Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion | 🟠 Major
🧩 Analysis chain
Add explicit return type, JSDoc documentation, and parameter validation.
The method has several issues that should be addressed:
subjectparameter is required but not validated. Other methods in this class (e.g.,revoke,getSecret) validate ID parameters usingthis.requireId().Apply this diff to add return type, JSDoc, and validation:
Additionally, verify whether the API response includes pagination metadata (total count, hasMore, etc.) or just returns an array:
🏁 Script executed:
Length of output: 99058
🏁 Script executed:
Length of output: 1054
Use paginated response type and validate subject ID
subjectviathis.requireId(queryParams.subject)before calling the API.async list(queryParams: GetAPIKeyListParams): Promise<PaginatedResourceResponse<APIKey[]>>and update the request generic to
PaginatedResourceResponse<APIKey[]>.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents