permissions

branch
February 12, 2026 22:53
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@notgitikanotgitikanotgitika approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@tejaskash@notgitika

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content
(function() {
function unstick() {
document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) {
if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {
el.style.position = 'static';
el.style.top = 'auto';
el.style.zIndex = 'auto';
}
});
}
unstick();
var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
})();
fix: add explicit permissions to CI workflows by tejaskash · Pull Request #309 · aws/agentcore-cli · GitHub
Skip to content
fix: add explicit permissions to CI workflows - #309
Merged
notgitika merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
fix/workflow-permissions
Feb 12, 2026
Merged
fix: add explicit permissions to CI workflows#309
notgitika merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
fix/workflow-permissions
Conversation
@tejaskash
@tejaskashtejaskash
commented
Feb 12, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
  • Add top-level permissions: contents: read to build-and-test.yml and lint.yml
  • Restricts GITHUB_TOKEN scope to least-privilege for all jobs
  • The coverage job in build-and-test.yml already has job-level permissions (pull-requests: write) which override the workflow-level default as needed
Resolves code scanning alerts #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9.
Test plan
  •  Verify build-and-test workflow passes (build + coverage jobs)
  •  Verify lint workflow passes (all 6 jobs)
  •  Confirm code scanning alerts are resolved after merge
@tejaskash
fix: add explicit permissions to CI workflows
a402b48
Add top-level `permissions: contents: read` to build-and-test and lint
workflows to restrict GITHUB_TOKEN scope. Resolves code scanning alerts
for missing workflow permissions.
@tejaskash
tejaskash
requested a review
from a teamFebruary 12, 2026 22:25
@github-actions
github-actionsBot
commented
Feb 12, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Coverage Report
StatusCategoryPercentageCovered / Total
🔵Lines8.32%532 / 6392
🔵Statements7.99%543 / 6793
🔵Functions5.61%73 / 1300
🔵Branches6.14%230 / 3743
Generated in workflow #339 for commit a402b48 by the Vitest Coverage Report Action
@notgitika
notgitika
merged commit 0c03dc4
into
mainFeb 12, 2026

16 checks passed

@notgitika
notgitika
deleted the

fix/workflow-permissions

branch
February 12, 2026 22:53
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@notgitikanotgitikanotgitika approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@tejaskash@notgitika