Clearer interaction of TensorFlowModel with new framework versions #1444

Description

@athewsey

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
We can create a sagemaker.tensorflow.model.TensorFlowModel for new versions of TensorFlow (e.g. 2.0, 2.1), but get a "container not found" error when trying to deploy() it.

Presumably this is because newer framework versions should make use of sagemaker.tensorflow.serving.Model instead, for the new-style TFServing based container instead of the old-style inference container?

Describe the solution you'd like
For these new TF versions where the old-style container isn't supported and there's no "choice", it would be best to make the core TensorFlowModel class produce a TFServing-based model.

Describe alternatives you've considered
Alternatively could raise errors on TensorFlowModel init with a new/unsupported framework version, and consider adding docs deprecation warnings to the old class suggesting the new serving-based class instead for modern framework versions.

Additional context
Clear, centralized documentation of SageMaker-provided framework container image URIs would also help, as it might be clearer what the SDK is trying to do wrong.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

    , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
     blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
    }
    } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
    })();
    (function(){
    try {
    var __m = "github.com";
    var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
    
    Skip to content

    Clearer interaction of TensorFlowModel with new framework versions #1444

    Description

    @athewsey

    Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
    We can create a sagemaker.tensorflow.model.TensorFlowModel for new versions of TensorFlow (e.g. 2.0, 2.1), but get a "container not found" error when trying to deploy() it.

    Presumably this is because newer framework versions should make use of sagemaker.tensorflow.serving.Model instead, for the new-style TFServing based container instead of the old-style inference container?

    Describe the solution you'd like
    For these new TF versions where the old-style container isn't supported and there's no "choice", it would be best to make the core TensorFlowModel class produce a TFServing-based model.

    Describe alternatives you've considered
    Alternatively could raise errors on TensorFlowModel init with a new/unsupported framework version, and consider adding docs deprecation warnings to the old class suggesting the new serving-based class instead for modern framework versions.

    Additional context
    Clear, centralized documentation of SageMaker-provided framework container image URIs would also help, as it might be clearer what the SDK is trying to do wrong.

    Metadata

    Metadata

    Assignees

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
      Skip to content

      Clearer interaction of TensorFlowModel with new framework versions #1444

      Description

      @athewsey

      Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
      We can create a sagemaker.tensorflow.model.TensorFlowModel for new versions of TensorFlow (e.g. 2.0, 2.1), but get a "container not found" error when trying to deploy() it.

      Presumably this is because newer framework versions should make use of sagemaker.tensorflow.serving.Model instead, for the new-style TFServing based container instead of the old-style inference container?

      Describe the solution you'd like
      For these new TF versions where the old-style container isn't supported and there's no "choice", it would be best to make the core TensorFlowModel class produce a TFServing-based model.

      Describe alternatives you've considered
      Alternatively could raise errors on TensorFlowModel init with a new/unsupported framework version, and consider adding docs deprecation warnings to the old class suggesting the new serving-based class instead for modern framework versions.

      Additional context
      Clear, centralized documentation of SageMaker-provided framework container image URIs would also help, as it might be clearer what the SDK is trying to do wrong.

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      Type

      No type

      Projects

      No projects

        Milestone

        No milestone

        Relationships

        None yet

        Development

        No branches or pull requests

        Issue actions

        , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
        Skip to content

        Clearer interaction of TensorFlowModel with new framework versions #1444

        Description

        @athewsey

        Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
        We can create a sagemaker.tensorflow.model.TensorFlowModel for new versions of TensorFlow (e.g. 2.0, 2.1), but get a "container not found" error when trying to deploy() it.

        Presumably this is because newer framework versions should make use of sagemaker.tensorflow.serving.Model instead, for the new-style TFServing based container instead of the old-style inference container?

        Describe the solution you'd like
        For these new TF versions where the old-style container isn't supported and there's no "choice", it would be best to make the core TensorFlowModel class produce a TFServing-based model.

        Describe alternatives you've considered
        Alternatively could raise errors on TensorFlowModel init with a new/unsupported framework version, and consider adding docs deprecation warnings to the old class suggesting the new serving-based class instead for modern framework versions.

        Additional context
        Clear, centralized documentation of SageMaker-provided framework container image URIs would also help, as it might be clearer what the SDK is trying to do wrong.

        Metadata

        Metadata

        Assignees

        Type

        No type

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
          Skip to content

          Clearer interaction of TensorFlowModel with new framework versions #1444

          Description

          @athewsey

          Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
          We can create a sagemaker.tensorflow.model.TensorFlowModel for new versions of TensorFlow (e.g. 2.0, 2.1), but get a "container not found" error when trying to deploy() it.

          Presumably this is because newer framework versions should make use of sagemaker.tensorflow.serving.Model instead, for the new-style TFServing based container instead of the old-style inference container?

          Describe the solution you'd like
          For these new TF versions where the old-style container isn't supported and there's no "choice", it would be best to make the core TensorFlowModel class produce a TFServing-based model.

          Describe alternatives you've considered
          Alternatively could raise errors on TensorFlowModel init with a new/unsupported framework version, and consider adding docs deprecation warnings to the old class suggesting the new serving-based class instead for modern framework versions.

          Additional context
          Clear, centralized documentation of SageMaker-provided framework container image URIs would also help, as it might be clearer what the SDK is trying to do wrong.

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          Type

          No type

          Projects

          No projects

            Milestone

            No milestone

            Relationships

            None yet

            Development

            No branches or pull requests

            Issue actions

            , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
            Skip to content

            Clearer interaction of TensorFlowModel with new framework versions #1444

            Description

            @athewsey

            Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
            We can create a sagemaker.tensorflow.model.TensorFlowModel for new versions of TensorFlow (e.g. 2.0, 2.1), but get a "container not found" error when trying to deploy() it.

            Presumably this is because newer framework versions should make use of sagemaker.tensorflow.serving.Model instead, for the new-style TFServing based container instead of the old-style inference container?

            Describe the solution you'd like
            For these new TF versions where the old-style container isn't supported and there's no "choice", it would be best to make the core TensorFlowModel class produce a TFServing-based model.

            Describe alternatives you've considered
            Alternatively could raise errors on TensorFlowModel init with a new/unsupported framework version, and consider adding docs deprecation warnings to the old class suggesting the new serving-based class instead for modern framework versions.

            Additional context
            Clear, centralized documentation of SageMaker-provided framework container image URIs would also help, as it might be clearer what the SDK is trying to do wrong.

            Metadata

            Metadata

            Assignees

            Type

            No type

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
              Skip to content

              Clearer interaction of TensorFlowModel with new framework versions #1444

              Description

              @athewsey

              Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
              We can create a sagemaker.tensorflow.model.TensorFlowModel for new versions of TensorFlow (e.g. 2.0, 2.1), but get a "container not found" error when trying to deploy() it.

              Presumably this is because newer framework versions should make use of sagemaker.tensorflow.serving.Model instead, for the new-style TFServing based container instead of the old-style inference container?

              Describe the solution you'd like
              For these new TF versions where the old-style container isn't supported and there's no "choice", it would be best to make the core TensorFlowModel class produce a TFServing-based model.

              Describe alternatives you've considered
              Alternatively could raise errors on TensorFlowModel init with a new/unsupported framework version, and consider adding docs deprecation warnings to the old class suggesting the new serving-based class instead for modern framework versions.

              Additional context
              Clear, centralized documentation of SageMaker-provided framework container image URIs would also help, as it might be clearer what the SDK is trying to do wrong.

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              Type

              No type

              Projects

              No projects

                Milestone

                No milestone

                Relationships

                None yet

                Development

                No branches or pull requests

                Issue actions

                , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
                Skip to content

                Clearer interaction of TensorFlowModel with new framework versions #1444

                Description

                @athewsey

                Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
                We can create a sagemaker.tensorflow.model.TensorFlowModel for new versions of TensorFlow (e.g. 2.0, 2.1), but get a "container not found" error when trying to deploy() it.

                Presumably this is because newer framework versions should make use of sagemaker.tensorflow.serving.Model instead, for the new-style TFServing based container instead of the old-style inference container?

                Describe the solution you'd like
                For these new TF versions where the old-style container isn't supported and there's no "choice", it would be best to make the core TensorFlowModel class produce a TFServing-based model.

                Describe alternatives you've considered
                Alternatively could raise errors on TensorFlowModel init with a new/unsupported framework version, and consider adding docs deprecation warnings to the old class suggesting the new serving-based class instead for modern framework versions.

                Additional context
                Clear, centralized documentation of SageMaker-provided framework container image URIs would also help, as it might be clearer what the SDK is trying to do wrong.

                Metadata

                Metadata

                Assignees

                Type

                No type

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  No milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions