Skip to content

docs(shared): use @hidden over @internal for internal Clerk/Client members - #8701

Merged
alexisintech merged 1 commit into
aa/generate-object-docsfrom
jacek/objects-docs-hide-internal-members
May 29, 2026
Merged

docs(shared): use @hidden over @internal for internal Clerk/Client members#8701
alexisintech merged 1 commit into
aa/generate-object-docsfrom
jacek/objects-docs-hide-internal-members

Conversation

@jacekradko

@jacekradkojacekradko commented May 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Targets the #8276 branch.

Those 18 __internal_* members on Clerk and ClientResource got @internal tags so they'd stay out of the generated /objects docs. The problem is snapi reads @internal as a TSDoc release tag and drops them from the API snapshot, so the API Changes check sees them disappear and reports 18 "removed" breaking changes. But there's no stripInternal in the build, so these members are still emitted in the .d.ts and at runtime. They're genuinely still part of the contract and shouldn't leave snapi's radar.

Swapping @internal to @hidden on just those members keeps typedoc excluding them from the docs (@hidden is a removal tag), while snapi keeps tracking them since @hidden isn't a release tag. The 14 pre-existing @internal tags are left alone. I ran the typedoc generation locally to confirm none of the 18 leak into the output and the build is clean.

One heads up: the API Changes check won't run on this PR, that workflow only triggers on PRs into main/release/*, so it'll re-validate on #8276 once these commits land on the branch.

@jacekradko
docs(shared): use@hiddenover@internalfor internal Clerk/Client me…
2f3f35d
…mbers
These 18 __internal_* members on Clerk and ClientResource were tagged @internal to keep them out of the generated /objects docs, but snapi reads @internal as a TSDoc release tag and drops them from the API snapshot, so the API Changes check reports them as removed (18 false breaking changes). There is no stripInternal in the build, so the members are still emitted in the .d.ts and at runtime and remain part of the contract.
Swap @internal to @hidden on just those members: typedoc still excludes them from the docs (@hidden is a removal tag), but snapi keeps tracking them since @hidden is not a release tag. The 14 pre-existing @internal tags are left as-is.
@vercel

vercelBot commented May 29, 2026•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

ProjectDeploymentActionsUpdated (UTC)
clerk-js-sandboxReadyReadyPreview, CommentMay 29, 2026 1:00am

Request Review

@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented May 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 2f3f35d

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@alexisintech

alexisintech commented May 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ahhh you're a genius thank you!

@alexisintech
alexisintech merged commit d555bdc into aa/generate-object-docsMay 29, 2026
7 checks passed
@alexisintech
alexisintech deleted the jacek/objects-docs-hide-internal-members branch May 29, 2026 01:07
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@wobsorianowobsorianowobsoriano approved these changes
@alexisintechalexisintechAwaiting requested review from alexisintech

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jacekradko@alexisintech@wobsoriano
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
docs(shared): use @hidden over @internal for internal Clerk/Client members by jacekradko · Pull Request #8701 · clerk/javascript · GitHub
Skip to content
docs(shared): use @hidden over @internal for internal Clerk/Client members - #8701
Merged
alexisintech merged 1 commit into
aa/generate-object-docsfrom 
jacek/objects-docs-hide-internal-members
May 29, 2026
Merged
docs(shared): use @hidden over @internal for internal Clerk/Client members#8701
alexisintech merged 1 commit into
aa/generate-object-docsfrom 
jacek/objects-docs-hide-internal-members
Conversation
@jacekradko
@jacekradkojacekradko
commented
May 29, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Targets the #8276 branch.
Those 18 __internal_* members on Clerk and ClientResource got @internal tags so they'd stay out of the generated /objects docs. The problem is snapi reads @internal as a TSDoc release tag and drops them from the API snapshot, so the API Changes check sees them disappear and reports 18 "removed" breaking changes. But there's no stripInternal in the build, so these members are still emitted in the .d.ts and at runtime. They're genuinely still part of the contract and shouldn't leave snapi's radar.
Swapping @internal to @hidden on just those members keeps typedoc excluding them from the docs (@hidden is a removal tag), while snapi keeps tracking them since @hidden isn't a release tag. The 14 pre-existing @internal tags are left alone. I ran the typedoc generation locally to confirm none of the 18 leak into the output and the build is clean.
One heads up: the API Changes check won't run on this PR, that workflow only triggers on PRs into main/release/*, so it'll re-validate on #8276 once these commits land on the branch.
@jacekradko
docs(shared): use@hiddenover@internalfor internal Clerk/Client me…
2f3f35d
…mbers
These 18 __internal_* members on Clerk and ClientResource were tagged @internal to keep them out of the generated /objects docs, but snapi reads @internal as a TSDoc release tag and drops them from the API snapshot, so the API Changes check reports them as removed (18 false breaking changes). There is no stripInternal in the build, so the members are still emitted in the .d.ts and at runtime and remain part of the contract.
Swap @internal to @hidden on just those members: typedoc still excludes them from the docs (@hidden is a removal tag), but snapi keeps tracking them since @hidden is not a release tag. The 14 pre-existing @internal tags are left as-is.
@vercel
vercelBot
commented
May 29, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
ProjectDeploymentActionsUpdated (UTC)
clerk-js-sandboxReadyReadyPreview, CommentMay 29, 2026 1:00am
Request Review
@changeset-bot
changeset-botBot
commented
May 29, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found
Latest commit: 2f3f35d
Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.
This PR includes no changesets
When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types
Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.
Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR
@alexisintech
alexisintech
commented
May 29, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
ahhh you're a genius thank you!
@alexisintech
alexisintech
merged commit d555bdc
into
aa/generate-object-docsMay 29, 2026

7 checks passed

@alexisintech
alexisintech
deleted the

jacek/objects-docs-hide-internal-members

branch
May 29, 2026 01:07
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@wobsorianowobsorianowobsoriano approved these changes
@alexisintechalexisintechAwaiting requested review from alexisintech

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jacekradko@alexisintech@wobsoriano

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode
(function() {
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '
.markdown-body {
color-scheme: dark light;
}
.markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }
.markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }
.markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }
.markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }
.markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }
.markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }
';
document.head.appendChild(style);
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
docs(shared): use @hidden over @internal for internal Clerk/Client members by jacekradko · Pull Request #8701 · clerk/javascript · GitHub
Skip to content
docs(shared): use @hidden over @internal for internal Clerk/Client members - #8701
Merged
alexisintech merged 1 commit into
aa/generate-object-docsfrom 
jacek/objects-docs-hide-internal-members
May 29, 2026
Merged
docs(shared): use @hidden over @internal for internal Clerk/Client members#8701
alexisintech merged 1 commit into
aa/generate-object-docsfrom 
jacek/objects-docs-hide-internal-members
Conversation
@jacekradko
@jacekradkojacekradko
commented
May 29, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Targets the #8276 branch.
Those 18 __internal_* members on Clerk and ClientResource got @internal tags so they'd stay out of the generated /objects docs. The problem is snapi reads @internal as a TSDoc release tag and drops them from the API snapshot, so the API Changes check sees them disappear and reports 18 "removed" breaking changes. But there's no stripInternal in the build, so these members are still emitted in the .d.ts and at runtime. They're genuinely still part of the contract and shouldn't leave snapi's radar.
Swapping @internal to @hidden on just those members keeps typedoc excluding them from the docs (@hidden is a removal tag), while snapi keeps tracking them since @hidden isn't a release tag. The 14 pre-existing @internal tags are left alone. I ran the typedoc generation locally to confirm none of the 18 leak into the output and the build is clean.
One heads up: the API Changes check won't run on this PR, that workflow only triggers on PRs into main/release/*, so it'll re-validate on #8276 once these commits land on the branch.
@jacekradko
docs(shared): use@hiddenover@internalfor internal Clerk/Client me…
2f3f35d
…mbers
These 18 __internal_* members on Clerk and ClientResource were tagged @internal to keep them out of the generated /objects docs, but snapi reads @internal as a TSDoc release tag and drops them from the API snapshot, so the API Changes check reports them as removed (18 false breaking changes). There is no stripInternal in the build, so the members are still emitted in the .d.ts and at runtime and remain part of the contract.
Swap @internal to @hidden on just those members: typedoc still excludes them from the docs (@hidden is a removal tag), but snapi keeps tracking them since @hidden is not a release tag. The 14 pre-existing @internal tags are left as-is.
@vercel
vercelBot
commented
May 29, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
ProjectDeploymentActionsUpdated (UTC)
clerk-js-sandboxReadyReadyPreview, CommentMay 29, 2026 1:00am
Request Review
@changeset-bot
changeset-botBot
commented
May 29, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found
Latest commit: 2f3f35d
Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.
This PR includes no changesets
When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types
Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.
Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR
@alexisintech
alexisintech
commented
May 29, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
ahhh you're a genius thank you!
@alexisintech
alexisintech
merged commit d555bdc
into
aa/generate-object-docsMay 29, 2026

7 checks passed

@alexisintech
alexisintech
deleted the

jacek/objects-docs-hide-internal-members

branch
May 29, 2026 01:07
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@wobsorianowobsorianowobsoriano approved these changes
@alexisintechalexisintechAwaiting requested review from alexisintech

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jacekradko@alexisintech@wobsoriano

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer
(function() {
var ref = document.referrer;
var terms = [];
if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {
var url = new URL(ref);
var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');
if (q) {
terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });
}
}
if (terms.length === 0) return;
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';
document.head.appendChild(style);
function highlight(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node
var text = node.textContent;
var found = false;
terms.forEach(function(term) {
var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi');
if (regex.test(text)) {
found = true;
var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();
var parts = text.split(regex);
parts.forEach(function(part, i) {
if (i % 2 === 0) {
frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));
} else {
var span = document.createElement('span');
span.className = 'userscript-highlight';
span.textContent = part;
frag.appendChild(span);
}
});
node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);
}
});
} else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element
var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];
if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {
Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);
}
}
}
highlight(document.body);
// Re-highlight on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
docs(shared): use @hidden over @internal for internal Clerk/Client members by jacekradko · Pull Request #8701 · clerk/javascript · GitHub
Skip to content
docs(shared): use @hidden over @internal for internal Clerk/Client members - #8701
Merged
alexisintech merged 1 commit into
aa/generate-object-docsfrom 
jacek/objects-docs-hide-internal-members
May 29, 2026
Merged
docs(shared): use @hidden over @internal for internal Clerk/Client members#8701
alexisintech merged 1 commit into
aa/generate-object-docsfrom 
jacek/objects-docs-hide-internal-members
Conversation
@jacekradko
@jacekradkojacekradko
commented
May 29, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Targets the #8276 branch.
Those 18 __internal_* members on Clerk and ClientResource got @internal tags so they'd stay out of the generated /objects docs. The problem is snapi reads @internal as a TSDoc release tag and drops them from the API snapshot, so the API Changes check sees them disappear and reports 18 "removed" breaking changes. But there's no stripInternal in the build, so these members are still emitted in the .d.ts and at runtime. They're genuinely still part of the contract and shouldn't leave snapi's radar.
Swapping @internal to @hidden on just those members keeps typedoc excluding them from the docs (@hidden is a removal tag), while snapi keeps tracking them since @hidden isn't a release tag. The 14 pre-existing @internal tags are left alone. I ran the typedoc generation locally to confirm none of the 18 leak into the output and the build is clean.
One heads up: the API Changes check won't run on this PR, that workflow only triggers on PRs into main/release/*, so it'll re-validate on #8276 once these commits land on the branch.
@jacekradko
docs(shared): use@hiddenover@internalfor internal Clerk/Client me…
2f3f35d
…mbers
These 18 __internal_* members on Clerk and ClientResource were tagged @internal to keep them out of the generated /objects docs, but snapi reads @internal as a TSDoc release tag and drops them from the API snapshot, so the API Changes check reports them as removed (18 false breaking changes). There is no stripInternal in the build, so the members are still emitted in the .d.ts and at runtime and remain part of the contract.
Swap @internal to @hidden on just those members: typedoc still excludes them from the docs (@hidden is a removal tag), but snapi keeps tracking them since @hidden is not a release tag. The 14 pre-existing @internal tags are left as-is.
@vercel
vercelBot
commented
May 29, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
ProjectDeploymentActionsUpdated (UTC)
clerk-js-sandboxReadyReadyPreview, CommentMay 29, 2026 1:00am
Request Review
@changeset-bot
changeset-botBot
commented
May 29, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found
Latest commit: 2f3f35d
Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.
This PR includes no changesets
When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types
Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.
Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR
@alexisintech
alexisintech
commented
May 29, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
ahhh you're a genius thank you!
@alexisintech
alexisintech
merged commit d555bdc
into
aa/generate-object-docsMay 29, 2026

7 checks passed

@alexisintech
alexisintech
deleted the

jacek/objects-docs-hide-internal-members

branch
May 29, 2026 01:07
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@wobsorianowobsorianowobsoriano approved these changes
@alexisintechalexisintechAwaiting requested review from alexisintech

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jacekradko@alexisintech@wobsoriano

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page
(function() {
var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',
'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',
'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];
function cleanUrl(url) {
try {
var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);
var changed = false;
trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {
if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {
u.searchParams.delete(p);
changed = true;
}
});
return changed ? u.toString() : url;
} catch (e) {
return url;
}
}
function cleanLinks() {
document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
cleanLinks();
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1) {
if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();
node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
docs(shared): use @hidden over @internal for internal Clerk/Client members by jacekradko · Pull Request #8701 · clerk/javascript · GitHub
Skip to content
docs(shared): use @hidden over @internal for internal Clerk/Client members - #8701
Merged
alexisintech merged 1 commit into
aa/generate-object-docsfrom 
jacek/objects-docs-hide-internal-members
May 29, 2026
Merged
docs(shared): use @hidden over @internal for internal Clerk/Client members#8701
alexisintech merged 1 commit into
aa/generate-object-docsfrom 
jacek/objects-docs-hide-internal-members
Conversation
@jacekradko
@jacekradkojacekradko
commented
May 29, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Targets the #8276 branch.
Those 18 __internal_* members on Clerk and ClientResource got @internal tags so they'd stay out of the generated /objects docs. The problem is snapi reads @internal as a TSDoc release tag and drops them from the API snapshot, so the API Changes check sees them disappear and reports 18 "removed" breaking changes. But there's no stripInternal in the build, so these members are still emitted in the .d.ts and at runtime. They're genuinely still part of the contract and shouldn't leave snapi's radar.
Swapping @internal to @hidden on just those members keeps typedoc excluding them from the docs (@hidden is a removal tag), while snapi keeps tracking them since @hidden isn't a release tag. The 14 pre-existing @internal tags are left alone. I ran the typedoc generation locally to confirm none of the 18 leak into the output and the build is clean.
One heads up: the API Changes check won't run on this PR, that workflow only triggers on PRs into main/release/*, so it'll re-validate on #8276 once these commits land on the branch.
@jacekradko
docs(shared): use@hiddenover@internalfor internal Clerk/Client me…
2f3f35d
…mbers
These 18 __internal_* members on Clerk and ClientResource were tagged @internal to keep them out of the generated /objects docs, but snapi reads @internal as a TSDoc release tag and drops them from the API snapshot, so the API Changes check reports them as removed (18 false breaking changes). There is no stripInternal in the build, so the members are still emitted in the .d.ts and at runtime and remain part of the contract.
Swap @internal to @hidden on just those members: typedoc still excludes them from the docs (@hidden is a removal tag), but snapi keeps tracking them since @hidden is not a release tag. The 14 pre-existing @internal tags are left as-is.
@vercel
vercelBot
commented
May 29, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
ProjectDeploymentActionsUpdated (UTC)
clerk-js-sandboxReadyReadyPreview, CommentMay 29, 2026 1:00am
Request Review
@changeset-bot
changeset-botBot
commented
May 29, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found
Latest commit: 2f3f35d
Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.
This PR includes no changesets
When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types
Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.
Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR
@alexisintech
alexisintech
commented
May 29, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
ahhh you're a genius thank you!
@alexisintech
alexisintech
merged commit d555bdc
into
aa/generate-object-docsMay 29, 2026

7 checks passed

@alexisintech
alexisintech
deleted the

jacek/objects-docs-hide-internal-members

branch
May 29, 2026 01:07
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@wobsorianowobsorianowobsoriano approved these changes
@alexisintechalexisintechAwaiting requested review from alexisintech

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jacekradko@alexisintech@wobsoriano

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube
(function() {
function tryTheater() {
var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]');
if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {
btn.click();
}
}
// Try immediately
tryTheater();
// Try after navigation (SPA)
var lastUrl = location.href;
setInterval(function() {
if (location.href !== lastUrl) {
lastUrl = location.href;
setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);
}
}, 1000);
// Also try on player load
var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
docs(shared): use @hidden over @internal for internal Clerk/Client members by jacekradko · Pull Request #8701 · clerk/javascript · GitHub
Skip to content
docs(shared): use @hidden over @internal for internal Clerk/Client members - #8701
Merged
alexisintech merged 1 commit into
aa/generate-object-docsfrom 
jacek/objects-docs-hide-internal-members
May 29, 2026
Merged
docs(shared): use @hidden over @internal for internal Clerk/Client members#8701
alexisintech merged 1 commit into
aa/generate-object-docsfrom 
jacek/objects-docs-hide-internal-members
Conversation
@jacekradko
@jacekradkojacekradko
commented
May 29, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Targets the #8276 branch.
Those 18 __internal_* members on Clerk and ClientResource got @internal tags so they'd stay out of the generated /objects docs. The problem is snapi reads @internal as a TSDoc release tag and drops them from the API snapshot, so the API Changes check sees them disappear and reports 18 "removed" breaking changes. But there's no stripInternal in the build, so these members are still emitted in the .d.ts and at runtime. They're genuinely still part of the contract and shouldn't leave snapi's radar.
Swapping @internal to @hidden on just those members keeps typedoc excluding them from the docs (@hidden is a removal tag), while snapi keeps tracking them since @hidden isn't a release tag. The 14 pre-existing @internal tags are left alone. I ran the typedoc generation locally to confirm none of the 18 leak into the output and the build is clean.
One heads up: the API Changes check won't run on this PR, that workflow only triggers on PRs into main/release/*, so it'll re-validate on #8276 once these commits land on the branch.
@jacekradko
docs(shared): use@hiddenover@internalfor internal Clerk/Client me…
2f3f35d
…mbers
These 18 __internal_* members on Clerk and ClientResource were tagged @internal to keep them out of the generated /objects docs, but snapi reads @internal as a TSDoc release tag and drops them from the API snapshot, so the API Changes check reports them as removed (18 false breaking changes). There is no stripInternal in the build, so the members are still emitted in the .d.ts and at runtime and remain part of the contract.
Swap @internal to @hidden on just those members: typedoc still excludes them from the docs (@hidden is a removal tag), but snapi keeps tracking them since @hidden is not a release tag. The 14 pre-existing @internal tags are left as-is.
@vercel
vercelBot
commented
May 29, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
ProjectDeploymentActionsUpdated (UTC)
clerk-js-sandboxReadyReadyPreview, CommentMay 29, 2026 1:00am
Request Review
@changeset-bot
changeset-botBot
commented
May 29, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found
Latest commit: 2f3f35d
Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.
This PR includes no changesets
When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types
Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.
Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR
@alexisintech
alexisintech
commented
May 29, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
ahhh you're a genius thank you!
@alexisintech
alexisintech
merged commit d555bdc
into
aa/generate-object-docsMay 29, 2026

7 checks passed

@alexisintech
alexisintech
deleted the

jacek/objects-docs-hide-internal-members

branch
May 29, 2026 01:07
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@wobsorianowobsorianowobsoriano approved these changes
@alexisintechalexisintechAwaiting requested review from alexisintech

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jacekradko@alexisintech@wobsoriano

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content
(function() {
function unstick() {
document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) {
if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {
el.style.position = 'static';
el.style.top = 'auto';
el.style.zIndex = 'auto';
}
});
}
unstick();
var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
docs(shared): use @hidden over @internal for internal Clerk/Client members by jacekradko · Pull Request #8701 · clerk/javascript · GitHub
Skip to content
docs(shared): use @hidden over @internal for internal Clerk/Client members - #8701
Merged
alexisintech merged 1 commit into
aa/generate-object-docsfrom 
jacek/objects-docs-hide-internal-members
May 29, 2026
Merged
docs(shared): use @hidden over @internal for internal Clerk/Client members#8701
alexisintech merged 1 commit into
aa/generate-object-docsfrom 
jacek/objects-docs-hide-internal-members
Conversation
@jacekradko
@jacekradkojacekradko
commented
May 29, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Targets the #8276 branch.
Those 18 __internal_* members on Clerk and ClientResource got @internal tags so they'd stay out of the generated /objects docs. The problem is snapi reads @internal as a TSDoc release tag and drops them from the API snapshot, so the API Changes check sees them disappear and reports 18 "removed" breaking changes. But there's no stripInternal in the build, so these members are still emitted in the .d.ts and at runtime. They're genuinely still part of the contract and shouldn't leave snapi's radar.
Swapping @internal to @hidden on just those members keeps typedoc excluding them from the docs (@hidden is a removal tag), while snapi keeps tracking them since @hidden isn't a release tag. The 14 pre-existing @internal tags are left alone. I ran the typedoc generation locally to confirm none of the 18 leak into the output and the build is clean.
One heads up: the API Changes check won't run on this PR, that workflow only triggers on PRs into main/release/*, so it'll re-validate on #8276 once these commits land on the branch.
@jacekradko
docs(shared): use@hiddenover@internalfor internal Clerk/Client me…
2f3f35d
…mbers
These 18 __internal_* members on Clerk and ClientResource were tagged @internal to keep them out of the generated /objects docs, but snapi reads @internal as a TSDoc release tag and drops them from the API snapshot, so the API Changes check reports them as removed (18 false breaking changes). There is no stripInternal in the build, so the members are still emitted in the .d.ts and at runtime and remain part of the contract.
Swap @internal to @hidden on just those members: typedoc still excludes them from the docs (@hidden is a removal tag), but snapi keeps tracking them since @hidden is not a release tag. The 14 pre-existing @internal tags are left as-is.
@vercel
vercelBot
commented
May 29, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
ProjectDeploymentActionsUpdated (UTC)
clerk-js-sandboxReadyReadyPreview, CommentMay 29, 2026 1:00am
Request Review
@changeset-bot
changeset-botBot
commented
May 29, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found
Latest commit: 2f3f35d
Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.
This PR includes no changesets
When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types
Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.
Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR
@alexisintech
alexisintech
commented
May 29, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
ahhh you're a genius thank you!
@alexisintech
alexisintech
merged commit d555bdc
into
aa/generate-object-docsMay 29, 2026

7 checks passed

@alexisintech
alexisintech
deleted the

jacek/objects-docs-hide-internal-members

branch
May 29, 2026 01:07
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@wobsorianowobsorianowobsoriano approved these changes
@alexisintechalexisintechAwaiting requested review from alexisintech

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jacekradko@alexisintech@wobsoriano

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site
(function() {
var enabled = true;
function applyDarkMode() {
if (!enabled) return;
// Create style element if it doesn't exist
var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');
if (!style) {
style = document.createElement('style');
style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';
document.head.appendChild(style);
}
// Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video
style.textContent = '
/* Invert everything except media */
html {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
background: #1a1a2e !important;
}
/* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */
img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
}
/* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */
.no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,
[data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"],
.ace_editor, .ace_editor *,
.CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,
.monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,
.markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,
.highlight, .highlight *,
pre code, pre code * {
filter: none !important;
}
/* Fix common UI elements */
.modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
background: #2d2d44 !important;
border-color: #444 !important;
}
/* Scrollbars */
::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }
::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }
::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }
/* Selection */
::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }
::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }
';
}
function removeDarkMode() {
var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');
if (style) style.remove();
}
// Toggle with Alt+Shift+D
document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {
if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {
e.preventDefault();
enabled = !enabled;
if (enabled) {
applyDarkMode();
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');
} else {
removeDarkMode();
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');
}
}
});
// Apply on load
applyDarkMode();
// Re-apply on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {
applyDarkMode();
}
});
observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();
docs(shared): use @hidden over @internal for internal Clerk/Client members by jacekradko · Pull Request #8701 · clerk/javascript · GitHub
Skip to content
docs(shared): use @hidden over @internal for internal Clerk/Client members - #8701
Merged
alexisintech merged 1 commit into
aa/generate-object-docsfrom 
jacek/objects-docs-hide-internal-members
May 29, 2026
Merged
docs(shared): use @hidden over @internal for internal Clerk/Client members#8701
alexisintech merged 1 commit into
aa/generate-object-docsfrom 
jacek/objects-docs-hide-internal-members
Conversation
@jacekradko
@jacekradkojacekradko
commented
May 29, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Targets the #8276 branch.
Those 18 __internal_* members on Clerk and ClientResource got @internal tags so they'd stay out of the generated /objects docs. The problem is snapi reads @internal as a TSDoc release tag and drops them from the API snapshot, so the API Changes check sees them disappear and reports 18 "removed" breaking changes. But there's no stripInternal in the build, so these members are still emitted in the .d.ts and at runtime. They're genuinely still part of the contract and shouldn't leave snapi's radar.
Swapping @internal to @hidden on just those members keeps typedoc excluding them from the docs (@hidden is a removal tag), while snapi keeps tracking them since @hidden isn't a release tag. The 14 pre-existing @internal tags are left alone. I ran the typedoc generation locally to confirm none of the 18 leak into the output and the build is clean.
One heads up: the API Changes check won't run on this PR, that workflow only triggers on PRs into main/release/*, so it'll re-validate on #8276 once these commits land on the branch.
@jacekradko
docs(shared): use@hiddenover@internalfor internal Clerk/Client me…
2f3f35d
…mbers
These 18 __internal_* members on Clerk and ClientResource were tagged @internal to keep them out of the generated /objects docs, but snapi reads @internal as a TSDoc release tag and drops them from the API snapshot, so the API Changes check reports them as removed (18 false breaking changes). There is no stripInternal in the build, so the members are still emitted in the .d.ts and at runtime and remain part of the contract.
Swap @internal to @hidden on just those members: typedoc still excludes them from the docs (@hidden is a removal tag), but snapi keeps tracking them since @hidden is not a release tag. The 14 pre-existing @internal tags are left as-is.
@vercel
vercelBot
commented
May 29, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
ProjectDeploymentActionsUpdated (UTC)
clerk-js-sandboxReadyReadyPreview, CommentMay 29, 2026 1:00am
Request Review
@changeset-bot
changeset-botBot
commented
May 29, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found
Latest commit: 2f3f35d
Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.
This PR includes no changesets
When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types
Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.
Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR
@alexisintech
alexisintech
commented
May 29, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
ahhh you're a genius thank you!
@alexisintech
alexisintech
merged commit d555bdc
into
aa/generate-object-docsMay 29, 2026

7 checks passed

@alexisintech
alexisintech
deleted the

jacek/objects-docs-hide-internal-members

branch
May 29, 2026 01:07
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@wobsorianowobsorianowobsoriano approved these changes
@alexisintechalexisintechAwaiting requested review from alexisintech

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jacekradko@alexisintech@wobsoriano