Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
breaking: make instance_type optional for Airflow model configs - #1627
Conversation
sagemaker-bot
commented
Jun 24, 2020
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
sagemaker-bot
commented
Jun 24, 2020
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
sagemaker-bot
commented
Jun 24, 2020
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
sagemaker-bot
commented
Jun 24, 2020
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
sagemaker-bot
commented
Jun 25, 2020
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
sagemaker-bot
commented
Jun 25, 2020
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
sagemaker-bot
commented
Jun 25, 2020
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
sagemaker-bot
commented
Jun 25, 2020
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
Issue #, if available:
Description of changes:
This follows the work from #1567. It doesn't make sense to require
instance_typein these two Airflow methods when it's not always used.For the migration tool, I thought about not including
model_config()on its own since there's a Keras module namedmodel_config, but I couldn't find any function names that might collide. (Also, I tried searching GitHub to see what might be common ways of importing the function, but mostly just found people's forks/installations of our code.)Testing done:
unit tests, linters
Merge Checklist
Put an
xin the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your pull request.General
Tests
unique_name_from_baseto create resource names in integ tests (if appropriate)By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.