Skip to content

fix(bolt): stop pair host server on failed runs and note v1 limits - #226

Merged
A-x6 merged 2 commits into
devfrom
pair-review-fixes
Aug 6, 2026
Merged

fix(bolt): stop pair host server on failed runs and note v1 limits#226
A-x6 merged 2 commits into
devfrom
pair-review-fixes

Conversation

@A-x6

@A-x6A-x6 commented Aug 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Follow-up to #225 addressing review feedback that landed after the merge. The host flow only stopped the local server when runMini resolved, so a rejected or interrupted interactive run left the listener open. The stop is now attached as a finalizer so it runs on every exit path:

yield*Effect.promise(()=>runMini({attach: url,session: created.id,// ...pair: true,}),).pipe(Effect.ensuring(Effect.promise(()=>server.stop(true))))

Also extends the README pair-programming Done entry to mention the remaining v1 limits (direct shell input may double-render, and permission prompts can be answered by either side) so the roadmap does not overstate v1 behavior.


View with [code]smith
Need help on this PR? Tag @codesmith-bot with what you need. Autofix is enabled.

Co-authored-by: Codesmith <codesmith-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
@vercel

vercelBot commented Aug 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

ProjectDeploymentActionsUpdated (UTC)
bolt-cli-appReadyReadyPreviewAug 6, 2026 5:06am

@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Aug 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@DevFlex-AI, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in:40 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 4fa2b397-e916-4180-8a29-f8c6682c2854

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b7091c7 and ca1ee6c.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • README.md
  • packages/opencode/src/cli/cmd/pair.ts

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@A-x6
A-x6 merged commit 3122b17 into devAug 6, 2026
11 of 22 checks passed
@deepsource-io

deepsource-ioBot commented Aug 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

DeepSource Code Review

We reviewed changes in b7091c7...ca1ee6c on this pull request. Below is the summary for the review, and you can see the individual issues we found as inline review comments.

See full review on DeepSource ↗

PR Report Card

Overall GradeSecurity

Reliability

Complexity

Hygiene

Code Review Summary

AnalyzerStatusUpdated (UTC)Details
JavaScriptAug 6, 2026 5:05a.m.Review ↗
ShellAug 6, 2026 5:05a.m.Review ↗
SecretsAug 6, 2026 5:05a.m.Review ↗
DockerAug 6, 2026 5:05a.m.Review ↗
PythonAug 6, 2026 5:05a.m.Review ↗
CSSAug 6, 2026 5:05a.m.Review ↗
RustAug 6, 2026 5:05a.m.Review ↗
RubyAug 6, 2026 5:05a.m.Review ↗
SwiftAug 6, 2026 5:05a.m.Review ↗
PHPAug 6, 2026 5:05a.m.Review ↗
LuaAug 6, 2026 5:05a.m.Review ↗
JavaAug 6, 2026 5:05a.m.Review ↗
GoAug 6, 2026 5:05a.m.Review ↗
C & C++Aug 6, 2026 5:05a.m.Review ↗
AnsibleAug 6, 2026 5:05a.m.Review ↗
ApexAug 6, 2026 5:05a.m.Review ↗
ElixirAug 6, 2026 5:05a.m.Review ↗
GroovyAug 6, 2026 5:05a.m.Review ↗
Objective-CAug 6, 2026 5:05a.m.Review ↗
PowerShellAug 6, 2026 5:05a.m.Review ↗
TerraformAug 6, 2026 5:05a.m.Review ↗
VB.NETAug 6, 2026 5:05a.m.Review ↗
SQLAug 6, 2026 5:05a.m.Review ↗
ScalaAug 6, 2026 5:05a.m.Review ↗
PerlAug 6, 2026 5:05a.m.Review ↗
KotlinAug 6, 2026 5:05a.m.Review ↗
HelmAug 6, 2026 5:05a.m.Review ↗
ErlangAug 6, 2026 5:05a.m.Review ↗
DartAug 6, 2026 5:05a.m.Review ↗
C#Aug 6, 2026 5:05a.m.Review ↗

Important

AI Review is run only on demand for your team. We're only showing results of static analysis review right now. To trigger AI Review, comment @deepsourcebot review on this thread.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@A-x6