Handling requests sent back from filters - #3544

Closed
dcaswel wants to merge 328 commits into
codeigniter4:developfrom
dcaswel:request-from-filters
Closed

Handling requests sent back from filters#3544
dcaswel wants to merge 328 commits into
codeigniter4:developfrom
dcaswel:request-from-filters

Conversation

@dcaswel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Expands the fix of #3085

Description
Filters have the ability to alter the request like adding a user object from an auth filter for example. When it does that the request gets altered implicitly by the filter because the filter's request is pointing to the same object as the request property of the Codeigniter object. If the request gets altered, the filters also return the request into the $possibleRedirect variable. This change makes the update to the request property more explicit by setting the property with what gets returned from the filters. This ensures that if for some reason the object pointers get messed up, the request used by the controllers is the altered one.

@dcaswel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

This change worked in my local environment but it is causing a bunch of issues in the static analysis check so I will see if I can figure those out later. If anyone has an idea of what is going on there, I would appreciate the help.

@michalsnmichalsn left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We would need some tests for this.

As for static analysis check - rebase should help.

@MGatnerMGatner left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is the right way to go. We will need some tests to verify that this works, and probably some User Guide mention (if it isn't already). I made a couple of logistic notes as well.

* Current request.
*
* @var HTTP\Request|HTTP\IncomingRequest|CLIRequest
* @var HTTP\Request|HTTP\IncomingRequest|CLIRequest|RequestInterface

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this should all just be ReqiestInterface. @samsonasik ant compelling reason why the other hints would be needed?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if method caller use CLIRequest or IncomingRequest only method, that needed, if not, it can only use RequestInterface.

@@ -434,6 +435,11 @@ protected function handleRequest(RouteCollectionInterface $routes = null, Cache
{
return $possibleRedirect->send();

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

While we're here, I don't think there is any need to check for RedirectResponseandResponseInterface since they are handled the same. Let's remove the first block.

@samsonasik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@caswell-wc It seems you messed up the rebase, better to make backup branch, back to this branch, reset all, rebase again, and cherry-pick your own commits.

@paulbalandan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What's the status of this PR?

@MGatner

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@caswell-wc just wrapped up another outstanding PR so hopefully he is looking at this soon. This is possibly resolved by #3864.

@dcaswel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

This request got pretty messed up and was a really small change so I'm closing it and will recreate it with a fresh fork.

@dcasweldcaswel closed this Nov 18, 2020
@dcaswel
dcaswel deleted the request-from-filters branch November 18, 2020 02:40
@dcasweldcaswel mentioned this pull request Nov 18, 2020
5 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

18 participants

@dcaswel@samsonasik@paulbalandan@MGatner@michalsn@lefuentes@nyufeng@devorama@agungsugiarto@lf-uraku-yuki@sba@InsiteFX@savasdersimcelik@keradus@MisterDuval@mostafakhudair@lighthinkstudio@eSkiSo
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Handling requests sent back from filters - #3544

Closed
dcaswel wants to merge 328 commits into
codeigniter4:developfrom
dcaswel:request-from-filters
Closed

Handling requests sent back from filters#3544
dcaswel wants to merge 328 commits into
codeigniter4:developfrom
dcaswel:request-from-filters

Conversation

@dcaswel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Expands the fix of #3085

Description
Filters have the ability to alter the request like adding a user object from an auth filter for example. When it does that the request gets altered implicitly by the filter because the filter's request is pointing to the same object as the request property of the Codeigniter object. If the request gets altered, the filters also return the request into the $possibleRedirect variable. This change makes the update to the request property more explicit by setting the property with what gets returned from the filters. This ensures that if for some reason the object pointers get messed up, the request used by the controllers is the altered one.

@dcaswel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

This change worked in my local environment but it is causing a bunch of issues in the static analysis check so I will see if I can figure those out later. If anyone has an idea of what is going on there, I would appreciate the help.

@michalsnmichalsn left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We would need some tests for this.

As for static analysis check - rebase should help.

@MGatnerMGatner left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is the right way to go. We will need some tests to verify that this works, and probably some User Guide mention (if it isn't already). I made a couple of logistic notes as well.

* Current request.
*
* @var HTTP\Request|HTTP\IncomingRequest|CLIRequest
* @var HTTP\Request|HTTP\IncomingRequest|CLIRequest|RequestInterface

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this should all just be ReqiestInterface. @samsonasik ant compelling reason why the other hints would be needed?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if method caller use CLIRequest or IncomingRequest only method, that needed, if not, it can only use RequestInterface.

@@ -434,6 +435,11 @@ protected function handleRequest(RouteCollectionInterface $routes = null, Cache
{
return $possibleRedirect->send();

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

While we're here, I don't think there is any need to check for RedirectResponseandResponseInterface since they are handled the same. Let's remove the first block.

@samsonasik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@caswell-wc It seems you messed up the rebase, better to make backup branch, back to this branch, reset all, rebase again, and cherry-pick your own commits.

@paulbalandan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What's the status of this PR?

@MGatner

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@caswell-wc just wrapped up another outstanding PR so hopefully he is looking at this soon. This is possibly resolved by #3864.

@dcaswel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

This request got pretty messed up and was a really small change so I'm closing it and will recreate it with a fresh fork.

@dcasweldcaswel closed this Nov 18, 2020
@dcaswel
dcaswel deleted the request-from-filters branch November 18, 2020 02:40
@dcasweldcaswel mentioned this pull request Nov 18, 2020
5 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

18 participants

@dcaswel@samsonasik@paulbalandan@MGatner@michalsn@lefuentes@nyufeng@devorama@agungsugiarto@lf-uraku-yuki@sba@InsiteFX@savasdersimcelik@keradus@MisterDuval@mostafakhudair@lighthinkstudio@eSkiSo
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Handling requests sent back from filters - #3544

Closed
dcaswel wants to merge 328 commits into
codeigniter4:developfrom
dcaswel:request-from-filters
Closed

Handling requests sent back from filters#3544
dcaswel wants to merge 328 commits into
codeigniter4:developfrom
dcaswel:request-from-filters

Conversation

@dcaswel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Expands the fix of #3085

Description
Filters have the ability to alter the request like adding a user object from an auth filter for example. When it does that the request gets altered implicitly by the filter because the filter's request is pointing to the same object as the request property of the Codeigniter object. If the request gets altered, the filters also return the request into the $possibleRedirect variable. This change makes the update to the request property more explicit by setting the property with what gets returned from the filters. This ensures that if for some reason the object pointers get messed up, the request used by the controllers is the altered one.

@dcaswel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

This change worked in my local environment but it is causing a bunch of issues in the static analysis check so I will see if I can figure those out later. If anyone has an idea of what is going on there, I would appreciate the help.

@michalsnmichalsn left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We would need some tests for this.

As for static analysis check - rebase should help.

@MGatnerMGatner left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is the right way to go. We will need some tests to verify that this works, and probably some User Guide mention (if it isn't already). I made a couple of logistic notes as well.

* Current request.
*
* @var HTTP\Request|HTTP\IncomingRequest|CLIRequest
* @var HTTP\Request|HTTP\IncomingRequest|CLIRequest|RequestInterface

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this should all just be ReqiestInterface. @samsonasik ant compelling reason why the other hints would be needed?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if method caller use CLIRequest or IncomingRequest only method, that needed, if not, it can only use RequestInterface.

@@ -434,6 +435,11 @@ protected function handleRequest(RouteCollectionInterface $routes = null, Cache
{
return $possibleRedirect->send();

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

While we're here, I don't think there is any need to check for RedirectResponseandResponseInterface since they are handled the same. Let's remove the first block.

@samsonasik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@caswell-wc It seems you messed up the rebase, better to make backup branch, back to this branch, reset all, rebase again, and cherry-pick your own commits.

@paulbalandan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What's the status of this PR?

@MGatner

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@caswell-wc just wrapped up another outstanding PR so hopefully he is looking at this soon. This is possibly resolved by #3864.

@dcaswel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

This request got pretty messed up and was a really small change so I'm closing it and will recreate it with a fresh fork.

@dcasweldcaswel closed this Nov 18, 2020
@dcaswel
dcaswel deleted the request-from-filters branch November 18, 2020 02:40
@dcasweldcaswel mentioned this pull request Nov 18, 2020
5 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

18 participants

@dcaswel@samsonasik@paulbalandan@MGatner@michalsn@lefuentes@nyufeng@devorama@agungsugiarto@lf-uraku-yuki@sba@InsiteFX@savasdersimcelik@keradus@MisterDuval@mostafakhudair@lighthinkstudio@eSkiSo
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Handling requests sent back from filters - #3544

Closed
dcaswel wants to merge 328 commits into
codeigniter4:developfrom
dcaswel:request-from-filters
Closed

Handling requests sent back from filters#3544
dcaswel wants to merge 328 commits into
codeigniter4:developfrom
dcaswel:request-from-filters

Conversation

@dcaswel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Expands the fix of #3085

Description
Filters have the ability to alter the request like adding a user object from an auth filter for example. When it does that the request gets altered implicitly by the filter because the filter's request is pointing to the same object as the request property of the Codeigniter object. If the request gets altered, the filters also return the request into the $possibleRedirect variable. This change makes the update to the request property more explicit by setting the property with what gets returned from the filters. This ensures that if for some reason the object pointers get messed up, the request used by the controllers is the altered one.

@dcaswel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

This change worked in my local environment but it is causing a bunch of issues in the static analysis check so I will see if I can figure those out later. If anyone has an idea of what is going on there, I would appreciate the help.

@michalsnmichalsn left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We would need some tests for this.

As for static analysis check - rebase should help.

@MGatnerMGatner left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is the right way to go. We will need some tests to verify that this works, and probably some User Guide mention (if it isn't already). I made a couple of logistic notes as well.

* Current request.
*
* @var HTTP\Request|HTTP\IncomingRequest|CLIRequest
* @var HTTP\Request|HTTP\IncomingRequest|CLIRequest|RequestInterface

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this should all just be ReqiestInterface. @samsonasik ant compelling reason why the other hints would be needed?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if method caller use CLIRequest or IncomingRequest only method, that needed, if not, it can only use RequestInterface.

@@ -434,6 +435,11 @@ protected function handleRequest(RouteCollectionInterface $routes = null, Cache
{
return $possibleRedirect->send();

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

While we're here, I don't think there is any need to check for RedirectResponseandResponseInterface since they are handled the same. Let's remove the first block.

@samsonasik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@caswell-wc It seems you messed up the rebase, better to make backup branch, back to this branch, reset all, rebase again, and cherry-pick your own commits.

@paulbalandan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What's the status of this PR?

@MGatner

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@caswell-wc just wrapped up another outstanding PR so hopefully he is looking at this soon. This is possibly resolved by #3864.

@dcaswel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

This request got pretty messed up and was a really small change so I'm closing it and will recreate it with a fresh fork.

@dcasweldcaswel closed this Nov 18, 2020
@dcaswel
dcaswel deleted the request-from-filters branch November 18, 2020 02:40
@dcasweldcaswel mentioned this pull request Nov 18, 2020
5 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

18 participants

@dcaswel@samsonasik@paulbalandan@MGatner@michalsn@lefuentes@nyufeng@devorama@agungsugiarto@lf-uraku-yuki@sba@InsiteFX@savasdersimcelik@keradus@MisterDuval@mostafakhudair@lighthinkstudio@eSkiSo
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Handling requests sent back from filters - #3544

Closed
dcaswel wants to merge 328 commits into
codeigniter4:developfrom
dcaswel:request-from-filters
Closed

Handling requests sent back from filters#3544
dcaswel wants to merge 328 commits into
codeigniter4:developfrom
dcaswel:request-from-filters

Conversation

@dcaswel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Expands the fix of #3085

Description
Filters have the ability to alter the request like adding a user object from an auth filter for example. When it does that the request gets altered implicitly by the filter because the filter's request is pointing to the same object as the request property of the Codeigniter object. If the request gets altered, the filters also return the request into the $possibleRedirect variable. This change makes the update to the request property more explicit by setting the property with what gets returned from the filters. This ensures that if for some reason the object pointers get messed up, the request used by the controllers is the altered one.

@dcaswel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

This change worked in my local environment but it is causing a bunch of issues in the static analysis check so I will see if I can figure those out later. If anyone has an idea of what is going on there, I would appreciate the help.

@michalsnmichalsn left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We would need some tests for this.

As for static analysis check - rebase should help.

@MGatnerMGatner left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is the right way to go. We will need some tests to verify that this works, and probably some User Guide mention (if it isn't already). I made a couple of logistic notes as well.

* Current request.
*
* @var HTTP\Request|HTTP\IncomingRequest|CLIRequest
* @var HTTP\Request|HTTP\IncomingRequest|CLIRequest|RequestInterface

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this should all just be ReqiestInterface. @samsonasik ant compelling reason why the other hints would be needed?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if method caller use CLIRequest or IncomingRequest only method, that needed, if not, it can only use RequestInterface.

@@ -434,6 +435,11 @@ protected function handleRequest(RouteCollectionInterface $routes = null, Cache
{
return $possibleRedirect->send();

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

While we're here, I don't think there is any need to check for RedirectResponseandResponseInterface since they are handled the same. Let's remove the first block.

@samsonasik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@caswell-wc It seems you messed up the rebase, better to make backup branch, back to this branch, reset all, rebase again, and cherry-pick your own commits.

@paulbalandan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What's the status of this PR?

@MGatner

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@caswell-wc just wrapped up another outstanding PR so hopefully he is looking at this soon. This is possibly resolved by #3864.

@dcaswel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

This request got pretty messed up and was a really small change so I'm closing it and will recreate it with a fresh fork.

@dcasweldcaswel closed this Nov 18, 2020
@dcaswel
dcaswel deleted the request-from-filters branch November 18, 2020 02:40
@dcasweldcaswel mentioned this pull request Nov 18, 2020
5 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

18 participants

@dcaswel@samsonasik@paulbalandan@MGatner@michalsn@lefuentes@nyufeng@devorama@agungsugiarto@lf-uraku-yuki@sba@InsiteFX@savasdersimcelik@keradus@MisterDuval@mostafakhudair@lighthinkstudio@eSkiSo
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Handling requests sent back from filters - #3544

Closed
dcaswel wants to merge 328 commits into
codeigniter4:developfrom
dcaswel:request-from-filters
Closed

Handling requests sent back from filters#3544
dcaswel wants to merge 328 commits into
codeigniter4:developfrom
dcaswel:request-from-filters

Conversation

@dcaswel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Expands the fix of #3085

Description
Filters have the ability to alter the request like adding a user object from an auth filter for example. When it does that the request gets altered implicitly by the filter because the filter's request is pointing to the same object as the request property of the Codeigniter object. If the request gets altered, the filters also return the request into the $possibleRedirect variable. This change makes the update to the request property more explicit by setting the property with what gets returned from the filters. This ensures that if for some reason the object pointers get messed up, the request used by the controllers is the altered one.

@dcaswel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

This change worked in my local environment but it is causing a bunch of issues in the static analysis check so I will see if I can figure those out later. If anyone has an idea of what is going on there, I would appreciate the help.

@michalsnmichalsn left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We would need some tests for this.

As for static analysis check - rebase should help.

@MGatnerMGatner left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is the right way to go. We will need some tests to verify that this works, and probably some User Guide mention (if it isn't already). I made a couple of logistic notes as well.

* Current request.
*
* @var HTTP\Request|HTTP\IncomingRequest|CLIRequest
* @var HTTP\Request|HTTP\IncomingRequest|CLIRequest|RequestInterface

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this should all just be ReqiestInterface. @samsonasik ant compelling reason why the other hints would be needed?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if method caller use CLIRequest or IncomingRequest only method, that needed, if not, it can only use RequestInterface.

@@ -434,6 +435,11 @@ protected function handleRequest(RouteCollectionInterface $routes = null, Cache
{
return $possibleRedirect->send();

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

While we're here, I don't think there is any need to check for RedirectResponseandResponseInterface since they are handled the same. Let's remove the first block.

@samsonasik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@caswell-wc It seems you messed up the rebase, better to make backup branch, back to this branch, reset all, rebase again, and cherry-pick your own commits.

@paulbalandan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What's the status of this PR?

@MGatner

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@caswell-wc just wrapped up another outstanding PR so hopefully he is looking at this soon. This is possibly resolved by #3864.

@dcaswel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

This request got pretty messed up and was a really small change so I'm closing it and will recreate it with a fresh fork.

@dcasweldcaswel closed this Nov 18, 2020
@dcaswel
dcaswel deleted the request-from-filters branch November 18, 2020 02:40
@dcasweldcaswel mentioned this pull request Nov 18, 2020
5 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

18 participants

@dcaswel@samsonasik@paulbalandan@MGatner@michalsn@lefuentes@nyufeng@devorama@agungsugiarto@lf-uraku-yuki@sba@InsiteFX@savasdersimcelik@keradus@MisterDuval@mostafakhudair@lighthinkstudio@eSkiSo
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Handling requests sent back from filters - #3544

Closed
dcaswel wants to merge 328 commits into
codeigniter4:developfrom
dcaswel:request-from-filters
Closed

Handling requests sent back from filters#3544
dcaswel wants to merge 328 commits into
codeigniter4:developfrom
dcaswel:request-from-filters

Conversation

@dcaswel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Expands the fix of #3085

Description
Filters have the ability to alter the request like adding a user object from an auth filter for example. When it does that the request gets altered implicitly by the filter because the filter's request is pointing to the same object as the request property of the Codeigniter object. If the request gets altered, the filters also return the request into the $possibleRedirect variable. This change makes the update to the request property more explicit by setting the property with what gets returned from the filters. This ensures that if for some reason the object pointers get messed up, the request used by the controllers is the altered one.

@dcaswel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

This change worked in my local environment but it is causing a bunch of issues in the static analysis check so I will see if I can figure those out later. If anyone has an idea of what is going on there, I would appreciate the help.

@michalsnmichalsn left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We would need some tests for this.

As for static analysis check - rebase should help.

@MGatnerMGatner left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is the right way to go. We will need some tests to verify that this works, and probably some User Guide mention (if it isn't already). I made a couple of logistic notes as well.

* Current request.
*
* @var HTTP\Request|HTTP\IncomingRequest|CLIRequest
* @var HTTP\Request|HTTP\IncomingRequest|CLIRequest|RequestInterface

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this should all just be ReqiestInterface. @samsonasik ant compelling reason why the other hints would be needed?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if method caller use CLIRequest or IncomingRequest only method, that needed, if not, it can only use RequestInterface.

@@ -434,6 +435,11 @@ protected function handleRequest(RouteCollectionInterface $routes = null, Cache
{
return $possibleRedirect->send();

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

While we're here, I don't think there is any need to check for RedirectResponseandResponseInterface since they are handled the same. Let's remove the first block.

@samsonasik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@caswell-wc It seems you messed up the rebase, better to make backup branch, back to this branch, reset all, rebase again, and cherry-pick your own commits.

@paulbalandan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What's the status of this PR?

@MGatner

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@caswell-wc just wrapped up another outstanding PR so hopefully he is looking at this soon. This is possibly resolved by #3864.

@dcaswel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

This request got pretty messed up and was a really small change so I'm closing it and will recreate it with a fresh fork.

@dcasweldcaswel closed this Nov 18, 2020
@dcaswel
dcaswel deleted the request-from-filters branch November 18, 2020 02:40
@dcasweldcaswel mentioned this pull request Nov 18, 2020
5 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

18 participants

@dcaswel@samsonasik@paulbalandan@MGatner@michalsn@lefuentes@nyufeng@devorama@agungsugiarto@lf-uraku-yuki@sba@InsiteFX@savasdersimcelik@keradus@MisterDuval@mostafakhudair@lighthinkstudio@eSkiSo
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Handling requests sent back from filters - #3544

Closed
dcaswel wants to merge 328 commits into
codeigniter4:developfrom
dcaswel:request-from-filters
Closed

Handling requests sent back from filters#3544
dcaswel wants to merge 328 commits into
codeigniter4:developfrom
dcaswel:request-from-filters

Conversation

@dcaswel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Expands the fix of #3085

Description
Filters have the ability to alter the request like adding a user object from an auth filter for example. When it does that the request gets altered implicitly by the filter because the filter's request is pointing to the same object as the request property of the Codeigniter object. If the request gets altered, the filters also return the request into the $possibleRedirect variable. This change makes the update to the request property more explicit by setting the property with what gets returned from the filters. This ensures that if for some reason the object pointers get messed up, the request used by the controllers is the altered one.

@dcaswel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

This change worked in my local environment but it is causing a bunch of issues in the static analysis check so I will see if I can figure those out later. If anyone has an idea of what is going on there, I would appreciate the help.

@michalsnmichalsn left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We would need some tests for this.

As for static analysis check - rebase should help.

@MGatnerMGatner left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is the right way to go. We will need some tests to verify that this works, and probably some User Guide mention (if it isn't already). I made a couple of logistic notes as well.

* Current request.
*
* @var HTTP\Request|HTTP\IncomingRequest|CLIRequest
* @var HTTP\Request|HTTP\IncomingRequest|CLIRequest|RequestInterface

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this should all just be ReqiestInterface. @samsonasik ant compelling reason why the other hints would be needed?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if method caller use CLIRequest or IncomingRequest only method, that needed, if not, it can only use RequestInterface.

@@ -434,6 +435,11 @@ protected function handleRequest(RouteCollectionInterface $routes = null, Cache
{
return $possibleRedirect->send();

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

While we're here, I don't think there is any need to check for RedirectResponseandResponseInterface since they are handled the same. Let's remove the first block.

@samsonasik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@caswell-wc It seems you messed up the rebase, better to make backup branch, back to this branch, reset all, rebase again, and cherry-pick your own commits.

@paulbalandan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What's the status of this PR?

@MGatner

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@caswell-wc just wrapped up another outstanding PR so hopefully he is looking at this soon. This is possibly resolved by #3864.

@dcaswel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

This request got pretty messed up and was a really small change so I'm closing it and will recreate it with a fresh fork.

@dcasweldcaswel closed this Nov 18, 2020
@dcaswel
dcaswel deleted the request-from-filters branch November 18, 2020 02:40
@dcasweldcaswel mentioned this pull request Nov 18, 2020
5 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

18 participants

@dcaswel@samsonasik@paulbalandan@MGatner@michalsn@lefuentes@nyufeng@devorama@agungsugiarto@lf-uraku-yuki@sba@InsiteFX@savasdersimcelik@keradus@MisterDuval@mostafakhudair@lighthinkstudio@eSkiSo