Skip to content

fix(desktop): community create handoff, NIP-27 mentions, workflows list - #2503

Open
Chessing234 wants to merge 5 commits into
block:mainfrom
Chessing234:fix/community-create-nip27
Open

Chessing234 wants to merge 5 commits into
block:mainfrom
Chessing234:fix/community-create-nip27

Conversation

@Chessing234

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Test plan

  • Create a hosted community and confirm you enter it (or see owned communities) instead of Join
  • Send @someone and confirm the published event content includes nostr:npub1…
  • Create a workflow, open Workflows with multiple member channels, confirm it appears

Made with Cursor

Synthesize the hosted relay URL when Builderlab omits normalized_host, refresh the owned list after create, and don't clear Builderlab auth when backing out of the ready stage.

Signed-off-by: Taksh <takshkothari09@gmail.com>
Keep @name in the composer; rewrite at send/edit time, extract npub mentions on read, and map known URIs back to @name for display.

Signed-off-by: Taksh <takshkothari09@gmail.com>
Avoid multi-value #h collapse on relays that only keep the first channel id, so the Workflows list stops showing empty.

Signed-off-by: Taksh <takshkothari09@gmail.com>
@Chessing234

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@tlongwell-block @wesbillman @wpfleger96 mind taking a look when you get a chance?

Signed-off-by: Taksh <takshkothari09@gmail.com>
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔐 Codex Security Review

Status: review required for the current range.

The current range is 114dbf745f1fe0bdbecb70e07a07f03c23687bdc...2e69cf7fe17eee6ccd940600347918736ea7f6d8.
A new review must complete for this exact range. When manual authorization
is required, a Block organization member must comment exactly
@buzz-security-review 2e69cf7fe17eee6ccd940600347918736ea7f6d8 to authorize a new review.
Any previous review applies only to its recorded range.

Signed-off-by: Taksh <takshkothari09@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant