Update bdk dependency to 0.22 - #118

Merged
notmandatory merged 1 commit into
bitcoindevkit:masterfrom
notmandatory:update_bdk022
Sep 9, 2022
Merged

Update bdk dependency to 0.22#118
notmandatory merged 1 commit into
bitcoindevkit:masterfrom
notmandatory:update_bdk022

Conversation

@notmandatory

@notmandatorynotmandatory commented Sep 5, 2022•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

  • Update bdk and bdk-reserves to v0.22.0.
  • Change rpc --skip-blocks option to --start-time which specifies time initial sync will start scanning from.

Notes to the reviewers

I haven't verified the bits and bytes of the new reserves PSBT in the tests. I assume it's different for the same reason as the other tests in bdk-reserves when we switched to bdk 0.22, but I could use some help confirming that.

This is draft until bdk and bdk-reservers v0.22 are published.

Checklists

All Submissions:

  • I've signed all my commits
  • I followed the contribution guidelines
  • I ran cargo fmt and cargo clippy before committing

@notmandatorynotmandatory self-assigned this Sep 5, 2022
@notmandatorynotmandatory added this to the Release 0.6.0 milestone Sep 5, 2022
@notmandatory
notmandatoryforce-pushed the update_bdk022 branch 8 times, most recently from b1e4b0e to 54036b3CompareSeptember 5, 2022 21:08
@notmandatory
notmandatory marked this pull request as draft September 5, 2022 21:27
@notmandatorynotmandatory mentioned this pull request Sep 5, 2022
Closed
21 tasks
rajarshimaitra
rajarshimaitra reviewed Sep 6, 2022
View reviewed changes

@rajarshimaitrarajarshimaitra left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tACK c013266

Thanks for the PR, I probably misunderstood the new update process.. I should have made the update as a fresh PR itself.. This is much cleaner..

I verified that the psbt only changed in omitted partial signatures.

From this PR

Input {
non_witness_utxo: None,
witness_utxo: Some(
TxOut {
value: 100000,
script_pubkey: Script(OP_0 OP_PUSHBYTES_20 ece526571053da86454c9e066779eaf9d1502e6a),
},
),
partial_sigs: {},
sighash_type: None,

From master

Input {
non_witness_utxo: None,
witness_utxo: Some(
TxOut {
value: 10000,
script_pubkey: Script(OP_0 OP_PUSHBYTES_20 ece526571053da86454c9e066779eaf9d1502e6a),
},
),
partial_sigs: {
PublicKey {
compressed: true,
inner: PublicKey(
e38744d6bf154145115968917eae5d57e20393653d93844a6938ec8b0758052bbd4f42a158da428c7a96a02ec380440540f08979145cb9216fade06e3088a5e1,
),
}: EcdsaSig {
sig: 30450221009c2f349bd0e1a366dbe201a11b7f567b1018576510e8b3cc60d5c79a51f7a34c022000c22e1bc207fc26cfe7d4c792779dea0e8e848b1e94dcebfc9ac29ec4c58a5b,
hash_ty: All,
},
},
sighash_type: None,
redeem_script: None,

@notmandatorynotmandatory mentioned this pull request Sep 6, 2022
Merged
6 tasks
@notmandatorynotmandatory mentioned this pull request Sep 8, 2022
Merged
notmandatory added a commit to bitcoindevkit/bdk-reserves that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2022
@notmandatory
Merge#11: Update bdk dependency to 0.22
6f742ff
1bf97ec Add cargo update step to CI Build and Test (Steve Myers)
e08ea81 Update bdk dependency to 0.22 (Steve Myers)
Pull request description:
This update also required recalculating the PSBT proofs due to BDK removing partial signatures, see bitcoindevkit/bdk-cli#118 (review).
Once this PR is merged I'll publish a new `bdk-reserves` release version `0.22.0`.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 972e51e9ab8dbbff869ce1b8916abf7781e3b30ac671bb719e82d8803b8c56aa3cff723762d2c771cb17bc6d71296bff7c9fee93312316d1162d18f99f35fbee
@notmandatory
notmandatory marked this pull request as ready for review September 8, 2022 17:43
@notmandatory

notmandatory commented Sep 8, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I've updated with newly published bdk and bdk-reserves version 0.22, PR now ready for final review/approval.

rajarshimaitra
rajarshimaitra approved these changes Sep 9, 2022
View reviewed changes

@rajarshimaitrarajarshimaitra left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK e8b2028

This is good to go..

@notmandatory
notmandatory merged commit 99a329f into bitcoindevkit:masterSep 9, 2022
@notmandatorynotmandatory mentioned this pull request Sep 13, 2022
Closed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

1 more reviewer
@rajarshimaitrarajarshimaitrarajarshimaitra approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

@notmandatorynotmandatory

Labels

None yet

Projects

BDK-CLI
Archived in project

Milestone

Release 0.6.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@notmandatory@rajarshimaitra
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

Skip to content
Update bdk dependency to 0.22 - #118
Merged
notmandatory merged 1 commit into
bitcoindevkit:masterfrom 
notmandatory:update_bdk022
Sep 9, 2022
Merged
Update bdk dependency to 0.22#118
notmandatory merged 1 commit into
bitcoindevkit:masterfrom 
notmandatory:update_bdk022
Conversation
@notmandatory
@notmandatorynotmandatory
commented
Sep 5, 2022•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Description
  • Update bdk and bdk-reserves to v0.22.0.
  • Change rpc --skip-blocks option to --start-time which specifies time initial sync will start scanning from.
Notes to the reviewers
I haven't verified the bits and bytes of the new reserves PSBT in the tests. I assume it's different for the same reason as the other tests in bdk-reserves when we switched to bdk 0.22, but I could use some help confirming that.
This is draft until bdk and bdk-reservers v0.22 are published.
Checklists
All Submissions:
  •  I've signed all my commits
  •  I followed the contribution guidelines
  •  I ran cargo fmt and cargo clippy before committing
@notmandatorynotmandatory
self-assigned this
Sep 5, 2022
@notmandatorynotmandatory
added this to the Release 0.6.0 milestone
Sep 5, 2022
@notmandatory
notmandatoryforce-pushed
the
update_bdk022
branch
8 times, most recently
from
b1e4b0e to
54036b3CompareSeptember 5, 2022 21:08
@notmandatory
notmandatory
marked this pull request as draft
September 5, 2022 21:27
@notmandatorynotmandatory
mentioned this pull request
Sep 5, 2022

Closed

21 tasks
rajarshimaitra
rajarshimaitra
reviewed
Sep 6, 2022
View reviewed changes
@rajarshimaitrarajarshimaitra
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tACK c013266
Thanks for the PR, I probably misunderstood the new update process.. I should have made the update as a fresh PR itself.. This is much cleaner..
I verified that the psbt only changed in omitted partial signatures.
From this PR
Input {
non_witness_utxo: None,
witness_utxo: Some(
TxOut {
value: 100000,
script_pubkey: Script(OP_0 OP_PUSHBYTES_20 ece526571053da86454c9e066779eaf9d1502e6a),
},
),
partial_sigs: {},
sighash_type: None,

From master
Input {
non_witness_utxo: None,
witness_utxo: Some(
TxOut {
value: 10000,
script_pubkey: Script(OP_0 OP_PUSHBYTES_20 ece526571053da86454c9e066779eaf9d1502e6a),
},
),
partial_sigs: {
PublicKey {
compressed: true,
inner: PublicKey(
e38744d6bf154145115968917eae5d57e20393653d93844a6938ec8b0758052bbd4f42a158da428c7a96a02ec380440540f08979145cb9216fade06e3088a5e1,
),
}: EcdsaSig {
sig: 30450221009c2f349bd0e1a366dbe201a11b7f567b1018576510e8b3cc60d5c79a51f7a34c022000c22e1bc207fc26cfe7d4c792779dea0e8e848b1e94dcebfc9ac29ec4c58a5b,
hash_ty: All,
},
},
sighash_type: None,
redeem_script: None,

@notmandatorynotmandatory
mentioned this pull request
Sep 6, 2022
 Merged

6 tasks
@notmandatorynotmandatory
mentioned this pull request
Sep 8, 2022
 Merged

notmandatory added a commit
to bitcoindevkit/bdk-reserves
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 8, 2022
@notmandatory
Merge#11: Update bdk dependency to 0.22
6f742ff
1bf97ec Add cargo update step to CI Build and Test (Steve Myers)
e08ea81 Update bdk dependency to 0.22 (Steve Myers)
Pull request description:
This update also required recalculating the PSBT proofs due to BDK removing partial signatures, see bitcoindevkit/bdk-cli#118 (review).
Once this PR is merged I'll publish a new `bdk-reserves` release version `0.22.0`.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 972e51e9ab8dbbff869ce1b8916abf7781e3b30ac671bb719e82d8803b8c56aa3cff723762d2c771cb17bc6d71296bff7c9fee93312316d1162d18f99f35fbee
@notmandatory
notmandatory
marked this pull request as ready for review
September 8, 2022 17:43
@notmandatory
notmandatory
commented
Sep 8, 2022

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
I've updated with newly published bdk and bdk-reserves version 0.22, PR now ready for final review/approval.
rajarshimaitra
rajarshimaitra
approved these changes
Sep 9, 2022
View reviewed changes
@rajarshimaitrarajarshimaitra
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK e8b2028
This is good to go..
@notmandatory
notmandatory
merged commit 99a329f
into
bitcoindevkit:masterSep 9, 2022
@notmandatorynotmandatory
mentioned this pull request
Sep 13, 2022

Closed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


1 more reviewer

@rajarshimaitrarajarshimaitrarajarshimaitra approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

@notmandatorynotmandatory

Labels


None yet


Projects

BDK-CLI

Archived in project


Milestone

Release 0.6.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@notmandatory@rajarshimaitra

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Update bdk dependency to 0.22 - #118
Merged
notmandatory merged 1 commit into
bitcoindevkit:masterfrom 
notmandatory:update_bdk022
Sep 9, 2022
Merged
Update bdk dependency to 0.22#118
notmandatory merged 1 commit into
bitcoindevkit:masterfrom 
notmandatory:update_bdk022
Conversation
@notmandatory
@notmandatorynotmandatory
commented
Sep 5, 2022•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Description
  • Update bdk and bdk-reserves to v0.22.0.
  • Change rpc --skip-blocks option to --start-time which specifies time initial sync will start scanning from.
Notes to the reviewers
I haven't verified the bits and bytes of the new reserves PSBT in the tests. I assume it's different for the same reason as the other tests in bdk-reserves when we switched to bdk 0.22, but I could use some help confirming that.
This is draft until bdk and bdk-reservers v0.22 are published.
Checklists
All Submissions:
  •  I've signed all my commits
  •  I followed the contribution guidelines
  •  I ran cargo fmt and cargo clippy before committing
@notmandatorynotmandatory
self-assigned this
Sep 5, 2022
@notmandatorynotmandatory
added this to the Release 0.6.0 milestone
Sep 5, 2022
@notmandatory
notmandatoryforce-pushed
the
update_bdk022
branch
8 times, most recently
from
b1e4b0e to
54036b3CompareSeptember 5, 2022 21:08
@notmandatory
notmandatory
marked this pull request as draft
September 5, 2022 21:27
@notmandatorynotmandatory
mentioned this pull request
Sep 5, 2022

Closed

21 tasks
rajarshimaitra
rajarshimaitra
reviewed
Sep 6, 2022
View reviewed changes
@rajarshimaitrarajarshimaitra
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tACK c013266
Thanks for the PR, I probably misunderstood the new update process.. I should have made the update as a fresh PR itself.. This is much cleaner..
I verified that the psbt only changed in omitted partial signatures.
From this PR
Input {
non_witness_utxo: None,
witness_utxo: Some(
TxOut {
value: 100000,
script_pubkey: Script(OP_0 OP_PUSHBYTES_20 ece526571053da86454c9e066779eaf9d1502e6a),
},
),
partial_sigs: {},
sighash_type: None,

From master
Input {
non_witness_utxo: None,
witness_utxo: Some(
TxOut {
value: 10000,
script_pubkey: Script(OP_0 OP_PUSHBYTES_20 ece526571053da86454c9e066779eaf9d1502e6a),
},
),
partial_sigs: {
PublicKey {
compressed: true,
inner: PublicKey(
e38744d6bf154145115968917eae5d57e20393653d93844a6938ec8b0758052bbd4f42a158da428c7a96a02ec380440540f08979145cb9216fade06e3088a5e1,
),
}: EcdsaSig {
sig: 30450221009c2f349bd0e1a366dbe201a11b7f567b1018576510e8b3cc60d5c79a51f7a34c022000c22e1bc207fc26cfe7d4c792779dea0e8e848b1e94dcebfc9ac29ec4c58a5b,
hash_ty: All,
},
},
sighash_type: None,
redeem_script: None,

@notmandatorynotmandatory
mentioned this pull request
Sep 6, 2022
 Merged

6 tasks
@notmandatorynotmandatory
mentioned this pull request
Sep 8, 2022
 Merged

notmandatory added a commit
to bitcoindevkit/bdk-reserves
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 8, 2022
@notmandatory
Merge#11: Update bdk dependency to 0.22
6f742ff
1bf97ec Add cargo update step to CI Build and Test (Steve Myers)
e08ea81 Update bdk dependency to 0.22 (Steve Myers)
Pull request description:
This update also required recalculating the PSBT proofs due to BDK removing partial signatures, see bitcoindevkit/bdk-cli#118 (review).
Once this PR is merged I'll publish a new `bdk-reserves` release version `0.22.0`.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 972e51e9ab8dbbff869ce1b8916abf7781e3b30ac671bb719e82d8803b8c56aa3cff723762d2c771cb17bc6d71296bff7c9fee93312316d1162d18f99f35fbee
@notmandatory
notmandatory
marked this pull request as ready for review
September 8, 2022 17:43
@notmandatory
notmandatory
commented
Sep 8, 2022

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
I've updated with newly published bdk and bdk-reserves version 0.22, PR now ready for final review/approval.
rajarshimaitra
rajarshimaitra
approved these changes
Sep 9, 2022
View reviewed changes
@rajarshimaitrarajarshimaitra
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK e8b2028
This is good to go..
@notmandatory
notmandatory
merged commit 99a329f
into
bitcoindevkit:masterSep 9, 2022
@notmandatorynotmandatory
mentioned this pull request
Sep 13, 2022

Closed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


1 more reviewer

@rajarshimaitrarajarshimaitrarajarshimaitra approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

@notmandatorynotmandatory

Labels


None yet


Projects

BDK-CLI

Archived in project


Milestone

Release 0.6.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@notmandatory@rajarshimaitra

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Update bdk dependency to 0.22 - #118
Merged
notmandatory merged 1 commit into
bitcoindevkit:masterfrom 
notmandatory:update_bdk022
Sep 9, 2022
Merged
Update bdk dependency to 0.22#118
notmandatory merged 1 commit into
bitcoindevkit:masterfrom 
notmandatory:update_bdk022
Conversation
@notmandatory
@notmandatorynotmandatory
commented
Sep 5, 2022•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Description
  • Update bdk and bdk-reserves to v0.22.0.
  • Change rpc --skip-blocks option to --start-time which specifies time initial sync will start scanning from.
Notes to the reviewers
I haven't verified the bits and bytes of the new reserves PSBT in the tests. I assume it's different for the same reason as the other tests in bdk-reserves when we switched to bdk 0.22, but I could use some help confirming that.
This is draft until bdk and bdk-reservers v0.22 are published.
Checklists
All Submissions:
  •  I've signed all my commits
  •  I followed the contribution guidelines
  •  I ran cargo fmt and cargo clippy before committing
@notmandatorynotmandatory
self-assigned this
Sep 5, 2022
@notmandatorynotmandatory
added this to the Release 0.6.0 milestone
Sep 5, 2022
@notmandatory
notmandatoryforce-pushed
the
update_bdk022
branch
8 times, most recently
from
b1e4b0e to
54036b3CompareSeptember 5, 2022 21:08
@notmandatory
notmandatory
marked this pull request as draft
September 5, 2022 21:27
@notmandatorynotmandatory
mentioned this pull request
Sep 5, 2022

Closed

21 tasks
rajarshimaitra
rajarshimaitra
reviewed
Sep 6, 2022
View reviewed changes
@rajarshimaitrarajarshimaitra
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tACK c013266
Thanks for the PR, I probably misunderstood the new update process.. I should have made the update as a fresh PR itself.. This is much cleaner..
I verified that the psbt only changed in omitted partial signatures.
From this PR
Input {
non_witness_utxo: None,
witness_utxo: Some(
TxOut {
value: 100000,
script_pubkey: Script(OP_0 OP_PUSHBYTES_20 ece526571053da86454c9e066779eaf9d1502e6a),
},
),
partial_sigs: {},
sighash_type: None,

From master
Input {
non_witness_utxo: None,
witness_utxo: Some(
TxOut {
value: 10000,
script_pubkey: Script(OP_0 OP_PUSHBYTES_20 ece526571053da86454c9e066779eaf9d1502e6a),
},
),
partial_sigs: {
PublicKey {
compressed: true,
inner: PublicKey(
e38744d6bf154145115968917eae5d57e20393653d93844a6938ec8b0758052bbd4f42a158da428c7a96a02ec380440540f08979145cb9216fade06e3088a5e1,
),
}: EcdsaSig {
sig: 30450221009c2f349bd0e1a366dbe201a11b7f567b1018576510e8b3cc60d5c79a51f7a34c022000c22e1bc207fc26cfe7d4c792779dea0e8e848b1e94dcebfc9ac29ec4c58a5b,
hash_ty: All,
},
},
sighash_type: None,
redeem_script: None,

@notmandatorynotmandatory
mentioned this pull request
Sep 6, 2022
 Merged

6 tasks
@notmandatorynotmandatory
mentioned this pull request
Sep 8, 2022
 Merged

notmandatory added a commit
to bitcoindevkit/bdk-reserves
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 8, 2022
@notmandatory
Merge#11: Update bdk dependency to 0.22
6f742ff
1bf97ec Add cargo update step to CI Build and Test (Steve Myers)
e08ea81 Update bdk dependency to 0.22 (Steve Myers)
Pull request description:
This update also required recalculating the PSBT proofs due to BDK removing partial signatures, see bitcoindevkit/bdk-cli#118 (review).
Once this PR is merged I'll publish a new `bdk-reserves` release version `0.22.0`.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 972e51e9ab8dbbff869ce1b8916abf7781e3b30ac671bb719e82d8803b8c56aa3cff723762d2c771cb17bc6d71296bff7c9fee93312316d1162d18f99f35fbee
@notmandatory
notmandatory
marked this pull request as ready for review
September 8, 2022 17:43
@notmandatory
notmandatory
commented
Sep 8, 2022

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
I've updated with newly published bdk and bdk-reserves version 0.22, PR now ready for final review/approval.
rajarshimaitra
rajarshimaitra
approved these changes
Sep 9, 2022
View reviewed changes
@rajarshimaitrarajarshimaitra
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK e8b2028
This is good to go..
@notmandatory
notmandatory
merged commit 99a329f
into
bitcoindevkit:masterSep 9, 2022
@notmandatorynotmandatory
mentioned this pull request
Sep 13, 2022

Closed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


1 more reviewer

@rajarshimaitrarajarshimaitrarajarshimaitra approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

@notmandatorynotmandatory

Labels


None yet


Projects

BDK-CLI

Archived in project


Milestone

Release 0.6.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@notmandatory@rajarshimaitra

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

Skip to content
Update bdk dependency to 0.22 - #118
Merged
notmandatory merged 1 commit into
bitcoindevkit:masterfrom 
notmandatory:update_bdk022
Sep 9, 2022
Merged
Update bdk dependency to 0.22#118
notmandatory merged 1 commit into
bitcoindevkit:masterfrom 
notmandatory:update_bdk022
Conversation
@notmandatory
@notmandatorynotmandatory
commented
Sep 5, 2022•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Description
  • Update bdk and bdk-reserves to v0.22.0.
  • Change rpc --skip-blocks option to --start-time which specifies time initial sync will start scanning from.
Notes to the reviewers
I haven't verified the bits and bytes of the new reserves PSBT in the tests. I assume it's different for the same reason as the other tests in bdk-reserves when we switched to bdk 0.22, but I could use some help confirming that.
This is draft until bdk and bdk-reservers v0.22 are published.
Checklists
All Submissions:
  •  I've signed all my commits
  •  I followed the contribution guidelines
  •  I ran cargo fmt and cargo clippy before committing
@notmandatorynotmandatory
self-assigned this
Sep 5, 2022
@notmandatorynotmandatory
added this to the Release 0.6.0 milestone
Sep 5, 2022
@notmandatory
notmandatoryforce-pushed
the
update_bdk022
branch
8 times, most recently
from
b1e4b0e to
54036b3CompareSeptember 5, 2022 21:08
@notmandatory
notmandatory
marked this pull request as draft
September 5, 2022 21:27
@notmandatorynotmandatory
mentioned this pull request
Sep 5, 2022

Closed

21 tasks
rajarshimaitra
rajarshimaitra
reviewed
Sep 6, 2022
View reviewed changes
@rajarshimaitrarajarshimaitra
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tACK c013266
Thanks for the PR, I probably misunderstood the new update process.. I should have made the update as a fresh PR itself.. This is much cleaner..
I verified that the psbt only changed in omitted partial signatures.
From this PR
Input {
non_witness_utxo: None,
witness_utxo: Some(
TxOut {
value: 100000,
script_pubkey: Script(OP_0 OP_PUSHBYTES_20 ece526571053da86454c9e066779eaf9d1502e6a),
},
),
partial_sigs: {},
sighash_type: None,

From master
Input {
non_witness_utxo: None,
witness_utxo: Some(
TxOut {
value: 10000,
script_pubkey: Script(OP_0 OP_PUSHBYTES_20 ece526571053da86454c9e066779eaf9d1502e6a),
},
),
partial_sigs: {
PublicKey {
compressed: true,
inner: PublicKey(
e38744d6bf154145115968917eae5d57e20393653d93844a6938ec8b0758052bbd4f42a158da428c7a96a02ec380440540f08979145cb9216fade06e3088a5e1,
),
}: EcdsaSig {
sig: 30450221009c2f349bd0e1a366dbe201a11b7f567b1018576510e8b3cc60d5c79a51f7a34c022000c22e1bc207fc26cfe7d4c792779dea0e8e848b1e94dcebfc9ac29ec4c58a5b,
hash_ty: All,
},
},
sighash_type: None,
redeem_script: None,

@notmandatorynotmandatory
mentioned this pull request
Sep 6, 2022
 Merged

6 tasks
@notmandatorynotmandatory
mentioned this pull request
Sep 8, 2022
 Merged

notmandatory added a commit
to bitcoindevkit/bdk-reserves
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 8, 2022
@notmandatory
Merge#11: Update bdk dependency to 0.22
6f742ff
1bf97ec Add cargo update step to CI Build and Test (Steve Myers)
e08ea81 Update bdk dependency to 0.22 (Steve Myers)
Pull request description:
This update also required recalculating the PSBT proofs due to BDK removing partial signatures, see bitcoindevkit/bdk-cli#118 (review).
Once this PR is merged I'll publish a new `bdk-reserves` release version `0.22.0`.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 972e51e9ab8dbbff869ce1b8916abf7781e3b30ac671bb719e82d8803b8c56aa3cff723762d2c771cb17bc6d71296bff7c9fee93312316d1162d18f99f35fbee
@notmandatory
notmandatory
marked this pull request as ready for review
September 8, 2022 17:43
@notmandatory
notmandatory
commented
Sep 8, 2022

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
I've updated with newly published bdk and bdk-reserves version 0.22, PR now ready for final review/approval.
rajarshimaitra
rajarshimaitra
approved these changes
Sep 9, 2022
View reviewed changes
@rajarshimaitrarajarshimaitra
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK e8b2028
This is good to go..
@notmandatory
notmandatory
merged commit 99a329f
into
bitcoindevkit:masterSep 9, 2022
@notmandatorynotmandatory
mentioned this pull request
Sep 13, 2022

Closed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


1 more reviewer

@rajarshimaitrarajarshimaitrarajarshimaitra approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

@notmandatorynotmandatory

Labels


None yet


Projects

BDK-CLI

Archived in project


Milestone

Release 0.6.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@notmandatory@rajarshimaitra

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Update bdk dependency to 0.22 - #118
Merged
notmandatory merged 1 commit into
bitcoindevkit:masterfrom 
notmandatory:update_bdk022
Sep 9, 2022
Merged
Update bdk dependency to 0.22#118
notmandatory merged 1 commit into
bitcoindevkit:masterfrom 
notmandatory:update_bdk022
Conversation
@notmandatory
@notmandatorynotmandatory
commented
Sep 5, 2022•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Description
  • Update bdk and bdk-reserves to v0.22.0.
  • Change rpc --skip-blocks option to --start-time which specifies time initial sync will start scanning from.
Notes to the reviewers
I haven't verified the bits and bytes of the new reserves PSBT in the tests. I assume it's different for the same reason as the other tests in bdk-reserves when we switched to bdk 0.22, but I could use some help confirming that.
This is draft until bdk and bdk-reservers v0.22 are published.
Checklists
All Submissions:
  •  I've signed all my commits
  •  I followed the contribution guidelines
  •  I ran cargo fmt and cargo clippy before committing
@notmandatorynotmandatory
self-assigned this
Sep 5, 2022
@notmandatorynotmandatory
added this to the Release 0.6.0 milestone
Sep 5, 2022
@notmandatory
notmandatoryforce-pushed
the
update_bdk022
branch
8 times, most recently
from
b1e4b0e to
54036b3CompareSeptember 5, 2022 21:08
@notmandatory
notmandatory
marked this pull request as draft
September 5, 2022 21:27
@notmandatorynotmandatory
mentioned this pull request
Sep 5, 2022

Closed

21 tasks
rajarshimaitra
rajarshimaitra
reviewed
Sep 6, 2022
View reviewed changes
@rajarshimaitrarajarshimaitra
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tACK c013266
Thanks for the PR, I probably misunderstood the new update process.. I should have made the update as a fresh PR itself.. This is much cleaner..
I verified that the psbt only changed in omitted partial signatures.
From this PR
Input {
non_witness_utxo: None,
witness_utxo: Some(
TxOut {
value: 100000,
script_pubkey: Script(OP_0 OP_PUSHBYTES_20 ece526571053da86454c9e066779eaf9d1502e6a),
},
),
partial_sigs: {},
sighash_type: None,

From master
Input {
non_witness_utxo: None,
witness_utxo: Some(
TxOut {
value: 10000,
script_pubkey: Script(OP_0 OP_PUSHBYTES_20 ece526571053da86454c9e066779eaf9d1502e6a),
},
),
partial_sigs: {
PublicKey {
compressed: true,
inner: PublicKey(
e38744d6bf154145115968917eae5d57e20393653d93844a6938ec8b0758052bbd4f42a158da428c7a96a02ec380440540f08979145cb9216fade06e3088a5e1,
),
}: EcdsaSig {
sig: 30450221009c2f349bd0e1a366dbe201a11b7f567b1018576510e8b3cc60d5c79a51f7a34c022000c22e1bc207fc26cfe7d4c792779dea0e8e848b1e94dcebfc9ac29ec4c58a5b,
hash_ty: All,
},
},
sighash_type: None,
redeem_script: None,

@notmandatorynotmandatory
mentioned this pull request
Sep 6, 2022
 Merged

6 tasks
@notmandatorynotmandatory
mentioned this pull request
Sep 8, 2022
 Merged

notmandatory added a commit
to bitcoindevkit/bdk-reserves
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 8, 2022
@notmandatory
Merge#11: Update bdk dependency to 0.22
6f742ff
1bf97ec Add cargo update step to CI Build and Test (Steve Myers)
e08ea81 Update bdk dependency to 0.22 (Steve Myers)
Pull request description:
This update also required recalculating the PSBT proofs due to BDK removing partial signatures, see bitcoindevkit/bdk-cli#118 (review).
Once this PR is merged I'll publish a new `bdk-reserves` release version `0.22.0`.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 972e51e9ab8dbbff869ce1b8916abf7781e3b30ac671bb719e82d8803b8c56aa3cff723762d2c771cb17bc6d71296bff7c9fee93312316d1162d18f99f35fbee
@notmandatory
notmandatory
marked this pull request as ready for review
September 8, 2022 17:43
@notmandatory
notmandatory
commented
Sep 8, 2022

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
I've updated with newly published bdk and bdk-reserves version 0.22, PR now ready for final review/approval.
rajarshimaitra
rajarshimaitra
approved these changes
Sep 9, 2022
View reviewed changes
@rajarshimaitrarajarshimaitra
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK e8b2028
This is good to go..
@notmandatory
notmandatory
merged commit 99a329f
into
bitcoindevkit:masterSep 9, 2022
@notmandatorynotmandatory
mentioned this pull request
Sep 13, 2022

Closed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


1 more reviewer

@rajarshimaitrarajarshimaitrarajarshimaitra approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

@notmandatorynotmandatory

Labels


None yet


Projects

BDK-CLI

Archived in project


Milestone

Release 0.6.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@notmandatory@rajarshimaitra

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Update bdk dependency to 0.22 - #118
Merged
notmandatory merged 1 commit into
bitcoindevkit:masterfrom 
notmandatory:update_bdk022
Sep 9, 2022
Merged
Update bdk dependency to 0.22#118
notmandatory merged 1 commit into
bitcoindevkit:masterfrom 
notmandatory:update_bdk022
Conversation
@notmandatory
@notmandatorynotmandatory
commented
Sep 5, 2022•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Description
  • Update bdk and bdk-reserves to v0.22.0.
  • Change rpc --skip-blocks option to --start-time which specifies time initial sync will start scanning from.
Notes to the reviewers
I haven't verified the bits and bytes of the new reserves PSBT in the tests. I assume it's different for the same reason as the other tests in bdk-reserves when we switched to bdk 0.22, but I could use some help confirming that.
This is draft until bdk and bdk-reservers v0.22 are published.
Checklists
All Submissions:
  •  I've signed all my commits
  •  I followed the contribution guidelines
  •  I ran cargo fmt and cargo clippy before committing
@notmandatorynotmandatory
self-assigned this
Sep 5, 2022
@notmandatorynotmandatory
added this to the Release 0.6.0 milestone
Sep 5, 2022
@notmandatory
notmandatoryforce-pushed
the
update_bdk022
branch
8 times, most recently
from
b1e4b0e to
54036b3CompareSeptember 5, 2022 21:08
@notmandatory
notmandatory
marked this pull request as draft
September 5, 2022 21:27
@notmandatorynotmandatory
mentioned this pull request
Sep 5, 2022

Closed

21 tasks
rajarshimaitra
rajarshimaitra
reviewed
Sep 6, 2022
View reviewed changes
@rajarshimaitrarajarshimaitra
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tACK c013266
Thanks for the PR, I probably misunderstood the new update process.. I should have made the update as a fresh PR itself.. This is much cleaner..
I verified that the psbt only changed in omitted partial signatures.
From this PR
Input {
non_witness_utxo: None,
witness_utxo: Some(
TxOut {
value: 100000,
script_pubkey: Script(OP_0 OP_PUSHBYTES_20 ece526571053da86454c9e066779eaf9d1502e6a),
},
),
partial_sigs: {},
sighash_type: None,

From master
Input {
non_witness_utxo: None,
witness_utxo: Some(
TxOut {
value: 10000,
script_pubkey: Script(OP_0 OP_PUSHBYTES_20 ece526571053da86454c9e066779eaf9d1502e6a),
},
),
partial_sigs: {
PublicKey {
compressed: true,
inner: PublicKey(
e38744d6bf154145115968917eae5d57e20393653d93844a6938ec8b0758052bbd4f42a158da428c7a96a02ec380440540f08979145cb9216fade06e3088a5e1,
),
}: EcdsaSig {
sig: 30450221009c2f349bd0e1a366dbe201a11b7f567b1018576510e8b3cc60d5c79a51f7a34c022000c22e1bc207fc26cfe7d4c792779dea0e8e848b1e94dcebfc9ac29ec4c58a5b,
hash_ty: All,
},
},
sighash_type: None,
redeem_script: None,

@notmandatorynotmandatory
mentioned this pull request
Sep 6, 2022
 Merged

6 tasks
@notmandatorynotmandatory
mentioned this pull request
Sep 8, 2022
 Merged

notmandatory added a commit
to bitcoindevkit/bdk-reserves
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 8, 2022
@notmandatory
Merge#11: Update bdk dependency to 0.22
6f742ff
1bf97ec Add cargo update step to CI Build and Test (Steve Myers)
e08ea81 Update bdk dependency to 0.22 (Steve Myers)
Pull request description:
This update also required recalculating the PSBT proofs due to BDK removing partial signatures, see bitcoindevkit/bdk-cli#118 (review).
Once this PR is merged I'll publish a new `bdk-reserves` release version `0.22.0`.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 972e51e9ab8dbbff869ce1b8916abf7781e3b30ac671bb719e82d8803b8c56aa3cff723762d2c771cb17bc6d71296bff7c9fee93312316d1162d18f99f35fbee
@notmandatory
notmandatory
marked this pull request as ready for review
September 8, 2022 17:43
@notmandatory
notmandatory
commented
Sep 8, 2022

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
I've updated with newly published bdk and bdk-reserves version 0.22, PR now ready for final review/approval.
rajarshimaitra
rajarshimaitra
approved these changes
Sep 9, 2022
View reviewed changes
@rajarshimaitrarajarshimaitra
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK e8b2028
This is good to go..
@notmandatory
notmandatory
merged commit 99a329f
into
bitcoindevkit:masterSep 9, 2022
@notmandatorynotmandatory
mentioned this pull request
Sep 13, 2022

Closed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


1 more reviewer

@rajarshimaitrarajarshimaitrarajarshimaitra approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

@notmandatorynotmandatory

Labels


None yet


Projects

BDK-CLI

Archived in project


Milestone

Release 0.6.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@notmandatory@rajarshimaitra

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

Skip to content
Update bdk dependency to 0.22 - #118
Merged
notmandatory merged 1 commit into
bitcoindevkit:masterfrom 
notmandatory:update_bdk022
Sep 9, 2022
Merged
Update bdk dependency to 0.22#118
notmandatory merged 1 commit into
bitcoindevkit:masterfrom 
notmandatory:update_bdk022
Conversation
@notmandatory
@notmandatorynotmandatory
commented
Sep 5, 2022•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Description
  • Update bdk and bdk-reserves to v0.22.0.
  • Change rpc --skip-blocks option to --start-time which specifies time initial sync will start scanning from.
Notes to the reviewers
I haven't verified the bits and bytes of the new reserves PSBT in the tests. I assume it's different for the same reason as the other tests in bdk-reserves when we switched to bdk 0.22, but I could use some help confirming that.
This is draft until bdk and bdk-reservers v0.22 are published.
Checklists
All Submissions:
  •  I've signed all my commits
  •  I followed the contribution guidelines
  •  I ran cargo fmt and cargo clippy before committing
@notmandatorynotmandatory
self-assigned this
Sep 5, 2022
@notmandatorynotmandatory
added this to the Release 0.6.0 milestone
Sep 5, 2022
@notmandatory
notmandatoryforce-pushed
the
update_bdk022
branch
8 times, most recently
from
b1e4b0e to
54036b3CompareSeptember 5, 2022 21:08
@notmandatory
notmandatory
marked this pull request as draft
September 5, 2022 21:27
@notmandatorynotmandatory
mentioned this pull request
Sep 5, 2022

Closed

21 tasks
rajarshimaitra
rajarshimaitra
reviewed
Sep 6, 2022
View reviewed changes
@rajarshimaitrarajarshimaitra
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tACK c013266
Thanks for the PR, I probably misunderstood the new update process.. I should have made the update as a fresh PR itself.. This is much cleaner..
I verified that the psbt only changed in omitted partial signatures.
From this PR
Input {
non_witness_utxo: None,
witness_utxo: Some(
TxOut {
value: 100000,
script_pubkey: Script(OP_0 OP_PUSHBYTES_20 ece526571053da86454c9e066779eaf9d1502e6a),
},
),
partial_sigs: {},
sighash_type: None,

From master
Input {
non_witness_utxo: None,
witness_utxo: Some(
TxOut {
value: 10000,
script_pubkey: Script(OP_0 OP_PUSHBYTES_20 ece526571053da86454c9e066779eaf9d1502e6a),
},
),
partial_sigs: {
PublicKey {
compressed: true,
inner: PublicKey(
e38744d6bf154145115968917eae5d57e20393653d93844a6938ec8b0758052bbd4f42a158da428c7a96a02ec380440540f08979145cb9216fade06e3088a5e1,
),
}: EcdsaSig {
sig: 30450221009c2f349bd0e1a366dbe201a11b7f567b1018576510e8b3cc60d5c79a51f7a34c022000c22e1bc207fc26cfe7d4c792779dea0e8e848b1e94dcebfc9ac29ec4c58a5b,
hash_ty: All,
},
},
sighash_type: None,
redeem_script: None,

@notmandatorynotmandatory
mentioned this pull request
Sep 6, 2022
 Merged

6 tasks
@notmandatorynotmandatory
mentioned this pull request
Sep 8, 2022
 Merged

notmandatory added a commit
to bitcoindevkit/bdk-reserves
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 8, 2022
@notmandatory
Merge#11: Update bdk dependency to 0.22
6f742ff
1bf97ec Add cargo update step to CI Build and Test (Steve Myers)
e08ea81 Update bdk dependency to 0.22 (Steve Myers)
Pull request description:
This update also required recalculating the PSBT proofs due to BDK removing partial signatures, see bitcoindevkit/bdk-cli#118 (review).
Once this PR is merged I'll publish a new `bdk-reserves` release version `0.22.0`.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 972e51e9ab8dbbff869ce1b8916abf7781e3b30ac671bb719e82d8803b8c56aa3cff723762d2c771cb17bc6d71296bff7c9fee93312316d1162d18f99f35fbee
@notmandatory
notmandatory
marked this pull request as ready for review
September 8, 2022 17:43
@notmandatory
notmandatory
commented
Sep 8, 2022

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
I've updated with newly published bdk and bdk-reserves version 0.22, PR now ready for final review/approval.
rajarshimaitra
rajarshimaitra
approved these changes
Sep 9, 2022
View reviewed changes
@rajarshimaitrarajarshimaitra
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK e8b2028
This is good to go..
@notmandatory
notmandatory
merged commit 99a329f
into
bitcoindevkit:masterSep 9, 2022
@notmandatorynotmandatory
mentioned this pull request
Sep 13, 2022

Closed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


1 more reviewer

@rajarshimaitrarajarshimaitrarajarshimaitra approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

@notmandatorynotmandatory

Labels


None yet


Projects

BDK-CLI

Archived in project


Milestone

Release 0.6.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@notmandatory@rajarshimaitra