Add per-input trial_count support to Eval() - #1342

Closed
Daniel Flynn (dflynn15) wants to merge 1 commit into
braintrustdata:mainfrom
dflynn15:feature/py-per-input-trial-count
Closed

Add per-input trial_count support to Eval()#1342
Daniel Flynn (dflynn15) wants to merge 1 commit into
braintrustdata:mainfrom
dflynn15:feature/py-per-input-trial-count

Conversation

@dflynn15

@dflynn15Daniel Flynn (dflynn15) commented Feb 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Why?

Braintrust's Eval() function supports a trialCount parameter that runs each input multiple times to measure variance in non-deterministic LLM outputs. However, this setting applies globally to all inputs, which creates some (but minimal) friction in some evaluation workflows. For example:

  1. Targeted Debugging is Expensive: When investigating a single flaky test case, you want to run it 10-20 times to understand the variance pattern. With global trialCount, this means running your entire suite 10-20 times, multiplying costs and wait time unnecessarily.

  2. Mixed Determinism is Common: Real evaluation suites contain a mix of deterministic scenarios (math problems, factual lookups) and non-deterministic ones (creative writing, open-ended reasoning). Forcing the same trial count on both wastes resources.

  3. Cost Scales Linearly: Every additional trial means another LLM API call. A global trialCount: 5 on a 100-item dataset means 500 API calls, even if only 10 items actually need variance analysis.

In order to address this, we've created a custom solution that I want to propose as a contribution. Specifically it, allows each data item to specify its own trialCount, overriding the global default. This gives users fine-grained control over where to invest their evaluation budget.


What?

Eval(
"My Project",
data=[
{"input": "stable query", "expected": "..."}, # Uses global (3)
{"input": "flaky query", "expected": "...", "trial_count": 10}, # Override to 10EvalCase(input="deterministic", expected="...", trial_count=1), # Override to 1
],
task=my_task,
scores=[Factuality],
trial_count=3, # Global default
)

There is a corollary JS PR up to match it here: #1341

Allow data items to specify their own trial_count, overriding the global
evaluator setting. This enables targeted debugging of flaky test cases
and mixed determinism scenarios without multiplying the entire suite.
- Add optional `trial_count` field to `EvalCase` dataclass and TypedDict
- Per-item trial_count takes precedence over global trial_count
- Items without trial_count use the global value (or 1 if unset)
- Works with both EvalCase objects and dict data
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs. If this PR is still relevant, please leave a comment, push an update, or remove the stale label. Thank you for your contributions!

@lforst

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Hi, this unfortunately became stale because we moved the python sdk into its own repo: https://github.com/braintrustdata/braintrust-sdk-python

We can think about re-introducing the change there.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@dflynn15@lforst
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Add per-input trial_count support to Eval() - #1342

Closed
Daniel Flynn (dflynn15) wants to merge 1 commit into
braintrustdata:mainfrom
dflynn15:feature/py-per-input-trial-count
Closed

Add per-input trial_count support to Eval()#1342
Daniel Flynn (dflynn15) wants to merge 1 commit into
braintrustdata:mainfrom
dflynn15:feature/py-per-input-trial-count

Conversation

@dflynn15

@dflynn15Daniel Flynn (dflynn15) commented Feb 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Why?

Braintrust's Eval() function supports a trialCount parameter that runs each input multiple times to measure variance in non-deterministic LLM outputs. However, this setting applies globally to all inputs, which creates some (but minimal) friction in some evaluation workflows. For example:

  1. Targeted Debugging is Expensive: When investigating a single flaky test case, you want to run it 10-20 times to understand the variance pattern. With global trialCount, this means running your entire suite 10-20 times, multiplying costs and wait time unnecessarily.

  2. Mixed Determinism is Common: Real evaluation suites contain a mix of deterministic scenarios (math problems, factual lookups) and non-deterministic ones (creative writing, open-ended reasoning). Forcing the same trial count on both wastes resources.

  3. Cost Scales Linearly: Every additional trial means another LLM API call. A global trialCount: 5 on a 100-item dataset means 500 API calls, even if only 10 items actually need variance analysis.

In order to address this, we've created a custom solution that I want to propose as a contribution. Specifically it, allows each data item to specify its own trialCount, overriding the global default. This gives users fine-grained control over where to invest their evaluation budget.


What?

Eval(
"My Project",
data=[
{"input": "stable query", "expected": "..."}, # Uses global (3)
{"input": "flaky query", "expected": "...", "trial_count": 10}, # Override to 10EvalCase(input="deterministic", expected="...", trial_count=1), # Override to 1
],
task=my_task,
scores=[Factuality],
trial_count=3, # Global default
)

There is a corollary JS PR up to match it here: #1341

Allow data items to specify their own trial_count, overriding the global
evaluator setting. This enables targeted debugging of flaky test cases
and mixed determinism scenarios without multiplying the entire suite.
- Add optional `trial_count` field to `EvalCase` dataclass and TypedDict
- Per-item trial_count takes precedence over global trial_count
- Items without trial_count use the global value (or 1 if unset)
- Works with both EvalCase objects and dict data
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs. If this PR is still relevant, please leave a comment, push an update, or remove the stale label. Thank you for your contributions!

@lforst

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Hi, this unfortunately became stale because we moved the python sdk into its own repo: https://github.com/braintrustdata/braintrust-sdk-python

We can think about re-introducing the change there.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@dflynn15@lforst
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Add per-input trial_count support to Eval() - #1342

Closed
Daniel Flynn (dflynn15) wants to merge 1 commit into
braintrustdata:mainfrom
dflynn15:feature/py-per-input-trial-count
Closed

Add per-input trial_count support to Eval()#1342
Daniel Flynn (dflynn15) wants to merge 1 commit into
braintrustdata:mainfrom
dflynn15:feature/py-per-input-trial-count

Conversation

@dflynn15

@dflynn15Daniel Flynn (dflynn15) commented Feb 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Why?

Braintrust's Eval() function supports a trialCount parameter that runs each input multiple times to measure variance in non-deterministic LLM outputs. However, this setting applies globally to all inputs, which creates some (but minimal) friction in some evaluation workflows. For example:

  1. Targeted Debugging is Expensive: When investigating a single flaky test case, you want to run it 10-20 times to understand the variance pattern. With global trialCount, this means running your entire suite 10-20 times, multiplying costs and wait time unnecessarily.

  2. Mixed Determinism is Common: Real evaluation suites contain a mix of deterministic scenarios (math problems, factual lookups) and non-deterministic ones (creative writing, open-ended reasoning). Forcing the same trial count on both wastes resources.

  3. Cost Scales Linearly: Every additional trial means another LLM API call. A global trialCount: 5 on a 100-item dataset means 500 API calls, even if only 10 items actually need variance analysis.

In order to address this, we've created a custom solution that I want to propose as a contribution. Specifically it, allows each data item to specify its own trialCount, overriding the global default. This gives users fine-grained control over where to invest their evaluation budget.


What?

Eval(
"My Project",
data=[
{"input": "stable query", "expected": "..."}, # Uses global (3)
{"input": "flaky query", "expected": "...", "trial_count": 10}, # Override to 10EvalCase(input="deterministic", expected="...", trial_count=1), # Override to 1
],
task=my_task,
scores=[Factuality],
trial_count=3, # Global default
)

There is a corollary JS PR up to match it here: #1341

Allow data items to specify their own trial_count, overriding the global
evaluator setting. This enables targeted debugging of flaky test cases
and mixed determinism scenarios without multiplying the entire suite.
- Add optional `trial_count` field to `EvalCase` dataclass and TypedDict
- Per-item trial_count takes precedence over global trial_count
- Items without trial_count use the global value (or 1 if unset)
- Works with both EvalCase objects and dict data
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs. If this PR is still relevant, please leave a comment, push an update, or remove the stale label. Thank you for your contributions!

@lforst

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Hi, this unfortunately became stale because we moved the python sdk into its own repo: https://github.com/braintrustdata/braintrust-sdk-python

We can think about re-introducing the change there.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@dflynn15@lforst
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Add per-input trial_count support to Eval() - #1342

Closed
Daniel Flynn (dflynn15) wants to merge 1 commit into
braintrustdata:mainfrom
dflynn15:feature/py-per-input-trial-count
Closed

Add per-input trial_count support to Eval()#1342
Daniel Flynn (dflynn15) wants to merge 1 commit into
braintrustdata:mainfrom
dflynn15:feature/py-per-input-trial-count

Conversation

@dflynn15

@dflynn15Daniel Flynn (dflynn15) commented Feb 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Why?

Braintrust's Eval() function supports a trialCount parameter that runs each input multiple times to measure variance in non-deterministic LLM outputs. However, this setting applies globally to all inputs, which creates some (but minimal) friction in some evaluation workflows. For example:

  1. Targeted Debugging is Expensive: When investigating a single flaky test case, you want to run it 10-20 times to understand the variance pattern. With global trialCount, this means running your entire suite 10-20 times, multiplying costs and wait time unnecessarily.

  2. Mixed Determinism is Common: Real evaluation suites contain a mix of deterministic scenarios (math problems, factual lookups) and non-deterministic ones (creative writing, open-ended reasoning). Forcing the same trial count on both wastes resources.

  3. Cost Scales Linearly: Every additional trial means another LLM API call. A global trialCount: 5 on a 100-item dataset means 500 API calls, even if only 10 items actually need variance analysis.

In order to address this, we've created a custom solution that I want to propose as a contribution. Specifically it, allows each data item to specify its own trialCount, overriding the global default. This gives users fine-grained control over where to invest their evaluation budget.


What?

Eval(
"My Project",
data=[
{"input": "stable query", "expected": "..."}, # Uses global (3)
{"input": "flaky query", "expected": "...", "trial_count": 10}, # Override to 10EvalCase(input="deterministic", expected="...", trial_count=1), # Override to 1
],
task=my_task,
scores=[Factuality],
trial_count=3, # Global default
)

There is a corollary JS PR up to match it here: #1341

Allow data items to specify their own trial_count, overriding the global
evaluator setting. This enables targeted debugging of flaky test cases
and mixed determinism scenarios without multiplying the entire suite.
- Add optional `trial_count` field to `EvalCase` dataclass and TypedDict
- Per-item trial_count takes precedence over global trial_count
- Items without trial_count use the global value (or 1 if unset)
- Works with both EvalCase objects and dict data
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs. If this PR is still relevant, please leave a comment, push an update, or remove the stale label. Thank you for your contributions!

@lforst

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Hi, this unfortunately became stale because we moved the python sdk into its own repo: https://github.com/braintrustdata/braintrust-sdk-python

We can think about re-introducing the change there.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@dflynn15@lforst
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Add per-input trial_count support to Eval() - #1342

Closed
Daniel Flynn (dflynn15) wants to merge 1 commit into
braintrustdata:mainfrom
dflynn15:feature/py-per-input-trial-count
Closed

Add per-input trial_count support to Eval()#1342
Daniel Flynn (dflynn15) wants to merge 1 commit into
braintrustdata:mainfrom
dflynn15:feature/py-per-input-trial-count

Conversation

@dflynn15

@dflynn15Daniel Flynn (dflynn15) commented Feb 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Why?

Braintrust's Eval() function supports a trialCount parameter that runs each input multiple times to measure variance in non-deterministic LLM outputs. However, this setting applies globally to all inputs, which creates some (but minimal) friction in some evaluation workflows. For example:

  1. Targeted Debugging is Expensive: When investigating a single flaky test case, you want to run it 10-20 times to understand the variance pattern. With global trialCount, this means running your entire suite 10-20 times, multiplying costs and wait time unnecessarily.

  2. Mixed Determinism is Common: Real evaluation suites contain a mix of deterministic scenarios (math problems, factual lookups) and non-deterministic ones (creative writing, open-ended reasoning). Forcing the same trial count on both wastes resources.

  3. Cost Scales Linearly: Every additional trial means another LLM API call. A global trialCount: 5 on a 100-item dataset means 500 API calls, even if only 10 items actually need variance analysis.

In order to address this, we've created a custom solution that I want to propose as a contribution. Specifically it, allows each data item to specify its own trialCount, overriding the global default. This gives users fine-grained control over where to invest their evaluation budget.


What?

Eval(
"My Project",
data=[
{"input": "stable query", "expected": "..."}, # Uses global (3)
{"input": "flaky query", "expected": "...", "trial_count": 10}, # Override to 10EvalCase(input="deterministic", expected="...", trial_count=1), # Override to 1
],
task=my_task,
scores=[Factuality],
trial_count=3, # Global default
)

There is a corollary JS PR up to match it here: #1341

Allow data items to specify their own trial_count, overriding the global
evaluator setting. This enables targeted debugging of flaky test cases
and mixed determinism scenarios without multiplying the entire suite.
- Add optional `trial_count` field to `EvalCase` dataclass and TypedDict
- Per-item trial_count takes precedence over global trial_count
- Items without trial_count use the global value (or 1 if unset)
- Works with both EvalCase objects and dict data
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs. If this PR is still relevant, please leave a comment, push an update, or remove the stale label. Thank you for your contributions!

@lforst

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Hi, this unfortunately became stale because we moved the python sdk into its own repo: https://github.com/braintrustdata/braintrust-sdk-python

We can think about re-introducing the change there.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@dflynn15@lforst
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Add per-input trial_count support to Eval() - #1342

Closed
Daniel Flynn (dflynn15) wants to merge 1 commit into
braintrustdata:mainfrom
dflynn15:feature/py-per-input-trial-count
Closed

Add per-input trial_count support to Eval()#1342
Daniel Flynn (dflynn15) wants to merge 1 commit into
braintrustdata:mainfrom
dflynn15:feature/py-per-input-trial-count

Conversation

@dflynn15

@dflynn15Daniel Flynn (dflynn15) commented Feb 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Why?

Braintrust's Eval() function supports a trialCount parameter that runs each input multiple times to measure variance in non-deterministic LLM outputs. However, this setting applies globally to all inputs, which creates some (but minimal) friction in some evaluation workflows. For example:

  1. Targeted Debugging is Expensive: When investigating a single flaky test case, you want to run it 10-20 times to understand the variance pattern. With global trialCount, this means running your entire suite 10-20 times, multiplying costs and wait time unnecessarily.

  2. Mixed Determinism is Common: Real evaluation suites contain a mix of deterministic scenarios (math problems, factual lookups) and non-deterministic ones (creative writing, open-ended reasoning). Forcing the same trial count on both wastes resources.

  3. Cost Scales Linearly: Every additional trial means another LLM API call. A global trialCount: 5 on a 100-item dataset means 500 API calls, even if only 10 items actually need variance analysis.

In order to address this, we've created a custom solution that I want to propose as a contribution. Specifically it, allows each data item to specify its own trialCount, overriding the global default. This gives users fine-grained control over where to invest their evaluation budget.


What?

Eval(
"My Project",
data=[
{"input": "stable query", "expected": "..."}, # Uses global (3)
{"input": "flaky query", "expected": "...", "trial_count": 10}, # Override to 10EvalCase(input="deterministic", expected="...", trial_count=1), # Override to 1
],
task=my_task,
scores=[Factuality],
trial_count=3, # Global default
)

There is a corollary JS PR up to match it here: #1341

Allow data items to specify their own trial_count, overriding the global
evaluator setting. This enables targeted debugging of flaky test cases
and mixed determinism scenarios without multiplying the entire suite.
- Add optional `trial_count` field to `EvalCase` dataclass and TypedDict
- Per-item trial_count takes precedence over global trial_count
- Items without trial_count use the global value (or 1 if unset)
- Works with both EvalCase objects and dict data
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs. If this PR is still relevant, please leave a comment, push an update, or remove the stale label. Thank you for your contributions!

@lforst

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Hi, this unfortunately became stale because we moved the python sdk into its own repo: https://github.com/braintrustdata/braintrust-sdk-python

We can think about re-introducing the change there.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@dflynn15@lforst
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Add per-input trial_count support to Eval() - #1342

Closed
Daniel Flynn (dflynn15) wants to merge 1 commit into
braintrustdata:mainfrom
dflynn15:feature/py-per-input-trial-count
Closed

Add per-input trial_count support to Eval()#1342
Daniel Flynn (dflynn15) wants to merge 1 commit into
braintrustdata:mainfrom
dflynn15:feature/py-per-input-trial-count

Conversation

@dflynn15

@dflynn15Daniel Flynn (dflynn15) commented Feb 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Why?

Braintrust's Eval() function supports a trialCount parameter that runs each input multiple times to measure variance in non-deterministic LLM outputs. However, this setting applies globally to all inputs, which creates some (but minimal) friction in some evaluation workflows. For example:

  1. Targeted Debugging is Expensive: When investigating a single flaky test case, you want to run it 10-20 times to understand the variance pattern. With global trialCount, this means running your entire suite 10-20 times, multiplying costs and wait time unnecessarily.

  2. Mixed Determinism is Common: Real evaluation suites contain a mix of deterministic scenarios (math problems, factual lookups) and non-deterministic ones (creative writing, open-ended reasoning). Forcing the same trial count on both wastes resources.

  3. Cost Scales Linearly: Every additional trial means another LLM API call. A global trialCount: 5 on a 100-item dataset means 500 API calls, even if only 10 items actually need variance analysis.

In order to address this, we've created a custom solution that I want to propose as a contribution. Specifically it, allows each data item to specify its own trialCount, overriding the global default. This gives users fine-grained control over where to invest their evaluation budget.


What?

Eval(
"My Project",
data=[
{"input": "stable query", "expected": "..."}, # Uses global (3)
{"input": "flaky query", "expected": "...", "trial_count": 10}, # Override to 10EvalCase(input="deterministic", expected="...", trial_count=1), # Override to 1
],
task=my_task,
scores=[Factuality],
trial_count=3, # Global default
)

There is a corollary JS PR up to match it here: #1341

Allow data items to specify their own trial_count, overriding the global
evaluator setting. This enables targeted debugging of flaky test cases
and mixed determinism scenarios without multiplying the entire suite.
- Add optional `trial_count` field to `EvalCase` dataclass and TypedDict
- Per-item trial_count takes precedence over global trial_count
- Items without trial_count use the global value (or 1 if unset)
- Works with both EvalCase objects and dict data
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs. If this PR is still relevant, please leave a comment, push an update, or remove the stale label. Thank you for your contributions!

@lforst

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Hi, this unfortunately became stale because we moved the python sdk into its own repo: https://github.com/braintrustdata/braintrust-sdk-python

We can think about re-introducing the change there.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@dflynn15@lforst
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Add per-input trial_count support to Eval() - #1342

Closed
Daniel Flynn (dflynn15) wants to merge 1 commit into
braintrustdata:mainfrom
dflynn15:feature/py-per-input-trial-count
Closed

Add per-input trial_count support to Eval()#1342
Daniel Flynn (dflynn15) wants to merge 1 commit into
braintrustdata:mainfrom
dflynn15:feature/py-per-input-trial-count

Conversation

@dflynn15

@dflynn15Daniel Flynn (dflynn15) commented Feb 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Why?

Braintrust's Eval() function supports a trialCount parameter that runs each input multiple times to measure variance in non-deterministic LLM outputs. However, this setting applies globally to all inputs, which creates some (but minimal) friction in some evaluation workflows. For example:

  1. Targeted Debugging is Expensive: When investigating a single flaky test case, you want to run it 10-20 times to understand the variance pattern. With global trialCount, this means running your entire suite 10-20 times, multiplying costs and wait time unnecessarily.

  2. Mixed Determinism is Common: Real evaluation suites contain a mix of deterministic scenarios (math problems, factual lookups) and non-deterministic ones (creative writing, open-ended reasoning). Forcing the same trial count on both wastes resources.

  3. Cost Scales Linearly: Every additional trial means another LLM API call. A global trialCount: 5 on a 100-item dataset means 500 API calls, even if only 10 items actually need variance analysis.

In order to address this, we've created a custom solution that I want to propose as a contribution. Specifically it, allows each data item to specify its own trialCount, overriding the global default. This gives users fine-grained control over where to invest their evaluation budget.


What?

Eval(
"My Project",
data=[
{"input": "stable query", "expected": "..."}, # Uses global (3)
{"input": "flaky query", "expected": "...", "trial_count": 10}, # Override to 10EvalCase(input="deterministic", expected="...", trial_count=1), # Override to 1
],
task=my_task,
scores=[Factuality],
trial_count=3, # Global default
)

There is a corollary JS PR up to match it here: #1341

Allow data items to specify their own trial_count, overriding the global
evaluator setting. This enables targeted debugging of flaky test cases
and mixed determinism scenarios without multiplying the entire suite.
- Add optional `trial_count` field to `EvalCase` dataclass and TypedDict
- Per-item trial_count takes precedence over global trial_count
- Items without trial_count use the global value (or 1 if unset)
- Works with both EvalCase objects and dict data
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs. If this PR is still relevant, please leave a comment, push an update, or remove the stale label. Thank you for your contributions!

@lforst

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Hi, this unfortunately became stale because we moved the python sdk into its own repo: https://github.com/braintrustdata/braintrust-sdk-python

We can think about re-introducing the change there.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@dflynn15@lforst