[BUG] MessageOneofEvaluator crashes with UnsupportedOperationException on repeated/map fields #427

Description

@ospanoff

Description

MessageOneofEvaluator.evaluate() calls Message.hasField(field) on every field in its field list (MessageOneofEvaluator.java:54). In protobuf-java, hasField() throws UnsupportedOperationException when invoked on a repeated or map field because presence is not a concept that applies to them. If a MessageOneofRule references a repeated or map field by name, the evaluator will crash at runtime instead of producing a validation result.

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Define a protobuf message with at least one repeated (or map) field and a MessageOneofRule that includes that field:
    messageExample {
    option(buf.validate.message).oneof= {
    fields: ["name", "tags"]
    required: true
    };
    stringname=1;
    repeatedstringtags=2;
    }
  2. Build a Validator and validate any instance of Example.
  3. Observe the exception during evaluation.

Expected Behavior

The MessageOneofRule should work as documented — validating that at most one (or exactly one, if required) of the specified fields is set, regardless of whether the fields are singular, repeated, or map types.

Actual Behavior

An UnsupportedOperationException is thrown at runtime

Screenshots/Logs

java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: hasField() called on a repeated field.
at com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessage.hasField(GeneratedMessage.java:255)
at build.buf.protovalidate.MessageOneofEvaluator.evaluate(MessageOneofEvaluator.java:54)

Environment

  • Operating System: macOS
  • Version: Darwin 25.3.0
  • Compiler/Toolchain: JDK 21+, Gradle 9.3.1
  • Protobuf Compiler & Version: buf v1.66.0, protobuf-java 4.34.0
  • Protovalidate Version: v1.1.0

Possible Solution

In MessageOneofEvaluator.evaluate(), check whether the field is repeated before calling hasField(), and use an appropriate presence check instead:

for (FieldDescriptorfield : fields) {
booleanisSet = field.isRepeated()
? msg.getRepeatedFieldCount(field) > 0
: msg.hasField(field);
if (isSet) {
hasCount++;
}
}

Additional Context

The fix should be tested thoroughly across all protobuf field types — singular scalars, message fields, repeated fields, and map fields — to ensure MessageOneofEvaluator correctly determines presence for each.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    BugSomething isn't working

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
       blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
      }
      } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
      })();
      (function(){
      try {
      var __m = "github.com";
      var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
      
      Skip to content

      [BUG] MessageOneofEvaluator crashes with UnsupportedOperationException on repeated/map fields #427

      Description

      @ospanoff

      Description

      MessageOneofEvaluator.evaluate() calls Message.hasField(field) on every field in its field list (MessageOneofEvaluator.java:54). In protobuf-java, hasField() throws UnsupportedOperationException when invoked on a repeated or map field because presence is not a concept that applies to them. If a MessageOneofRule references a repeated or map field by name, the evaluator will crash at runtime instead of producing a validation result.

      Steps to Reproduce

      1. Define a protobuf message with at least one repeated (or map) field and a MessageOneofRule that includes that field:
        messageExample {
        option(buf.validate.message).oneof= {
        fields: ["name", "tags"]
        required: true
        };
        stringname=1;
        repeatedstringtags=2;
        }
      2. Build a Validator and validate any instance of Example.
      3. Observe the exception during evaluation.

      Expected Behavior

      The MessageOneofRule should work as documented — validating that at most one (or exactly one, if required) of the specified fields is set, regardless of whether the fields are singular, repeated, or map types.

      Actual Behavior

      An UnsupportedOperationException is thrown at runtime

      Screenshots/Logs

      java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: hasField() called on a repeated field.
      at com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessage.hasField(GeneratedMessage.java:255)
      at build.buf.protovalidate.MessageOneofEvaluator.evaluate(MessageOneofEvaluator.java:54)
      

      Environment

      • Operating System: macOS
      • Version: Darwin 25.3.0
      • Compiler/Toolchain: JDK 21+, Gradle 9.3.1
      • Protobuf Compiler & Version: buf v1.66.0, protobuf-java 4.34.0
      • Protovalidate Version: v1.1.0

      Possible Solution

      In MessageOneofEvaluator.evaluate(), check whether the field is repeated before calling hasField(), and use an appropriate presence check instead:

      for (FieldDescriptorfield : fields) {
      booleanisSet = field.isRepeated()
      ? msg.getRepeatedFieldCount(field) > 0
      : msg.hasField(field);
      if (isSet) {
      hasCount++;
      }
      }

      Additional Context

      The fix should be tested thoroughly across all protobuf field types — singular scalars, message fields, repeated fields, and map fields — to ensure MessageOneofEvaluator correctly determines presence for each.

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      No one assigned

        Labels

        BugSomething isn't working

        Type

        No type

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
          Skip to content

          [BUG] MessageOneofEvaluator crashes with UnsupportedOperationException on repeated/map fields #427

          Description

          @ospanoff

          Description

          MessageOneofEvaluator.evaluate() calls Message.hasField(field) on every field in its field list (MessageOneofEvaluator.java:54). In protobuf-java, hasField() throws UnsupportedOperationException when invoked on a repeated or map field because presence is not a concept that applies to them. If a MessageOneofRule references a repeated or map field by name, the evaluator will crash at runtime instead of producing a validation result.

          Steps to Reproduce

          1. Define a protobuf message with at least one repeated (or map) field and a MessageOneofRule that includes that field:
            messageExample {
            option(buf.validate.message).oneof= {
            fields: ["name", "tags"]
            required: true
            };
            stringname=1;
            repeatedstringtags=2;
            }
          2. Build a Validator and validate any instance of Example.
          3. Observe the exception during evaluation.

          Expected Behavior

          The MessageOneofRule should work as documented — validating that at most one (or exactly one, if required) of the specified fields is set, regardless of whether the fields are singular, repeated, or map types.

          Actual Behavior

          An UnsupportedOperationException is thrown at runtime

          Screenshots/Logs

          java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: hasField() called on a repeated field.
          at com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessage.hasField(GeneratedMessage.java:255)
          at build.buf.protovalidate.MessageOneofEvaluator.evaluate(MessageOneofEvaluator.java:54)
          

          Environment

          • Operating System: macOS
          • Version: Darwin 25.3.0
          • Compiler/Toolchain: JDK 21+, Gradle 9.3.1
          • Protobuf Compiler & Version: buf v1.66.0, protobuf-java 4.34.0
          • Protovalidate Version: v1.1.0

          Possible Solution

          In MessageOneofEvaluator.evaluate(), check whether the field is repeated before calling hasField(), and use an appropriate presence check instead:

          for (FieldDescriptorfield : fields) {
          booleanisSet = field.isRepeated()
          ? msg.getRepeatedFieldCount(field) > 0
          : msg.hasField(field);
          if (isSet) {
          hasCount++;
          }
          }

          Additional Context

          The fix should be tested thoroughly across all protobuf field types — singular scalars, message fields, repeated fields, and map fields — to ensure MessageOneofEvaluator correctly determines presence for each.

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          No one assigned

            Labels

            BugSomething isn't working

            Type

            No type

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
              Skip to content

              [BUG] MessageOneofEvaluator crashes with UnsupportedOperationException on repeated/map fields #427

              Description

              @ospanoff

              Description

              MessageOneofEvaluator.evaluate() calls Message.hasField(field) on every field in its field list (MessageOneofEvaluator.java:54). In protobuf-java, hasField() throws UnsupportedOperationException when invoked on a repeated or map field because presence is not a concept that applies to them. If a MessageOneofRule references a repeated or map field by name, the evaluator will crash at runtime instead of producing a validation result.

              Steps to Reproduce

              1. Define a protobuf message with at least one repeated (or map) field and a MessageOneofRule that includes that field:
                messageExample {
                option(buf.validate.message).oneof= {
                fields: ["name", "tags"]
                required: true
                };
                stringname=1;
                repeatedstringtags=2;
                }
              2. Build a Validator and validate any instance of Example.
              3. Observe the exception during evaluation.

              Expected Behavior

              The MessageOneofRule should work as documented — validating that at most one (or exactly one, if required) of the specified fields is set, regardless of whether the fields are singular, repeated, or map types.

              Actual Behavior

              An UnsupportedOperationException is thrown at runtime

              Screenshots/Logs

              java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: hasField() called on a repeated field.
              at com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessage.hasField(GeneratedMessage.java:255)
              at build.buf.protovalidate.MessageOneofEvaluator.evaluate(MessageOneofEvaluator.java:54)
              

              Environment

              • Operating System: macOS
              • Version: Darwin 25.3.0
              • Compiler/Toolchain: JDK 21+, Gradle 9.3.1
              • Protobuf Compiler & Version: buf v1.66.0, protobuf-java 4.34.0
              • Protovalidate Version: v1.1.0

              Possible Solution

              In MessageOneofEvaluator.evaluate(), check whether the field is repeated before calling hasField(), and use an appropriate presence check instead:

              for (FieldDescriptorfield : fields) {
              booleanisSet = field.isRepeated()
              ? msg.getRepeatedFieldCount(field) > 0
              : msg.hasField(field);
              if (isSet) {
              hasCount++;
              }
              }

              Additional Context

              The fix should be tested thoroughly across all protobuf field types — singular scalars, message fields, repeated fields, and map fields — to ensure MessageOneofEvaluator correctly determines presence for each.

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              No one assigned

                Labels

                BugSomething isn't working

                Type

                No type

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  No milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions

                  , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
                  Skip to content

                  [BUG] MessageOneofEvaluator crashes with UnsupportedOperationException on repeated/map fields #427

                  Description

                  @ospanoff

                  Description

                  MessageOneofEvaluator.evaluate() calls Message.hasField(field) on every field in its field list (MessageOneofEvaluator.java:54). In protobuf-java, hasField() throws UnsupportedOperationException when invoked on a repeated or map field because presence is not a concept that applies to them. If a MessageOneofRule references a repeated or map field by name, the evaluator will crash at runtime instead of producing a validation result.

                  Steps to Reproduce

                  1. Define a protobuf message with at least one repeated (or map) field and a MessageOneofRule that includes that field:
                    messageExample {
                    option(buf.validate.message).oneof= {
                    fields: ["name", "tags"]
                    required: true
                    };
                    stringname=1;
                    repeatedstringtags=2;
                    }
                  2. Build a Validator and validate any instance of Example.
                  3. Observe the exception during evaluation.

                  Expected Behavior

                  The MessageOneofRule should work as documented — validating that at most one (or exactly one, if required) of the specified fields is set, regardless of whether the fields are singular, repeated, or map types.

                  Actual Behavior

                  An UnsupportedOperationException is thrown at runtime

                  Screenshots/Logs

                  java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: hasField() called on a repeated field.
                  at com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessage.hasField(GeneratedMessage.java:255)
                  at build.buf.protovalidate.MessageOneofEvaluator.evaluate(MessageOneofEvaluator.java:54)
                  

                  Environment

                  • Operating System: macOS
                  • Version: Darwin 25.3.0
                  • Compiler/Toolchain: JDK 21+, Gradle 9.3.1
                  • Protobuf Compiler & Version: buf v1.66.0, protobuf-java 4.34.0
                  • Protovalidate Version: v1.1.0

                  Possible Solution

                  In MessageOneofEvaluator.evaluate(), check whether the field is repeated before calling hasField(), and use an appropriate presence check instead:

                  for (FieldDescriptorfield : fields) {
                  booleanisSet = field.isRepeated()
                  ? msg.getRepeatedFieldCount(field) > 0
                  : msg.hasField(field);
                  if (isSet) {
                  hasCount++;
                  }
                  }

                  Additional Context

                  The fix should be tested thoroughly across all protobuf field types — singular scalars, message fields, repeated fields, and map fields — to ensure MessageOneofEvaluator correctly determines presence for each.

                  Metadata

                  Metadata

                  Assignees

                  No one assigned

                    Labels

                    BugSomething isn't working

                    Type

                    No type

                    Projects

                    No projects

                      Milestone

                      No milestone

                      Relationships

                      None yet

                      Development

                      No branches or pull requests

                      Issue actions

                      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                      Skip to content

                      [BUG] MessageOneofEvaluator crashes with UnsupportedOperationException on repeated/map fields #427

                      Description

                      @ospanoff

                      Description

                      MessageOneofEvaluator.evaluate() calls Message.hasField(field) on every field in its field list (MessageOneofEvaluator.java:54). In protobuf-java, hasField() throws UnsupportedOperationException when invoked on a repeated or map field because presence is not a concept that applies to them. If a MessageOneofRule references a repeated or map field by name, the evaluator will crash at runtime instead of producing a validation result.

                      Steps to Reproduce

                      1. Define a protobuf message with at least one repeated (or map) field and a MessageOneofRule that includes that field:
                        messageExample {
                        option(buf.validate.message).oneof= {
                        fields: ["name", "tags"]
                        required: true
                        };
                        stringname=1;
                        repeatedstringtags=2;
                        }
                      2. Build a Validator and validate any instance of Example.
                      3. Observe the exception during evaluation.

                      Expected Behavior

                      The MessageOneofRule should work as documented — validating that at most one (or exactly one, if required) of the specified fields is set, regardless of whether the fields are singular, repeated, or map types.

                      Actual Behavior

                      An UnsupportedOperationException is thrown at runtime

                      Screenshots/Logs

                      java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: hasField() called on a repeated field.
                      at com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessage.hasField(GeneratedMessage.java:255)
                      at build.buf.protovalidate.MessageOneofEvaluator.evaluate(MessageOneofEvaluator.java:54)
                      

                      Environment

                      • Operating System: macOS
                      • Version: Darwin 25.3.0
                      • Compiler/Toolchain: JDK 21+, Gradle 9.3.1
                      • Protobuf Compiler & Version: buf v1.66.0, protobuf-java 4.34.0
                      • Protovalidate Version: v1.1.0

                      Possible Solution

                      In MessageOneofEvaluator.evaluate(), check whether the field is repeated before calling hasField(), and use an appropriate presence check instead:

                      for (FieldDescriptorfield : fields) {
                      booleanisSet = field.isRepeated()
                      ? msg.getRepeatedFieldCount(field) > 0
                      : msg.hasField(field);
                      if (isSet) {
                      hasCount++;
                      }
                      }

                      Additional Context

                      The fix should be tested thoroughly across all protobuf field types — singular scalars, message fields, repeated fields, and map fields — to ensure MessageOneofEvaluator correctly determines presence for each.

                      Metadata

                      Metadata

                      Assignees

                      No one assigned

                        Labels

                        BugSomething isn't working

                        Type

                        No type

                        Projects

                        No projects

                          Milestone

                          No milestone

                          Relationships

                          None yet

                          Development

                          No branches or pull requests

                          Issue actions

                          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                          Skip to content

                          [BUG] MessageOneofEvaluator crashes with UnsupportedOperationException on repeated/map fields #427

                          Description

                          @ospanoff

                          Description

                          MessageOneofEvaluator.evaluate() calls Message.hasField(field) on every field in its field list (MessageOneofEvaluator.java:54). In protobuf-java, hasField() throws UnsupportedOperationException when invoked on a repeated or map field because presence is not a concept that applies to them. If a MessageOneofRule references a repeated or map field by name, the evaluator will crash at runtime instead of producing a validation result.

                          Steps to Reproduce

                          1. Define a protobuf message with at least one repeated (or map) field and a MessageOneofRule that includes that field:
                            messageExample {
                            option(buf.validate.message).oneof= {
                            fields: ["name", "tags"]
                            required: true
                            };
                            stringname=1;
                            repeatedstringtags=2;
                            }
                          2. Build a Validator and validate any instance of Example.
                          3. Observe the exception during evaluation.

                          Expected Behavior

                          The MessageOneofRule should work as documented — validating that at most one (or exactly one, if required) of the specified fields is set, regardless of whether the fields are singular, repeated, or map types.

                          Actual Behavior

                          An UnsupportedOperationException is thrown at runtime

                          Screenshots/Logs

                          java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: hasField() called on a repeated field.
                          at com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessage.hasField(GeneratedMessage.java:255)
                          at build.buf.protovalidate.MessageOneofEvaluator.evaluate(MessageOneofEvaluator.java:54)
                          

                          Environment

                          • Operating System: macOS
                          • Version: Darwin 25.3.0
                          • Compiler/Toolchain: JDK 21+, Gradle 9.3.1
                          • Protobuf Compiler & Version: buf v1.66.0, protobuf-java 4.34.0
                          • Protovalidate Version: v1.1.0

                          Possible Solution

                          In MessageOneofEvaluator.evaluate(), check whether the field is repeated before calling hasField(), and use an appropriate presence check instead:

                          for (FieldDescriptorfield : fields) {
                          booleanisSet = field.isRepeated()
                          ? msg.getRepeatedFieldCount(field) > 0
                          : msg.hasField(field);
                          if (isSet) {
                          hasCount++;
                          }
                          }

                          Additional Context

                          The fix should be tested thoroughly across all protobuf field types — singular scalars, message fields, repeated fields, and map fields — to ensure MessageOneofEvaluator correctly determines presence for each.

                          Metadata

                          Metadata

                          Assignees

                          No one assigned

                            Labels

                            BugSomething isn't working

                            Type

                            No type

                            Projects

                            No projects

                              Milestone

                              No milestone

                              Relationships

                              None yet

                              Development

                              No branches or pull requests

                              Issue actions

                              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
                              Skip to content

                              [BUG] MessageOneofEvaluator crashes with UnsupportedOperationException on repeated/map fields #427

                              Description

                              @ospanoff

                              Description

                              MessageOneofEvaluator.evaluate() calls Message.hasField(field) on every field in its field list (MessageOneofEvaluator.java:54). In protobuf-java, hasField() throws UnsupportedOperationException when invoked on a repeated or map field because presence is not a concept that applies to them. If a MessageOneofRule references a repeated or map field by name, the evaluator will crash at runtime instead of producing a validation result.

                              Steps to Reproduce

                              1. Define a protobuf message with at least one repeated (or map) field and a MessageOneofRule that includes that field:
                                messageExample {
                                option(buf.validate.message).oneof= {
                                fields: ["name", "tags"]
                                required: true
                                };
                                stringname=1;
                                repeatedstringtags=2;
                                }
                              2. Build a Validator and validate any instance of Example.
                              3. Observe the exception during evaluation.

                              Expected Behavior

                              The MessageOneofRule should work as documented — validating that at most one (or exactly one, if required) of the specified fields is set, regardless of whether the fields are singular, repeated, or map types.

                              Actual Behavior

                              An UnsupportedOperationException is thrown at runtime

                              Screenshots/Logs

                              java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: hasField() called on a repeated field.
                              at com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessage.hasField(GeneratedMessage.java:255)
                              at build.buf.protovalidate.MessageOneofEvaluator.evaluate(MessageOneofEvaluator.java:54)
                              

                              Environment

                              • Operating System: macOS
                              • Version: Darwin 25.3.0
                              • Compiler/Toolchain: JDK 21+, Gradle 9.3.1
                              • Protobuf Compiler & Version: buf v1.66.0, protobuf-java 4.34.0
                              • Protovalidate Version: v1.1.0

                              Possible Solution

                              In MessageOneofEvaluator.evaluate(), check whether the field is repeated before calling hasField(), and use an appropriate presence check instead:

                              for (FieldDescriptorfield : fields) {
                              booleanisSet = field.isRepeated()
                              ? msg.getRepeatedFieldCount(field) > 0
                              : msg.hasField(field);
                              if (isSet) {
                              hasCount++;
                              }
                              }

                              Additional Context

                              The fix should be tested thoroughly across all protobuf field types — singular scalars, message fields, repeated fields, and map fields — to ensure MessageOneofEvaluator correctly determines presence for each.

                              Metadata

                              Metadata

                              Assignees

                              No one assigned

                                Labels

                                BugSomething isn't working

                                Type

                                No type

                                Projects

                                No projects

                                  Milestone

                                  No milestone

                                  Relationships

                                  None yet

                                  Development

                                  No branches or pull requests

                                  Issue actions