Skip to content

fix(backend): Update params and documention on createUser - #9305

Merged
dmoerner merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
daniel/backend-create-user-identification-status
Jul 31, 2026
Merged

fix(backend): Update params and documention on createUser#9305
dmoerner merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
daniel/backend-create-user-identification-status

Conversation

@dmoerner

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Add the optional emailAddressIdentificationStatus and phoneNumberIdentificationStatus parameters to CreateUserParams. The Backend API has supported these arrays on POST /v1/users since they shipped, but createUser() had no way to pass them, so every email address and phone number was necessarily created verified. Each array runs parallel to emailAddress / phoneNumber — one item per identifier, applied by position — and an item set to 'reserved' creates that identifier unverified but still usable for sign-in and locked so no other user can claim it.

The createUser() documentation is corrected accordingly: it stated unconditionally that created email addresses and phone numbers are automatically verified, which is only the default.

Description

Checklist

  • pnpm test runs as expected.
  • pnpm build runs as expected.
  • (If applicable) JSDoc comments have been added or updated for any package exports
  • (If applicable) Documentation has been updated

Type of change

  • 🐛 Bug fix
  • 🌟 New feature
  • 🔨 Breaking change
  • 📖 Refactoring / dependency upgrade / documentation
  • other:

Add the optional `emailAddressIdentificationStatus` and `phoneNumberIdentificationStatus` parameters to `CreateUserParams`. The Backend API has supported these arrays on `POST /v1/users` since they shipped, but `createUser()` had no way to pass them, so every email address and phone number was necessarily created verified. Each array runs parallel to `emailAddress` / `phoneNumber` — one item per identifier, applied by position — and an item set to `'reserved'` creates that identifier unverified but still usable for sign-in and locked so no other user can claim it.
The `createUser()` documentation is corrected accordingly: it stated unconditionally that created email addresses and phone numbers are automatically verified, which is only the default.
@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 6754033

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 10 packages
NameType
@clerk/backendPatch
@clerk/astroPatch
@clerk/expressPatch
@clerk/fastifyPatch
@clerk/honoPatch
@clerk/nextjsPatch
@clerk/nuxtPatch
@clerk/react-routerPatch
@clerk/tanstack-react-startPatch
@clerk/testingPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercelBot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

ProjectDeploymentActionsUpdated (UTC)
clerk-js-sandboxReadyReadyPreviewJul 31, 2026 5:01pm
swingsetReadyReadyPreviewJul 31, 2026 5:01pm

Request Review

@pkg-pr-new

pkg-pr-newBot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Open in StackBlitz

@clerk/astro

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/astro@9305

@clerk/backend

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/backend@9305

@clerk/chrome-extension

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/chrome-extension@9305

@clerk/clerk-js

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/clerk-js@9305

@clerk/electron

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/electron@9305

@clerk/electron-passkeys

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/electron-passkeys@9305

@clerk/eslint-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/eslint-plugin@9305

@clerk/expo

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/expo@9305

@clerk/expo-google-signin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/expo-google-signin@9305

@clerk/expo-passkeys

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/expo-passkeys@9305

@clerk/express

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/express@9305

@clerk/fastify

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/fastify@9305

@clerk/hono

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/hono@9305

@clerk/localizations

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/localizations@9305

@clerk/nextjs

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/nextjs@9305

@clerk/nuxt

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/nuxt@9305

@clerk/react

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/react@9305

@clerk/react-router

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/react-router@9305

@clerk/shared

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/shared@9305

@clerk/tanstack-react-start

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/tanstack-react-start@9305

@clerk/testing

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/testing@9305

@clerk/ui

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/ui@9305

@clerk/upgrade

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/upgrade@9305

@clerk/vue

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/vue@9305

commit: 6754033

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

API Changes Report

Generated by Break Check on 2026-07-31T17:02:38.529Z

Summary

MetricCount
Packages analyzed19
Packages with changes0
🔴 Breaking changes0
🟡 Non-breaking changes0
🟢 Additions0

No API Changes Detected

All packages have stable APIs with no detected changes.


Report generated by Break Check

Last ran on 6754033.

@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The backend CreateUserParams contract now supports optional positional identification status arrays for email addresses and phone numbers. Each value can be created as verified or reserved. The createUser documentation and backend changeset describe the new parameters and reserved-contact behavior. Documentation no longer states that all email addresses and phone numbers are always automatically verified.

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes

Suggested reviewers:alexisintech

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Title check✅ PassedThe title clearly identifies the backend parameter and documentation updates for createUser().
Description check✅ PassedThe description accurately explains the new status parameters, positional behavior, reserved identifiers, and documentation correction.
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedNo functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/backend/src/api/endpoints/UserApi.ts (1)

239-239: 🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration | 🔵 Trivial | ⚡ Quick win

Add request-body coverage for both status arrays.

The existing createUser() test path does not send either new field or inspect the request body. Add a test with mixed 'verified' and 'reserved' values. Assert that both arrays and their positional order are preserved.

Also applies to: 243-243

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@packages/backend/src/api/endpoints/UserApi.ts` at line 239, Add request-body
coverage in the existing createUser() test path for both new status-array
fields, supplying mixed 'verified' and 'reserved' values. Capture or inspect the
outgoing request body and assert that each array is present with its values
preserved in the original positional order.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Nitpick comments:
In `@packages/backend/src/api/endpoints/UserApi.ts`:
- Line 239: Add request-body coverage in the existing createUser() test path for
both new status-array fields, supplying mixed 'verified' and 'reserved' values.
Capture or inspect the outgoing request body and assert that each array is
present with its values preserved in the original positional order.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Organization UI (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: da20e0b8-caec-4806-acf1-7778b2aa5fb5

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 38f347c and e3525bd.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .changeset/backend-create-user-identification-status.md
  • packages/backend/src/api/endpoints/UserApi.ts
🔗 Linked repositories identified

CodeRabbit considers these linked repositories for cross-repo context during reviews:

  • clerk/clerk_go(manual)
  • clerk/dashboard(manual)
  • clerk/accounts(manual)
  • clerk/backoffice(manual)
  • clerk/clerk(manual)
  • clerk/clerk-docs(manual)
  • clerk/cloudflare-workers(manual)
  • clerk/clerk-ios(auto-detected)
  • clerk/clerk-android(auto-detected)
  • clerk/cli(auto-detected)

@wobsorianowobsoriano left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍🏼

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@dmoerner@wobsoriano
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
fix(backend): Update params and documention on createUser by dmoerner · Pull Request #9305 · clerk/javascript · GitHub
Skip to content

fix(backend): Update params and documention on createUser - #9305

Merged
dmoerner merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
daniel/backend-create-user-identification-status
Jul 31, 2026
Merged

fix(backend): Update params and documention on createUser#9305
dmoerner merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
daniel/backend-create-user-identification-status

Conversation

@dmoerner

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Add the optional emailAddressIdentificationStatus and phoneNumberIdentificationStatus parameters to CreateUserParams. The Backend API has supported these arrays on POST /v1/users since they shipped, but createUser() had no way to pass them, so every email address and phone number was necessarily created verified. Each array runs parallel to emailAddress / phoneNumber — one item per identifier, applied by position — and an item set to 'reserved' creates that identifier unverified but still usable for sign-in and locked so no other user can claim it.

The createUser() documentation is corrected accordingly: it stated unconditionally that created email addresses and phone numbers are automatically verified, which is only the default.

Description

Checklist

  • pnpm test runs as expected.
  • pnpm build runs as expected.
  • (If applicable) JSDoc comments have been added or updated for any package exports
  • (If applicable) Documentation has been updated

Type of change

  • 🐛 Bug fix
  • 🌟 New feature
  • 🔨 Breaking change
  • 📖 Refactoring / dependency upgrade / documentation
  • other:

Add the optional `emailAddressIdentificationStatus` and `phoneNumberIdentificationStatus` parameters to `CreateUserParams`. The Backend API has supported these arrays on `POST /v1/users` since they shipped, but `createUser()` had no way to pass them, so every email address and phone number was necessarily created verified. Each array runs parallel to `emailAddress` / `phoneNumber` — one item per identifier, applied by position — and an item set to `'reserved'` creates that identifier unverified but still usable for sign-in and locked so no other user can claim it.
The `createUser()` documentation is corrected accordingly: it stated unconditionally that created email addresses and phone numbers are automatically verified, which is only the default.
@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 6754033

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 10 packages
NameType
@clerk/backendPatch
@clerk/astroPatch
@clerk/expressPatch
@clerk/fastifyPatch
@clerk/honoPatch
@clerk/nextjsPatch
@clerk/nuxtPatch
@clerk/react-routerPatch
@clerk/tanstack-react-startPatch
@clerk/testingPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercelBot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

ProjectDeploymentActionsUpdated (UTC)
clerk-js-sandboxReadyReadyPreviewJul 31, 2026 5:01pm
swingsetReadyReadyPreviewJul 31, 2026 5:01pm

Request Review

@pkg-pr-new

pkg-pr-newBot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Open in StackBlitz

@clerk/astro

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/astro@9305

@clerk/backend

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/backend@9305

@clerk/chrome-extension

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/chrome-extension@9305

@clerk/clerk-js

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/clerk-js@9305

@clerk/electron

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/electron@9305

@clerk/electron-passkeys

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/electron-passkeys@9305

@clerk/eslint-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/eslint-plugin@9305

@clerk/expo

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/expo@9305

@clerk/expo-google-signin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/expo-google-signin@9305

@clerk/expo-passkeys

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/expo-passkeys@9305

@clerk/express

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/express@9305

@clerk/fastify

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/fastify@9305

@clerk/hono

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/hono@9305

@clerk/localizations

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/localizations@9305

@clerk/nextjs

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/nextjs@9305

@clerk/nuxt

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/nuxt@9305

@clerk/react

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/react@9305

@clerk/react-router

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/react-router@9305

@clerk/shared

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/shared@9305

@clerk/tanstack-react-start

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/tanstack-react-start@9305

@clerk/testing

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/testing@9305

@clerk/ui

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/ui@9305

@clerk/upgrade

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/upgrade@9305

@clerk/vue

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/vue@9305

commit: 6754033

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

API Changes Report

Generated by Break Check on 2026-07-31T17:02:38.529Z

Summary

MetricCount
Packages analyzed19
Packages with changes0
🔴 Breaking changes0
🟡 Non-breaking changes0
🟢 Additions0

No API Changes Detected

All packages have stable APIs with no detected changes.


Report generated by Break Check

Last ran on 6754033.

@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The backend CreateUserParams contract now supports optional positional identification status arrays for email addresses and phone numbers. Each value can be created as verified or reserved. The createUser documentation and backend changeset describe the new parameters and reserved-contact behavior. Documentation no longer states that all email addresses and phone numbers are always automatically verified.

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes

Suggested reviewers:alexisintech

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Title check✅ PassedThe title clearly identifies the backend parameter and documentation updates for createUser().
Description check✅ PassedThe description accurately explains the new status parameters, positional behavior, reserved identifiers, and documentation correction.
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedNo functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/backend/src/api/endpoints/UserApi.ts (1)

239-239: 🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration | 🔵 Trivial | ⚡ Quick win

Add request-body coverage for both status arrays.

The existing createUser() test path does not send either new field or inspect the request body. Add a test with mixed 'verified' and 'reserved' values. Assert that both arrays and their positional order are preserved.

Also applies to: 243-243

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@packages/backend/src/api/endpoints/UserApi.ts` at line 239, Add request-body
coverage in the existing createUser() test path for both new status-array
fields, supplying mixed 'verified' and 'reserved' values. Capture or inspect the
outgoing request body and assert that each array is present with its values
preserved in the original positional order.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Nitpick comments:
In `@packages/backend/src/api/endpoints/UserApi.ts`:
- Line 239: Add request-body coverage in the existing createUser() test path for
both new status-array fields, supplying mixed 'verified' and 'reserved' values.
Capture or inspect the outgoing request body and assert that each array is
present with its values preserved in the original positional order.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Organization UI (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: da20e0b8-caec-4806-acf1-7778b2aa5fb5

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 38f347c and e3525bd.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .changeset/backend-create-user-identification-status.md
  • packages/backend/src/api/endpoints/UserApi.ts
🔗 Linked repositories identified

CodeRabbit considers these linked repositories for cross-repo context during reviews:

  • clerk/clerk_go(manual)
  • clerk/dashboard(manual)
  • clerk/accounts(manual)
  • clerk/backoffice(manual)
  • clerk/clerk(manual)
  • clerk/clerk-docs(manual)
  • clerk/cloudflare-workers(manual)
  • clerk/clerk-ios(auto-detected)
  • clerk/clerk-android(auto-detected)
  • clerk/cli(auto-detected)

@wobsorianowobsoriano left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍🏼

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@dmoerner@wobsoriano
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' fix(backend): Update params and documention on createUser by dmoerner · Pull Request #9305 · clerk/javascript · GitHub
Skip to content

fix(backend): Update params and documention on createUser - #9305

Merged
dmoerner merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
daniel/backend-create-user-identification-status
Jul 31, 2026
Merged

fix(backend): Update params and documention on createUser#9305
dmoerner merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
daniel/backend-create-user-identification-status

Conversation

@dmoerner

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Add the optional emailAddressIdentificationStatus and phoneNumberIdentificationStatus parameters to CreateUserParams. The Backend API has supported these arrays on POST /v1/users since they shipped, but createUser() had no way to pass them, so every email address and phone number was necessarily created verified. Each array runs parallel to emailAddress / phoneNumber — one item per identifier, applied by position — and an item set to 'reserved' creates that identifier unverified but still usable for sign-in and locked so no other user can claim it.

The createUser() documentation is corrected accordingly: it stated unconditionally that created email addresses and phone numbers are automatically verified, which is only the default.

Description

Checklist

  • pnpm test runs as expected.
  • pnpm build runs as expected.
  • (If applicable) JSDoc comments have been added or updated for any package exports
  • (If applicable) Documentation has been updated

Type of change

  • 🐛 Bug fix
  • 🌟 New feature
  • 🔨 Breaking change
  • 📖 Refactoring / dependency upgrade / documentation
  • other:

Add the optional `emailAddressIdentificationStatus` and `phoneNumberIdentificationStatus` parameters to `CreateUserParams`. The Backend API has supported these arrays on `POST /v1/users` since they shipped, but `createUser()` had no way to pass them, so every email address and phone number was necessarily created verified. Each array runs parallel to `emailAddress` / `phoneNumber` — one item per identifier, applied by position — and an item set to `'reserved'` creates that identifier unverified but still usable for sign-in and locked so no other user can claim it.
The `createUser()` documentation is corrected accordingly: it stated unconditionally that created email addresses and phone numbers are automatically verified, which is only the default.
@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 6754033

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 10 packages
NameType
@clerk/backendPatch
@clerk/astroPatch
@clerk/expressPatch
@clerk/fastifyPatch
@clerk/honoPatch
@clerk/nextjsPatch
@clerk/nuxtPatch
@clerk/react-routerPatch
@clerk/tanstack-react-startPatch
@clerk/testingPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercelBot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

ProjectDeploymentActionsUpdated (UTC)
clerk-js-sandboxReadyReadyPreviewJul 31, 2026 5:01pm
swingsetReadyReadyPreviewJul 31, 2026 5:01pm

Request Review

@pkg-pr-new

pkg-pr-newBot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Open in StackBlitz

@clerk/astro

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/astro@9305

@clerk/backend

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/backend@9305

@clerk/chrome-extension

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/chrome-extension@9305

@clerk/clerk-js

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/clerk-js@9305

@clerk/electron

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/electron@9305

@clerk/electron-passkeys

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/electron-passkeys@9305

@clerk/eslint-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/eslint-plugin@9305

@clerk/expo

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/expo@9305

@clerk/expo-google-signin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/expo-google-signin@9305

@clerk/expo-passkeys

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/expo-passkeys@9305

@clerk/express

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/express@9305

@clerk/fastify

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/fastify@9305

@clerk/hono

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/hono@9305

@clerk/localizations

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/localizations@9305

@clerk/nextjs

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/nextjs@9305

@clerk/nuxt

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/nuxt@9305

@clerk/react

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/react@9305

@clerk/react-router

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/react-router@9305

@clerk/shared

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/shared@9305

@clerk/tanstack-react-start

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/tanstack-react-start@9305

@clerk/testing

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/testing@9305

@clerk/ui

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/ui@9305

@clerk/upgrade

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/upgrade@9305

@clerk/vue

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/vue@9305

commit: 6754033

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

API Changes Report

Generated by Break Check on 2026-07-31T17:02:38.529Z

Summary

MetricCount
Packages analyzed19
Packages with changes0
🔴 Breaking changes0
🟡 Non-breaking changes0
🟢 Additions0

No API Changes Detected

All packages have stable APIs with no detected changes.


Report generated by Break Check

Last ran on 6754033.

@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The backend CreateUserParams contract now supports optional positional identification status arrays for email addresses and phone numbers. Each value can be created as verified or reserved. The createUser documentation and backend changeset describe the new parameters and reserved-contact behavior. Documentation no longer states that all email addresses and phone numbers are always automatically verified.

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes

Suggested reviewers:alexisintech

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Title check✅ PassedThe title clearly identifies the backend parameter and documentation updates for createUser().
Description check✅ PassedThe description accurately explains the new status parameters, positional behavior, reserved identifiers, and documentation correction.
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedNo functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/backend/src/api/endpoints/UserApi.ts (1)

239-239: 🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration | 🔵 Trivial | ⚡ Quick win

Add request-body coverage for both status arrays.

The existing createUser() test path does not send either new field or inspect the request body. Add a test with mixed 'verified' and 'reserved' values. Assert that both arrays and their positional order are preserved.

Also applies to: 243-243

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@packages/backend/src/api/endpoints/UserApi.ts` at line 239, Add request-body
coverage in the existing createUser() test path for both new status-array
fields, supplying mixed 'verified' and 'reserved' values. Capture or inspect the
outgoing request body and assert that each array is present with its values
preserved in the original positional order.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Nitpick comments:
In `@packages/backend/src/api/endpoints/UserApi.ts`:
- Line 239: Add request-body coverage in the existing createUser() test path for
both new status-array fields, supplying mixed 'verified' and 'reserved' values.
Capture or inspect the outgoing request body and assert that each array is
present with its values preserved in the original positional order.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Organization UI (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: da20e0b8-caec-4806-acf1-7778b2aa5fb5

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 38f347c and e3525bd.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .changeset/backend-create-user-identification-status.md
  • packages/backend/src/api/endpoints/UserApi.ts
🔗 Linked repositories identified

CodeRabbit considers these linked repositories for cross-repo context during reviews:

  • clerk/clerk_go(manual)
  • clerk/dashboard(manual)
  • clerk/accounts(manual)
  • clerk/backoffice(manual)
  • clerk/clerk(manual)
  • clerk/clerk-docs(manual)
  • clerk/cloudflare-workers(manual)
  • clerk/clerk-ios(auto-detected)
  • clerk/clerk-android(auto-detected)
  • clerk/cli(auto-detected)

@wobsorianowobsoriano left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍🏼

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@dmoerner@wobsoriano
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' fix(backend): Update params and documention on createUser by dmoerner · Pull Request #9305 · clerk/javascript · GitHub
Skip to content

fix(backend): Update params and documention on createUser - #9305

Merged
dmoerner merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
daniel/backend-create-user-identification-status
Jul 31, 2026
Merged

fix(backend): Update params and documention on createUser#9305
dmoerner merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
daniel/backend-create-user-identification-status

Conversation

@dmoerner

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Add the optional emailAddressIdentificationStatus and phoneNumberIdentificationStatus parameters to CreateUserParams. The Backend API has supported these arrays on POST /v1/users since they shipped, but createUser() had no way to pass them, so every email address and phone number was necessarily created verified. Each array runs parallel to emailAddress / phoneNumber — one item per identifier, applied by position — and an item set to 'reserved' creates that identifier unverified but still usable for sign-in and locked so no other user can claim it.

The createUser() documentation is corrected accordingly: it stated unconditionally that created email addresses and phone numbers are automatically verified, which is only the default.

Description

Checklist

  • pnpm test runs as expected.
  • pnpm build runs as expected.
  • (If applicable) JSDoc comments have been added or updated for any package exports
  • (If applicable) Documentation has been updated

Type of change

  • 🐛 Bug fix
  • 🌟 New feature
  • 🔨 Breaking change
  • 📖 Refactoring / dependency upgrade / documentation
  • other:

Add the optional `emailAddressIdentificationStatus` and `phoneNumberIdentificationStatus` parameters to `CreateUserParams`. The Backend API has supported these arrays on `POST /v1/users` since they shipped, but `createUser()` had no way to pass them, so every email address and phone number was necessarily created verified. Each array runs parallel to `emailAddress` / `phoneNumber` — one item per identifier, applied by position — and an item set to `'reserved'` creates that identifier unverified but still usable for sign-in and locked so no other user can claim it.
The `createUser()` documentation is corrected accordingly: it stated unconditionally that created email addresses and phone numbers are automatically verified, which is only the default.
@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 6754033

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 10 packages
NameType
@clerk/backendPatch
@clerk/astroPatch
@clerk/expressPatch
@clerk/fastifyPatch
@clerk/honoPatch
@clerk/nextjsPatch
@clerk/nuxtPatch
@clerk/react-routerPatch
@clerk/tanstack-react-startPatch
@clerk/testingPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercelBot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

ProjectDeploymentActionsUpdated (UTC)
clerk-js-sandboxReadyReadyPreviewJul 31, 2026 5:01pm
swingsetReadyReadyPreviewJul 31, 2026 5:01pm

Request Review

@pkg-pr-new

pkg-pr-newBot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Open in StackBlitz

@clerk/astro

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/astro@9305

@clerk/backend

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/backend@9305

@clerk/chrome-extension

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/chrome-extension@9305

@clerk/clerk-js

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/clerk-js@9305

@clerk/electron

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/electron@9305

@clerk/electron-passkeys

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/electron-passkeys@9305

@clerk/eslint-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/eslint-plugin@9305

@clerk/expo

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/expo@9305

@clerk/expo-google-signin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/expo-google-signin@9305

@clerk/expo-passkeys

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/expo-passkeys@9305

@clerk/express

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/express@9305

@clerk/fastify

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/fastify@9305

@clerk/hono

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/hono@9305

@clerk/localizations

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/localizations@9305

@clerk/nextjs

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/nextjs@9305

@clerk/nuxt

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/nuxt@9305

@clerk/react

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/react@9305

@clerk/react-router

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/react-router@9305

@clerk/shared

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/shared@9305

@clerk/tanstack-react-start

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/tanstack-react-start@9305

@clerk/testing

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/testing@9305

@clerk/ui

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/ui@9305

@clerk/upgrade

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/upgrade@9305

@clerk/vue

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/vue@9305

commit: 6754033

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

API Changes Report

Generated by Break Check on 2026-07-31T17:02:38.529Z

Summary

MetricCount
Packages analyzed19
Packages with changes0
🔴 Breaking changes0
🟡 Non-breaking changes0
🟢 Additions0

No API Changes Detected

All packages have stable APIs with no detected changes.


Report generated by Break Check

Last ran on 6754033.

@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The backend CreateUserParams contract now supports optional positional identification status arrays for email addresses and phone numbers. Each value can be created as verified or reserved. The createUser documentation and backend changeset describe the new parameters and reserved-contact behavior. Documentation no longer states that all email addresses and phone numbers are always automatically verified.

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes

Suggested reviewers:alexisintech

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Title check✅ PassedThe title clearly identifies the backend parameter and documentation updates for createUser().
Description check✅ PassedThe description accurately explains the new status parameters, positional behavior, reserved identifiers, and documentation correction.
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedNo functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/backend/src/api/endpoints/UserApi.ts (1)

239-239: 🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration | 🔵 Trivial | ⚡ Quick win

Add request-body coverage for both status arrays.

The existing createUser() test path does not send either new field or inspect the request body. Add a test with mixed 'verified' and 'reserved' values. Assert that both arrays and their positional order are preserved.

Also applies to: 243-243

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@packages/backend/src/api/endpoints/UserApi.ts` at line 239, Add request-body
coverage in the existing createUser() test path for both new status-array
fields, supplying mixed 'verified' and 'reserved' values. Capture or inspect the
outgoing request body and assert that each array is present with its values
preserved in the original positional order.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Nitpick comments:
In `@packages/backend/src/api/endpoints/UserApi.ts`:
- Line 239: Add request-body coverage in the existing createUser() test path for
both new status-array fields, supplying mixed 'verified' and 'reserved' values.
Capture or inspect the outgoing request body and assert that each array is
present with its values preserved in the original positional order.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Organization UI (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: da20e0b8-caec-4806-acf1-7778b2aa5fb5

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 38f347c and e3525bd.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .changeset/backend-create-user-identification-status.md
  • packages/backend/src/api/endpoints/UserApi.ts
🔗 Linked repositories identified

CodeRabbit considers these linked repositories for cross-repo context during reviews:

  • clerk/clerk_go(manual)
  • clerk/dashboard(manual)
  • clerk/accounts(manual)
  • clerk/backoffice(manual)
  • clerk/clerk(manual)
  • clerk/clerk-docs(manual)
  • clerk/cloudflare-workers(manual)
  • clerk/clerk-ios(auto-detected)
  • clerk/clerk-android(auto-detected)
  • clerk/cli(auto-detected)

@wobsorianowobsoriano left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍🏼

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@dmoerner@wobsoriano
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' fix(backend): Update params and documention on createUser by dmoerner · Pull Request #9305 · clerk/javascript · GitHub
Skip to content

fix(backend): Update params and documention on createUser - #9305

Merged
dmoerner merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
daniel/backend-create-user-identification-status
Jul 31, 2026
Merged

fix(backend): Update params and documention on createUser#9305
dmoerner merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
daniel/backend-create-user-identification-status

Conversation

@dmoerner

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Add the optional emailAddressIdentificationStatus and phoneNumberIdentificationStatus parameters to CreateUserParams. The Backend API has supported these arrays on POST /v1/users since they shipped, but createUser() had no way to pass them, so every email address and phone number was necessarily created verified. Each array runs parallel to emailAddress / phoneNumber — one item per identifier, applied by position — and an item set to 'reserved' creates that identifier unverified but still usable for sign-in and locked so no other user can claim it.

The createUser() documentation is corrected accordingly: it stated unconditionally that created email addresses and phone numbers are automatically verified, which is only the default.

Description

Checklist

  • pnpm test runs as expected.
  • pnpm build runs as expected.
  • (If applicable) JSDoc comments have been added or updated for any package exports
  • (If applicable) Documentation has been updated

Type of change

  • 🐛 Bug fix
  • 🌟 New feature
  • 🔨 Breaking change
  • 📖 Refactoring / dependency upgrade / documentation
  • other:

Add the optional `emailAddressIdentificationStatus` and `phoneNumberIdentificationStatus` parameters to `CreateUserParams`. The Backend API has supported these arrays on `POST /v1/users` since they shipped, but `createUser()` had no way to pass them, so every email address and phone number was necessarily created verified. Each array runs parallel to `emailAddress` / `phoneNumber` — one item per identifier, applied by position — and an item set to `'reserved'` creates that identifier unverified but still usable for sign-in and locked so no other user can claim it.
The `createUser()` documentation is corrected accordingly: it stated unconditionally that created email addresses and phone numbers are automatically verified, which is only the default.
@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 6754033

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 10 packages
NameType
@clerk/backendPatch
@clerk/astroPatch
@clerk/expressPatch
@clerk/fastifyPatch
@clerk/honoPatch
@clerk/nextjsPatch
@clerk/nuxtPatch
@clerk/react-routerPatch
@clerk/tanstack-react-startPatch
@clerk/testingPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercelBot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

ProjectDeploymentActionsUpdated (UTC)
clerk-js-sandboxReadyReadyPreviewJul 31, 2026 5:01pm
swingsetReadyReadyPreviewJul 31, 2026 5:01pm

Request Review

@pkg-pr-new

pkg-pr-newBot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Open in StackBlitz

@clerk/astro

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/astro@9305

@clerk/backend

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/backend@9305

@clerk/chrome-extension

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/chrome-extension@9305

@clerk/clerk-js

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/clerk-js@9305

@clerk/electron

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/electron@9305

@clerk/electron-passkeys

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/electron-passkeys@9305

@clerk/eslint-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/eslint-plugin@9305

@clerk/expo

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/expo@9305

@clerk/expo-google-signin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/expo-google-signin@9305

@clerk/expo-passkeys

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/expo-passkeys@9305

@clerk/express

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/express@9305

@clerk/fastify

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/fastify@9305

@clerk/hono

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/hono@9305

@clerk/localizations

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/localizations@9305

@clerk/nextjs

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/nextjs@9305

@clerk/nuxt

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/nuxt@9305

@clerk/react

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/react@9305

@clerk/react-router

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/react-router@9305

@clerk/shared

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/shared@9305

@clerk/tanstack-react-start

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/tanstack-react-start@9305

@clerk/testing

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/testing@9305

@clerk/ui

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/ui@9305

@clerk/upgrade

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/upgrade@9305

@clerk/vue

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/vue@9305

commit: 6754033

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

API Changes Report

Generated by Break Check on 2026-07-31T17:02:38.529Z

Summary

MetricCount
Packages analyzed19
Packages with changes0
🔴 Breaking changes0
🟡 Non-breaking changes0
🟢 Additions0

No API Changes Detected

All packages have stable APIs with no detected changes.


Report generated by Break Check

Last ran on 6754033.

@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The backend CreateUserParams contract now supports optional positional identification status arrays for email addresses and phone numbers. Each value can be created as verified or reserved. The createUser documentation and backend changeset describe the new parameters and reserved-contact behavior. Documentation no longer states that all email addresses and phone numbers are always automatically verified.

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes

Suggested reviewers:alexisintech

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Title check✅ PassedThe title clearly identifies the backend parameter and documentation updates for createUser().
Description check✅ PassedThe description accurately explains the new status parameters, positional behavior, reserved identifiers, and documentation correction.
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedNo functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/backend/src/api/endpoints/UserApi.ts (1)

239-239: 🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration | 🔵 Trivial | ⚡ Quick win

Add request-body coverage for both status arrays.

The existing createUser() test path does not send either new field or inspect the request body. Add a test with mixed 'verified' and 'reserved' values. Assert that both arrays and their positional order are preserved.

Also applies to: 243-243

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@packages/backend/src/api/endpoints/UserApi.ts` at line 239, Add request-body
coverage in the existing createUser() test path for both new status-array
fields, supplying mixed 'verified' and 'reserved' values. Capture or inspect the
outgoing request body and assert that each array is present with its values
preserved in the original positional order.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Nitpick comments:
In `@packages/backend/src/api/endpoints/UserApi.ts`:
- Line 239: Add request-body coverage in the existing createUser() test path for
both new status-array fields, supplying mixed 'verified' and 'reserved' values.
Capture or inspect the outgoing request body and assert that each array is
present with its values preserved in the original positional order.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Organization UI (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: da20e0b8-caec-4806-acf1-7778b2aa5fb5

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 38f347c and e3525bd.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .changeset/backend-create-user-identification-status.md
  • packages/backend/src/api/endpoints/UserApi.ts
🔗 Linked repositories identified

CodeRabbit considers these linked repositories for cross-repo context during reviews:

  • clerk/clerk_go(manual)
  • clerk/dashboard(manual)
  • clerk/accounts(manual)
  • clerk/backoffice(manual)
  • clerk/clerk(manual)
  • clerk/clerk-docs(manual)
  • clerk/cloudflare-workers(manual)
  • clerk/clerk-ios(auto-detected)
  • clerk/clerk-android(auto-detected)
  • clerk/cli(auto-detected)

@wobsorianowobsoriano left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍🏼

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@dmoerner@wobsoriano
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' fix(backend): Update params and documention on createUser by dmoerner · Pull Request #9305 · clerk/javascript · GitHub
Skip to content

fix(backend): Update params and documention on createUser - #9305

Merged
dmoerner merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
daniel/backend-create-user-identification-status
Jul 31, 2026
Merged

fix(backend): Update params and documention on createUser#9305
dmoerner merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
daniel/backend-create-user-identification-status

Conversation

@dmoerner

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Add the optional emailAddressIdentificationStatus and phoneNumberIdentificationStatus parameters to CreateUserParams. The Backend API has supported these arrays on POST /v1/users since they shipped, but createUser() had no way to pass them, so every email address and phone number was necessarily created verified. Each array runs parallel to emailAddress / phoneNumber — one item per identifier, applied by position — and an item set to 'reserved' creates that identifier unverified but still usable for sign-in and locked so no other user can claim it.

The createUser() documentation is corrected accordingly: it stated unconditionally that created email addresses and phone numbers are automatically verified, which is only the default.

Description

Checklist

  • pnpm test runs as expected.
  • pnpm build runs as expected.
  • (If applicable) JSDoc comments have been added or updated for any package exports
  • (If applicable) Documentation has been updated

Type of change

  • 🐛 Bug fix
  • 🌟 New feature
  • 🔨 Breaking change
  • 📖 Refactoring / dependency upgrade / documentation
  • other:

Add the optional `emailAddressIdentificationStatus` and `phoneNumberIdentificationStatus` parameters to `CreateUserParams`. The Backend API has supported these arrays on `POST /v1/users` since they shipped, but `createUser()` had no way to pass them, so every email address and phone number was necessarily created verified. Each array runs parallel to `emailAddress` / `phoneNumber` — one item per identifier, applied by position — and an item set to `'reserved'` creates that identifier unverified but still usable for sign-in and locked so no other user can claim it.
The `createUser()` documentation is corrected accordingly: it stated unconditionally that created email addresses and phone numbers are automatically verified, which is only the default.
@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 6754033

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 10 packages
NameType
@clerk/backendPatch
@clerk/astroPatch
@clerk/expressPatch
@clerk/fastifyPatch
@clerk/honoPatch
@clerk/nextjsPatch
@clerk/nuxtPatch
@clerk/react-routerPatch
@clerk/tanstack-react-startPatch
@clerk/testingPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercelBot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

ProjectDeploymentActionsUpdated (UTC)
clerk-js-sandboxReadyReadyPreviewJul 31, 2026 5:01pm
swingsetReadyReadyPreviewJul 31, 2026 5:01pm

Request Review

@pkg-pr-new

pkg-pr-newBot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Open in StackBlitz

@clerk/astro

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/astro@9305

@clerk/backend

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/backend@9305

@clerk/chrome-extension

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/chrome-extension@9305

@clerk/clerk-js

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/clerk-js@9305

@clerk/electron

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/electron@9305

@clerk/electron-passkeys

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/electron-passkeys@9305

@clerk/eslint-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/eslint-plugin@9305

@clerk/expo

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/expo@9305

@clerk/expo-google-signin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/expo-google-signin@9305

@clerk/expo-passkeys

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/expo-passkeys@9305

@clerk/express

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/express@9305

@clerk/fastify

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/fastify@9305

@clerk/hono

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/hono@9305

@clerk/localizations

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/localizations@9305

@clerk/nextjs

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/nextjs@9305

@clerk/nuxt

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/nuxt@9305

@clerk/react

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/react@9305

@clerk/react-router

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/react-router@9305

@clerk/shared

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/shared@9305

@clerk/tanstack-react-start

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/tanstack-react-start@9305

@clerk/testing

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/testing@9305

@clerk/ui

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/ui@9305

@clerk/upgrade

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/upgrade@9305

@clerk/vue

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/vue@9305

commit: 6754033

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

API Changes Report

Generated by Break Check on 2026-07-31T17:02:38.529Z

Summary

MetricCount
Packages analyzed19
Packages with changes0
🔴 Breaking changes0
🟡 Non-breaking changes0
🟢 Additions0

No API Changes Detected

All packages have stable APIs with no detected changes.


Report generated by Break Check

Last ran on 6754033.

@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The backend CreateUserParams contract now supports optional positional identification status arrays for email addresses and phone numbers. Each value can be created as verified or reserved. The createUser documentation and backend changeset describe the new parameters and reserved-contact behavior. Documentation no longer states that all email addresses and phone numbers are always automatically verified.

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes

Suggested reviewers:alexisintech

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Title check✅ PassedThe title clearly identifies the backend parameter and documentation updates for createUser().
Description check✅ PassedThe description accurately explains the new status parameters, positional behavior, reserved identifiers, and documentation correction.
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedNo functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/backend/src/api/endpoints/UserApi.ts (1)

239-239: 🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration | 🔵 Trivial | ⚡ Quick win

Add request-body coverage for both status arrays.

The existing createUser() test path does not send either new field or inspect the request body. Add a test with mixed 'verified' and 'reserved' values. Assert that both arrays and their positional order are preserved.

Also applies to: 243-243

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@packages/backend/src/api/endpoints/UserApi.ts` at line 239, Add request-body
coverage in the existing createUser() test path for both new status-array
fields, supplying mixed 'verified' and 'reserved' values. Capture or inspect the
outgoing request body and assert that each array is present with its values
preserved in the original positional order.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Nitpick comments:
In `@packages/backend/src/api/endpoints/UserApi.ts`:
- Line 239: Add request-body coverage in the existing createUser() test path for
both new status-array fields, supplying mixed 'verified' and 'reserved' values.
Capture or inspect the outgoing request body and assert that each array is
present with its values preserved in the original positional order.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Organization UI (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: da20e0b8-caec-4806-acf1-7778b2aa5fb5

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 38f347c and e3525bd.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .changeset/backend-create-user-identification-status.md
  • packages/backend/src/api/endpoints/UserApi.ts
🔗 Linked repositories identified

CodeRabbit considers these linked repositories for cross-repo context during reviews:

  • clerk/clerk_go(manual)
  • clerk/dashboard(manual)
  • clerk/accounts(manual)
  • clerk/backoffice(manual)
  • clerk/clerk(manual)
  • clerk/clerk-docs(manual)
  • clerk/cloudflare-workers(manual)
  • clerk/clerk-ios(auto-detected)
  • clerk/clerk-android(auto-detected)
  • clerk/cli(auto-detected)

@wobsorianowobsoriano left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍🏼

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@dmoerner@wobsoriano
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' fix(backend): Update params and documention on createUser by dmoerner · Pull Request #9305 · clerk/javascript · GitHub
Skip to content

fix(backend): Update params and documention on createUser - #9305

Merged
dmoerner merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
daniel/backend-create-user-identification-status
Jul 31, 2026
Merged

fix(backend): Update params and documention on createUser#9305
dmoerner merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
daniel/backend-create-user-identification-status

Conversation

@dmoerner

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Add the optional emailAddressIdentificationStatus and phoneNumberIdentificationStatus parameters to CreateUserParams. The Backend API has supported these arrays on POST /v1/users since they shipped, but createUser() had no way to pass them, so every email address and phone number was necessarily created verified. Each array runs parallel to emailAddress / phoneNumber — one item per identifier, applied by position — and an item set to 'reserved' creates that identifier unverified but still usable for sign-in and locked so no other user can claim it.

The createUser() documentation is corrected accordingly: it stated unconditionally that created email addresses and phone numbers are automatically verified, which is only the default.

Description

Checklist

  • pnpm test runs as expected.
  • pnpm build runs as expected.
  • (If applicable) JSDoc comments have been added or updated for any package exports
  • (If applicable) Documentation has been updated

Type of change

  • 🐛 Bug fix
  • 🌟 New feature
  • 🔨 Breaking change
  • 📖 Refactoring / dependency upgrade / documentation
  • other:

Add the optional `emailAddressIdentificationStatus` and `phoneNumberIdentificationStatus` parameters to `CreateUserParams`. The Backend API has supported these arrays on `POST /v1/users` since they shipped, but `createUser()` had no way to pass them, so every email address and phone number was necessarily created verified. Each array runs parallel to `emailAddress` / `phoneNumber` — one item per identifier, applied by position — and an item set to `'reserved'` creates that identifier unverified but still usable for sign-in and locked so no other user can claim it.
The `createUser()` documentation is corrected accordingly: it stated unconditionally that created email addresses and phone numbers are automatically verified, which is only the default.
@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 6754033

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 10 packages
NameType
@clerk/backendPatch
@clerk/astroPatch
@clerk/expressPatch
@clerk/fastifyPatch
@clerk/honoPatch
@clerk/nextjsPatch
@clerk/nuxtPatch
@clerk/react-routerPatch
@clerk/tanstack-react-startPatch
@clerk/testingPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercelBot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

ProjectDeploymentActionsUpdated (UTC)
clerk-js-sandboxReadyReadyPreviewJul 31, 2026 5:01pm
swingsetReadyReadyPreviewJul 31, 2026 5:01pm

Request Review

@pkg-pr-new

pkg-pr-newBot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Open in StackBlitz

@clerk/astro

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/astro@9305

@clerk/backend

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/backend@9305

@clerk/chrome-extension

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/chrome-extension@9305

@clerk/clerk-js

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/clerk-js@9305

@clerk/electron

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/electron@9305

@clerk/electron-passkeys

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/electron-passkeys@9305

@clerk/eslint-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/eslint-plugin@9305

@clerk/expo

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/expo@9305

@clerk/expo-google-signin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/expo-google-signin@9305

@clerk/expo-passkeys

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/expo-passkeys@9305

@clerk/express

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/express@9305

@clerk/fastify

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/fastify@9305

@clerk/hono

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/hono@9305

@clerk/localizations

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/localizations@9305

@clerk/nextjs

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/nextjs@9305

@clerk/nuxt

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/nuxt@9305

@clerk/react

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/react@9305

@clerk/react-router

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/react-router@9305

@clerk/shared

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/shared@9305

@clerk/tanstack-react-start

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/tanstack-react-start@9305

@clerk/testing

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/testing@9305

@clerk/ui

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/ui@9305

@clerk/upgrade

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/upgrade@9305

@clerk/vue

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/vue@9305

commit: 6754033

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

API Changes Report

Generated by Break Check on 2026-07-31T17:02:38.529Z

Summary

MetricCount
Packages analyzed19
Packages with changes0
🔴 Breaking changes0
🟡 Non-breaking changes0
🟢 Additions0

No API Changes Detected

All packages have stable APIs with no detected changes.


Report generated by Break Check

Last ran on 6754033.

@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The backend CreateUserParams contract now supports optional positional identification status arrays for email addresses and phone numbers. Each value can be created as verified or reserved. The createUser documentation and backend changeset describe the new parameters and reserved-contact behavior. Documentation no longer states that all email addresses and phone numbers are always automatically verified.

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes

Suggested reviewers:alexisintech

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Title check✅ PassedThe title clearly identifies the backend parameter and documentation updates for createUser().
Description check✅ PassedThe description accurately explains the new status parameters, positional behavior, reserved identifiers, and documentation correction.
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedNo functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/backend/src/api/endpoints/UserApi.ts (1)

239-239: 🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration | 🔵 Trivial | ⚡ Quick win

Add request-body coverage for both status arrays.

The existing createUser() test path does not send either new field or inspect the request body. Add a test with mixed 'verified' and 'reserved' values. Assert that both arrays and their positional order are preserved.

Also applies to: 243-243

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@packages/backend/src/api/endpoints/UserApi.ts` at line 239, Add request-body
coverage in the existing createUser() test path for both new status-array
fields, supplying mixed 'verified' and 'reserved' values. Capture or inspect the
outgoing request body and assert that each array is present with its values
preserved in the original positional order.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Nitpick comments:
In `@packages/backend/src/api/endpoints/UserApi.ts`:
- Line 239: Add request-body coverage in the existing createUser() test path for
both new status-array fields, supplying mixed 'verified' and 'reserved' values.
Capture or inspect the outgoing request body and assert that each array is
present with its values preserved in the original positional order.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Organization UI (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: da20e0b8-caec-4806-acf1-7778b2aa5fb5

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 38f347c and e3525bd.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .changeset/backend-create-user-identification-status.md
  • packages/backend/src/api/endpoints/UserApi.ts
🔗 Linked repositories identified

CodeRabbit considers these linked repositories for cross-repo context during reviews:

  • clerk/clerk_go(manual)
  • clerk/dashboard(manual)
  • clerk/accounts(manual)
  • clerk/backoffice(manual)
  • clerk/clerk(manual)
  • clerk/clerk-docs(manual)
  • clerk/cloudflare-workers(manual)
  • clerk/clerk-ios(auto-detected)
  • clerk/clerk-android(auto-detected)
  • clerk/cli(auto-detected)

@wobsorianowobsoriano left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍🏼

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@dmoerner@wobsoriano
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); fix(backend): Update params and documention on createUser by dmoerner · Pull Request #9305 · clerk/javascript · GitHub
Skip to content

fix(backend): Update params and documention on createUser - #9305

Merged
dmoerner merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
daniel/backend-create-user-identification-status
Jul 31, 2026
Merged

fix(backend): Update params and documention on createUser#9305
dmoerner merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
daniel/backend-create-user-identification-status

Conversation

@dmoerner

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Add the optional emailAddressIdentificationStatus and phoneNumberIdentificationStatus parameters to CreateUserParams. The Backend API has supported these arrays on POST /v1/users since they shipped, but createUser() had no way to pass them, so every email address and phone number was necessarily created verified. Each array runs parallel to emailAddress / phoneNumber — one item per identifier, applied by position — and an item set to 'reserved' creates that identifier unverified but still usable for sign-in and locked so no other user can claim it.

The createUser() documentation is corrected accordingly: it stated unconditionally that created email addresses and phone numbers are automatically verified, which is only the default.

Description

Checklist

  • pnpm test runs as expected.
  • pnpm build runs as expected.
  • (If applicable) JSDoc comments have been added or updated for any package exports
  • (If applicable) Documentation has been updated

Type of change

  • 🐛 Bug fix
  • 🌟 New feature
  • 🔨 Breaking change
  • 📖 Refactoring / dependency upgrade / documentation
  • other:

Add the optional `emailAddressIdentificationStatus` and `phoneNumberIdentificationStatus` parameters to `CreateUserParams`. The Backend API has supported these arrays on `POST /v1/users` since they shipped, but `createUser()` had no way to pass them, so every email address and phone number was necessarily created verified. Each array runs parallel to `emailAddress` / `phoneNumber` — one item per identifier, applied by position — and an item set to `'reserved'` creates that identifier unverified but still usable for sign-in and locked so no other user can claim it.
The `createUser()` documentation is corrected accordingly: it stated unconditionally that created email addresses and phone numbers are automatically verified, which is only the default.
@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 6754033

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 10 packages
NameType
@clerk/backendPatch
@clerk/astroPatch
@clerk/expressPatch
@clerk/fastifyPatch
@clerk/honoPatch
@clerk/nextjsPatch
@clerk/nuxtPatch
@clerk/react-routerPatch
@clerk/tanstack-react-startPatch
@clerk/testingPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercelBot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

ProjectDeploymentActionsUpdated (UTC)
clerk-js-sandboxReadyReadyPreviewJul 31, 2026 5:01pm
swingsetReadyReadyPreviewJul 31, 2026 5:01pm

Request Review

@pkg-pr-new

pkg-pr-newBot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Open in StackBlitz

@clerk/astro

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/astro@9305

@clerk/backend

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/backend@9305

@clerk/chrome-extension

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/chrome-extension@9305

@clerk/clerk-js

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/clerk-js@9305

@clerk/electron

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/electron@9305

@clerk/electron-passkeys

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/electron-passkeys@9305

@clerk/eslint-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/eslint-plugin@9305

@clerk/expo

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/expo@9305

@clerk/expo-google-signin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/expo-google-signin@9305

@clerk/expo-passkeys

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/expo-passkeys@9305

@clerk/express

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/express@9305

@clerk/fastify

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/fastify@9305

@clerk/hono

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/hono@9305

@clerk/localizations

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/localizations@9305

@clerk/nextjs

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/nextjs@9305

@clerk/nuxt

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/nuxt@9305

@clerk/react

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/react@9305

@clerk/react-router

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/react-router@9305

@clerk/shared

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/shared@9305

@clerk/tanstack-react-start

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/tanstack-react-start@9305

@clerk/testing

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/testing@9305

@clerk/ui

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/ui@9305

@clerk/upgrade

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/upgrade@9305

@clerk/vue

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/vue@9305

commit: 6754033

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

API Changes Report

Generated by Break Check on 2026-07-31T17:02:38.529Z

Summary

MetricCount
Packages analyzed19
Packages with changes0
🔴 Breaking changes0
🟡 Non-breaking changes0
🟢 Additions0

No API Changes Detected

All packages have stable APIs with no detected changes.


Report generated by Break Check

Last ran on 6754033.

@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The backend CreateUserParams contract now supports optional positional identification status arrays for email addresses and phone numbers. Each value can be created as verified or reserved. The createUser documentation and backend changeset describe the new parameters and reserved-contact behavior. Documentation no longer states that all email addresses and phone numbers are always automatically verified.

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes

Suggested reviewers:alexisintech

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Title check✅ PassedThe title clearly identifies the backend parameter and documentation updates for createUser().
Description check✅ PassedThe description accurately explains the new status parameters, positional behavior, reserved identifiers, and documentation correction.
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedNo functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/backend/src/api/endpoints/UserApi.ts (1)

239-239: 🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration | 🔵 Trivial | ⚡ Quick win

Add request-body coverage for both status arrays.

The existing createUser() test path does not send either new field or inspect the request body. Add a test with mixed 'verified' and 'reserved' values. Assert that both arrays and their positional order are preserved.

Also applies to: 243-243

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@packages/backend/src/api/endpoints/UserApi.ts` at line 239, Add request-body
coverage in the existing createUser() test path for both new status-array
fields, supplying mixed 'verified' and 'reserved' values. Capture or inspect the
outgoing request body and assert that each array is present with its values
preserved in the original positional order.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Nitpick comments:
In `@packages/backend/src/api/endpoints/UserApi.ts`:
- Line 239: Add request-body coverage in the existing createUser() test path for
both new status-array fields, supplying mixed 'verified' and 'reserved' values.
Capture or inspect the outgoing request body and assert that each array is
present with its values preserved in the original positional order.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Organization UI (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: da20e0b8-caec-4806-acf1-7778b2aa5fb5

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 38f347c and e3525bd.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .changeset/backend-create-user-identification-status.md
  • packages/backend/src/api/endpoints/UserApi.ts
🔗 Linked repositories identified

CodeRabbit considers these linked repositories for cross-repo context during reviews:

  • clerk/clerk_go(manual)
  • clerk/dashboard(manual)
  • clerk/accounts(manual)
  • clerk/backoffice(manual)
  • clerk/clerk(manual)
  • clerk/clerk-docs(manual)
  • clerk/cloudflare-workers(manual)
  • clerk/clerk-ios(auto-detected)
  • clerk/clerk-android(auto-detected)
  • clerk/cli(auto-detected)

@wobsorianowobsoriano left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍🏼

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@dmoerner@wobsoriano