Release 2.7.3 - #125

Merged
danieliser merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
release/2.7.3
Sep 1, 2026
Merged

Release 2.7.3#125
danieliser merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
release/2.7.3

Conversation

@danieliser

@danieliserdanieliser commented Sep 1, 2026•
edited by coderabbitai Bot
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • route the free Core review CTA to the unselected WordPress.org submission form
  • route Pro-installed sites to the verified-purchaser review flow for Content Control Pro
  • add focused route coverage and prepare the 2.7.3 release metadata

Verification

  • focused review-route unit tests pass (2 tests, 2 assertions)
  • PHPCS passes
  • PHPStan passes
  • production release build passes
  • release artifact verifier passes (184 entries)
  • live review landing page verified at desktop and mobile sizes; its optional redirect timer is present but disabled
  • legacy full unit suite retains four pre-existing PHP 8.5 failures unrelated to this change

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Review prompts now direct Pro customers to the appropriate product review page.
    • Free installations continue linking to the WordPress.org review form.

  • Release

    • Updated the plugin to version 2.7.3.
    • Added changelog and readme notes for the review-link fix.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connectorBot commented Sep 1, 2026•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

ReviewStatusCommitReview trigger
📝 Code Review✅ Completed2026-09-01T09:49:32.438265Z103f6d4PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Sep 1, 2026•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Team

Run ID: 36b79f7a-bfe6-400b-a01d-7c979a877964

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 61bb4a6 and 103f6d4.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • classes/Controllers/Admin/Reviews.php
  • content-control.php
  • package.json
  • readme.txt
  • tests/unit/Classes/AdminReviews.php

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The Reviews controller now selects a Pro or WordPress.org review URL based on installation status. Tests cover both paths. Plugin, package, stable-tag, and changelog versions are updated to 2.7.3.

Changes

Review link routing and release

Layer / File(s)Summary
Conditional review link routing and tests
classes/Controllers/Admin/Reviews.php, tests/unit/Classes/AdminReviews.php		Reviews::triggers() now uses get_review_link(). The method returns the Pro landing page for Pro installations and the WordPress.org review form otherwise. Tests cover both URLs.
Version metadata and changelog
content-control.php, package.json, readme.txt, CHANGELOG.md		Version values and stable-tag metadata are updated from 2.7.2 to 2.7.3. Changelog entries document the review-link fix.

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes

Merge Risk:⚪ Minimal · up to 103f6

This release routes review links based on whether Pro is installed and updates the associated release metadata; no actionable merge-blocking risk remains after normal checks and review.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Description Check✅ PassedCheck skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check✅ PassedThe title accurately identifies the 2.7.3 release, which includes the review-link routing fix, release metadata updates, and focused tests. It is concise and clear, although it does not describe the r…
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedDocstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 8 functions across 3 files. (3 skipped: 3 …
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Full details: Title check

Explanation

The title accurately identifies the 2.7.3 release, which includes the review-link routing fix, release metadata updates, and focused tests. It is concise and clear, although it does not describe the routing change.

Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 8 functions across 3 files. (3 skipped: 3 unsupported.)

✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  • Create stacked PR
  • Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch release/2.7.3

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@danieliser
danieliser merged commit e4332f4 into masterSep 1, 2026
4 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@danieliser
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

Skip to content
Release 2.7.3 - #125
Merged
danieliser merged 2 commits into
masterfrom 
release/2.7.3
Sep 1, 2026
Merged
Release 2.7.3#125
danieliser merged 2 commits into
masterfrom 
release/2.7.3
Conversation
@danieliser
@danieliserdanieliser
commented
Sep 1, 2026•

edited by coderabbitai
Bot
Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
  • route the free Core review CTA to the unselected WordPress.org submission form
  • route Pro-installed sites to the verified-purchaser review flow for Content Control Pro
  • add focused route coverage and prepare the 2.7.3 release metadata
Verification
  • focused review-route unit tests pass (2 tests, 2 assertions)
  • PHPCS passes
  • PHPStan passes
  • production release build passes
  • release artifact verifier passes (184 entries)
  • live review landing page verified at desktop and mobile sizes; its optional redirect timer is present but disabled
  • legacy full unit suite retains four pre-existing PHP 8.5 failures unrelated to this change
Summary by CodeRabbit
  • Bug Fixes
    • Review prompts now direct Pro customers to the appropriate product review page.
    • Free installations continue linking to the WordPress.org review form.
  • Release
    • Updated the plugin to version 2.7.3.
    • Added changelog and readme notes for the review-link fix.
@chatgpt-codex-connector
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
commented
Sep 1, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary
This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ReviewStatusCommitReview trigger
📝 Code Review✅ Completed2026-09-01T09:49:32.438265Z103f6d4PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.
@coderabbitai
coderabbitaiBot
commented
Sep 1, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉
ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Team
Run ID: 36b79f7a-bfe6-400b-a01d-7c979a877964
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 61bb4a6 and 103f6d4.
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • classes/Controllers/Admin/Reviews.php
  • content-control.php
  • package.json
  • readme.txt
  • tests/unit/Classes/AdminReviews.php
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.
📝 Walkthrough
Walkthrough
The Reviews controller now selects a Pro or WordPress.org review URL based on installation status. Tests cover both paths. Plugin, package, stable-tag, and changelog versions are updated to 2.7.3.
Changes
Review link routing and release
Layer / File(s)Summary
Conditional review link routing and tests
classes/Controllers/Admin/Reviews.php, tests/unit/Classes/AdminReviews.php		Reviews::triggers() now uses get_review_link(). The method returns the Pro landing page for Pro installations and the WordPress.org review form otherwise. Tests cover both URLs.
Version metadata and changelog
content-control.php, package.json, readme.txt, CHANGELOG.md		Version values and stable-tag metadata are updated from 2.7.2 to 2.7.3. Changelog entries document the review-link fix.
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes
Merge Risk:⚪ Minimal · up to 103f6
This release routes review links based on whether Pro is installed and updates the associated release metadata; no actionable merge-blocking risk remains after normal checks and review.
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Description Check✅ PassedCheck skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check✅ PassedThe title accurately identifies the 2.7.3 release, which includes the review-link routing fix, release metadata updates, and focused tests. It is concise and clear, although it does not describe the r…
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedDocstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 8 functions across 3 files. (3 skipped: 3 …
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Full details: Title check
Explanation
The title accurately identifies the 2.7.3 release, which includes the review-link routing fix, release metadata updates, and focused tests. It is concise and clear, although it does not describe the routing change.
Full details: Docstring Coverage
Explanation
Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 8 functions across 3 files. (3 skipped: 3 unsupported.)
✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  •  Create stacked PR
  •  Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  •  Create PR with unit tests
  •  Commit unit tests in branch release/2.7.3
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
❤️ Share
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
@danieliser
danieliser
merged commit e4332f4
into
masterSep 1, 2026

4 checks passed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@danieliser

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Release 2.7.3 - #125
Merged
danieliser merged 2 commits into
masterfrom 
release/2.7.3
Sep 1, 2026
Merged
Release 2.7.3#125
danieliser merged 2 commits into
masterfrom 
release/2.7.3
Conversation
@danieliser
@danieliserdanieliser
commented
Sep 1, 2026•

edited by coderabbitai
Bot
Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
  • route the free Core review CTA to the unselected WordPress.org submission form
  • route Pro-installed sites to the verified-purchaser review flow for Content Control Pro
  • add focused route coverage and prepare the 2.7.3 release metadata
Verification
  • focused review-route unit tests pass (2 tests, 2 assertions)
  • PHPCS passes
  • PHPStan passes
  • production release build passes
  • release artifact verifier passes (184 entries)
  • live review landing page verified at desktop and mobile sizes; its optional redirect timer is present but disabled
  • legacy full unit suite retains four pre-existing PHP 8.5 failures unrelated to this change
Summary by CodeRabbit
  • Bug Fixes
    • Review prompts now direct Pro customers to the appropriate product review page.
    • Free installations continue linking to the WordPress.org review form.
  • Release
    • Updated the plugin to version 2.7.3.
    • Added changelog and readme notes for the review-link fix.
@chatgpt-codex-connector
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
commented
Sep 1, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary
This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ReviewStatusCommitReview trigger
📝 Code Review✅ Completed2026-09-01T09:49:32.438265Z103f6d4PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.
@coderabbitai
coderabbitaiBot
commented
Sep 1, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉
ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Team
Run ID: 36b79f7a-bfe6-400b-a01d-7c979a877964
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 61bb4a6 and 103f6d4.
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • classes/Controllers/Admin/Reviews.php
  • content-control.php
  • package.json
  • readme.txt
  • tests/unit/Classes/AdminReviews.php
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.
📝 Walkthrough
Walkthrough
The Reviews controller now selects a Pro or WordPress.org review URL based on installation status. Tests cover both paths. Plugin, package, stable-tag, and changelog versions are updated to 2.7.3.
Changes
Review link routing and release
Layer / File(s)Summary
Conditional review link routing and tests
classes/Controllers/Admin/Reviews.php, tests/unit/Classes/AdminReviews.php		Reviews::triggers() now uses get_review_link(). The method returns the Pro landing page for Pro installations and the WordPress.org review form otherwise. Tests cover both URLs.
Version metadata and changelog
content-control.php, package.json, readme.txt, CHANGELOG.md		Version values and stable-tag metadata are updated from 2.7.2 to 2.7.3. Changelog entries document the review-link fix.
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes
Merge Risk:⚪ Minimal · up to 103f6
This release routes review links based on whether Pro is installed and updates the associated release metadata; no actionable merge-blocking risk remains after normal checks and review.
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Description Check✅ PassedCheck skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check✅ PassedThe title accurately identifies the 2.7.3 release, which includes the review-link routing fix, release metadata updates, and focused tests. It is concise and clear, although it does not describe the r…
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedDocstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 8 functions across 3 files. (3 skipped: 3 …
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Full details: Title check
Explanation
The title accurately identifies the 2.7.3 release, which includes the review-link routing fix, release metadata updates, and focused tests. It is concise and clear, although it does not describe the routing change.
Full details: Docstring Coverage
Explanation
Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 8 functions across 3 files. (3 skipped: 3 unsupported.)
✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  •  Create stacked PR
  •  Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  •  Create PR with unit tests
  •  Commit unit tests in branch release/2.7.3
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
❤️ Share
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
@danieliser
danieliser
merged commit e4332f4
into
masterSep 1, 2026

4 checks passed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@danieliser

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Release 2.7.3 - #125
Merged
danieliser merged 2 commits into
masterfrom 
release/2.7.3
Sep 1, 2026
Merged
Release 2.7.3#125
danieliser merged 2 commits into
masterfrom 
release/2.7.3
Conversation
@danieliser
@danieliserdanieliser
commented
Sep 1, 2026•

edited by coderabbitai
Bot
Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
  • route the free Core review CTA to the unselected WordPress.org submission form
  • route Pro-installed sites to the verified-purchaser review flow for Content Control Pro
  • add focused route coverage and prepare the 2.7.3 release metadata
Verification
  • focused review-route unit tests pass (2 tests, 2 assertions)
  • PHPCS passes
  • PHPStan passes
  • production release build passes
  • release artifact verifier passes (184 entries)
  • live review landing page verified at desktop and mobile sizes; its optional redirect timer is present but disabled
  • legacy full unit suite retains four pre-existing PHP 8.5 failures unrelated to this change
Summary by CodeRabbit
  • Bug Fixes
    • Review prompts now direct Pro customers to the appropriate product review page.
    • Free installations continue linking to the WordPress.org review form.
  • Release
    • Updated the plugin to version 2.7.3.
    • Added changelog and readme notes for the review-link fix.
@chatgpt-codex-connector
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
commented
Sep 1, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary
This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ReviewStatusCommitReview trigger
📝 Code Review✅ Completed2026-09-01T09:49:32.438265Z103f6d4PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.
@coderabbitai
coderabbitaiBot
commented
Sep 1, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉
ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Team
Run ID: 36b79f7a-bfe6-400b-a01d-7c979a877964
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 61bb4a6 and 103f6d4.
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • classes/Controllers/Admin/Reviews.php
  • content-control.php
  • package.json
  • readme.txt
  • tests/unit/Classes/AdminReviews.php
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.
📝 Walkthrough
Walkthrough
The Reviews controller now selects a Pro or WordPress.org review URL based on installation status. Tests cover both paths. Plugin, package, stable-tag, and changelog versions are updated to 2.7.3.
Changes
Review link routing and release
Layer / File(s)Summary
Conditional review link routing and tests
classes/Controllers/Admin/Reviews.php, tests/unit/Classes/AdminReviews.php		Reviews::triggers() now uses get_review_link(). The method returns the Pro landing page for Pro installations and the WordPress.org review form otherwise. Tests cover both URLs.
Version metadata and changelog
content-control.php, package.json, readme.txt, CHANGELOG.md		Version values and stable-tag metadata are updated from 2.7.2 to 2.7.3. Changelog entries document the review-link fix.
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes
Merge Risk:⚪ Minimal · up to 103f6
This release routes review links based on whether Pro is installed and updates the associated release metadata; no actionable merge-blocking risk remains after normal checks and review.
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Description Check✅ PassedCheck skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check✅ PassedThe title accurately identifies the 2.7.3 release, which includes the review-link routing fix, release metadata updates, and focused tests. It is concise and clear, although it does not describe the r…
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedDocstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 8 functions across 3 files. (3 skipped: 3 …
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Full details: Title check
Explanation
The title accurately identifies the 2.7.3 release, which includes the review-link routing fix, release metadata updates, and focused tests. It is concise and clear, although it does not describe the routing change.
Full details: Docstring Coverage
Explanation
Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 8 functions across 3 files. (3 skipped: 3 unsupported.)
✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  •  Create stacked PR
  •  Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  •  Create PR with unit tests
  •  Commit unit tests in branch release/2.7.3
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
❤️ Share
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
@danieliser
danieliser
merged commit e4332f4
into
masterSep 1, 2026

4 checks passed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@danieliser

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

Skip to content
Release 2.7.3 - #125
Merged
danieliser merged 2 commits into
masterfrom 
release/2.7.3
Sep 1, 2026
Merged
Release 2.7.3#125
danieliser merged 2 commits into
masterfrom 
release/2.7.3
Conversation
@danieliser
@danieliserdanieliser
commented
Sep 1, 2026•

edited by coderabbitai
Bot
Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
  • route the free Core review CTA to the unselected WordPress.org submission form
  • route Pro-installed sites to the verified-purchaser review flow for Content Control Pro
  • add focused route coverage and prepare the 2.7.3 release metadata
Verification
  • focused review-route unit tests pass (2 tests, 2 assertions)
  • PHPCS passes
  • PHPStan passes
  • production release build passes
  • release artifact verifier passes (184 entries)
  • live review landing page verified at desktop and mobile sizes; its optional redirect timer is present but disabled
  • legacy full unit suite retains four pre-existing PHP 8.5 failures unrelated to this change
Summary by CodeRabbit
  • Bug Fixes
    • Review prompts now direct Pro customers to the appropriate product review page.
    • Free installations continue linking to the WordPress.org review form.
  • Release
    • Updated the plugin to version 2.7.3.
    • Added changelog and readme notes for the review-link fix.
@chatgpt-codex-connector
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
commented
Sep 1, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary
This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ReviewStatusCommitReview trigger
📝 Code Review✅ Completed2026-09-01T09:49:32.438265Z103f6d4PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.
@coderabbitai
coderabbitaiBot
commented
Sep 1, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉
ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Team
Run ID: 36b79f7a-bfe6-400b-a01d-7c979a877964
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 61bb4a6 and 103f6d4.
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • classes/Controllers/Admin/Reviews.php
  • content-control.php
  • package.json
  • readme.txt
  • tests/unit/Classes/AdminReviews.php
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.
📝 Walkthrough
Walkthrough
The Reviews controller now selects a Pro or WordPress.org review URL based on installation status. Tests cover both paths. Plugin, package, stable-tag, and changelog versions are updated to 2.7.3.
Changes
Review link routing and release
Layer / File(s)Summary
Conditional review link routing and tests
classes/Controllers/Admin/Reviews.php, tests/unit/Classes/AdminReviews.php		Reviews::triggers() now uses get_review_link(). The method returns the Pro landing page for Pro installations and the WordPress.org review form otherwise. Tests cover both URLs.
Version metadata and changelog
content-control.php, package.json, readme.txt, CHANGELOG.md		Version values and stable-tag metadata are updated from 2.7.2 to 2.7.3. Changelog entries document the review-link fix.
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes
Merge Risk:⚪ Minimal · up to 103f6
This release routes review links based on whether Pro is installed and updates the associated release metadata; no actionable merge-blocking risk remains after normal checks and review.
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Description Check✅ PassedCheck skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check✅ PassedThe title accurately identifies the 2.7.3 release, which includes the review-link routing fix, release metadata updates, and focused tests. It is concise and clear, although it does not describe the r…
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedDocstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 8 functions across 3 files. (3 skipped: 3 …
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Full details: Title check
Explanation
The title accurately identifies the 2.7.3 release, which includes the review-link routing fix, release metadata updates, and focused tests. It is concise and clear, although it does not describe the routing change.
Full details: Docstring Coverage
Explanation
Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 8 functions across 3 files. (3 skipped: 3 unsupported.)
✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  •  Create stacked PR
  •  Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  •  Create PR with unit tests
  •  Commit unit tests in branch release/2.7.3
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
❤️ Share
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
@danieliser
danieliser
merged commit e4332f4
into
masterSep 1, 2026

4 checks passed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@danieliser

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Release 2.7.3 - #125
Merged
danieliser merged 2 commits into
masterfrom 
release/2.7.3
Sep 1, 2026
Merged
Release 2.7.3#125
danieliser merged 2 commits into
masterfrom 
release/2.7.3
Conversation
@danieliser
@danieliserdanieliser
commented
Sep 1, 2026•

edited by coderabbitai
Bot
Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
  • route the free Core review CTA to the unselected WordPress.org submission form
  • route Pro-installed sites to the verified-purchaser review flow for Content Control Pro
  • add focused route coverage and prepare the 2.7.3 release metadata
Verification
  • focused review-route unit tests pass (2 tests, 2 assertions)
  • PHPCS passes
  • PHPStan passes
  • production release build passes
  • release artifact verifier passes (184 entries)
  • live review landing page verified at desktop and mobile sizes; its optional redirect timer is present but disabled
  • legacy full unit suite retains four pre-existing PHP 8.5 failures unrelated to this change
Summary by CodeRabbit
  • Bug Fixes
    • Review prompts now direct Pro customers to the appropriate product review page.
    • Free installations continue linking to the WordPress.org review form.
  • Release
    • Updated the plugin to version 2.7.3.
    • Added changelog and readme notes for the review-link fix.
@chatgpt-codex-connector
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
commented
Sep 1, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary
This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ReviewStatusCommitReview trigger
📝 Code Review✅ Completed2026-09-01T09:49:32.438265Z103f6d4PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.
@coderabbitai
coderabbitaiBot
commented
Sep 1, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉
ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Team
Run ID: 36b79f7a-bfe6-400b-a01d-7c979a877964
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 61bb4a6 and 103f6d4.
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • classes/Controllers/Admin/Reviews.php
  • content-control.php
  • package.json
  • readme.txt
  • tests/unit/Classes/AdminReviews.php
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.
📝 Walkthrough
Walkthrough
The Reviews controller now selects a Pro or WordPress.org review URL based on installation status. Tests cover both paths. Plugin, package, stable-tag, and changelog versions are updated to 2.7.3.
Changes
Review link routing and release
Layer / File(s)Summary
Conditional review link routing and tests
classes/Controllers/Admin/Reviews.php, tests/unit/Classes/AdminReviews.php		Reviews::triggers() now uses get_review_link(). The method returns the Pro landing page for Pro installations and the WordPress.org review form otherwise. Tests cover both URLs.
Version metadata and changelog
content-control.php, package.json, readme.txt, CHANGELOG.md		Version values and stable-tag metadata are updated from 2.7.2 to 2.7.3. Changelog entries document the review-link fix.
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes
Merge Risk:⚪ Minimal · up to 103f6
This release routes review links based on whether Pro is installed and updates the associated release metadata; no actionable merge-blocking risk remains after normal checks and review.
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Description Check✅ PassedCheck skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check✅ PassedThe title accurately identifies the 2.7.3 release, which includes the review-link routing fix, release metadata updates, and focused tests. It is concise and clear, although it does not describe the r…
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedDocstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 8 functions across 3 files. (3 skipped: 3 …
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Full details: Title check
Explanation
The title accurately identifies the 2.7.3 release, which includes the review-link routing fix, release metadata updates, and focused tests. It is concise and clear, although it does not describe the routing change.
Full details: Docstring Coverage
Explanation
Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 8 functions across 3 files. (3 skipped: 3 unsupported.)
✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  •  Create stacked PR
  •  Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  •  Create PR with unit tests
  •  Commit unit tests in branch release/2.7.3
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
❤️ Share
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
@danieliser
danieliser
merged commit e4332f4
into
masterSep 1, 2026

4 checks passed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@danieliser

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Release 2.7.3 - #125
Merged
danieliser merged 2 commits into
masterfrom 
release/2.7.3
Sep 1, 2026
Merged
Release 2.7.3#125
danieliser merged 2 commits into
masterfrom 
release/2.7.3
Conversation
@danieliser
@danieliserdanieliser
commented
Sep 1, 2026•

edited by coderabbitai
Bot
Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
  • route the free Core review CTA to the unselected WordPress.org submission form
  • route Pro-installed sites to the verified-purchaser review flow for Content Control Pro
  • add focused route coverage and prepare the 2.7.3 release metadata
Verification
  • focused review-route unit tests pass (2 tests, 2 assertions)
  • PHPCS passes
  • PHPStan passes
  • production release build passes
  • release artifact verifier passes (184 entries)
  • live review landing page verified at desktop and mobile sizes; its optional redirect timer is present but disabled
  • legacy full unit suite retains four pre-existing PHP 8.5 failures unrelated to this change
Summary by CodeRabbit
  • Bug Fixes
    • Review prompts now direct Pro customers to the appropriate product review page.
    • Free installations continue linking to the WordPress.org review form.
  • Release
    • Updated the plugin to version 2.7.3.
    • Added changelog and readme notes for the review-link fix.
@chatgpt-codex-connector
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
commented
Sep 1, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary
This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ReviewStatusCommitReview trigger
📝 Code Review✅ Completed2026-09-01T09:49:32.438265Z103f6d4PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.
@coderabbitai
coderabbitaiBot
commented
Sep 1, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉
ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Team
Run ID: 36b79f7a-bfe6-400b-a01d-7c979a877964
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 61bb4a6 and 103f6d4.
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • classes/Controllers/Admin/Reviews.php
  • content-control.php
  • package.json
  • readme.txt
  • tests/unit/Classes/AdminReviews.php
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.
📝 Walkthrough
Walkthrough
The Reviews controller now selects a Pro or WordPress.org review URL based on installation status. Tests cover both paths. Plugin, package, stable-tag, and changelog versions are updated to 2.7.3.
Changes
Review link routing and release
Layer / File(s)Summary
Conditional review link routing and tests
classes/Controllers/Admin/Reviews.php, tests/unit/Classes/AdminReviews.php		Reviews::triggers() now uses get_review_link(). The method returns the Pro landing page for Pro installations and the WordPress.org review form otherwise. Tests cover both URLs.
Version metadata and changelog
content-control.php, package.json, readme.txt, CHANGELOG.md		Version values and stable-tag metadata are updated from 2.7.2 to 2.7.3. Changelog entries document the review-link fix.
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes
Merge Risk:⚪ Minimal · up to 103f6
This release routes review links based on whether Pro is installed and updates the associated release metadata; no actionable merge-blocking risk remains after normal checks and review.
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Description Check✅ PassedCheck skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check✅ PassedThe title accurately identifies the 2.7.3 release, which includes the review-link routing fix, release metadata updates, and focused tests. It is concise and clear, although it does not describe the r…
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedDocstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 8 functions across 3 files. (3 skipped: 3 …
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Full details: Title check
Explanation
The title accurately identifies the 2.7.3 release, which includes the review-link routing fix, release metadata updates, and focused tests. It is concise and clear, although it does not describe the routing change.
Full details: Docstring Coverage
Explanation
Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 8 functions across 3 files. (3 skipped: 3 unsupported.)
✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  •  Create stacked PR
  •  Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  •  Create PR with unit tests
  •  Commit unit tests in branch release/2.7.3
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
❤️ Share
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
@danieliser
danieliser
merged commit e4332f4
into
masterSep 1, 2026

4 checks passed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@danieliser

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

Skip to content
Release 2.7.3 - #125
Merged
danieliser merged 2 commits into
masterfrom 
release/2.7.3
Sep 1, 2026
Merged
Release 2.7.3#125
danieliser merged 2 commits into
masterfrom 
release/2.7.3
Conversation
@danieliser
@danieliserdanieliser
commented
Sep 1, 2026•

edited by coderabbitai
Bot
Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
  • route the free Core review CTA to the unselected WordPress.org submission form
  • route Pro-installed sites to the verified-purchaser review flow for Content Control Pro
  • add focused route coverage and prepare the 2.7.3 release metadata
Verification
  • focused review-route unit tests pass (2 tests, 2 assertions)
  • PHPCS passes
  • PHPStan passes
  • production release build passes
  • release artifact verifier passes (184 entries)
  • live review landing page verified at desktop and mobile sizes; its optional redirect timer is present but disabled
  • legacy full unit suite retains four pre-existing PHP 8.5 failures unrelated to this change
Summary by CodeRabbit
  • Bug Fixes
    • Review prompts now direct Pro customers to the appropriate product review page.
    • Free installations continue linking to the WordPress.org review form.
  • Release
    • Updated the plugin to version 2.7.3.
    • Added changelog and readme notes for the review-link fix.
@chatgpt-codex-connector
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
commented
Sep 1, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary
This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ReviewStatusCommitReview trigger
📝 Code Review✅ Completed2026-09-01T09:49:32.438265Z103f6d4PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.
@coderabbitai
coderabbitaiBot
commented
Sep 1, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉
ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Team
Run ID: 36b79f7a-bfe6-400b-a01d-7c979a877964
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 61bb4a6 and 103f6d4.
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • classes/Controllers/Admin/Reviews.php
  • content-control.php
  • package.json
  • readme.txt
  • tests/unit/Classes/AdminReviews.php
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.
📝 Walkthrough
Walkthrough
The Reviews controller now selects a Pro or WordPress.org review URL based on installation status. Tests cover both paths. Plugin, package, stable-tag, and changelog versions are updated to 2.7.3.
Changes
Review link routing and release
Layer / File(s)Summary
Conditional review link routing and tests
classes/Controllers/Admin/Reviews.php, tests/unit/Classes/AdminReviews.php		Reviews::triggers() now uses get_review_link(). The method returns the Pro landing page for Pro installations and the WordPress.org review form otherwise. Tests cover both URLs.
Version metadata and changelog
content-control.php, package.json, readme.txt, CHANGELOG.md		Version values and stable-tag metadata are updated from 2.7.2 to 2.7.3. Changelog entries document the review-link fix.
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes
Merge Risk:⚪ Minimal · up to 103f6
This release routes review links based on whether Pro is installed and updates the associated release metadata; no actionable merge-blocking risk remains after normal checks and review.
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Description Check✅ PassedCheck skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check✅ PassedThe title accurately identifies the 2.7.3 release, which includes the review-link routing fix, release metadata updates, and focused tests. It is concise and clear, although it does not describe the r…
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedDocstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 8 functions across 3 files. (3 skipped: 3 …
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Full details: Title check
Explanation
The title accurately identifies the 2.7.3 release, which includes the review-link routing fix, release metadata updates, and focused tests. It is concise and clear, although it does not describe the routing change.
Full details: Docstring Coverage
Explanation
Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 8 functions across 3 files. (3 skipped: 3 unsupported.)
✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  •  Create stacked PR
  •  Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  •  Create PR with unit tests
  •  Commit unit tests in branch release/2.7.3
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
❤️ Share
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
@danieliser
danieliser
merged commit e4332f4
into
masterSep 1, 2026

4 checks passed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@danieliser