Rehydrate remote prompt parameters - #166

Merged
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
josh/rehydrate-remote-prompt-parameters
Mar 31, 2026
Merged

Rehydrate remote prompt parameters#166
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
josh/rehydrate-remote-prompt-parameters

Conversation

@joshuawootonn

@joshuawootonnJoshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn) commented Mar 27, 2026•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Parameters were being passed to the task as raw dictionaries in the Python SDK, which meant loaded Parameters did not expose .build() for hydrating your prompt with values. With this change, a Prompt class is instantiated after schema validation, so that you can run build in your task to rehydrate your prompt. This matches the existing behavior of static Parameters, not including this in the initial port was an oversight on my part.

Demo

  • JavaScript demo:
CleanShot.2026-03-27.at.10.28.05.mp4
  • Python demo:
CleanShot.2026-03-27.at.10.31.21.mp4

Related PRs

@joshuawootonnJoshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn) mentioned this pull request Mar 27, 2026
Merged
@joshuawootonn

Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn) commented Mar 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor
CleanShot 2026-03-27 at 12 51 13@2x

Not sure why the , 1) version of our builds are failing.

@joshuawootonn
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)force-pushed the josh/rehydrate-remote-prompt-parameters branch from b22192d to 9c5646bCompareMarch 31, 2026 15:17
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn) added a commit to braintrustdata/braintrust-sdk-javascript that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2026
@joshuawootonn
Rehydrate remote prompt parameters (#1697)
db57f90
## Summary
`Parameter`s were being passed to the `task` as a raw object in the JS
SDK, which meant loaded `Parameter`s did not expose `.build()` for
hydrating your prompt with values. With this change, a `Prompt` class is
instantiated after schema validation, so that you can run `build` in
your `task` to rehydrate your prompt. This matches the existing behavior
of static `Parameter`s, not including this in the initial implementation
was an oversight on my part.
## Demo
- JavaScript demo: https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4d900806-dfbd-45d1-8f65-8f169713043a
- Python demo: https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8c2c0e05-e12c-4e2d-812a-bd1c228ce225
## Related PRs
<!-- codex-related-prs:start -->
- [braintrustdata/braintrust-sdk-python
#166](braintrustdata/braintrust-sdk-python#166)
- Companion Python SDK PR
- [braintrustdata/braintrust
#12219](https://github.com/braintrustdata/braintrust/pull/12219) -
Parent PR
<!-- codex-related-prs:end -->
@joshuawootonn
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn) merged commit 161fa36 into mainMar 31, 2026
36 checks passed
@joshuawootonn
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn) deleted the josh/rehydrate-remote-prompt-parameters branch March 31, 2026 19:15
@AbhiPrasadAbhijeet Prasad (AbhiPrasad) mentioned this pull request Mar 31, 2026
Merged
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@AbhiPrasadAbhijeet Prasad (AbhiPrasad)AbhiPrasad approved these changes
@lforstLuca Forstner (lforst)Awaiting requested review from lforst

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@joshuawootonn@AbhiPrasad
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

Skip to content
Rehydrate remote prompt parameters - #166
Merged
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
josh/rehydrate-remote-prompt-parameters
Mar 31, 2026
Merged
Rehydrate remote prompt parameters#166
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
josh/rehydrate-remote-prompt-parameters
Conversation
@joshuawootonn
@joshuawootonnJoshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)
commented
Mar 27, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
Parameters were being passed to the task as raw dictionaries in the Python SDK, which meant loaded Parameters did not expose .build() for hydrating your prompt with values. With this change, a Prompt class is instantiated after schema validation, so that you can run build in your task to rehydrate your prompt. This matches the existing behavior of static Parameters, not including this in the initial port was an oversight on my part.
Demo
  • JavaScript demo:
CleanShot.2026-03-27.at.10.28.05.mp4
  • Python demo:
CleanShot.2026-03-27.at.10.31.21.mp4
Related PRs
@joshuawootonnJoshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)
mentioned this pull request
Mar 27, 2026
 Merged

@joshuawootonn
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)
commented
Mar 27, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
CleanShot 2026-03-27 at 12 51 13@2x
Not sure why the , 1) version of our builds are failing.
@joshuawootonn
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)force-pushed
the
josh/rehydrate-remote-prompt-parameters
branch
from
b22192d to
9c5646bCompareMarch 31, 2026 15:17
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn) added a commit
to braintrustdata/braintrust-sdk-javascript
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2026
@joshuawootonn
Rehydrate remote prompt parameters (#1697)
db57f90
## Summary
`Parameter`s were being passed to the `task` as a raw object in the JS
SDK, which meant loaded `Parameter`s did not expose `.build()` for
hydrating your prompt with values. With this change, a `Prompt` class is
instantiated after schema validation, so that you can run `build` in
your `task` to rehydrate your prompt. This matches the existing behavior
of static `Parameter`s, not including this in the initial implementation
was an oversight on my part.
## Demo
- JavaScript demo: https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4d900806-dfbd-45d1-8f65-8f169713043a
- Python demo: https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8c2c0e05-e12c-4e2d-812a-bd1c228ce225
## Related PRs
<!-- codex-related-prs:start -->
- [braintrustdata/braintrust-sdk-python
#166](braintrustdata/braintrust-sdk-python#166)
- Companion Python SDK PR
- [braintrustdata/braintrust
#12219](https://github.com/braintrustdata/braintrust/pull/12219) -
Parent PR
<!-- codex-related-prs:end -->
@joshuawootonn
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)
merged commit 161fa36
into
mainMar 31, 2026

36 checks passed

@joshuawootonn
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)
deleted the

josh/rehydrate-remote-prompt-parameters

branch
March 31, 2026 19:15
@AbhiPrasadAbhijeet Prasad (AbhiPrasad)
mentioned this pull request
Mar 31, 2026
 Merged

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@AbhiPrasadAbhijeet Prasad (AbhiPrasad)AbhiPrasad approved these changes
@lforstLuca Forstner (lforst)Awaiting requested review from lforst

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@joshuawootonn@AbhiPrasad

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Rehydrate remote prompt parameters - #166
Merged
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
josh/rehydrate-remote-prompt-parameters
Mar 31, 2026
Merged
Rehydrate remote prompt parameters#166
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
josh/rehydrate-remote-prompt-parameters
Conversation
@joshuawootonn
@joshuawootonnJoshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)
commented
Mar 27, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
Parameters were being passed to the task as raw dictionaries in the Python SDK, which meant loaded Parameters did not expose .build() for hydrating your prompt with values. With this change, a Prompt class is instantiated after schema validation, so that you can run build in your task to rehydrate your prompt. This matches the existing behavior of static Parameters, not including this in the initial port was an oversight on my part.
Demo
  • JavaScript demo:
CleanShot.2026-03-27.at.10.28.05.mp4
  • Python demo:
CleanShot.2026-03-27.at.10.31.21.mp4
Related PRs
@joshuawootonnJoshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)
mentioned this pull request
Mar 27, 2026
 Merged

@joshuawootonn
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)
commented
Mar 27, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
CleanShot 2026-03-27 at 12 51 13@2x
Not sure why the , 1) version of our builds are failing.
@joshuawootonn
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)force-pushed
the
josh/rehydrate-remote-prompt-parameters
branch
from
b22192d to
9c5646bCompareMarch 31, 2026 15:17
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn) added a commit
to braintrustdata/braintrust-sdk-javascript
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2026
@joshuawootonn
Rehydrate remote prompt parameters (#1697)
db57f90
## Summary
`Parameter`s were being passed to the `task` as a raw object in the JS
SDK, which meant loaded `Parameter`s did not expose `.build()` for
hydrating your prompt with values. With this change, a `Prompt` class is
instantiated after schema validation, so that you can run `build` in
your `task` to rehydrate your prompt. This matches the existing behavior
of static `Parameter`s, not including this in the initial implementation
was an oversight on my part.
## Demo
- JavaScript demo: https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4d900806-dfbd-45d1-8f65-8f169713043a
- Python demo: https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8c2c0e05-e12c-4e2d-812a-bd1c228ce225
## Related PRs
<!-- codex-related-prs:start -->
- [braintrustdata/braintrust-sdk-python
#166](braintrustdata/braintrust-sdk-python#166)
- Companion Python SDK PR
- [braintrustdata/braintrust
#12219](https://github.com/braintrustdata/braintrust/pull/12219) -
Parent PR
<!-- codex-related-prs:end -->
@joshuawootonn
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)
merged commit 161fa36
into
mainMar 31, 2026

36 checks passed

@joshuawootonn
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)
deleted the

josh/rehydrate-remote-prompt-parameters

branch
March 31, 2026 19:15
@AbhiPrasadAbhijeet Prasad (AbhiPrasad)
mentioned this pull request
Mar 31, 2026
 Merged

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@AbhiPrasadAbhijeet Prasad (AbhiPrasad)AbhiPrasad approved these changes
@lforstLuca Forstner (lforst)Awaiting requested review from lforst

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@joshuawootonn@AbhiPrasad

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Rehydrate remote prompt parameters - #166
Merged
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
josh/rehydrate-remote-prompt-parameters
Mar 31, 2026
Merged
Rehydrate remote prompt parameters#166
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
josh/rehydrate-remote-prompt-parameters
Conversation
@joshuawootonn
@joshuawootonnJoshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)
commented
Mar 27, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
Parameters were being passed to the task as raw dictionaries in the Python SDK, which meant loaded Parameters did not expose .build() for hydrating your prompt with values. With this change, a Prompt class is instantiated after schema validation, so that you can run build in your task to rehydrate your prompt. This matches the existing behavior of static Parameters, not including this in the initial port was an oversight on my part.
Demo
  • JavaScript demo:
CleanShot.2026-03-27.at.10.28.05.mp4
  • Python demo:
CleanShot.2026-03-27.at.10.31.21.mp4
Related PRs
@joshuawootonnJoshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)
mentioned this pull request
Mar 27, 2026
 Merged

@joshuawootonn
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)
commented
Mar 27, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
CleanShot 2026-03-27 at 12 51 13@2x
Not sure why the , 1) version of our builds are failing.
@joshuawootonn
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)force-pushed
the
josh/rehydrate-remote-prompt-parameters
branch
from
b22192d to
9c5646bCompareMarch 31, 2026 15:17
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn) added a commit
to braintrustdata/braintrust-sdk-javascript
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2026
@joshuawootonn
Rehydrate remote prompt parameters (#1697)
db57f90
## Summary
`Parameter`s were being passed to the `task` as a raw object in the JS
SDK, which meant loaded `Parameter`s did not expose `.build()` for
hydrating your prompt with values. With this change, a `Prompt` class is
instantiated after schema validation, so that you can run `build` in
your `task` to rehydrate your prompt. This matches the existing behavior
of static `Parameter`s, not including this in the initial implementation
was an oversight on my part.
## Demo
- JavaScript demo: https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4d900806-dfbd-45d1-8f65-8f169713043a
- Python demo: https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8c2c0e05-e12c-4e2d-812a-bd1c228ce225
## Related PRs
<!-- codex-related-prs:start -->
- [braintrustdata/braintrust-sdk-python
#166](braintrustdata/braintrust-sdk-python#166)
- Companion Python SDK PR
- [braintrustdata/braintrust
#12219](https://github.com/braintrustdata/braintrust/pull/12219) -
Parent PR
<!-- codex-related-prs:end -->
@joshuawootonn
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)
merged commit 161fa36
into
mainMar 31, 2026

36 checks passed

@joshuawootonn
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)
deleted the

josh/rehydrate-remote-prompt-parameters

branch
March 31, 2026 19:15
@AbhiPrasadAbhijeet Prasad (AbhiPrasad)
mentioned this pull request
Mar 31, 2026
 Merged

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@AbhiPrasadAbhijeet Prasad (AbhiPrasad)AbhiPrasad approved these changes
@lforstLuca Forstner (lforst)Awaiting requested review from lforst

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@joshuawootonn@AbhiPrasad

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

Skip to content
Rehydrate remote prompt parameters - #166
Merged
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
josh/rehydrate-remote-prompt-parameters
Mar 31, 2026
Merged
Rehydrate remote prompt parameters#166
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
josh/rehydrate-remote-prompt-parameters
Conversation
@joshuawootonn
@joshuawootonnJoshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)
commented
Mar 27, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
Parameters were being passed to the task as raw dictionaries in the Python SDK, which meant loaded Parameters did not expose .build() for hydrating your prompt with values. With this change, a Prompt class is instantiated after schema validation, so that you can run build in your task to rehydrate your prompt. This matches the existing behavior of static Parameters, not including this in the initial port was an oversight on my part.
Demo
  • JavaScript demo:
CleanShot.2026-03-27.at.10.28.05.mp4
  • Python demo:
CleanShot.2026-03-27.at.10.31.21.mp4
Related PRs
@joshuawootonnJoshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)
mentioned this pull request
Mar 27, 2026
 Merged

@joshuawootonn
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)
commented
Mar 27, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
CleanShot 2026-03-27 at 12 51 13@2x
Not sure why the , 1) version of our builds are failing.
@joshuawootonn
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)force-pushed
the
josh/rehydrate-remote-prompt-parameters
branch
from
b22192d to
9c5646bCompareMarch 31, 2026 15:17
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn) added a commit
to braintrustdata/braintrust-sdk-javascript
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2026
@joshuawootonn
Rehydrate remote prompt parameters (#1697)
db57f90
## Summary
`Parameter`s were being passed to the `task` as a raw object in the JS
SDK, which meant loaded `Parameter`s did not expose `.build()` for
hydrating your prompt with values. With this change, a `Prompt` class is
instantiated after schema validation, so that you can run `build` in
your `task` to rehydrate your prompt. This matches the existing behavior
of static `Parameter`s, not including this in the initial implementation
was an oversight on my part.
## Demo
- JavaScript demo: https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4d900806-dfbd-45d1-8f65-8f169713043a
- Python demo: https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8c2c0e05-e12c-4e2d-812a-bd1c228ce225
## Related PRs
<!-- codex-related-prs:start -->
- [braintrustdata/braintrust-sdk-python
#166](braintrustdata/braintrust-sdk-python#166)
- Companion Python SDK PR
- [braintrustdata/braintrust
#12219](https://github.com/braintrustdata/braintrust/pull/12219) -
Parent PR
<!-- codex-related-prs:end -->
@joshuawootonn
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)
merged commit 161fa36
into
mainMar 31, 2026

36 checks passed

@joshuawootonn
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)
deleted the

josh/rehydrate-remote-prompt-parameters

branch
March 31, 2026 19:15
@AbhiPrasadAbhijeet Prasad (AbhiPrasad)
mentioned this pull request
Mar 31, 2026
 Merged

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@AbhiPrasadAbhijeet Prasad (AbhiPrasad)AbhiPrasad approved these changes
@lforstLuca Forstner (lforst)Awaiting requested review from lforst

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@joshuawootonn@AbhiPrasad

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Rehydrate remote prompt parameters - #166
Merged
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
josh/rehydrate-remote-prompt-parameters
Mar 31, 2026
Merged
Rehydrate remote prompt parameters#166
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
josh/rehydrate-remote-prompt-parameters
Conversation
@joshuawootonn
@joshuawootonnJoshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)
commented
Mar 27, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
Parameters were being passed to the task as raw dictionaries in the Python SDK, which meant loaded Parameters did not expose .build() for hydrating your prompt with values. With this change, a Prompt class is instantiated after schema validation, so that you can run build in your task to rehydrate your prompt. This matches the existing behavior of static Parameters, not including this in the initial port was an oversight on my part.
Demo
  • JavaScript demo:
CleanShot.2026-03-27.at.10.28.05.mp4
  • Python demo:
CleanShot.2026-03-27.at.10.31.21.mp4
Related PRs
@joshuawootonnJoshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)
mentioned this pull request
Mar 27, 2026
 Merged

@joshuawootonn
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)
commented
Mar 27, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
CleanShot 2026-03-27 at 12 51 13@2x
Not sure why the , 1) version of our builds are failing.
@joshuawootonn
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)force-pushed
the
josh/rehydrate-remote-prompt-parameters
branch
from
b22192d to
9c5646bCompareMarch 31, 2026 15:17
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn) added a commit
to braintrustdata/braintrust-sdk-javascript
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2026
@joshuawootonn
Rehydrate remote prompt parameters (#1697)
db57f90
## Summary
`Parameter`s were being passed to the `task` as a raw object in the JS
SDK, which meant loaded `Parameter`s did not expose `.build()` for
hydrating your prompt with values. With this change, a `Prompt` class is
instantiated after schema validation, so that you can run `build` in
your `task` to rehydrate your prompt. This matches the existing behavior
of static `Parameter`s, not including this in the initial implementation
was an oversight on my part.
## Demo
- JavaScript demo: https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4d900806-dfbd-45d1-8f65-8f169713043a
- Python demo: https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8c2c0e05-e12c-4e2d-812a-bd1c228ce225
## Related PRs
<!-- codex-related-prs:start -->
- [braintrustdata/braintrust-sdk-python
#166](braintrustdata/braintrust-sdk-python#166)
- Companion Python SDK PR
- [braintrustdata/braintrust
#12219](https://github.com/braintrustdata/braintrust/pull/12219) -
Parent PR
<!-- codex-related-prs:end -->
@joshuawootonn
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)
merged commit 161fa36
into
mainMar 31, 2026

36 checks passed

@joshuawootonn
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)
deleted the

josh/rehydrate-remote-prompt-parameters

branch
March 31, 2026 19:15
@AbhiPrasadAbhijeet Prasad (AbhiPrasad)
mentioned this pull request
Mar 31, 2026
 Merged

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@AbhiPrasadAbhijeet Prasad (AbhiPrasad)AbhiPrasad approved these changes
@lforstLuca Forstner (lforst)Awaiting requested review from lforst

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@joshuawootonn@AbhiPrasad

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Rehydrate remote prompt parameters - #166
Merged
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
josh/rehydrate-remote-prompt-parameters
Mar 31, 2026
Merged
Rehydrate remote prompt parameters#166
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
josh/rehydrate-remote-prompt-parameters
Conversation
@joshuawootonn
@joshuawootonnJoshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)
commented
Mar 27, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
Parameters were being passed to the task as raw dictionaries in the Python SDK, which meant loaded Parameters did not expose .build() for hydrating your prompt with values. With this change, a Prompt class is instantiated after schema validation, so that you can run build in your task to rehydrate your prompt. This matches the existing behavior of static Parameters, not including this in the initial port was an oversight on my part.
Demo
  • JavaScript demo:
CleanShot.2026-03-27.at.10.28.05.mp4
  • Python demo:
CleanShot.2026-03-27.at.10.31.21.mp4
Related PRs
@joshuawootonnJoshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)
mentioned this pull request
Mar 27, 2026
 Merged

@joshuawootonn
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)
commented
Mar 27, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
CleanShot 2026-03-27 at 12 51 13@2x
Not sure why the , 1) version of our builds are failing.
@joshuawootonn
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)force-pushed
the
josh/rehydrate-remote-prompt-parameters
branch
from
b22192d to
9c5646bCompareMarch 31, 2026 15:17
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn) added a commit
to braintrustdata/braintrust-sdk-javascript
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2026
@joshuawootonn
Rehydrate remote prompt parameters (#1697)
db57f90
## Summary
`Parameter`s were being passed to the `task` as a raw object in the JS
SDK, which meant loaded `Parameter`s did not expose `.build()` for
hydrating your prompt with values. With this change, a `Prompt` class is
instantiated after schema validation, so that you can run `build` in
your `task` to rehydrate your prompt. This matches the existing behavior
of static `Parameter`s, not including this in the initial implementation
was an oversight on my part.
## Demo
- JavaScript demo: https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4d900806-dfbd-45d1-8f65-8f169713043a
- Python demo: https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8c2c0e05-e12c-4e2d-812a-bd1c228ce225
## Related PRs
<!-- codex-related-prs:start -->
- [braintrustdata/braintrust-sdk-python
#166](braintrustdata/braintrust-sdk-python#166)
- Companion Python SDK PR
- [braintrustdata/braintrust
#12219](https://github.com/braintrustdata/braintrust/pull/12219) -
Parent PR
<!-- codex-related-prs:end -->
@joshuawootonn
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)
merged commit 161fa36
into
mainMar 31, 2026

36 checks passed

@joshuawootonn
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)
deleted the

josh/rehydrate-remote-prompt-parameters

branch
March 31, 2026 19:15
@AbhiPrasadAbhijeet Prasad (AbhiPrasad)
mentioned this pull request
Mar 31, 2026
 Merged

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@AbhiPrasadAbhijeet Prasad (AbhiPrasad)AbhiPrasad approved these changes
@lforstLuca Forstner (lforst)Awaiting requested review from lforst

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@joshuawootonn@AbhiPrasad

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

Skip to content
Rehydrate remote prompt parameters - #166
Merged
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
josh/rehydrate-remote-prompt-parameters
Mar 31, 2026
Merged
Rehydrate remote prompt parameters#166
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
josh/rehydrate-remote-prompt-parameters
Conversation
@joshuawootonn
@joshuawootonnJoshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)
commented
Mar 27, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
Parameters were being passed to the task as raw dictionaries in the Python SDK, which meant loaded Parameters did not expose .build() for hydrating your prompt with values. With this change, a Prompt class is instantiated after schema validation, so that you can run build in your task to rehydrate your prompt. This matches the existing behavior of static Parameters, not including this in the initial port was an oversight on my part.
Demo
  • JavaScript demo:
CleanShot.2026-03-27.at.10.28.05.mp4
  • Python demo:
CleanShot.2026-03-27.at.10.31.21.mp4
Related PRs
@joshuawootonnJoshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)
mentioned this pull request
Mar 27, 2026
 Merged

@joshuawootonn
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)
commented
Mar 27, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
CleanShot 2026-03-27 at 12 51 13@2x
Not sure why the , 1) version of our builds are failing.
@joshuawootonn
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)force-pushed
the
josh/rehydrate-remote-prompt-parameters
branch
from
b22192d to
9c5646bCompareMarch 31, 2026 15:17
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn) added a commit
to braintrustdata/braintrust-sdk-javascript
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2026
@joshuawootonn
Rehydrate remote prompt parameters (#1697)
db57f90
## Summary
`Parameter`s were being passed to the `task` as a raw object in the JS
SDK, which meant loaded `Parameter`s did not expose `.build()` for
hydrating your prompt with values. With this change, a `Prompt` class is
instantiated after schema validation, so that you can run `build` in
your `task` to rehydrate your prompt. This matches the existing behavior
of static `Parameter`s, not including this in the initial implementation
was an oversight on my part.
## Demo
- JavaScript demo: https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4d900806-dfbd-45d1-8f65-8f169713043a
- Python demo: https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8c2c0e05-e12c-4e2d-812a-bd1c228ce225
## Related PRs
<!-- codex-related-prs:start -->
- [braintrustdata/braintrust-sdk-python
#166](braintrustdata/braintrust-sdk-python#166)
- Companion Python SDK PR
- [braintrustdata/braintrust
#12219](https://github.com/braintrustdata/braintrust/pull/12219) -
Parent PR
<!-- codex-related-prs:end -->
@joshuawootonn
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)
merged commit 161fa36
into
mainMar 31, 2026

36 checks passed

@joshuawootonn
Joshua Wootonn (joshuawootonn)
deleted the

josh/rehydrate-remote-prompt-parameters

branch
March 31, 2026 19:15
@AbhiPrasadAbhijeet Prasad (AbhiPrasad)
mentioned this pull request
Mar 31, 2026
 Merged

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@AbhiPrasadAbhijeet Prasad (AbhiPrasad)AbhiPrasad approved these changes
@lforstLuca Forstner (lforst)Awaiting requested review from lforst

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@joshuawootonn@AbhiPrasad