Add tup2 to tup9 for Gen - #181
Conversation
jmid
commented
Dec 2, 2021
I think these are fine. What do you think @c-cube? Even if they are so straightforward, it would be nice to include tests of them. For uniformity it would be nice to add |
c-cube
commented
Dec 3, 2021
can we get the same in QCheck.Gen? |
vch9
commented
Dec 3, 2021
Yes I will add these in QCheck. When I did this PR I thought QCheck2 would replace QCheck. However, I started the migration in our project where we have a lot of QCheck tests and the execution's time has raised a lot. I now believe QCheck is still relevant in many cases. |
c-cube
commented
Dec 3, 2021
Indeed, it might be that they both have their use :-). |
vch9
commented
Dec 3, 2021
c-cube
commented
Dec 3, 2021
Looks good I think. Thanks for the patience on such boilerplat-y code :D |
jmid
commented
Dec 4, 2021
It would be great if you could extract a representable test case and share it here 🙏🙂 QCheck2 is a great effort! In the long run, I still hope for it to replace QCheck. |
vch9
commented
Dec 4, 2021
It's a test in the Tezos code base, there is a lot of dependencies going on there. I don't know if it can be easily extracted for our testing purpose. |
Alternative (and easy) solution for #108.
Nothing smart happening there.