Bug: The SQLSRV driver ignores the port value from the config. - #6036

Merged
kenjis merged 2 commits into
codeigniter4:developfrom
iRedds:fix-sqlsrv-port
May 27, 2022
Merged

Bug: The SQLSRV driver ignores the port value from the config.#6036
kenjis merged 2 commits into
codeigniter4:developfrom
iRedds:fix-sqlsrv-port

Conversation

@iRedds

@iReddsiRedds commented May 27, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Description
Fixes#6032

The SQLSRV driver ignores the port value from the config.

This PR fixes a bug.
Also, if a port is already specified in the hostname, the port from the configuration will be ignored.

It seems to me that the default tests are enough, because the database connection settings for the tests use the default port, which was ignored when configuring the connection.

Checklist:

  • Securely signed commits

Signed-off-by: Andrey Pyzhikov <5071@mail.ru>
@kenjiskenjis added bug Verified issues on the current code behavior or pull requests that will fix them database Issues or pull requests that affect the database layer labels May 27, 2022
Comment threadsystem/Database/SQLSRV/Connection.php Outdated
Signed-off-by: Andrey Pyzhikov <5071@mail.ru>
@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It seems to me that the default tests are enough, because the database connection settings for the tests use the default port, which was ignored when configuring the connection.

This bug was not detected by the existing tests, so tests are not enough.
But to test this, we build another SQL Server with the different port.
It costs a lot.

I've confirmed Port 1444 server can be connected with this PR.

@kenjis
kenjis merged commit 7b42a12 into codeigniter4:developMay 27, 2022
@iRedds

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

@kenjis I don't see the point in an additional server.
We can use non-standard ports for each DBMS for github actions and in test configs. Or at least change the ports in the docker containers to listen.

@iRedds
iRedds deleted the fix-sqlsrv-port branch May 27, 2022 08:08
@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@iRedds Okay, you are correct.
Changing the port of the docker containers to listen is enough.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bugVerified issues on the current code behavior or pull requests that will fix themdatabaseIssues or pull requests that affect the database layer

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug: SQLSRV with specified port over network

3 participants

@iRedds@kenjis@samsonasik
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Bug: The SQLSRV driver ignores the port value from the config. - #6036

Merged
kenjis merged 2 commits into
codeigniter4:developfrom
iRedds:fix-sqlsrv-port
May 27, 2022
Merged

Bug: The SQLSRV driver ignores the port value from the config.#6036
kenjis merged 2 commits into
codeigniter4:developfrom
iRedds:fix-sqlsrv-port

Conversation

@iRedds

@iReddsiRedds commented May 27, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Description
Fixes#6032

The SQLSRV driver ignores the port value from the config.

This PR fixes a bug.
Also, if a port is already specified in the hostname, the port from the configuration will be ignored.

It seems to me that the default tests are enough, because the database connection settings for the tests use the default port, which was ignored when configuring the connection.

Checklist:

  • Securely signed commits

Signed-off-by: Andrey Pyzhikov <5071@mail.ru>
@kenjiskenjis added bug Verified issues on the current code behavior or pull requests that will fix them database Issues or pull requests that affect the database layer labels May 27, 2022
Comment threadsystem/Database/SQLSRV/Connection.php Outdated
Signed-off-by: Andrey Pyzhikov <5071@mail.ru>
@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It seems to me that the default tests are enough, because the database connection settings for the tests use the default port, which was ignored when configuring the connection.

This bug was not detected by the existing tests, so tests are not enough.
But to test this, we build another SQL Server with the different port.
It costs a lot.

I've confirmed Port 1444 server can be connected with this PR.

@kenjis
kenjis merged commit 7b42a12 into codeigniter4:developMay 27, 2022
@iRedds

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

@kenjis I don't see the point in an additional server.
We can use non-standard ports for each DBMS for github actions and in test configs. Or at least change the ports in the docker containers to listen.

@iRedds
iRedds deleted the fix-sqlsrv-port branch May 27, 2022 08:08
@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@iRedds Okay, you are correct.
Changing the port of the docker containers to listen is enough.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bugVerified issues on the current code behavior or pull requests that will fix themdatabaseIssues or pull requests that affect the database layer

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug: SQLSRV with specified port over network

3 participants

@iRedds@kenjis@samsonasik
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Bug: The SQLSRV driver ignores the port value from the config. - #6036

Merged
kenjis merged 2 commits into
codeigniter4:developfrom
iRedds:fix-sqlsrv-port
May 27, 2022
Merged

Bug: The SQLSRV driver ignores the port value from the config.#6036
kenjis merged 2 commits into
codeigniter4:developfrom
iRedds:fix-sqlsrv-port

Conversation

@iRedds

@iReddsiRedds commented May 27, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Description
Fixes#6032

The SQLSRV driver ignores the port value from the config.

This PR fixes a bug.
Also, if a port is already specified in the hostname, the port from the configuration will be ignored.

It seems to me that the default tests are enough, because the database connection settings for the tests use the default port, which was ignored when configuring the connection.

Checklist:

  • Securely signed commits

Signed-off-by: Andrey Pyzhikov <5071@mail.ru>
@kenjiskenjis added bug Verified issues on the current code behavior or pull requests that will fix them database Issues or pull requests that affect the database layer labels May 27, 2022
Comment threadsystem/Database/SQLSRV/Connection.php Outdated
Signed-off-by: Andrey Pyzhikov <5071@mail.ru>
@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It seems to me that the default tests are enough, because the database connection settings for the tests use the default port, which was ignored when configuring the connection.

This bug was not detected by the existing tests, so tests are not enough.
But to test this, we build another SQL Server with the different port.
It costs a lot.

I've confirmed Port 1444 server can be connected with this PR.

@kenjis
kenjis merged commit 7b42a12 into codeigniter4:developMay 27, 2022
@iRedds

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

@kenjis I don't see the point in an additional server.
We can use non-standard ports for each DBMS for github actions and in test configs. Or at least change the ports in the docker containers to listen.

@iRedds
iRedds deleted the fix-sqlsrv-port branch May 27, 2022 08:08
@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@iRedds Okay, you are correct.
Changing the port of the docker containers to listen is enough.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bugVerified issues on the current code behavior or pull requests that will fix themdatabaseIssues or pull requests that affect the database layer

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug: SQLSRV with specified port over network

3 participants

@iRedds@kenjis@samsonasik
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Bug: The SQLSRV driver ignores the port value from the config. - #6036

Merged
kenjis merged 2 commits into
codeigniter4:developfrom
iRedds:fix-sqlsrv-port
May 27, 2022
Merged

Bug: The SQLSRV driver ignores the port value from the config.#6036
kenjis merged 2 commits into
codeigniter4:developfrom
iRedds:fix-sqlsrv-port

Conversation

@iRedds

@iReddsiRedds commented May 27, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Description
Fixes#6032

The SQLSRV driver ignores the port value from the config.

This PR fixes a bug.
Also, if a port is already specified in the hostname, the port from the configuration will be ignored.

It seems to me that the default tests are enough, because the database connection settings for the tests use the default port, which was ignored when configuring the connection.

Checklist:

  • Securely signed commits

Signed-off-by: Andrey Pyzhikov <5071@mail.ru>
@kenjiskenjis added bug Verified issues on the current code behavior or pull requests that will fix them database Issues or pull requests that affect the database layer labels May 27, 2022
Comment threadsystem/Database/SQLSRV/Connection.php Outdated
Signed-off-by: Andrey Pyzhikov <5071@mail.ru>
@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It seems to me that the default tests are enough, because the database connection settings for the tests use the default port, which was ignored when configuring the connection.

This bug was not detected by the existing tests, so tests are not enough.
But to test this, we build another SQL Server with the different port.
It costs a lot.

I've confirmed Port 1444 server can be connected with this PR.

@kenjis
kenjis merged commit 7b42a12 into codeigniter4:developMay 27, 2022
@iRedds

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

@kenjis I don't see the point in an additional server.
We can use non-standard ports for each DBMS for github actions and in test configs. Or at least change the ports in the docker containers to listen.

@iRedds
iRedds deleted the fix-sqlsrv-port branch May 27, 2022 08:08
@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@iRedds Okay, you are correct.
Changing the port of the docker containers to listen is enough.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bugVerified issues on the current code behavior or pull requests that will fix themdatabaseIssues or pull requests that affect the database layer

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug: SQLSRV with specified port over network

3 participants

@iRedds@kenjis@samsonasik
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Bug: The SQLSRV driver ignores the port value from the config. - #6036

Merged
kenjis merged 2 commits into
codeigniter4:developfrom
iRedds:fix-sqlsrv-port
May 27, 2022
Merged

Bug: The SQLSRV driver ignores the port value from the config.#6036
kenjis merged 2 commits into
codeigniter4:developfrom
iRedds:fix-sqlsrv-port

Conversation

@iRedds

@iReddsiRedds commented May 27, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Description
Fixes#6032

The SQLSRV driver ignores the port value from the config.

This PR fixes a bug.
Also, if a port is already specified in the hostname, the port from the configuration will be ignored.

It seems to me that the default tests are enough, because the database connection settings for the tests use the default port, which was ignored when configuring the connection.

Checklist:

  • Securely signed commits

Signed-off-by: Andrey Pyzhikov <5071@mail.ru>
@kenjiskenjis added bug Verified issues on the current code behavior or pull requests that will fix them database Issues or pull requests that affect the database layer labels May 27, 2022
Comment threadsystem/Database/SQLSRV/Connection.php Outdated
Signed-off-by: Andrey Pyzhikov <5071@mail.ru>
@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It seems to me that the default tests are enough, because the database connection settings for the tests use the default port, which was ignored when configuring the connection.

This bug was not detected by the existing tests, so tests are not enough.
But to test this, we build another SQL Server with the different port.
It costs a lot.

I've confirmed Port 1444 server can be connected with this PR.

@kenjis
kenjis merged commit 7b42a12 into codeigniter4:developMay 27, 2022
@iRedds

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

@kenjis I don't see the point in an additional server.
We can use non-standard ports for each DBMS for github actions and in test configs. Or at least change the ports in the docker containers to listen.

@iRedds
iRedds deleted the fix-sqlsrv-port branch May 27, 2022 08:08
@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@iRedds Okay, you are correct.
Changing the port of the docker containers to listen is enough.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bugVerified issues on the current code behavior or pull requests that will fix themdatabaseIssues or pull requests that affect the database layer

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug: SQLSRV with specified port over network

3 participants

@iRedds@kenjis@samsonasik
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Bug: The SQLSRV driver ignores the port value from the config. - #6036

Merged
kenjis merged 2 commits into
codeigniter4:developfrom
iRedds:fix-sqlsrv-port
May 27, 2022
Merged

Bug: The SQLSRV driver ignores the port value from the config.#6036
kenjis merged 2 commits into
codeigniter4:developfrom
iRedds:fix-sqlsrv-port

Conversation

@iRedds

@iReddsiRedds commented May 27, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Description
Fixes#6032

The SQLSRV driver ignores the port value from the config.

This PR fixes a bug.
Also, if a port is already specified in the hostname, the port from the configuration will be ignored.

It seems to me that the default tests are enough, because the database connection settings for the tests use the default port, which was ignored when configuring the connection.

Checklist:

  • Securely signed commits

Signed-off-by: Andrey Pyzhikov <5071@mail.ru>
@kenjiskenjis added bug Verified issues on the current code behavior or pull requests that will fix them database Issues or pull requests that affect the database layer labels May 27, 2022
Comment threadsystem/Database/SQLSRV/Connection.php Outdated
Signed-off-by: Andrey Pyzhikov <5071@mail.ru>
@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It seems to me that the default tests are enough, because the database connection settings for the tests use the default port, which was ignored when configuring the connection.

This bug was not detected by the existing tests, so tests are not enough.
But to test this, we build another SQL Server with the different port.
It costs a lot.

I've confirmed Port 1444 server can be connected with this PR.

@kenjis
kenjis merged commit 7b42a12 into codeigniter4:developMay 27, 2022
@iRedds

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

@kenjis I don't see the point in an additional server.
We can use non-standard ports for each DBMS for github actions and in test configs. Or at least change the ports in the docker containers to listen.

@iRedds
iRedds deleted the fix-sqlsrv-port branch May 27, 2022 08:08
@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@iRedds Okay, you are correct.
Changing the port of the docker containers to listen is enough.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bugVerified issues on the current code behavior or pull requests that will fix themdatabaseIssues or pull requests that affect the database layer

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug: SQLSRV with specified port over network

3 participants

@iRedds@kenjis@samsonasik
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Bug: The SQLSRV driver ignores the port value from the config. - #6036

Merged
kenjis merged 2 commits into
codeigniter4:developfrom
iRedds:fix-sqlsrv-port
May 27, 2022
Merged

Bug: The SQLSRV driver ignores the port value from the config.#6036
kenjis merged 2 commits into
codeigniter4:developfrom
iRedds:fix-sqlsrv-port

Conversation

@iRedds

@iReddsiRedds commented May 27, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Description
Fixes#6032

The SQLSRV driver ignores the port value from the config.

This PR fixes a bug.
Also, if a port is already specified in the hostname, the port from the configuration will be ignored.

It seems to me that the default tests are enough, because the database connection settings for the tests use the default port, which was ignored when configuring the connection.

Checklist:

  • Securely signed commits

Signed-off-by: Andrey Pyzhikov <5071@mail.ru>
@kenjiskenjis added bug Verified issues on the current code behavior or pull requests that will fix them database Issues or pull requests that affect the database layer labels May 27, 2022
Comment threadsystem/Database/SQLSRV/Connection.php Outdated
Signed-off-by: Andrey Pyzhikov <5071@mail.ru>
@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It seems to me that the default tests are enough, because the database connection settings for the tests use the default port, which was ignored when configuring the connection.

This bug was not detected by the existing tests, so tests are not enough.
But to test this, we build another SQL Server with the different port.
It costs a lot.

I've confirmed Port 1444 server can be connected with this PR.

@kenjis
kenjis merged commit 7b42a12 into codeigniter4:developMay 27, 2022
@iRedds

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

@kenjis I don't see the point in an additional server.
We can use non-standard ports for each DBMS for github actions and in test configs. Or at least change the ports in the docker containers to listen.

@iRedds
iRedds deleted the fix-sqlsrv-port branch May 27, 2022 08:08
@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@iRedds Okay, you are correct.
Changing the port of the docker containers to listen is enough.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bugVerified issues on the current code behavior or pull requests that will fix themdatabaseIssues or pull requests that affect the database layer

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug: SQLSRV with specified port over network

3 participants

@iRedds@kenjis@samsonasik
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Bug: The SQLSRV driver ignores the port value from the config. - #6036

Merged
kenjis merged 2 commits into
codeigniter4:developfrom
iRedds:fix-sqlsrv-port
May 27, 2022
Merged

Bug: The SQLSRV driver ignores the port value from the config.#6036
kenjis merged 2 commits into
codeigniter4:developfrom
iRedds:fix-sqlsrv-port

Conversation

@iRedds

@iReddsiRedds commented May 27, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Description
Fixes#6032

The SQLSRV driver ignores the port value from the config.

This PR fixes a bug.
Also, if a port is already specified in the hostname, the port from the configuration will be ignored.

It seems to me that the default tests are enough, because the database connection settings for the tests use the default port, which was ignored when configuring the connection.

Checklist:

  • Securely signed commits

Signed-off-by: Andrey Pyzhikov <5071@mail.ru>
@kenjiskenjis added bug Verified issues on the current code behavior or pull requests that will fix them database Issues or pull requests that affect the database layer labels May 27, 2022
Comment threadsystem/Database/SQLSRV/Connection.php Outdated
Signed-off-by: Andrey Pyzhikov <5071@mail.ru>
@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It seems to me that the default tests are enough, because the database connection settings for the tests use the default port, which was ignored when configuring the connection.

This bug was not detected by the existing tests, so tests are not enough.
But to test this, we build another SQL Server with the different port.
It costs a lot.

I've confirmed Port 1444 server can be connected with this PR.

@kenjis
kenjis merged commit 7b42a12 into codeigniter4:developMay 27, 2022
@iRedds

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

@kenjis I don't see the point in an additional server.
We can use non-standard ports for each DBMS for github actions and in test configs. Or at least change the ports in the docker containers to listen.

@iRedds
iRedds deleted the fix-sqlsrv-port branch May 27, 2022 08:08
@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@iRedds Okay, you are correct.
Changing the port of the docker containers to listen is enough.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bugVerified issues on the current code behavior or pull requests that will fix themdatabaseIssues or pull requests that affect the database layer

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug: SQLSRV with specified port over network

3 participants

@iRedds@kenjis@samsonasik