Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is a local java repository necessarily reproducible?
We detect the java_home from environment variables if not explicitly set. Even with an explicit
java_home, what if it points to a symlink (that can change under us)?Does it even make sense to cache a local repo like this remotely?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe a repo that has a symlink to a absolute on-host location will get cached in the local repo contents cache but not the remote one (but @fmeum can confirm!)
I do think it would be safer/more obviously correct not to cache this one, but I'd also hope that it's completely lazy and that we don't force/autoregister the autodetecting toolchain for this language the way rules_cc and others do, though I haven't verified :/
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It should generally be safe to mark such repos reproducible since there "contents" are just the symlink to an absolute path, where the path is determines by attributes.
Whether both caches behave correctly in this case is not something I have checked yet, but if not, that just means they are buggy.