fix(backend): Fix unhandled handshake error - #2541

Merged
brkalow merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
brk.fix/handshake-invalid
Jan 10, 2024
Merged

fix(backend): Fix unhandled handshake error#2541
brkalow merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
brk.fix/handshake-invalid

Conversation

@brkalow

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

Fixes a bug in the handshake flow that would cause an unhandled error if the handshake payload or session token in the handshake payload fails to be verified.

Checklist

  • npm test runs as expected.
  • npm run build runs as expected.
  • (If applicable) JSDoc comments have been added or updated for any package exports
  • (If applicable) Documentation has been updated

Type of change

  • 🐛 Bug fix
  • 🌟 New feature
  • 🔨 Breaking change
  • 📖 Refactoring / dependency upgrade / documentation
  • other:

Packages affected

  • @clerk/backend
  • @clerk/chrome-extension
  • @clerk/clerk-js
  • @clerk/clerk-expo
  • @clerk/fastify
  • gatsby-plugin-clerk
  • @clerk/localizations
  • @clerk/nextjs
  • @clerk/clerk-react
  • @clerk/remix
  • @clerk/clerk-sdk-node
  • @clerk/shared
  • @clerk/themes
  • @clerk/types
  • build/tooling/chore

@brkalow
brkalow requested review from a team and LekoArts and removed request for a teamJanuary 10, 2024 18:31
@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Jan 10, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: f8a1026

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 7 packages
NameType
@clerk/backendPatch
@clerk/fastifyPatch
gatsby-plugin-clerkPatch
@clerk/nextjsPatch
@clerk/remixPatch
@clerk/clerk-sdk-nodePatch
@clerk/elementsPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

Comment on lines +210 to +211
// If for some reason the handshake token is invalid or stale, we ignore it and continue trying to authenticate the request.
// Worst case, the handshake will trigger again and return a refreshed token.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it possible that this would lead to an infinite redirect loop, if FAPI will not return a fresh token ?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, it seems less likely that FAPI would return a stale token / invalid handshake payload though. For some reason we're seeing stale handshake cookies here, so the only solution is to move past the handshake handling and attempt to authenticate the request like normal.

@brkalow
brkalow enabled auto-merge January 10, 2024 19:00
@brkalow
brkalow added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 10, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit e6ecbaaJan 10, 2024
@brkalow
brkalow deleted the brk.fix/handshake-invalid branch January 10, 2024 19:16
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@brkalow@nikosdouvlis@panteliselef@clerk-cookie
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

fix(backend): Fix unhandled handshake error - #2541

Merged
brkalow merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
brk.fix/handshake-invalid
Jan 10, 2024
Merged

fix(backend): Fix unhandled handshake error#2541
brkalow merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
brk.fix/handshake-invalid

Conversation

@brkalow

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

Fixes a bug in the handshake flow that would cause an unhandled error if the handshake payload or session token in the handshake payload fails to be verified.

Checklist

  • npm test runs as expected.
  • npm run build runs as expected.
  • (If applicable) JSDoc comments have been added or updated for any package exports
  • (If applicable) Documentation has been updated

Type of change

  • 🐛 Bug fix
  • 🌟 New feature
  • 🔨 Breaking change
  • 📖 Refactoring / dependency upgrade / documentation
  • other:

Packages affected

  • @clerk/backend
  • @clerk/chrome-extension
  • @clerk/clerk-js
  • @clerk/clerk-expo
  • @clerk/fastify
  • gatsby-plugin-clerk
  • @clerk/localizations
  • @clerk/nextjs
  • @clerk/clerk-react
  • @clerk/remix
  • @clerk/clerk-sdk-node
  • @clerk/shared
  • @clerk/themes
  • @clerk/types
  • build/tooling/chore

@brkalow
brkalow requested review from a team and LekoArts and removed request for a teamJanuary 10, 2024 18:31
@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Jan 10, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: f8a1026

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 7 packages
NameType
@clerk/backendPatch
@clerk/fastifyPatch
gatsby-plugin-clerkPatch
@clerk/nextjsPatch
@clerk/remixPatch
@clerk/clerk-sdk-nodePatch
@clerk/elementsPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

Comment on lines +210 to +211
// If for some reason the handshake token is invalid or stale, we ignore it and continue trying to authenticate the request.
// Worst case, the handshake will trigger again and return a refreshed token.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it possible that this would lead to an infinite redirect loop, if FAPI will not return a fresh token ?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, it seems less likely that FAPI would return a stale token / invalid handshake payload though. For some reason we're seeing stale handshake cookies here, so the only solution is to move past the handshake handling and attempt to authenticate the request like normal.

@brkalow
brkalow enabled auto-merge January 10, 2024 19:00
@brkalow
brkalow added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 10, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit e6ecbaaJan 10, 2024
@brkalow
brkalow deleted the brk.fix/handshake-invalid branch January 10, 2024 19:16
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@brkalow@nikosdouvlis@panteliselef@clerk-cookie
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(backend): Fix unhandled handshake error - #2541

Merged
brkalow merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
brk.fix/handshake-invalid
Jan 10, 2024
Merged

fix(backend): Fix unhandled handshake error#2541
brkalow merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
brk.fix/handshake-invalid

Conversation

@brkalow

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

Fixes a bug in the handshake flow that would cause an unhandled error if the handshake payload or session token in the handshake payload fails to be verified.

Checklist

  • npm test runs as expected.
  • npm run build runs as expected.
  • (If applicable) JSDoc comments have been added or updated for any package exports
  • (If applicable) Documentation has been updated

Type of change

  • 🐛 Bug fix
  • 🌟 New feature
  • 🔨 Breaking change
  • 📖 Refactoring / dependency upgrade / documentation
  • other:

Packages affected

  • @clerk/backend
  • @clerk/chrome-extension
  • @clerk/clerk-js
  • @clerk/clerk-expo
  • @clerk/fastify
  • gatsby-plugin-clerk
  • @clerk/localizations
  • @clerk/nextjs
  • @clerk/clerk-react
  • @clerk/remix
  • @clerk/clerk-sdk-node
  • @clerk/shared
  • @clerk/themes
  • @clerk/types
  • build/tooling/chore

@brkalow
brkalow requested review from a team and LekoArts and removed request for a teamJanuary 10, 2024 18:31
@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Jan 10, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: f8a1026

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 7 packages
NameType
@clerk/backendPatch
@clerk/fastifyPatch
gatsby-plugin-clerkPatch
@clerk/nextjsPatch
@clerk/remixPatch
@clerk/clerk-sdk-nodePatch
@clerk/elementsPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

Comment on lines +210 to +211
// If for some reason the handshake token is invalid or stale, we ignore it and continue trying to authenticate the request.
// Worst case, the handshake will trigger again and return a refreshed token.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it possible that this would lead to an infinite redirect loop, if FAPI will not return a fresh token ?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, it seems less likely that FAPI would return a stale token / invalid handshake payload though. For some reason we're seeing stale handshake cookies here, so the only solution is to move past the handshake handling and attempt to authenticate the request like normal.

@brkalow
brkalow enabled auto-merge January 10, 2024 19:00
@brkalow
brkalow added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 10, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit e6ecbaaJan 10, 2024
@brkalow
brkalow deleted the brk.fix/handshake-invalid branch January 10, 2024 19:16
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@brkalow@nikosdouvlis@panteliselef@clerk-cookie
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(backend): Fix unhandled handshake error - #2541

Merged
brkalow merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
brk.fix/handshake-invalid
Jan 10, 2024
Merged

fix(backend): Fix unhandled handshake error#2541
brkalow merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
brk.fix/handshake-invalid

Conversation

@brkalow

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

Fixes a bug in the handshake flow that would cause an unhandled error if the handshake payload or session token in the handshake payload fails to be verified.

Checklist

  • npm test runs as expected.
  • npm run build runs as expected.
  • (If applicable) JSDoc comments have been added or updated for any package exports
  • (If applicable) Documentation has been updated

Type of change

  • 🐛 Bug fix
  • 🌟 New feature
  • 🔨 Breaking change
  • 📖 Refactoring / dependency upgrade / documentation
  • other:

Packages affected

  • @clerk/backend
  • @clerk/chrome-extension
  • @clerk/clerk-js
  • @clerk/clerk-expo
  • @clerk/fastify
  • gatsby-plugin-clerk
  • @clerk/localizations
  • @clerk/nextjs
  • @clerk/clerk-react
  • @clerk/remix
  • @clerk/clerk-sdk-node
  • @clerk/shared
  • @clerk/themes
  • @clerk/types
  • build/tooling/chore

@brkalow
brkalow requested review from a team and LekoArts and removed request for a teamJanuary 10, 2024 18:31
@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Jan 10, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: f8a1026

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 7 packages
NameType
@clerk/backendPatch
@clerk/fastifyPatch
gatsby-plugin-clerkPatch
@clerk/nextjsPatch
@clerk/remixPatch
@clerk/clerk-sdk-nodePatch
@clerk/elementsPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

Comment on lines +210 to +211
// If for some reason the handshake token is invalid or stale, we ignore it and continue trying to authenticate the request.
// Worst case, the handshake will trigger again and return a refreshed token.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it possible that this would lead to an infinite redirect loop, if FAPI will not return a fresh token ?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, it seems less likely that FAPI would return a stale token / invalid handshake payload though. For some reason we're seeing stale handshake cookies here, so the only solution is to move past the handshake handling and attempt to authenticate the request like normal.

@brkalow
brkalow enabled auto-merge January 10, 2024 19:00
@brkalow
brkalow added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 10, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit e6ecbaaJan 10, 2024
@brkalow
brkalow deleted the brk.fix/handshake-invalid branch January 10, 2024 19:16
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@brkalow@nikosdouvlis@panteliselef@clerk-cookie
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

fix(backend): Fix unhandled handshake error - #2541

Merged
brkalow merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
brk.fix/handshake-invalid
Jan 10, 2024
Merged

fix(backend): Fix unhandled handshake error#2541
brkalow merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
brk.fix/handshake-invalid

Conversation

@brkalow

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

Fixes a bug in the handshake flow that would cause an unhandled error if the handshake payload or session token in the handshake payload fails to be verified.

Checklist

  • npm test runs as expected.
  • npm run build runs as expected.
  • (If applicable) JSDoc comments have been added or updated for any package exports
  • (If applicable) Documentation has been updated

Type of change

  • 🐛 Bug fix
  • 🌟 New feature
  • 🔨 Breaking change
  • 📖 Refactoring / dependency upgrade / documentation
  • other:

Packages affected

  • @clerk/backend
  • @clerk/chrome-extension
  • @clerk/clerk-js
  • @clerk/clerk-expo
  • @clerk/fastify
  • gatsby-plugin-clerk
  • @clerk/localizations
  • @clerk/nextjs
  • @clerk/clerk-react
  • @clerk/remix
  • @clerk/clerk-sdk-node
  • @clerk/shared
  • @clerk/themes
  • @clerk/types
  • build/tooling/chore

@brkalow
brkalow requested review from a team and LekoArts and removed request for a teamJanuary 10, 2024 18:31
@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Jan 10, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: f8a1026

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 7 packages
NameType
@clerk/backendPatch
@clerk/fastifyPatch
gatsby-plugin-clerkPatch
@clerk/nextjsPatch
@clerk/remixPatch
@clerk/clerk-sdk-nodePatch
@clerk/elementsPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

Comment on lines +210 to +211
// If for some reason the handshake token is invalid or stale, we ignore it and continue trying to authenticate the request.
// Worst case, the handshake will trigger again and return a refreshed token.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it possible that this would lead to an infinite redirect loop, if FAPI will not return a fresh token ?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, it seems less likely that FAPI would return a stale token / invalid handshake payload though. For some reason we're seeing stale handshake cookies here, so the only solution is to move past the handshake handling and attempt to authenticate the request like normal.

@brkalow
brkalow enabled auto-merge January 10, 2024 19:00
@brkalow
brkalow added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 10, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit e6ecbaaJan 10, 2024
@brkalow
brkalow deleted the brk.fix/handshake-invalid branch January 10, 2024 19:16
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@brkalow@nikosdouvlis@panteliselef@clerk-cookie
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(backend): Fix unhandled handshake error - #2541

Merged
brkalow merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
brk.fix/handshake-invalid
Jan 10, 2024
Merged

fix(backend): Fix unhandled handshake error#2541
brkalow merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
brk.fix/handshake-invalid

Conversation

@brkalow

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

Fixes a bug in the handshake flow that would cause an unhandled error if the handshake payload or session token in the handshake payload fails to be verified.

Checklist

  • npm test runs as expected.
  • npm run build runs as expected.
  • (If applicable) JSDoc comments have been added or updated for any package exports
  • (If applicable) Documentation has been updated

Type of change

  • 🐛 Bug fix
  • 🌟 New feature
  • 🔨 Breaking change
  • 📖 Refactoring / dependency upgrade / documentation
  • other:

Packages affected

  • @clerk/backend
  • @clerk/chrome-extension
  • @clerk/clerk-js
  • @clerk/clerk-expo
  • @clerk/fastify
  • gatsby-plugin-clerk
  • @clerk/localizations
  • @clerk/nextjs
  • @clerk/clerk-react
  • @clerk/remix
  • @clerk/clerk-sdk-node
  • @clerk/shared
  • @clerk/themes
  • @clerk/types
  • build/tooling/chore

@brkalow
brkalow requested review from a team and LekoArts and removed request for a teamJanuary 10, 2024 18:31
@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Jan 10, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: f8a1026

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 7 packages
NameType
@clerk/backendPatch
@clerk/fastifyPatch
gatsby-plugin-clerkPatch
@clerk/nextjsPatch
@clerk/remixPatch
@clerk/clerk-sdk-nodePatch
@clerk/elementsPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

Comment on lines +210 to +211
// If for some reason the handshake token is invalid or stale, we ignore it and continue trying to authenticate the request.
// Worst case, the handshake will trigger again and return a refreshed token.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it possible that this would lead to an infinite redirect loop, if FAPI will not return a fresh token ?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, it seems less likely that FAPI would return a stale token / invalid handshake payload though. For some reason we're seeing stale handshake cookies here, so the only solution is to move past the handshake handling and attempt to authenticate the request like normal.

@brkalow
brkalow enabled auto-merge January 10, 2024 19:00
@brkalow
brkalow added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 10, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit e6ecbaaJan 10, 2024
@brkalow
brkalow deleted the brk.fix/handshake-invalid branch January 10, 2024 19:16
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@brkalow@nikosdouvlis@panteliselef@clerk-cookie
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(backend): Fix unhandled handshake error - #2541

Merged
brkalow merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
brk.fix/handshake-invalid
Jan 10, 2024
Merged

fix(backend): Fix unhandled handshake error#2541
brkalow merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
brk.fix/handshake-invalid

Conversation

@brkalow

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

Fixes a bug in the handshake flow that would cause an unhandled error if the handshake payload or session token in the handshake payload fails to be verified.

Checklist

  • npm test runs as expected.
  • npm run build runs as expected.
  • (If applicable) JSDoc comments have been added or updated for any package exports
  • (If applicable) Documentation has been updated

Type of change

  • 🐛 Bug fix
  • 🌟 New feature
  • 🔨 Breaking change
  • 📖 Refactoring / dependency upgrade / documentation
  • other:

Packages affected

  • @clerk/backend
  • @clerk/chrome-extension
  • @clerk/clerk-js
  • @clerk/clerk-expo
  • @clerk/fastify
  • gatsby-plugin-clerk
  • @clerk/localizations
  • @clerk/nextjs
  • @clerk/clerk-react
  • @clerk/remix
  • @clerk/clerk-sdk-node
  • @clerk/shared
  • @clerk/themes
  • @clerk/types
  • build/tooling/chore

@brkalow
brkalow requested review from a team and LekoArts and removed request for a teamJanuary 10, 2024 18:31
@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Jan 10, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: f8a1026

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 7 packages
NameType
@clerk/backendPatch
@clerk/fastifyPatch
gatsby-plugin-clerkPatch
@clerk/nextjsPatch
@clerk/remixPatch
@clerk/clerk-sdk-nodePatch
@clerk/elementsPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

Comment on lines +210 to +211
// If for some reason the handshake token is invalid or stale, we ignore it and continue trying to authenticate the request.
// Worst case, the handshake will trigger again and return a refreshed token.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it possible that this would lead to an infinite redirect loop, if FAPI will not return a fresh token ?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, it seems less likely that FAPI would return a stale token / invalid handshake payload though. For some reason we're seeing stale handshake cookies here, so the only solution is to move past the handshake handling and attempt to authenticate the request like normal.

@brkalow
brkalow enabled auto-merge January 10, 2024 19:00
@brkalow
brkalow added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 10, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit e6ecbaaJan 10, 2024
@brkalow
brkalow deleted the brk.fix/handshake-invalid branch January 10, 2024 19:16
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@brkalow@nikosdouvlis@panteliselef@clerk-cookie
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

fix(backend): Fix unhandled handshake error - #2541

Merged
brkalow merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
brk.fix/handshake-invalid
Jan 10, 2024
Merged

fix(backend): Fix unhandled handshake error#2541
brkalow merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
brk.fix/handshake-invalid

Conversation

@brkalow

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

Fixes a bug in the handshake flow that would cause an unhandled error if the handshake payload or session token in the handshake payload fails to be verified.

Checklist

  • npm test runs as expected.
  • npm run build runs as expected.
  • (If applicable) JSDoc comments have been added or updated for any package exports
  • (If applicable) Documentation has been updated

Type of change

  • 🐛 Bug fix
  • 🌟 New feature
  • 🔨 Breaking change
  • 📖 Refactoring / dependency upgrade / documentation
  • other:

Packages affected

  • @clerk/backend
  • @clerk/chrome-extension
  • @clerk/clerk-js
  • @clerk/clerk-expo
  • @clerk/fastify
  • gatsby-plugin-clerk
  • @clerk/localizations
  • @clerk/nextjs
  • @clerk/clerk-react
  • @clerk/remix
  • @clerk/clerk-sdk-node
  • @clerk/shared
  • @clerk/themes
  • @clerk/types
  • build/tooling/chore

@brkalow
brkalow requested review from a team and LekoArts and removed request for a teamJanuary 10, 2024 18:31
@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Jan 10, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: f8a1026

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 7 packages
NameType
@clerk/backendPatch
@clerk/fastifyPatch
gatsby-plugin-clerkPatch
@clerk/nextjsPatch
@clerk/remixPatch
@clerk/clerk-sdk-nodePatch
@clerk/elementsPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

Comment on lines +210 to +211
// If for some reason the handshake token is invalid or stale, we ignore it and continue trying to authenticate the request.
// Worst case, the handshake will trigger again and return a refreshed token.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it possible that this would lead to an infinite redirect loop, if FAPI will not return a fresh token ?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, it seems less likely that FAPI would return a stale token / invalid handshake payload though. For some reason we're seeing stale handshake cookies here, so the only solution is to move past the handshake handling and attempt to authenticate the request like normal.

@brkalow
brkalow enabled auto-merge January 10, 2024 19:00
@brkalow
brkalow added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 10, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit e6ecbaaJan 10, 2024
@brkalow
brkalow deleted the brk.fix/handshake-invalid branch January 10, 2024 19:16
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@brkalow@nikosdouvlis@panteliselef@clerk-cookie