fix: avoid duplicate package suffix in Go benchmarks [#336]

[ktrz]

resolves#336

• Fixes duplicate suffixes for users who worked around Golang Benchmarks don't take Package Name into consideration #264 by including
  package names in benchmark names
• Detects when benchmark name already contains package reference (full
  path, underscored, or ≥2 trailing segments) and skips suffix
• Adds go-force-package-suffix option to always append suffix regardless of
  detection

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Added a Go option to force appending package path suffixes to benchmark names (with safeguards to avoid duplicate suffixes).

• Documentation

  • README updated with the new Go configuration option.
  • New GitHub Issues Skill guide added for CLI-based issue workflows.

• Tests

  • Added and extended tests covering package-suffix behavior and configuration parsing.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0ad1f40 and a54e7ac.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• action-types.yml

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Adds a new boolean input go-force-package-suffix across action metadata and types, exposes it in runtime config, and updates Go benchmark extraction to conditionally append package suffixes (with a force option). Tests and README are updated; an unrelated skill doc was added.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Action metadata & docs action.yml, action-types.yml, README.md, .claude/skills/github-issues/SKILL.md	Declare new input go-force-package-suffix (boolean, default false) and document the option; added an unrelated GitHub Issues skill doc.
Configuration src/config.ts	Add goForcePackageSuffix: boolean to exported Config; read value from input via getBoolInput('go-force-package-suffix').
Extraction logic src/extract.ts	Introduce GoExtractOptions and containsPackageRef() helper; change extractGoResult() signature to accept options and conditionally append package suffix based on forcePackageSuffix or detection.
Tests test/config.spec.ts, test/extractGoResult.spec.ts, test/write.spec.ts	Add config parsing tests for the new input; add many cases validating suffix detection, edge cases, Windows line endings, multi-package inputs, and force behavior; update test configs to include the new field.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes

Possibly related issues

• Go benchmarks: Avoid duplicating package name when workaround already applied #336: Implements package-ref detection and conditional suffixing in extractGoResult, matching this PR's objective to avoid duplicate Go package suffixes.

Possibly related PRs

• fix: include package name for duplicate bench names [#264] #330: Modifies extractGoResult handling of Go benchmark package suffixes; closely related to the extraction logic changes here.

Suggested reviewers

• NachoVazquez

Poem

🐰 A suffix tale in code tonight,
Go names prance under test-run light.
If packages peek where names already be,
A clever check will set them free.
Force the flag, and let suffixes sing—hooray! 🎉

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The PR title clearly and concisely describes the main change: fixing duplicate package suffixes in Go benchmarks, directly addressing issue #336.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch fix/336-avoid-duplicate-package-suffix

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 89.24%. Comparing base (7e8372b) to head (a54e7ac).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #337 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 89.13% 89.24% +0.11% 
==========================================
Files 16 16 Lines 948 958 +10 Branches 201 205 +4 ==========================================
+ Hits 845 855 +10 
Misses 103 103 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[ktrz]

Hey @gaby, @ReneWerner87

Before I publish the new version, I wanted to make sure that it doesn't break your existing workaround by adding this new feature for including the package name.

There is a separate action input to force it to use the package names when possible, but if it finds the package name in the benchmark name, it won't do it. Chris, could you have a look at this PR and give me a green light that it should work as expected for gofiber?

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Around line 535-547: The MD003 warning is because the new input section uses
ATX "#### `go-force-package-suffix` (Optional)" instead of the expected setext
style; change the heading for the `go-force-package-suffix` section to setext
style by replacing the ATX heading with the plain heading text
"go-force-package-suffix (Optional)" followed by an underline of '=' (or '-' for
subheading) on the next line so markdownlint MD003 passes, or alternatively
adjust the lint rule if setext is not desired.

---

ℹ️ Review info

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7e8372b and 0ad1f40.

📒 Files selected for processing (8)

• .claude/skills/github-issues/SKILL.md
• README.md
• action.yml
• src/config.ts
• src/extract.ts
• test/config.spec.ts
• test/extractGoResult.spec.ts
• test/write.spec.ts

[ReneWerner87]

lets see
gofiber/fiber#4108
https://github.com/gofiber/fiber/actions/runs/22349967774/job/64674240847?pr=4108

[ReneWerner87]

https://github.com/gofiber/fiber/actions/runs/22352009343/job/64681321065?pr=4108
looks good

[ReneWerner87]

@ktrz

[ktrz]

Sorry, busy week. I'll get this in over the week.