Skip to content

709/from imports - #760

Merged
f0rmiga merged 11 commits into
bazel-contrib:mainfrom
aptenodytes-forsteri:709/from-imports
Aug 4, 2022
Merged

709/from imports#760
f0rmiga merged 11 commits into
bazel-contrib:mainfrom
aptenodytes-forsteri:709/from-imports

Conversation

@aptenodytes-forsteri

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature (please, look at the "Scope of the project" section in the README.md file)
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

  • from foo import bar adds //foo as a dep instead of //foo/bar.
  • from foo.bar import baz adds //foo/bar as a dep instead of //foo/bar:baz (when //foo/bar:baz is a separate py_library that contains foo/bar/baz.py as a source).
  • from google.cloud import aiplatform does not add "@gazelle_python_test_google_cloud_aiplatform//:pkg", as a dep (fails to resolve from imports for pip packages).

Issue Number: #709

What is the new behavior?

When gazelle encounters from foo.bar import baz, try to resolve, in order from most specific to least specific:

foo.bar.baz
foo.bar
foo

This way, if foo.bar.baz is in the manifest file or in the index of existing rules (e.g. from a rule that contains the source file foo/bar/baz, it can be found). If foo.bar.baz can't be resolved, try foo.bar (maybe baz is just a function or variable in foo/bar.py).

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No - all existing tests continue to pass.

Other information

May want to consider antagonistic cases - are there cases where imports are truly ambiguous?

aptenodytes-forsteriand others added 5 commits July 16, 2022 23:32
- Add test case with `from __future__ import print_function`.
- Make sure that `from foo import bar, baz` works.
- Add test case for this.
Comment threadgazelle/testdata/invalid_imported_module/test.yaml Outdated
- Keep error the same as before.

@f0rmigaf0rmiga left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!!

@f0rmiga
f0rmiga merged commit ebeb822 into bazel-contrib:mainAug 4, 2022
@aptenodytes-forsteri
aptenodytes-forsteri deleted the 709/from-imports branch August 4, 2022 18:04
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@aptenodytes-forsteri@f0rmiga
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
709/from imports by aptenodytes-forsteri · Pull Request #760 · bazel-contrib/rules_python · GitHub
Skip to content

709/from imports - #760

Merged
f0rmiga merged 11 commits into
bazel-contrib:mainfrom
aptenodytes-forsteri:709/from-imports
Aug 4, 2022
Merged

709/from imports#760
f0rmiga merged 11 commits into
bazel-contrib:mainfrom
aptenodytes-forsteri:709/from-imports

Conversation

@aptenodytes-forsteri

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature (please, look at the "Scope of the project" section in the README.md file)
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

  • from foo import bar adds //foo as a dep instead of //foo/bar.
  • from foo.bar import baz adds //foo/bar as a dep instead of //foo/bar:baz (when //foo/bar:baz is a separate py_library that contains foo/bar/baz.py as a source).
  • from google.cloud import aiplatform does not add "@gazelle_python_test_google_cloud_aiplatform//:pkg", as a dep (fails to resolve from imports for pip packages).

Issue Number: #709

What is the new behavior?

When gazelle encounters from foo.bar import baz, try to resolve, in order from most specific to least specific:

foo.bar.baz
foo.bar
foo

This way, if foo.bar.baz is in the manifest file or in the index of existing rules (e.g. from a rule that contains the source file foo/bar/baz, it can be found). If foo.bar.baz can't be resolved, try foo.bar (maybe baz is just a function or variable in foo/bar.py).

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No - all existing tests continue to pass.

Other information

May want to consider antagonistic cases - are there cases where imports are truly ambiguous?

aptenodytes-forsteriand others added 5 commits July 16, 2022 23:32
- Add test case with `from __future__ import print_function`.
- Make sure that `from foo import bar, baz` works.
- Add test case for this.
Comment threadgazelle/testdata/invalid_imported_module/test.yaml Outdated
- Keep error the same as before.

@f0rmigaf0rmiga left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!!

@f0rmiga
f0rmiga merged commit ebeb822 into bazel-contrib:mainAug 4, 2022
@aptenodytes-forsteri
aptenodytes-forsteri deleted the 709/from-imports branch August 4, 2022 18:04
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@aptenodytes-forsteri@f0rmiga
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' 709/from imports by aptenodytes-forsteri · Pull Request #760 · bazel-contrib/rules_python · GitHub
Skip to content

709/from imports - #760

Merged
f0rmiga merged 11 commits into
bazel-contrib:mainfrom
aptenodytes-forsteri:709/from-imports
Aug 4, 2022
Merged

709/from imports#760
f0rmiga merged 11 commits into
bazel-contrib:mainfrom
aptenodytes-forsteri:709/from-imports

Conversation

@aptenodytes-forsteri

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature (please, look at the "Scope of the project" section in the README.md file)
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

  • from foo import bar adds //foo as a dep instead of //foo/bar.
  • from foo.bar import baz adds //foo/bar as a dep instead of //foo/bar:baz (when //foo/bar:baz is a separate py_library that contains foo/bar/baz.py as a source).
  • from google.cloud import aiplatform does not add "@gazelle_python_test_google_cloud_aiplatform//:pkg", as a dep (fails to resolve from imports for pip packages).

Issue Number: #709

What is the new behavior?

When gazelle encounters from foo.bar import baz, try to resolve, in order from most specific to least specific:

foo.bar.baz
foo.bar
foo

This way, if foo.bar.baz is in the manifest file or in the index of existing rules (e.g. from a rule that contains the source file foo/bar/baz, it can be found). If foo.bar.baz can't be resolved, try foo.bar (maybe baz is just a function or variable in foo/bar.py).

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No - all existing tests continue to pass.

Other information

May want to consider antagonistic cases - are there cases where imports are truly ambiguous?

aptenodytes-forsteriand others added 5 commits July 16, 2022 23:32
- Add test case with `from __future__ import print_function`.
- Make sure that `from foo import bar, baz` works.
- Add test case for this.
Comment threadgazelle/testdata/invalid_imported_module/test.yaml Outdated
- Keep error the same as before.

@f0rmigaf0rmiga left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!!

@f0rmiga
f0rmiga merged commit ebeb822 into bazel-contrib:mainAug 4, 2022
@aptenodytes-forsteri
aptenodytes-forsteri deleted the 709/from-imports branch August 4, 2022 18:04
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@aptenodytes-forsteri@f0rmiga
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' 709/from imports by aptenodytes-forsteri · Pull Request #760 · bazel-contrib/rules_python · GitHub
Skip to content

709/from imports - #760

Merged
f0rmiga merged 11 commits into
bazel-contrib:mainfrom
aptenodytes-forsteri:709/from-imports
Aug 4, 2022
Merged

709/from imports#760
f0rmiga merged 11 commits into
bazel-contrib:mainfrom
aptenodytes-forsteri:709/from-imports

Conversation

@aptenodytes-forsteri

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature (please, look at the "Scope of the project" section in the README.md file)
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

  • from foo import bar adds //foo as a dep instead of //foo/bar.
  • from foo.bar import baz adds //foo/bar as a dep instead of //foo/bar:baz (when //foo/bar:baz is a separate py_library that contains foo/bar/baz.py as a source).
  • from google.cloud import aiplatform does not add "@gazelle_python_test_google_cloud_aiplatform//:pkg", as a dep (fails to resolve from imports for pip packages).

Issue Number: #709

What is the new behavior?

When gazelle encounters from foo.bar import baz, try to resolve, in order from most specific to least specific:

foo.bar.baz
foo.bar
foo

This way, if foo.bar.baz is in the manifest file or in the index of existing rules (e.g. from a rule that contains the source file foo/bar/baz, it can be found). If foo.bar.baz can't be resolved, try foo.bar (maybe baz is just a function or variable in foo/bar.py).

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No - all existing tests continue to pass.

Other information

May want to consider antagonistic cases - are there cases where imports are truly ambiguous?

aptenodytes-forsteriand others added 5 commits July 16, 2022 23:32
- Add test case with `from __future__ import print_function`.
- Make sure that `from foo import bar, baz` works.
- Add test case for this.
Comment threadgazelle/testdata/invalid_imported_module/test.yaml Outdated
- Keep error the same as before.

@f0rmigaf0rmiga left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!!

@f0rmiga
f0rmiga merged commit ebeb822 into bazel-contrib:mainAug 4, 2022
@aptenodytes-forsteri
aptenodytes-forsteri deleted the 709/from-imports branch August 4, 2022 18:04
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@aptenodytes-forsteri@f0rmiga
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' 709/from imports by aptenodytes-forsteri · Pull Request #760 · bazel-contrib/rules_python · GitHub
Skip to content

709/from imports - #760

Merged
f0rmiga merged 11 commits into
bazel-contrib:mainfrom
aptenodytes-forsteri:709/from-imports
Aug 4, 2022
Merged

709/from imports#760
f0rmiga merged 11 commits into
bazel-contrib:mainfrom
aptenodytes-forsteri:709/from-imports

Conversation

@aptenodytes-forsteri

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature (please, look at the "Scope of the project" section in the README.md file)
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

  • from foo import bar adds //foo as a dep instead of //foo/bar.
  • from foo.bar import baz adds //foo/bar as a dep instead of //foo/bar:baz (when //foo/bar:baz is a separate py_library that contains foo/bar/baz.py as a source).
  • from google.cloud import aiplatform does not add "@gazelle_python_test_google_cloud_aiplatform//:pkg", as a dep (fails to resolve from imports for pip packages).

Issue Number: #709

What is the new behavior?

When gazelle encounters from foo.bar import baz, try to resolve, in order from most specific to least specific:

foo.bar.baz
foo.bar
foo

This way, if foo.bar.baz is in the manifest file or in the index of existing rules (e.g. from a rule that contains the source file foo/bar/baz, it can be found). If foo.bar.baz can't be resolved, try foo.bar (maybe baz is just a function or variable in foo/bar.py).

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No - all existing tests continue to pass.

Other information

May want to consider antagonistic cases - are there cases where imports are truly ambiguous?

aptenodytes-forsteriand others added 5 commits July 16, 2022 23:32
- Add test case with `from __future__ import print_function`.
- Make sure that `from foo import bar, baz` works.
- Add test case for this.
Comment threadgazelle/testdata/invalid_imported_module/test.yaml Outdated
- Keep error the same as before.

@f0rmigaf0rmiga left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!!

@f0rmiga
f0rmiga merged commit ebeb822 into bazel-contrib:mainAug 4, 2022
@aptenodytes-forsteri
aptenodytes-forsteri deleted the 709/from-imports branch August 4, 2022 18:04
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@aptenodytes-forsteri@f0rmiga
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' 709/from imports by aptenodytes-forsteri · Pull Request #760 · bazel-contrib/rules_python · GitHub
Skip to content

709/from imports - #760

Merged
f0rmiga merged 11 commits into
bazel-contrib:mainfrom
aptenodytes-forsteri:709/from-imports
Aug 4, 2022
Merged

709/from imports#760
f0rmiga merged 11 commits into
bazel-contrib:mainfrom
aptenodytes-forsteri:709/from-imports

Conversation

@aptenodytes-forsteri

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature (please, look at the "Scope of the project" section in the README.md file)
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

  • from foo import bar adds //foo as a dep instead of //foo/bar.
  • from foo.bar import baz adds //foo/bar as a dep instead of //foo/bar:baz (when //foo/bar:baz is a separate py_library that contains foo/bar/baz.py as a source).
  • from google.cloud import aiplatform does not add "@gazelle_python_test_google_cloud_aiplatform//:pkg", as a dep (fails to resolve from imports for pip packages).

Issue Number: #709

What is the new behavior?

When gazelle encounters from foo.bar import baz, try to resolve, in order from most specific to least specific:

foo.bar.baz
foo.bar
foo

This way, if foo.bar.baz is in the manifest file or in the index of existing rules (e.g. from a rule that contains the source file foo/bar/baz, it can be found). If foo.bar.baz can't be resolved, try foo.bar (maybe baz is just a function or variable in foo/bar.py).

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No - all existing tests continue to pass.

Other information

May want to consider antagonistic cases - are there cases where imports are truly ambiguous?

aptenodytes-forsteriand others added 5 commits July 16, 2022 23:32
- Add test case with `from __future__ import print_function`.
- Make sure that `from foo import bar, baz` works.
- Add test case for this.
Comment threadgazelle/testdata/invalid_imported_module/test.yaml Outdated
- Keep error the same as before.

@f0rmigaf0rmiga left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!!

@f0rmiga
f0rmiga merged commit ebeb822 into bazel-contrib:mainAug 4, 2022
@aptenodytes-forsteri
aptenodytes-forsteri deleted the 709/from-imports branch August 4, 2022 18:04
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@aptenodytes-forsteri@f0rmiga
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' 709/from imports by aptenodytes-forsteri · Pull Request #760 · bazel-contrib/rules_python · GitHub
Skip to content

709/from imports - #760

Merged
f0rmiga merged 11 commits into
bazel-contrib:mainfrom
aptenodytes-forsteri:709/from-imports
Aug 4, 2022
Merged

709/from imports#760
f0rmiga merged 11 commits into
bazel-contrib:mainfrom
aptenodytes-forsteri:709/from-imports

Conversation

@aptenodytes-forsteri

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature (please, look at the "Scope of the project" section in the README.md file)
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

  • from foo import bar adds //foo as a dep instead of //foo/bar.
  • from foo.bar import baz adds //foo/bar as a dep instead of //foo/bar:baz (when //foo/bar:baz is a separate py_library that contains foo/bar/baz.py as a source).
  • from google.cloud import aiplatform does not add "@gazelle_python_test_google_cloud_aiplatform//:pkg", as a dep (fails to resolve from imports for pip packages).

Issue Number: #709

What is the new behavior?

When gazelle encounters from foo.bar import baz, try to resolve, in order from most specific to least specific:

foo.bar.baz
foo.bar
foo

This way, if foo.bar.baz is in the manifest file or in the index of existing rules (e.g. from a rule that contains the source file foo/bar/baz, it can be found). If foo.bar.baz can't be resolved, try foo.bar (maybe baz is just a function or variable in foo/bar.py).

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No - all existing tests continue to pass.

Other information

May want to consider antagonistic cases - are there cases where imports are truly ambiguous?

aptenodytes-forsteriand others added 5 commits July 16, 2022 23:32
- Add test case with `from __future__ import print_function`.
- Make sure that `from foo import bar, baz` works.
- Add test case for this.
Comment threadgazelle/testdata/invalid_imported_module/test.yaml Outdated
- Keep error the same as before.

@f0rmigaf0rmiga left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!!

@f0rmiga
f0rmiga merged commit ebeb822 into bazel-contrib:mainAug 4, 2022
@aptenodytes-forsteri
aptenodytes-forsteri deleted the 709/from-imports branch August 4, 2022 18:04
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@aptenodytes-forsteri@f0rmiga
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); 709/from imports by aptenodytes-forsteri · Pull Request #760 · bazel-contrib/rules_python · GitHub
Skip to content

709/from imports - #760

Merged
f0rmiga merged 11 commits into
bazel-contrib:mainfrom
aptenodytes-forsteri:709/from-imports
Aug 4, 2022
Merged

709/from imports#760
f0rmiga merged 11 commits into
bazel-contrib:mainfrom
aptenodytes-forsteri:709/from-imports

Conversation

@aptenodytes-forsteri

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature (please, look at the "Scope of the project" section in the README.md file)
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

  • from foo import bar adds //foo as a dep instead of //foo/bar.
  • from foo.bar import baz adds //foo/bar as a dep instead of //foo/bar:baz (when //foo/bar:baz is a separate py_library that contains foo/bar/baz.py as a source).
  • from google.cloud import aiplatform does not add "@gazelle_python_test_google_cloud_aiplatform//:pkg", as a dep (fails to resolve from imports for pip packages).

Issue Number: #709

What is the new behavior?

When gazelle encounters from foo.bar import baz, try to resolve, in order from most specific to least specific:

foo.bar.baz
foo.bar
foo

This way, if foo.bar.baz is in the manifest file or in the index of existing rules (e.g. from a rule that contains the source file foo/bar/baz, it can be found). If foo.bar.baz can't be resolved, try foo.bar (maybe baz is just a function or variable in foo/bar.py).

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No - all existing tests continue to pass.

Other information

May want to consider antagonistic cases - are there cases where imports are truly ambiguous?

aptenodytes-forsteriand others added 5 commits July 16, 2022 23:32
- Add test case with `from __future__ import print_function`.
- Make sure that `from foo import bar, baz` works.
- Add test case for this.
Comment threadgazelle/testdata/invalid_imported_module/test.yaml Outdated
- Keep error the same as before.

@f0rmigaf0rmiga left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!!

@f0rmiga
f0rmiga merged commit ebeb822 into bazel-contrib:mainAug 4, 2022
@aptenodytes-forsteri
aptenodytes-forsteri deleted the 709/from-imports branch August 4, 2022 18:04
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@aptenodytes-forsteri@f0rmiga