Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions .changeset/protect-check-standalone-signup.md
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
---
'@clerk/ui': patch
---
Comment thread
mwickett marked this conversation as resolved.

Fix standalone `<SignUp />` Protect checks so the verification card stays mounted while a solved challenge routes to the next step, while stale direct visits to the protect-check route return to the start of the sign-up flow.
30 changes: 28 additions & 2 deletions packages/ui/src/components/SignUp/SignUpProtectCheck.tsx
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
import { useClerk } from '@clerk/shared/react';
import type { SignUpProps, SignUpResource } from '@clerk/shared/types';
import type { ComponentType } from 'react';
import { type ComponentType, useEffect, useRef, useState } from 'react';

import { Card } from '@/ui/elements/Card';
import { useCardState, withCardStateProvider } from '@/ui/elements/contexts';
Expand All@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ import {
Spinner,
useLocalizations,
} from '../../customizables';
import { useNavigateToFlowStart } from '../../hooks/useNavigateToFlowStart';
import { useProtectCheckRunner } from '../../hooks/useProtectCheckRunner';
import { useRouter } from '../../router';
import { completeSignUpFlow } from './util';
Expand All@@ -42,13 +43,31 @@ function SignUpProtectCheckInternal({
verifyPhonePath = '../verify-phone-number',
continuePath = '../continue',
protectCheckPath = '.',
}: SignUpProtectCheckProps = {}): JSX.Element {
}: SignUpProtectCheckProps = {}): JSX.Element | null {
const card = useCardState();
const { t } = useLocalizations();
const signUp = useCoreSignUp();
const { navigate } = useRouter();
const { navigateToFlowStart } = useNavigateToFlowStart();
const { setActive } = useClerk();
const { afterSignUpUrl, navigateOnSetActive } = useSignUpContext();
// Latches that a protect check existed at some point, so the resolution race
// (submitProtectCheck clearing protectCheck mid-navigation) isn't mistaken for
// a stale visit. State adjusted during render (guarded) rather than a ref
// write, which React disallows in the render body.
const [everSawProtectCheck, setEverSawProtectCheck] = useState(!!signUp.protectCheck);
const didStartNoCheckFallbackRef = useRef(false);

if (signUp.protectCheck && !everSawProtectCheck) {
setEverSawProtectCheck(true);
}

useEffect(() => {
if (!signUp.protectCheck && !everSawProtectCheck && !didStartNoCheckFallbackRef.current) {
didStartNoCheckFallbackRef.current = true;
void navigateToFlowStart();
}
}, [everSawProtectCheck, navigateToFlowStart, signUp.protectCheck]);

const { containerRef, isRunning, hasError, retry } = useProtectCheckRunner<SignUpResource>({
getProtectCheck: () => signUp.protectCheck,
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -81,6 +100,13 @@ function SignUpProtectCheckInternal({
},
});

// Stale/direct visit that never had a check: render nothing while the
// flow-start redirect scheduled above kicks in, instead of flashing the card
// shell for one paint. Must stay below every hook call.
if (!signUp.protectCheck && !everSawProtectCheck) {
return null;
}

return (
<Flow.Part part='protectCheck'>
<Card.Root>
Expand Down
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from 'vitest';
import { bindCreateFixtures } from '@/test/create-fixtures';
import { fireEvent, render } from '@/test/utils';

import { SignUp } from '../index';
import { SignUpProtectCheck } from '../SignUpProtectCheck';

vi.mock('@clerk/shared/internal/clerk-js/protectCheck', () => ({
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -34,6 +35,46 @@ describe('SignUpProtectCheck', () => {
expect(await findByText(/verifying your request/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
});

it('keeps the standalone protect-check route mounted after protectCheck clears', async () => {
const { wrapper, fixtures } = await createFixtures(f => {
f.startSignUpWithProtectCheck();
});
fixtures.router.currentPath = '/sign-up/protect-check';
fixtures.router.fullPath = '/sign-up';
fixtures.router.indexPath = '/sign-up';
fixtures.router.matches.mockImplementation((path?: string) => path === 'protect-check');
mockExecute.mockReturnValue(new Promise(() => {}));

const { findByText, queryByText, rerender } = render(<SignUp />, { wrapper });

expect(await findByText(/verifying your request/i)).toBeInTheDocument();

(fixtures.signUp as any).protectCheck = null;
(fixtures.signUp as any).missingFields = [];
rerender(<SignUp />);

expect(queryByText(/verifying your request/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
expect(fixtures.router.navigate).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('/sign-up');
});

it('routes stale standalone protect-check visits back to the flow start', async () => {
const { wrapper, fixtures } = await createFixtures(f => {
f.startSignUpWithEmailAddress();
});
fixtures.router.currentPath = '/sign-up/protect-check';
fixtures.router.fullPath = '/sign-up';
fixtures.router.indexPath = '/sign-up';

const { queryByText } = render(<SignUpProtectCheck />, { wrapper });

// The card shell must not flash while the redirect below kicks in.
expect(queryByText(/verifying your request/i)).not.toBeInTheDocument();

await waitFor(() => expect(fixtures.router.navigate).toHaveBeenCalledWith('/sign-up'));
expect(mockExecute).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(queryByText(/verifying your request/i)).not.toBeInTheDocument();
});

it('runs the SDK challenge with the URL and resource and submits the proof token', async () => {
const { wrapper, fixtures } = await createFixtures(f => {
f.startSignUpWithProtectCheck({ sdkUrl: 'https://protect.example.com/v1.js' });
Expand Down
16 changes: 8 additions & 8 deletions packages/ui/src/components/SignUp/index.tsx
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -35,10 +35,11 @@ function SignUpRoutes(): JSX.Element {
return (
<Flow.Root flow='signUp'>
<Switch>
<Route
path='protect-check'
canActivate={clerk => !!clerk.client.signUp.protectCheck}
>
{/* No canActivate guard here. `!!signUp.protectCheck` flips to false
when submitProtectCheck resolves and clears protectCheck, which
unmounts this card mid-navigation and blanks the route. The card
owns its own post-resolution routing. */}
<Route path='protect-check'>
Comment thread
mwickett marked this conversation as resolved.
<SignUpProtectCheck />
</Route>
<Route
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -75,10 +76,9 @@ function SignUpRoutes(): JSX.Element {
/>
</Route>
<Route path='continue'>
<Route
path='protect-check'
canActivate={clerk => !!clerk.client.signUp.protectCheck}
>
{/* No canActivate guard: same resolution race as the top-level
protect-check route; the card owns its own routing. */}
<Route path='protect-check'>
{/* Under `continue`, the continue index is `..`, not `../continue`. */}
<SignUpProtectCheck continuePath='..' />
</Route>
Expand Down
Loading
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions .changeset/protect-check-standalone-signup.md
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
---
'@clerk/ui': patch
---
Comment thread
mwickett marked this conversation as resolved.

Fix standalone `<SignUp />` Protect checks so the verification card stays mounted while a solved challenge routes to the next step, while stale direct visits to the protect-check route return to the start of the sign-up flow.
30 changes: 28 additions & 2 deletions packages/ui/src/components/SignUp/SignUpProtectCheck.tsx
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
import { useClerk } from '@clerk/shared/react';
import type { SignUpProps, SignUpResource } from '@clerk/shared/types';
import type { ComponentType } from 'react';
import { type ComponentType, useEffect, useRef, useState } from 'react';

import { Card } from '@/ui/elements/Card';
import { useCardState, withCardStateProvider } from '@/ui/elements/contexts';
Expand All@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ import {
Spinner,
useLocalizations,
} from '../../customizables';
import { useNavigateToFlowStart } from '../../hooks/useNavigateToFlowStart';
import { useProtectCheckRunner } from '../../hooks/useProtectCheckRunner';
import { useRouter } from '../../router';
import { completeSignUpFlow } from './util';
Expand All@@ -42,13 +43,31 @@ function SignUpProtectCheckInternal({
verifyPhonePath = '../verify-phone-number',
continuePath = '../continue',
protectCheckPath = '.',
}: SignUpProtectCheckProps = {}): JSX.Element {
}: SignUpProtectCheckProps = {}): JSX.Element | null {
const card = useCardState();
const { t } = useLocalizations();
const signUp = useCoreSignUp();
const { navigate } = useRouter();
const { navigateToFlowStart } = useNavigateToFlowStart();
const { setActive } = useClerk();
const { afterSignUpUrl, navigateOnSetActive } = useSignUpContext();
// Latches that a protect check existed at some point, so the resolution race
// (submitProtectCheck clearing protectCheck mid-navigation) isn't mistaken for
// a stale visit. State adjusted during render (guarded) rather than a ref
// write, which React disallows in the render body.
const [everSawProtectCheck, setEverSawProtectCheck] = useState(!!signUp.protectCheck);
const didStartNoCheckFallbackRef = useRef(false);

if (signUp.protectCheck && !everSawProtectCheck) {
setEverSawProtectCheck(true);
}

useEffect(() => {
if (!signUp.protectCheck && !everSawProtectCheck && !didStartNoCheckFallbackRef.current) {
didStartNoCheckFallbackRef.current = true;
void navigateToFlowStart();
}
}, [everSawProtectCheck, navigateToFlowStart, signUp.protectCheck]);

const { containerRef, isRunning, hasError, retry } = useProtectCheckRunner<SignUpResource>({
getProtectCheck: () => signUp.protectCheck,
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -81,6 +100,13 @@ function SignUpProtectCheckInternal({
},
});

// Stale/direct visit that never had a check: render nothing while the
// flow-start redirect scheduled above kicks in, instead of flashing the card
// shell for one paint. Must stay below every hook call.
if (!signUp.protectCheck && !everSawProtectCheck) {
return null;
}

return (
<Flow.Part part='protectCheck'>
<Card.Root>
Expand Down
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from 'vitest';
import { bindCreateFixtures } from '@/test/create-fixtures';
import { fireEvent, render } from '@/test/utils';

import { SignUp } from '../index';
import { SignUpProtectCheck } from '../SignUpProtectCheck';

vi.mock('@clerk/shared/internal/clerk-js/protectCheck', () => ({
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -34,6 +35,46 @@ describe('SignUpProtectCheck', () => {
expect(await findByText(/verifying your request/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
});

it('keeps the standalone protect-check route mounted after protectCheck clears', async () => {
const { wrapper, fixtures } = await createFixtures(f => {
f.startSignUpWithProtectCheck();
});
fixtures.router.currentPath = '/sign-up/protect-check';
fixtures.router.fullPath = '/sign-up';
fixtures.router.indexPath = '/sign-up';
fixtures.router.matches.mockImplementation((path?: string) => path === 'protect-check');
mockExecute.mockReturnValue(new Promise(() => {}));

const { findByText, queryByText, rerender } = render(<SignUp />, { wrapper });

expect(await findByText(/verifying your request/i)).toBeInTheDocument();

(fixtures.signUp as any).protectCheck = null;
(fixtures.signUp as any).missingFields = [];
rerender(<SignUp />);

expect(queryByText(/verifying your request/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
expect(fixtures.router.navigate).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('/sign-up');
});

it('routes stale standalone protect-check visits back to the flow start', async () => {
const { wrapper, fixtures } = await createFixtures(f => {
f.startSignUpWithEmailAddress();
});
fixtures.router.currentPath = '/sign-up/protect-check';
fixtures.router.fullPath = '/sign-up';
fixtures.router.indexPath = '/sign-up';

const { queryByText } = render(<SignUpProtectCheck />, { wrapper });

// The card shell must not flash while the redirect below kicks in.
expect(queryByText(/verifying your request/i)).not.toBeInTheDocument();

await waitFor(() => expect(fixtures.router.navigate).toHaveBeenCalledWith('/sign-up'));
expect(mockExecute).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(queryByText(/verifying your request/i)).not.toBeInTheDocument();
});

it('runs the SDK challenge with the URL and resource and submits the proof token', async () => {
const { wrapper, fixtures } = await createFixtures(f => {
f.startSignUpWithProtectCheck({ sdkUrl: 'https://protect.example.com/v1.js' });
Expand Down
16 changes: 8 additions & 8 deletions packages/ui/src/components/SignUp/index.tsx
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -35,10 +35,11 @@ function SignUpRoutes(): JSX.Element {
return (
<Flow.Root flow='signUp'>
<Switch>
<Route
path='protect-check'
canActivate={clerk => !!clerk.client.signUp.protectCheck}
>
{/* No canActivate guard here. `!!signUp.protectCheck` flips to false
when submitProtectCheck resolves and clears protectCheck, which
unmounts this card mid-navigation and blanks the route. The card
owns its own post-resolution routing. */}
<Route path='protect-check'>
Comment thread
mwickett marked this conversation as resolved.
<SignUpProtectCheck />
</Route>
<Route
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -75,10 +76,9 @@ function SignUpRoutes(): JSX.Element {
/>
</Route>
<Route path='continue'>
<Route
path='protect-check'
canActivate={clerk => !!clerk.client.signUp.protectCheck}
>
{/* No canActivate guard: same resolution race as the top-level
protect-check route; the card owns its own routing. */}
<Route path='protect-check'>
{/* Under `continue`, the continue index is `..`, not `../continue`. */}
<SignUpProtectCheck continuePath='..' />
</Route>
Expand Down
Loading
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions .changeset/protect-check-standalone-signup.md
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
---
'@clerk/ui': patch
---
Comment thread
mwickett marked this conversation as resolved.

Fix standalone `<SignUp />` Protect checks so the verification card stays mounted while a solved challenge routes to the next step, while stale direct visits to the protect-check route return to the start of the sign-up flow.
30 changes: 28 additions & 2 deletions packages/ui/src/components/SignUp/SignUpProtectCheck.tsx
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
import { useClerk } from '@clerk/shared/react';
import type { SignUpProps, SignUpResource } from '@clerk/shared/types';
import type { ComponentType } from 'react';
import { type ComponentType, useEffect, useRef, useState } from 'react';

import { Card } from '@/ui/elements/Card';
import { useCardState, withCardStateProvider } from '@/ui/elements/contexts';
Expand All@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ import {
Spinner,
useLocalizations,
} from '../../customizables';
import { useNavigateToFlowStart } from '../../hooks/useNavigateToFlowStart';
import { useProtectCheckRunner } from '../../hooks/useProtectCheckRunner';
import { useRouter } from '../../router';
import { completeSignUpFlow } from './util';
Expand All@@ -42,13 +43,31 @@ function SignUpProtectCheckInternal({
verifyPhonePath = '../verify-phone-number',
continuePath = '../continue',
protectCheckPath = '.',
}: SignUpProtectCheckProps = {}): JSX.Element {
}: SignUpProtectCheckProps = {}): JSX.Element | null {
const card = useCardState();
const { t } = useLocalizations();
const signUp = useCoreSignUp();
const { navigate } = useRouter();
const { navigateToFlowStart } = useNavigateToFlowStart();
const { setActive } = useClerk();
const { afterSignUpUrl, navigateOnSetActive } = useSignUpContext();
// Latches that a protect check existed at some point, so the resolution race
// (submitProtectCheck clearing protectCheck mid-navigation) isn't mistaken for
// a stale visit. State adjusted during render (guarded) rather than a ref
// write, which React disallows in the render body.
const [everSawProtectCheck, setEverSawProtectCheck] = useState(!!signUp.protectCheck);
const didStartNoCheckFallbackRef = useRef(false);

if (signUp.protectCheck && !everSawProtectCheck) {
setEverSawProtectCheck(true);
}

useEffect(() => {
if (!signUp.protectCheck && !everSawProtectCheck && !didStartNoCheckFallbackRef.current) {
didStartNoCheckFallbackRef.current = true;
void navigateToFlowStart();
}
}, [everSawProtectCheck, navigateToFlowStart, signUp.protectCheck]);

const { containerRef, isRunning, hasError, retry } = useProtectCheckRunner<SignUpResource>({
getProtectCheck: () => signUp.protectCheck,
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -81,6 +100,13 @@ function SignUpProtectCheckInternal({
},
});

// Stale/direct visit that never had a check: render nothing while the
// flow-start redirect scheduled above kicks in, instead of flashing the card
// shell for one paint. Must stay below every hook call.
if (!signUp.protectCheck && !everSawProtectCheck) {
return null;
}

return (
<Flow.Part part='protectCheck'>
<Card.Root>
Expand Down
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from 'vitest';
import { bindCreateFixtures } from '@/test/create-fixtures';
import { fireEvent, render } from '@/test/utils';

import { SignUp } from '../index';
import { SignUpProtectCheck } from '../SignUpProtectCheck';

vi.mock('@clerk/shared/internal/clerk-js/protectCheck', () => ({
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -34,6 +35,46 @@ describe('SignUpProtectCheck', () => {
expect(await findByText(/verifying your request/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
});

it('keeps the standalone protect-check route mounted after protectCheck clears', async () => {
const { wrapper, fixtures } = await createFixtures(f => {
f.startSignUpWithProtectCheck();
});
fixtures.router.currentPath = '/sign-up/protect-check';
fixtures.router.fullPath = '/sign-up';
fixtures.router.indexPath = '/sign-up';
fixtures.router.matches.mockImplementation((path?: string) => path === 'protect-check');
mockExecute.mockReturnValue(new Promise(() => {}));

const { findByText, queryByText, rerender } = render(<SignUp />, { wrapper });

expect(await findByText(/verifying your request/i)).toBeInTheDocument();

(fixtures.signUp as any).protectCheck = null;
(fixtures.signUp as any).missingFields = [];
rerender(<SignUp />);

expect(queryByText(/verifying your request/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
expect(fixtures.router.navigate).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('/sign-up');
});

it('routes stale standalone protect-check visits back to the flow start', async () => {
const { wrapper, fixtures } = await createFixtures(f => {
f.startSignUpWithEmailAddress();
});
fixtures.router.currentPath = '/sign-up/protect-check';
fixtures.router.fullPath = '/sign-up';
fixtures.router.indexPath = '/sign-up';

const { queryByText } = render(<SignUpProtectCheck />, { wrapper });

// The card shell must not flash while the redirect below kicks in.
expect(queryByText(/verifying your request/i)).not.toBeInTheDocument();

await waitFor(() => expect(fixtures.router.navigate).toHaveBeenCalledWith('/sign-up'));
expect(mockExecute).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(queryByText(/verifying your request/i)).not.toBeInTheDocument();
});

it('runs the SDK challenge with the URL and resource and submits the proof token', async () => {
const { wrapper, fixtures } = await createFixtures(f => {
f.startSignUpWithProtectCheck({ sdkUrl: 'https://protect.example.com/v1.js' });
Expand Down
16 changes: 8 additions & 8 deletions packages/ui/src/components/SignUp/index.tsx
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -35,10 +35,11 @@ function SignUpRoutes(): JSX.Element {
return (
<Flow.Root flow='signUp'>
<Switch>
<Route
path='protect-check'
canActivate={clerk => !!clerk.client.signUp.protectCheck}
>
{/* No canActivate guard here. `!!signUp.protectCheck` flips to false
when submitProtectCheck resolves and clears protectCheck, which
unmounts this card mid-navigation and blanks the route. The card
owns its own post-resolution routing. */}
<Route path='protect-check'>
Comment thread
mwickett marked this conversation as resolved.
<SignUpProtectCheck />
</Route>
<Route
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -75,10 +76,9 @@ function SignUpRoutes(): JSX.Element {
/>
</Route>
<Route path='continue'>
<Route
path='protect-check'
canActivate={clerk => !!clerk.client.signUp.protectCheck}
>
{/* No canActivate guard: same resolution race as the top-level
protect-check route; the card owns its own routing. */}
<Route path='protect-check'>
{/* Under `continue`, the continue index is `..`, not `../continue`. */}
<SignUpProtectCheck continuePath='..' />
</Route>
Expand Down
Loading
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions .changeset/protect-check-standalone-signup.md
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
---
'@clerk/ui': patch
---
Comment thread
mwickett marked this conversation as resolved.

Fix standalone `<SignUp />` Protect checks so the verification card stays mounted while a solved challenge routes to the next step, while stale direct visits to the protect-check route return to the start of the sign-up flow.
30 changes: 28 additions & 2 deletions packages/ui/src/components/SignUp/SignUpProtectCheck.tsx
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
import { useClerk } from '@clerk/shared/react';
import type { SignUpProps, SignUpResource } from '@clerk/shared/types';
import type { ComponentType } from 'react';
import { type ComponentType, useEffect, useRef, useState } from 'react';

import { Card } from '@/ui/elements/Card';
import { useCardState, withCardStateProvider } from '@/ui/elements/contexts';
Expand All@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ import {
Spinner,
useLocalizations,
} from '../../customizables';
import { useNavigateToFlowStart } from '../../hooks/useNavigateToFlowStart';
import { useProtectCheckRunner } from '../../hooks/useProtectCheckRunner';
import { useRouter } from '../../router';
import { completeSignUpFlow } from './util';
Expand All@@ -42,13 +43,31 @@ function SignUpProtectCheckInternal({
verifyPhonePath = '../verify-phone-number',
continuePath = '../continue',
protectCheckPath = '.',
}: SignUpProtectCheckProps = {}): JSX.Element {
}: SignUpProtectCheckProps = {}): JSX.Element | null {
const card = useCardState();
const { t } = useLocalizations();
const signUp = useCoreSignUp();
const { navigate } = useRouter();
const { navigateToFlowStart } = useNavigateToFlowStart();
const { setActive } = useClerk();
const { afterSignUpUrl, navigateOnSetActive } = useSignUpContext();
// Latches that a protect check existed at some point, so the resolution race
// (submitProtectCheck clearing protectCheck mid-navigation) isn't mistaken for
// a stale visit. State adjusted during render (guarded) rather than a ref
// write, which React disallows in the render body.
const [everSawProtectCheck, setEverSawProtectCheck] = useState(!!signUp.protectCheck);
const didStartNoCheckFallbackRef = useRef(false);

if (signUp.protectCheck && !everSawProtectCheck) {
setEverSawProtectCheck(true);
}

useEffect(() => {
if (!signUp.protectCheck && !everSawProtectCheck && !didStartNoCheckFallbackRef.current) {
didStartNoCheckFallbackRef.current = true;
void navigateToFlowStart();
}
}, [everSawProtectCheck, navigateToFlowStart, signUp.protectCheck]);

const { containerRef, isRunning, hasError, retry } = useProtectCheckRunner<SignUpResource>({
getProtectCheck: () => signUp.protectCheck,
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -81,6 +100,13 @@ function SignUpProtectCheckInternal({
},
});

// Stale/direct visit that never had a check: render nothing while the
// flow-start redirect scheduled above kicks in, instead of flashing the card
// shell for one paint. Must stay below every hook call.
if (!signUp.protectCheck && !everSawProtectCheck) {
return null;
}

return (
<Flow.Part part='protectCheck'>
<Card.Root>
Expand Down
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from 'vitest';
import { bindCreateFixtures } from '@/test/create-fixtures';
import { fireEvent, render } from '@/test/utils';

import { SignUp } from '../index';
import { SignUpProtectCheck } from '../SignUpProtectCheck';

vi.mock('@clerk/shared/internal/clerk-js/protectCheck', () => ({
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -34,6 +35,46 @@ describe('SignUpProtectCheck', () => {
expect(await findByText(/verifying your request/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
});

it('keeps the standalone protect-check route mounted after protectCheck clears', async () => {
const { wrapper, fixtures } = await createFixtures(f => {
f.startSignUpWithProtectCheck();
});
fixtures.router.currentPath = '/sign-up/protect-check';
fixtures.router.fullPath = '/sign-up';
fixtures.router.indexPath = '/sign-up';
fixtures.router.matches.mockImplementation((path?: string) => path === 'protect-check');
mockExecute.mockReturnValue(new Promise(() => {}));

const { findByText, queryByText, rerender } = render(<SignUp />, { wrapper });

expect(await findByText(/verifying your request/i)).toBeInTheDocument();

(fixtures.signUp as any).protectCheck = null;
(fixtures.signUp as any).missingFields = [];
rerender(<SignUp />);

expect(queryByText(/verifying your request/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
expect(fixtures.router.navigate).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('/sign-up');
});

it('routes stale standalone protect-check visits back to the flow start', async () => {
const { wrapper, fixtures } = await createFixtures(f => {
f.startSignUpWithEmailAddress();
});
fixtures.router.currentPath = '/sign-up/protect-check';
fixtures.router.fullPath = '/sign-up';
fixtures.router.indexPath = '/sign-up';

const { queryByText } = render(<SignUpProtectCheck />, { wrapper });

// The card shell must not flash while the redirect below kicks in.
expect(queryByText(/verifying your request/i)).not.toBeInTheDocument();

await waitFor(() => expect(fixtures.router.navigate).toHaveBeenCalledWith('/sign-up'));
expect(mockExecute).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(queryByText(/verifying your request/i)).not.toBeInTheDocument();
});

it('runs the SDK challenge with the URL and resource and submits the proof token', async () => {
const { wrapper, fixtures } = await createFixtures(f => {
f.startSignUpWithProtectCheck({ sdkUrl: 'https://protect.example.com/v1.js' });
Expand Down
16 changes: 8 additions & 8 deletions packages/ui/src/components/SignUp/index.tsx
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -35,10 +35,11 @@ function SignUpRoutes(): JSX.Element {
return (
<Flow.Root flow='signUp'>
<Switch>
<Route
path='protect-check'
canActivate={clerk => !!clerk.client.signUp.protectCheck}
>
{/* No canActivate guard here. `!!signUp.protectCheck` flips to false
when submitProtectCheck resolves and clears protectCheck, which
unmounts this card mid-navigation and blanks the route. The card
owns its own post-resolution routing. */}
<Route path='protect-check'>
Comment thread
mwickett marked this conversation as resolved.
<SignUpProtectCheck />
</Route>
<Route
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -75,10 +76,9 @@ function SignUpRoutes(): JSX.Element {
/>
</Route>
<Route path='continue'>
<Route
path='protect-check'
canActivate={clerk => !!clerk.client.signUp.protectCheck}
>
{/* No canActivate guard: same resolution race as the top-level
protect-check route; the card owns its own routing. */}
<Route path='protect-check'>
{/* Under `continue`, the continue index is `..`, not `../continue`. */}
<SignUpProtectCheck continuePath='..' />
</Route>
Expand Down
Loading
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions .changeset/protect-check-standalone-signup.md
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
---
'@clerk/ui': patch
---
Comment thread
mwickett marked this conversation as resolved.

Fix standalone `<SignUp />` Protect checks so the verification card stays mounted while a solved challenge routes to the next step, while stale direct visits to the protect-check route return to the start of the sign-up flow.
30 changes: 28 additions & 2 deletions packages/ui/src/components/SignUp/SignUpProtectCheck.tsx
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
import { useClerk } from '@clerk/shared/react';
import type { SignUpProps, SignUpResource } from '@clerk/shared/types';
import type { ComponentType } from 'react';
import { type ComponentType, useEffect, useRef, useState } from 'react';

import { Card } from '@/ui/elements/Card';
import { useCardState, withCardStateProvider } from '@/ui/elements/contexts';
Expand All@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ import {
Spinner,
useLocalizations,
} from '../../customizables';
import { useNavigateToFlowStart } from '../../hooks/useNavigateToFlowStart';
import { useProtectCheckRunner } from '../../hooks/useProtectCheckRunner';
import { useRouter } from '../../router';
import { completeSignUpFlow } from './util';
Expand All@@ -42,13 +43,31 @@ function SignUpProtectCheckInternal({
verifyPhonePath = '../verify-phone-number',
continuePath = '../continue',
protectCheckPath = '.',
}: SignUpProtectCheckProps = {}): JSX.Element {
}: SignUpProtectCheckProps = {}): JSX.Element | null {
const card = useCardState();
const { t } = useLocalizations();
const signUp = useCoreSignUp();
const { navigate } = useRouter();
const { navigateToFlowStart } = useNavigateToFlowStart();
const { setActive } = useClerk();
const { afterSignUpUrl, navigateOnSetActive } = useSignUpContext();
// Latches that a protect check existed at some point, so the resolution race
// (submitProtectCheck clearing protectCheck mid-navigation) isn't mistaken for
// a stale visit. State adjusted during render (guarded) rather than a ref
// write, which React disallows in the render body.
const [everSawProtectCheck, setEverSawProtectCheck] = useState(!!signUp.protectCheck);
const didStartNoCheckFallbackRef = useRef(false);

if (signUp.protectCheck && !everSawProtectCheck) {
setEverSawProtectCheck(true);
}

useEffect(() => {
if (!signUp.protectCheck && !everSawProtectCheck && !didStartNoCheckFallbackRef.current) {
didStartNoCheckFallbackRef.current = true;
void navigateToFlowStart();
}
}, [everSawProtectCheck, navigateToFlowStart, signUp.protectCheck]);

const { containerRef, isRunning, hasError, retry } = useProtectCheckRunner<SignUpResource>({
getProtectCheck: () => signUp.protectCheck,
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -81,6 +100,13 @@ function SignUpProtectCheckInternal({
},
});

// Stale/direct visit that never had a check: render nothing while the
// flow-start redirect scheduled above kicks in, instead of flashing the card
// shell for one paint. Must stay below every hook call.
if (!signUp.protectCheck && !everSawProtectCheck) {
return null;
}

return (
<Flow.Part part='protectCheck'>
<Card.Root>
Expand Down
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from 'vitest';
import { bindCreateFixtures } from '@/test/create-fixtures';
import { fireEvent, render } from '@/test/utils';

import { SignUp } from '../index';
import { SignUpProtectCheck } from '../SignUpProtectCheck';

vi.mock('@clerk/shared/internal/clerk-js/protectCheck', () => ({
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -34,6 +35,46 @@ describe('SignUpProtectCheck', () => {
expect(await findByText(/verifying your request/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
});

it('keeps the standalone protect-check route mounted after protectCheck clears', async () => {
const { wrapper, fixtures } = await createFixtures(f => {
f.startSignUpWithProtectCheck();
});
fixtures.router.currentPath = '/sign-up/protect-check';
fixtures.router.fullPath = '/sign-up';
fixtures.router.indexPath = '/sign-up';
fixtures.router.matches.mockImplementation((path?: string) => path === 'protect-check');
mockExecute.mockReturnValue(new Promise(() => {}));

const { findByText, queryByText, rerender } = render(<SignUp />, { wrapper });

expect(await findByText(/verifying your request/i)).toBeInTheDocument();

(fixtures.signUp as any).protectCheck = null;
(fixtures.signUp as any).missingFields = [];
rerender(<SignUp />);

expect(queryByText(/verifying your request/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
expect(fixtures.router.navigate).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('/sign-up');
});

it('routes stale standalone protect-check visits back to the flow start', async () => {
const { wrapper, fixtures } = await createFixtures(f => {
f.startSignUpWithEmailAddress();
});
fixtures.router.currentPath = '/sign-up/protect-check';
fixtures.router.fullPath = '/sign-up';
fixtures.router.indexPath = '/sign-up';

const { queryByText } = render(<SignUpProtectCheck />, { wrapper });

// The card shell must not flash while the redirect below kicks in.
expect(queryByText(/verifying your request/i)).not.toBeInTheDocument();

await waitFor(() => expect(fixtures.router.navigate).toHaveBeenCalledWith('/sign-up'));
expect(mockExecute).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(queryByText(/verifying your request/i)).not.toBeInTheDocument();
});

it('runs the SDK challenge with the URL and resource and submits the proof token', async () => {
const { wrapper, fixtures } = await createFixtures(f => {
f.startSignUpWithProtectCheck({ sdkUrl: 'https://protect.example.com/v1.js' });
Expand Down
16 changes: 8 additions & 8 deletions packages/ui/src/components/SignUp/index.tsx
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -35,10 +35,11 @@ function SignUpRoutes(): JSX.Element {
return (
<Flow.Root flow='signUp'>
<Switch>
<Route
path='protect-check'
canActivate={clerk => !!clerk.client.signUp.protectCheck}
>
{/* No canActivate guard here. `!!signUp.protectCheck` flips to false
when submitProtectCheck resolves and clears protectCheck, which
unmounts this card mid-navigation and blanks the route. The card
owns its own post-resolution routing. */}
<Route path='protect-check'>
Comment thread
mwickett marked this conversation as resolved.
<SignUpProtectCheck />
</Route>
<Route
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -75,10 +76,9 @@ function SignUpRoutes(): JSX.Element {
/>
</Route>
<Route path='continue'>
<Route
path='protect-check'
canActivate={clerk => !!clerk.client.signUp.protectCheck}
>
{/* No canActivate guard: same resolution race as the top-level
protect-check route; the card owns its own routing. */}
<Route path='protect-check'>
{/* Under `continue`, the continue index is `..`, not `../continue`. */}
<SignUpProtectCheck continuePath='..' />
</Route>
Expand Down
Loading
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions .changeset/protect-check-standalone-signup.md
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
---
'@clerk/ui': patch
---
Comment thread
mwickett marked this conversation as resolved.

Fix standalone `<SignUp />` Protect checks so the verification card stays mounted while a solved challenge routes to the next step, while stale direct visits to the protect-check route return to the start of the sign-up flow.
30 changes: 28 additions & 2 deletions packages/ui/src/components/SignUp/SignUpProtectCheck.tsx
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
import { useClerk } from '@clerk/shared/react';
import type { SignUpProps, SignUpResource } from '@clerk/shared/types';
import type { ComponentType } from 'react';
import { type ComponentType, useEffect, useRef, useState } from 'react';

import { Card } from '@/ui/elements/Card';
import { useCardState, withCardStateProvider } from '@/ui/elements/contexts';
Expand All@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ import {
Spinner,
useLocalizations,
} from '../../customizables';
import { useNavigateToFlowStart } from '../../hooks/useNavigateToFlowStart';
import { useProtectCheckRunner } from '../../hooks/useProtectCheckRunner';
import { useRouter } from '../../router';
import { completeSignUpFlow } from './util';
Expand All@@ -42,13 +43,31 @@ function SignUpProtectCheckInternal({
verifyPhonePath = '../verify-phone-number',
continuePath = '../continue',
protectCheckPath = '.',
}: SignUpProtectCheckProps = {}): JSX.Element {
}: SignUpProtectCheckProps = {}): JSX.Element | null {
const card = useCardState();
const { t } = useLocalizations();
const signUp = useCoreSignUp();
const { navigate } = useRouter();
const { navigateToFlowStart } = useNavigateToFlowStart();
const { setActive } = useClerk();
const { afterSignUpUrl, navigateOnSetActive } = useSignUpContext();
// Latches that a protect check existed at some point, so the resolution race
// (submitProtectCheck clearing protectCheck mid-navigation) isn't mistaken for
// a stale visit. State adjusted during render (guarded) rather than a ref
// write, which React disallows in the render body.
const [everSawProtectCheck, setEverSawProtectCheck] = useState(!!signUp.protectCheck);
const didStartNoCheckFallbackRef = useRef(false);

if (signUp.protectCheck && !everSawProtectCheck) {
setEverSawProtectCheck(true);
}

useEffect(() => {
if (!signUp.protectCheck && !everSawProtectCheck && !didStartNoCheckFallbackRef.current) {
didStartNoCheckFallbackRef.current = true;
void navigateToFlowStart();
}
}, [everSawProtectCheck, navigateToFlowStart, signUp.protectCheck]);

const { containerRef, isRunning, hasError, retry } = useProtectCheckRunner<SignUpResource>({
getProtectCheck: () => signUp.protectCheck,
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -81,6 +100,13 @@ function SignUpProtectCheckInternal({
},
});

// Stale/direct visit that never had a check: render nothing while the
// flow-start redirect scheduled above kicks in, instead of flashing the card
// shell for one paint. Must stay below every hook call.
if (!signUp.protectCheck && !everSawProtectCheck) {
return null;
}

return (
<Flow.Part part='protectCheck'>
<Card.Root>
Expand Down
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from 'vitest';
import { bindCreateFixtures } from '@/test/create-fixtures';
import { fireEvent, render } from '@/test/utils';

import { SignUp } from '../index';
import { SignUpProtectCheck } from '../SignUpProtectCheck';

vi.mock('@clerk/shared/internal/clerk-js/protectCheck', () => ({
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -34,6 +35,46 @@ describe('SignUpProtectCheck', () => {
expect(await findByText(/verifying your request/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
});

it('keeps the standalone protect-check route mounted after protectCheck clears', async () => {
const { wrapper, fixtures } = await createFixtures(f => {
f.startSignUpWithProtectCheck();
});
fixtures.router.currentPath = '/sign-up/protect-check';
fixtures.router.fullPath = '/sign-up';
fixtures.router.indexPath = '/sign-up';
fixtures.router.matches.mockImplementation((path?: string) => path === 'protect-check');
mockExecute.mockReturnValue(new Promise(() => {}));

const { findByText, queryByText, rerender } = render(<SignUp />, { wrapper });

expect(await findByText(/verifying your request/i)).toBeInTheDocument();

(fixtures.signUp as any).protectCheck = null;
(fixtures.signUp as any).missingFields = [];
rerender(<SignUp />);

expect(queryByText(/verifying your request/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
expect(fixtures.router.navigate).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('/sign-up');
});

it('routes stale standalone protect-check visits back to the flow start', async () => {
const { wrapper, fixtures } = await createFixtures(f => {
f.startSignUpWithEmailAddress();
});
fixtures.router.currentPath = '/sign-up/protect-check';
fixtures.router.fullPath = '/sign-up';
fixtures.router.indexPath = '/sign-up';

const { queryByText } = render(<SignUpProtectCheck />, { wrapper });

// The card shell must not flash while the redirect below kicks in.
expect(queryByText(/verifying your request/i)).not.toBeInTheDocument();

await waitFor(() => expect(fixtures.router.navigate).toHaveBeenCalledWith('/sign-up'));
expect(mockExecute).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(queryByText(/verifying your request/i)).not.toBeInTheDocument();
});

it('runs the SDK challenge with the URL and resource and submits the proof token', async () => {
const { wrapper, fixtures } = await createFixtures(f => {
f.startSignUpWithProtectCheck({ sdkUrl: 'https://protect.example.com/v1.js' });
Expand Down
16 changes: 8 additions & 8 deletions packages/ui/src/components/SignUp/index.tsx
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -35,10 +35,11 @@ function SignUpRoutes(): JSX.Element {
return (
<Flow.Root flow='signUp'>
<Switch>
<Route
path='protect-check'
canActivate={clerk => !!clerk.client.signUp.protectCheck}
>
{/* No canActivate guard here. `!!signUp.protectCheck` flips to false
when submitProtectCheck resolves and clears protectCheck, which
unmounts this card mid-navigation and blanks the route. The card
owns its own post-resolution routing. */}
<Route path='protect-check'>
Comment thread
mwickett marked this conversation as resolved.
<SignUpProtectCheck />
</Route>
<Route
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -75,10 +76,9 @@ function SignUpRoutes(): JSX.Element {
/>
</Route>
<Route path='continue'>
<Route
path='protect-check'
canActivate={clerk => !!clerk.client.signUp.protectCheck}
>
{/* No canActivate guard: same resolution race as the top-level
protect-check route; the card owns its own routing. */}
<Route path='protect-check'>
{/* Under `continue`, the continue index is `..`, not `../continue`. */}
<SignUpProtectCheck continuePath='..' />
</Route>
Expand Down
Loading
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions .changeset/protect-check-standalone-signup.md
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
---
'@clerk/ui': patch
---
Comment thread
mwickett marked this conversation as resolved.

Fix standalone `<SignUp />` Protect checks so the verification card stays mounted while a solved challenge routes to the next step, while stale direct visits to the protect-check route return to the start of the sign-up flow.
30 changes: 28 additions & 2 deletions packages/ui/src/components/SignUp/SignUpProtectCheck.tsx
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
import { useClerk } from '@clerk/shared/react';
import type { SignUpProps, SignUpResource } from '@clerk/shared/types';
import type { ComponentType } from 'react';
import { type ComponentType, useEffect, useRef, useState } from 'react';

import { Card } from '@/ui/elements/Card';
import { useCardState, withCardStateProvider } from '@/ui/elements/contexts';
Expand All@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ import {
Spinner,
useLocalizations,
} from '../../customizables';
import { useNavigateToFlowStart } from '../../hooks/useNavigateToFlowStart';
import { useProtectCheckRunner } from '../../hooks/useProtectCheckRunner';
import { useRouter } from '../../router';
import { completeSignUpFlow } from './util';
Expand All@@ -42,13 +43,31 @@ function SignUpProtectCheckInternal({
verifyPhonePath = '../verify-phone-number',
continuePath = '../continue',
protectCheckPath = '.',
}: SignUpProtectCheckProps = {}): JSX.Element {
}: SignUpProtectCheckProps = {}): JSX.Element | null {
const card = useCardState();
const { t } = useLocalizations();
const signUp = useCoreSignUp();
const { navigate } = useRouter();
const { navigateToFlowStart } = useNavigateToFlowStart();
const { setActive } = useClerk();
const { afterSignUpUrl, navigateOnSetActive } = useSignUpContext();
// Latches that a protect check existed at some point, so the resolution race
// (submitProtectCheck clearing protectCheck mid-navigation) isn't mistaken for
// a stale visit. State adjusted during render (guarded) rather than a ref
// write, which React disallows in the render body.
const [everSawProtectCheck, setEverSawProtectCheck] = useState(!!signUp.protectCheck);
const didStartNoCheckFallbackRef = useRef(false);

if (signUp.protectCheck && !everSawProtectCheck) {
setEverSawProtectCheck(true);
}

useEffect(() => {
if (!signUp.protectCheck && !everSawProtectCheck && !didStartNoCheckFallbackRef.current) {
didStartNoCheckFallbackRef.current = true;
void navigateToFlowStart();
}
}, [everSawProtectCheck, navigateToFlowStart, signUp.protectCheck]);

const { containerRef, isRunning, hasError, retry } = useProtectCheckRunner<SignUpResource>({
getProtectCheck: () => signUp.protectCheck,
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -81,6 +100,13 @@ function SignUpProtectCheckInternal({
},
});

// Stale/direct visit that never had a check: render nothing while the
// flow-start redirect scheduled above kicks in, instead of flashing the card
// shell for one paint. Must stay below every hook call.
if (!signUp.protectCheck && !everSawProtectCheck) {
return null;
}

return (
<Flow.Part part='protectCheck'>
<Card.Root>
Expand Down
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from 'vitest';
import { bindCreateFixtures } from '@/test/create-fixtures';
import { fireEvent, render } from '@/test/utils';

import { SignUp } from '../index';
import { SignUpProtectCheck } from '../SignUpProtectCheck';

vi.mock('@clerk/shared/internal/clerk-js/protectCheck', () => ({
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -34,6 +35,46 @@ describe('SignUpProtectCheck', () => {
expect(await findByText(/verifying your request/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
});

it('keeps the standalone protect-check route mounted after protectCheck clears', async () => {
const { wrapper, fixtures } = await createFixtures(f => {
f.startSignUpWithProtectCheck();
});
fixtures.router.currentPath = '/sign-up/protect-check';
fixtures.router.fullPath = '/sign-up';
fixtures.router.indexPath = '/sign-up';
fixtures.router.matches.mockImplementation((path?: string) => path === 'protect-check');
mockExecute.mockReturnValue(new Promise(() => {}));

const { findByText, queryByText, rerender } = render(<SignUp />, { wrapper });

expect(await findByText(/verifying your request/i)).toBeInTheDocument();

(fixtures.signUp as any).protectCheck = null;
(fixtures.signUp as any).missingFields = [];
rerender(<SignUp />);

expect(queryByText(/verifying your request/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
expect(fixtures.router.navigate).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('/sign-up');
});

it('routes stale standalone protect-check visits back to the flow start', async () => {
const { wrapper, fixtures } = await createFixtures(f => {
f.startSignUpWithEmailAddress();
});
fixtures.router.currentPath = '/sign-up/protect-check';
fixtures.router.fullPath = '/sign-up';
fixtures.router.indexPath = '/sign-up';

const { queryByText } = render(<SignUpProtectCheck />, { wrapper });

// The card shell must not flash while the redirect below kicks in.
expect(queryByText(/verifying your request/i)).not.toBeInTheDocument();

await waitFor(() => expect(fixtures.router.navigate).toHaveBeenCalledWith('/sign-up'));
expect(mockExecute).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(queryByText(/verifying your request/i)).not.toBeInTheDocument();
});

it('runs the SDK challenge with the URL and resource and submits the proof token', async () => {
const { wrapper, fixtures } = await createFixtures(f => {
f.startSignUpWithProtectCheck({ sdkUrl: 'https://protect.example.com/v1.js' });
Expand Down
16 changes: 8 additions & 8 deletions packages/ui/src/components/SignUp/index.tsx
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -35,10 +35,11 @@ function SignUpRoutes(): JSX.Element {
return (
<Flow.Root flow='signUp'>
<Switch>
<Route
path='protect-check'
canActivate={clerk => !!clerk.client.signUp.protectCheck}
>
{/* No canActivate guard here. `!!signUp.protectCheck` flips to false
when submitProtectCheck resolves and clears protectCheck, which
unmounts this card mid-navigation and blanks the route. The card
owns its own post-resolution routing. */}
<Route path='protect-check'>
Comment thread
mwickett marked this conversation as resolved.
<SignUpProtectCheck />
</Route>
<Route
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -75,10 +76,9 @@ function SignUpRoutes(): JSX.Element {
/>
</Route>
<Route path='continue'>
<Route
path='protect-check'
canActivate={clerk => !!clerk.client.signUp.protectCheck}
>
{/* No canActivate guard: same resolution race as the top-level
protect-check route; the card owns its own routing. */}
<Route path='protect-check'>
{/* Under `continue`, the continue index is `..`, not `../continue`. */}
<SignUpProtectCheck continuePath='..' />
</Route>
Expand Down
Loading
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions .changeset/protect-check-standalone-signup.md
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
---
'@clerk/ui': patch
---
Comment thread
mwickett marked this conversation as resolved.

Fix standalone `<SignUp />` Protect checks so the verification card stays mounted while a solved challenge routes to the next step, while stale direct visits to the protect-check route return to the start of the sign-up flow.
30 changes: 28 additions & 2 deletions packages/ui/src/components/SignUp/SignUpProtectCheck.tsx
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
import { useClerk } from '@clerk/shared/react';
import type { SignUpProps, SignUpResource } from '@clerk/shared/types';
import type { ComponentType } from 'react';
import { type ComponentType, useEffect, useRef, useState } from 'react';

import { Card } from '@/ui/elements/Card';
import { useCardState, withCardStateProvider } from '@/ui/elements/contexts';
Expand All@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ import {
Spinner,
useLocalizations,
} from '../../customizables';
import { useNavigateToFlowStart } from '../../hooks/useNavigateToFlowStart';
import { useProtectCheckRunner } from '../../hooks/useProtectCheckRunner';
import { useRouter } from '../../router';
import { completeSignUpFlow } from './util';
Expand All@@ -42,13 +43,31 @@ function SignUpProtectCheckInternal({
verifyPhonePath = '../verify-phone-number',
continuePath = '../continue',
protectCheckPath = '.',
}: SignUpProtectCheckProps = {}): JSX.Element {
}: SignUpProtectCheckProps = {}): JSX.Element | null {
const card = useCardState();
const { t } = useLocalizations();
const signUp = useCoreSignUp();
const { navigate } = useRouter();
const { navigateToFlowStart } = useNavigateToFlowStart();
const { setActive } = useClerk();
const { afterSignUpUrl, navigateOnSetActive } = useSignUpContext();
// Latches that a protect check existed at some point, so the resolution race
// (submitProtectCheck clearing protectCheck mid-navigation) isn't mistaken for
// a stale visit. State adjusted during render (guarded) rather than a ref
// write, which React disallows in the render body.
const [everSawProtectCheck, setEverSawProtectCheck] = useState(!!signUp.protectCheck);
const didStartNoCheckFallbackRef = useRef(false);

if (signUp.protectCheck && !everSawProtectCheck) {
setEverSawProtectCheck(true);
}

useEffect(() => {
if (!signUp.protectCheck && !everSawProtectCheck && !didStartNoCheckFallbackRef.current) {
didStartNoCheckFallbackRef.current = true;
void navigateToFlowStart();
}
}, [everSawProtectCheck, navigateToFlowStart, signUp.protectCheck]);

const { containerRef, isRunning, hasError, retry } = useProtectCheckRunner<SignUpResource>({
getProtectCheck: () => signUp.protectCheck,
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -81,6 +100,13 @@ function SignUpProtectCheckInternal({
},
});

// Stale/direct visit that never had a check: render nothing while the
// flow-start redirect scheduled above kicks in, instead of flashing the card
// shell for one paint. Must stay below every hook call.
if (!signUp.protectCheck && !everSawProtectCheck) {
return null;
}

return (
<Flow.Part part='protectCheck'>
<Card.Root>
Expand Down
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from 'vitest';
import { bindCreateFixtures } from '@/test/create-fixtures';
import { fireEvent, render } from '@/test/utils';

import { SignUp } from '../index';
import { SignUpProtectCheck } from '../SignUpProtectCheck';

vi.mock('@clerk/shared/internal/clerk-js/protectCheck', () => ({
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -34,6 +35,46 @@ describe('SignUpProtectCheck', () => {
expect(await findByText(/verifying your request/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
});

it('keeps the standalone protect-check route mounted after protectCheck clears', async () => {
const { wrapper, fixtures } = await createFixtures(f => {
f.startSignUpWithProtectCheck();
});
fixtures.router.currentPath = '/sign-up/protect-check';
fixtures.router.fullPath = '/sign-up';
fixtures.router.indexPath = '/sign-up';
fixtures.router.matches.mockImplementation((path?: string) => path === 'protect-check');
mockExecute.mockReturnValue(new Promise(() => {}));

const { findByText, queryByText, rerender } = render(<SignUp />, { wrapper });

expect(await findByText(/verifying your request/i)).toBeInTheDocument();

(fixtures.signUp as any).protectCheck = null;
(fixtures.signUp as any).missingFields = [];
rerender(<SignUp />);

expect(queryByText(/verifying your request/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
expect(fixtures.router.navigate).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('/sign-up');
});

it('routes stale standalone protect-check visits back to the flow start', async () => {
const { wrapper, fixtures } = await createFixtures(f => {
f.startSignUpWithEmailAddress();
});
fixtures.router.currentPath = '/sign-up/protect-check';
fixtures.router.fullPath = '/sign-up';
fixtures.router.indexPath = '/sign-up';

const { queryByText } = render(<SignUpProtectCheck />, { wrapper });

// The card shell must not flash while the redirect below kicks in.
expect(queryByText(/verifying your request/i)).not.toBeInTheDocument();

await waitFor(() => expect(fixtures.router.navigate).toHaveBeenCalledWith('/sign-up'));
expect(mockExecute).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(queryByText(/verifying your request/i)).not.toBeInTheDocument();
});

it('runs the SDK challenge with the URL and resource and submits the proof token', async () => {
const { wrapper, fixtures } = await createFixtures(f => {
f.startSignUpWithProtectCheck({ sdkUrl: 'https://protect.example.com/v1.js' });
Expand Down
16 changes: 8 additions & 8 deletions packages/ui/src/components/SignUp/index.tsx
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -35,10 +35,11 @@ function SignUpRoutes(): JSX.Element {
return (
<Flow.Root flow='signUp'>
<Switch>
<Route
path='protect-check'
canActivate={clerk => !!clerk.client.signUp.protectCheck}
>
{/* No canActivate guard here. `!!signUp.protectCheck` flips to false
when submitProtectCheck resolves and clears protectCheck, which
unmounts this card mid-navigation and blanks the route. The card
owns its own post-resolution routing. */}
<Route path='protect-check'>
Comment thread
mwickett marked this conversation as resolved.
<SignUpProtectCheck />
</Route>
<Route
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -75,10 +76,9 @@ function SignUpRoutes(): JSX.Element {
/>
</Route>
<Route path='continue'>
<Route
path='protect-check'
canActivate={clerk => !!clerk.client.signUp.protectCheck}
>
{/* No canActivate guard: same resolution race as the top-level
protect-check route; the card owns its own routing. */}
<Route path='protect-check'>
{/* Under `continue`, the continue index is `..`, not `../continue`. */}
<SignUpProtectCheck continuePath='..' />
</Route>
Expand Down
Loading