feat: add URIFactory - #7239

Closed
kenjis wants to merge 17 commits into
codeigniter4:4.4from
kenjis:feat-URIFactory
Closed

feat: add URIFactory#7239
kenjis wants to merge 17 commits into
codeigniter4:4.4from
kenjis:feat-URIFactory

Conversation

@kenjis

@kenjiskenjis commented Feb 10, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Needs #7232

Description
Add URIFactory to create the current URI object.

To create the current URI object before the Request object. Also, to remove all URI adjustment processing currently performed in the constructor of the Request object.

This PR does not change any existing features yet.

  • add URIFactory::createFromGlobals()
  • add URI::setRoutePath() and URI::getRoutePath()

Checklist:

  • Securely signed commits
  • Component(s) with PHPDoc blocks, only if necessary or adds value
  • Unit testing, with >80% coverage
  • User guide updated
  • Conforms to style guide

@kenjiskenjis added enhancement PRs that improve existing functionalities 4.4 labels Feb 10, 2023
@kenjis
kenjisforce-pushed the feat-URIFactory branch 2 times, most recently from 816dbcc to 516a76aCompareFebruary 10, 2023 06:36
Comment on lines +34 to +37
public function __construct(array &$server, array &$get, App $appConfig)
{
$this->server = &$server;
$this->get = &$get;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think passing by reference, which means modifying superglobal arrays, is the right approach.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is the right approach?

@iRedds

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

In my opinion, two factories are needed
\CodeIgniter\HTTP\URI::createFromRequest(Request $request) and \CodeIgniter\HTTP\URI::createFromString(string $url)

To create a separate class that works directly with _SERVER and _GET, and even created before the request object, this is not correct in my opinion.

@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

How do you create Request object without URI object?

@iRedds

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

How do you create Request object without URI object?

Say hello to the framework architects for the URI class in the Request constructor.
For the same reason, in other classes, _SERVER is also directly accessed.

@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Say hello to the framework architects for the URI class in the Request constructor.
For the same reason, in other classes, _SERVER is also directly accessed.

Sorry, I don't get what you say at all.
Who are the framework architects?
What do you mean by say hello?

@iRedds

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The URI class depends on the Request class for incoming requests because the Request class must provide access to a copy of _SERVER.

Therefore, making the Request class dependent on the URI is a framework architecture error.

I don't know who designed these classes.
I meant that the question "How do you create Request object without URI object?" should be forwarded to those who designed.

@kenjis
kenjis marked this pull request as draft February 10, 2023 10:22
@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

The URI class depends on the Request class for incoming requests because the Request class must provide access to a copy of _SERVER.

Indeed.

I meant that the question "How do you create Request object without URI object?" should be forwarded to those who designed.

Who designed does not matter.
The only question is how do we redesign.

@iRedds

iRedds commented Feb 10, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Who designed does not matter. The only question is how do we redesign.

I don't know.
There are two abstract options.

  1. Qualitatively, but this is BC at the level of major versions.
publicfunction__constructor (protectedarray$query = [], protectedarray$request = [], protectedarray$server = []) {}
// and factorypublicstaticfunctioncreateFromGlobals(): Request {
$request = newstatic($_GET, $_REQUEST, $_SERVER);
return$request->withUri(Uri::createFromRequest($request));
}
  1. Remove the restriction on $uri = null in the IncomingRequest constructor. And when null, use a request-based factory.
    if (empty($uri) || empty($userAgent)) {
    thrownewInvalidArgumentException('You must supply the parameters: uri, userAgent.');
    }
if (empty($userAgent)) {
thrownewInvalidArgumentException('You must supply the parameters: uri, userAgent.');
}
$this->uri = $uri ?? URI::createFromRequest($this);

Or something similar.

@kenjiskenjis closed this Feb 14, 2023
This was referenced Feb 14, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancementPRs that improve existing functionalities

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@kenjis@iRedds
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

feat: add URIFactory - #7239

Closed
kenjis wants to merge 17 commits into
codeigniter4:4.4from
kenjis:feat-URIFactory
Closed

feat: add URIFactory#7239
kenjis wants to merge 17 commits into
codeigniter4:4.4from
kenjis:feat-URIFactory

Conversation

@kenjis

@kenjiskenjis commented Feb 10, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Needs #7232

Description
Add URIFactory to create the current URI object.

To create the current URI object before the Request object. Also, to remove all URI adjustment processing currently performed in the constructor of the Request object.

This PR does not change any existing features yet.

  • add URIFactory::createFromGlobals()
  • add URI::setRoutePath() and URI::getRoutePath()

Checklist:

  • Securely signed commits
  • Component(s) with PHPDoc blocks, only if necessary or adds value
  • Unit testing, with >80% coverage
  • User guide updated
  • Conforms to style guide

@kenjiskenjis added enhancement PRs that improve existing functionalities 4.4 labels Feb 10, 2023
@kenjis
kenjisforce-pushed the feat-URIFactory branch 2 times, most recently from 816dbcc to 516a76aCompareFebruary 10, 2023 06:36
Comment on lines +34 to +37
public function __construct(array &$server, array &$get, App $appConfig)
{
$this->server = &$server;
$this->get = &$get;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think passing by reference, which means modifying superglobal arrays, is the right approach.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is the right approach?

@iRedds

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

In my opinion, two factories are needed
\CodeIgniter\HTTP\URI::createFromRequest(Request $request) and \CodeIgniter\HTTP\URI::createFromString(string $url)

To create a separate class that works directly with _SERVER and _GET, and even created before the request object, this is not correct in my opinion.

@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

How do you create Request object without URI object?

@iRedds

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

How do you create Request object without URI object?

Say hello to the framework architects for the URI class in the Request constructor.
For the same reason, in other classes, _SERVER is also directly accessed.

@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Say hello to the framework architects for the URI class in the Request constructor.
For the same reason, in other classes, _SERVER is also directly accessed.

Sorry, I don't get what you say at all.
Who are the framework architects?
What do you mean by say hello?

@iRedds

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The URI class depends on the Request class for incoming requests because the Request class must provide access to a copy of _SERVER.

Therefore, making the Request class dependent on the URI is a framework architecture error.

I don't know who designed these classes.
I meant that the question "How do you create Request object without URI object?" should be forwarded to those who designed.

@kenjis
kenjis marked this pull request as draft February 10, 2023 10:22
@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

The URI class depends on the Request class for incoming requests because the Request class must provide access to a copy of _SERVER.

Indeed.

I meant that the question "How do you create Request object without URI object?" should be forwarded to those who designed.

Who designed does not matter.
The only question is how do we redesign.

@iRedds

iRedds commented Feb 10, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Who designed does not matter. The only question is how do we redesign.

I don't know.
There are two abstract options.

  1. Qualitatively, but this is BC at the level of major versions.
publicfunction__constructor (protectedarray$query = [], protectedarray$request = [], protectedarray$server = []) {}
// and factorypublicstaticfunctioncreateFromGlobals(): Request {
$request = newstatic($_GET, $_REQUEST, $_SERVER);
return$request->withUri(Uri::createFromRequest($request));
}
  1. Remove the restriction on $uri = null in the IncomingRequest constructor. And when null, use a request-based factory.
    if (empty($uri) || empty($userAgent)) {
    thrownewInvalidArgumentException('You must supply the parameters: uri, userAgent.');
    }
if (empty($userAgent)) {
thrownewInvalidArgumentException('You must supply the parameters: uri, userAgent.');
}
$this->uri = $uri ?? URI::createFromRequest($this);

Or something similar.

@kenjiskenjis closed this Feb 14, 2023
This was referenced Feb 14, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancementPRs that improve existing functionalities

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@kenjis@iRedds
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

feat: add URIFactory - #7239

Closed
kenjis wants to merge 17 commits into
codeigniter4:4.4from
kenjis:feat-URIFactory
Closed

feat: add URIFactory#7239
kenjis wants to merge 17 commits into
codeigniter4:4.4from
kenjis:feat-URIFactory

Conversation

@kenjis

@kenjiskenjis commented Feb 10, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Needs #7232

Description
Add URIFactory to create the current URI object.

To create the current URI object before the Request object. Also, to remove all URI adjustment processing currently performed in the constructor of the Request object.

This PR does not change any existing features yet.

  • add URIFactory::createFromGlobals()
  • add URI::setRoutePath() and URI::getRoutePath()

Checklist:

  • Securely signed commits
  • Component(s) with PHPDoc blocks, only if necessary or adds value
  • Unit testing, with >80% coverage
  • User guide updated
  • Conforms to style guide

@kenjiskenjis added enhancement PRs that improve existing functionalities 4.4 labels Feb 10, 2023
@kenjis
kenjisforce-pushed the feat-URIFactory branch 2 times, most recently from 816dbcc to 516a76aCompareFebruary 10, 2023 06:36
Comment on lines +34 to +37
public function __construct(array &$server, array &$get, App $appConfig)
{
$this->server = &$server;
$this->get = &$get;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think passing by reference, which means modifying superglobal arrays, is the right approach.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is the right approach?

@iRedds

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

In my opinion, two factories are needed
\CodeIgniter\HTTP\URI::createFromRequest(Request $request) and \CodeIgniter\HTTP\URI::createFromString(string $url)

To create a separate class that works directly with _SERVER and _GET, and even created before the request object, this is not correct in my opinion.

@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

How do you create Request object without URI object?

@iRedds

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

How do you create Request object without URI object?

Say hello to the framework architects for the URI class in the Request constructor.
For the same reason, in other classes, _SERVER is also directly accessed.

@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Say hello to the framework architects for the URI class in the Request constructor.
For the same reason, in other classes, _SERVER is also directly accessed.

Sorry, I don't get what you say at all.
Who are the framework architects?
What do you mean by say hello?

@iRedds

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The URI class depends on the Request class for incoming requests because the Request class must provide access to a copy of _SERVER.

Therefore, making the Request class dependent on the URI is a framework architecture error.

I don't know who designed these classes.
I meant that the question "How do you create Request object without URI object?" should be forwarded to those who designed.

@kenjis
kenjis marked this pull request as draft February 10, 2023 10:22
@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

The URI class depends on the Request class for incoming requests because the Request class must provide access to a copy of _SERVER.

Indeed.

I meant that the question "How do you create Request object without URI object?" should be forwarded to those who designed.

Who designed does not matter.
The only question is how do we redesign.

@iRedds

iRedds commented Feb 10, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Who designed does not matter. The only question is how do we redesign.

I don't know.
There are two abstract options.

  1. Qualitatively, but this is BC at the level of major versions.
publicfunction__constructor (protectedarray$query = [], protectedarray$request = [], protectedarray$server = []) {}
// and factorypublicstaticfunctioncreateFromGlobals(): Request {
$request = newstatic($_GET, $_REQUEST, $_SERVER);
return$request->withUri(Uri::createFromRequest($request));
}
  1. Remove the restriction on $uri = null in the IncomingRequest constructor. And when null, use a request-based factory.
    if (empty($uri) || empty($userAgent)) {
    thrownewInvalidArgumentException('You must supply the parameters: uri, userAgent.');
    }
if (empty($userAgent)) {
thrownewInvalidArgumentException('You must supply the parameters: uri, userAgent.');
}
$this->uri = $uri ?? URI::createFromRequest($this);

Or something similar.

@kenjiskenjis closed this Feb 14, 2023
This was referenced Feb 14, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancementPRs that improve existing functionalities

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@kenjis@iRedds
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

feat: add URIFactory - #7239

Closed
kenjis wants to merge 17 commits into
codeigniter4:4.4from
kenjis:feat-URIFactory
Closed

feat: add URIFactory#7239
kenjis wants to merge 17 commits into
codeigniter4:4.4from
kenjis:feat-URIFactory

Conversation

@kenjis

@kenjiskenjis commented Feb 10, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Needs #7232

Description
Add URIFactory to create the current URI object.

To create the current URI object before the Request object. Also, to remove all URI adjustment processing currently performed in the constructor of the Request object.

This PR does not change any existing features yet.

  • add URIFactory::createFromGlobals()
  • add URI::setRoutePath() and URI::getRoutePath()

Checklist:

  • Securely signed commits
  • Component(s) with PHPDoc blocks, only if necessary or adds value
  • Unit testing, with >80% coverage
  • User guide updated
  • Conforms to style guide

@kenjiskenjis added enhancement PRs that improve existing functionalities 4.4 labels Feb 10, 2023
@kenjis
kenjisforce-pushed the feat-URIFactory branch 2 times, most recently from 816dbcc to 516a76aCompareFebruary 10, 2023 06:36
Comment on lines +34 to +37
public function __construct(array &$server, array &$get, App $appConfig)
{
$this->server = &$server;
$this->get = &$get;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think passing by reference, which means modifying superglobal arrays, is the right approach.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is the right approach?

@iRedds

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

In my opinion, two factories are needed
\CodeIgniter\HTTP\URI::createFromRequest(Request $request) and \CodeIgniter\HTTP\URI::createFromString(string $url)

To create a separate class that works directly with _SERVER and _GET, and even created before the request object, this is not correct in my opinion.

@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

How do you create Request object without URI object?

@iRedds

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

How do you create Request object without URI object?

Say hello to the framework architects for the URI class in the Request constructor.
For the same reason, in other classes, _SERVER is also directly accessed.

@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Say hello to the framework architects for the URI class in the Request constructor.
For the same reason, in other classes, _SERVER is also directly accessed.

Sorry, I don't get what you say at all.
Who are the framework architects?
What do you mean by say hello?

@iRedds

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The URI class depends on the Request class for incoming requests because the Request class must provide access to a copy of _SERVER.

Therefore, making the Request class dependent on the URI is a framework architecture error.

I don't know who designed these classes.
I meant that the question "How do you create Request object without URI object?" should be forwarded to those who designed.

@kenjis
kenjis marked this pull request as draft February 10, 2023 10:22
@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

The URI class depends on the Request class for incoming requests because the Request class must provide access to a copy of _SERVER.

Indeed.

I meant that the question "How do you create Request object without URI object?" should be forwarded to those who designed.

Who designed does not matter.
The only question is how do we redesign.

@iRedds

iRedds commented Feb 10, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Who designed does not matter. The only question is how do we redesign.

I don't know.
There are two abstract options.

  1. Qualitatively, but this is BC at the level of major versions.
publicfunction__constructor (protectedarray$query = [], protectedarray$request = [], protectedarray$server = []) {}
// and factorypublicstaticfunctioncreateFromGlobals(): Request {
$request = newstatic($_GET, $_REQUEST, $_SERVER);
return$request->withUri(Uri::createFromRequest($request));
}
  1. Remove the restriction on $uri = null in the IncomingRequest constructor. And when null, use a request-based factory.
    if (empty($uri) || empty($userAgent)) {
    thrownewInvalidArgumentException('You must supply the parameters: uri, userAgent.');
    }
if (empty($userAgent)) {
thrownewInvalidArgumentException('You must supply the parameters: uri, userAgent.');
}
$this->uri = $uri ?? URI::createFromRequest($this);

Or something similar.

@kenjiskenjis closed this Feb 14, 2023
This was referenced Feb 14, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancementPRs that improve existing functionalities

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@kenjis@iRedds
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

feat: add URIFactory - #7239

Closed
kenjis wants to merge 17 commits into
codeigniter4:4.4from
kenjis:feat-URIFactory
Closed

feat: add URIFactory#7239
kenjis wants to merge 17 commits into
codeigniter4:4.4from
kenjis:feat-URIFactory

Conversation

@kenjis

@kenjiskenjis commented Feb 10, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Needs #7232

Description
Add URIFactory to create the current URI object.

To create the current URI object before the Request object. Also, to remove all URI adjustment processing currently performed in the constructor of the Request object.

This PR does not change any existing features yet.

  • add URIFactory::createFromGlobals()
  • add URI::setRoutePath() and URI::getRoutePath()

Checklist:

  • Securely signed commits
  • Component(s) with PHPDoc blocks, only if necessary or adds value
  • Unit testing, with >80% coverage
  • User guide updated
  • Conforms to style guide

@kenjiskenjis added enhancement PRs that improve existing functionalities 4.4 labels Feb 10, 2023
@kenjis
kenjisforce-pushed the feat-URIFactory branch 2 times, most recently from 816dbcc to 516a76aCompareFebruary 10, 2023 06:36
Comment on lines +34 to +37
public function __construct(array &$server, array &$get, App $appConfig)
{
$this->server = &$server;
$this->get = &$get;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think passing by reference, which means modifying superglobal arrays, is the right approach.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is the right approach?

@iRedds

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

In my opinion, two factories are needed
\CodeIgniter\HTTP\URI::createFromRequest(Request $request) and \CodeIgniter\HTTP\URI::createFromString(string $url)

To create a separate class that works directly with _SERVER and _GET, and even created before the request object, this is not correct in my opinion.

@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

How do you create Request object without URI object?

@iRedds

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

How do you create Request object without URI object?

Say hello to the framework architects for the URI class in the Request constructor.
For the same reason, in other classes, _SERVER is also directly accessed.

@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Say hello to the framework architects for the URI class in the Request constructor.
For the same reason, in other classes, _SERVER is also directly accessed.

Sorry, I don't get what you say at all.
Who are the framework architects?
What do you mean by say hello?

@iRedds

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The URI class depends on the Request class for incoming requests because the Request class must provide access to a copy of _SERVER.

Therefore, making the Request class dependent on the URI is a framework architecture error.

I don't know who designed these classes.
I meant that the question "How do you create Request object without URI object?" should be forwarded to those who designed.

@kenjis
kenjis marked this pull request as draft February 10, 2023 10:22
@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

The URI class depends on the Request class for incoming requests because the Request class must provide access to a copy of _SERVER.

Indeed.

I meant that the question "How do you create Request object without URI object?" should be forwarded to those who designed.

Who designed does not matter.
The only question is how do we redesign.

@iRedds

iRedds commented Feb 10, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Who designed does not matter. The only question is how do we redesign.

I don't know.
There are two abstract options.

  1. Qualitatively, but this is BC at the level of major versions.
publicfunction__constructor (protectedarray$query = [], protectedarray$request = [], protectedarray$server = []) {}
// and factorypublicstaticfunctioncreateFromGlobals(): Request {
$request = newstatic($_GET, $_REQUEST, $_SERVER);
return$request->withUri(Uri::createFromRequest($request));
}
  1. Remove the restriction on $uri = null in the IncomingRequest constructor. And when null, use a request-based factory.
    if (empty($uri) || empty($userAgent)) {
    thrownewInvalidArgumentException('You must supply the parameters: uri, userAgent.');
    }
if (empty($userAgent)) {
thrownewInvalidArgumentException('You must supply the parameters: uri, userAgent.');
}
$this->uri = $uri ?? URI::createFromRequest($this);

Or something similar.

@kenjiskenjis closed this Feb 14, 2023
This was referenced Feb 14, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancementPRs that improve existing functionalities

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@kenjis@iRedds
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

feat: add URIFactory - #7239

Closed
kenjis wants to merge 17 commits into
codeigniter4:4.4from
kenjis:feat-URIFactory
Closed

feat: add URIFactory#7239
kenjis wants to merge 17 commits into
codeigniter4:4.4from
kenjis:feat-URIFactory

Conversation

@kenjis

@kenjiskenjis commented Feb 10, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Needs #7232

Description
Add URIFactory to create the current URI object.

To create the current URI object before the Request object. Also, to remove all URI adjustment processing currently performed in the constructor of the Request object.

This PR does not change any existing features yet.

  • add URIFactory::createFromGlobals()
  • add URI::setRoutePath() and URI::getRoutePath()

Checklist:

  • Securely signed commits
  • Component(s) with PHPDoc blocks, only if necessary or adds value
  • Unit testing, with >80% coverage
  • User guide updated
  • Conforms to style guide

@kenjiskenjis added enhancement PRs that improve existing functionalities 4.4 labels Feb 10, 2023
@kenjis
kenjisforce-pushed the feat-URIFactory branch 2 times, most recently from 816dbcc to 516a76aCompareFebruary 10, 2023 06:36
Comment on lines +34 to +37
public function __construct(array &$server, array &$get, App $appConfig)
{
$this->server = &$server;
$this->get = &$get;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think passing by reference, which means modifying superglobal arrays, is the right approach.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is the right approach?

@iRedds

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

In my opinion, two factories are needed
\CodeIgniter\HTTP\URI::createFromRequest(Request $request) and \CodeIgniter\HTTP\URI::createFromString(string $url)

To create a separate class that works directly with _SERVER and _GET, and even created before the request object, this is not correct in my opinion.

@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

How do you create Request object without URI object?

@iRedds

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

How do you create Request object without URI object?

Say hello to the framework architects for the URI class in the Request constructor.
For the same reason, in other classes, _SERVER is also directly accessed.

@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Say hello to the framework architects for the URI class in the Request constructor.
For the same reason, in other classes, _SERVER is also directly accessed.

Sorry, I don't get what you say at all.
Who are the framework architects?
What do you mean by say hello?

@iRedds

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The URI class depends on the Request class for incoming requests because the Request class must provide access to a copy of _SERVER.

Therefore, making the Request class dependent on the URI is a framework architecture error.

I don't know who designed these classes.
I meant that the question "How do you create Request object without URI object?" should be forwarded to those who designed.

@kenjis
kenjis marked this pull request as draft February 10, 2023 10:22
@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

The URI class depends on the Request class for incoming requests because the Request class must provide access to a copy of _SERVER.

Indeed.

I meant that the question "How do you create Request object without URI object?" should be forwarded to those who designed.

Who designed does not matter.
The only question is how do we redesign.

@iRedds

iRedds commented Feb 10, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Who designed does not matter. The only question is how do we redesign.

I don't know.
There are two abstract options.

  1. Qualitatively, but this is BC at the level of major versions.
publicfunction__constructor (protectedarray$query = [], protectedarray$request = [], protectedarray$server = []) {}
// and factorypublicstaticfunctioncreateFromGlobals(): Request {
$request = newstatic($_GET, $_REQUEST, $_SERVER);
return$request->withUri(Uri::createFromRequest($request));
}
  1. Remove the restriction on $uri = null in the IncomingRequest constructor. And when null, use a request-based factory.
    if (empty($uri) || empty($userAgent)) {
    thrownewInvalidArgumentException('You must supply the parameters: uri, userAgent.');
    }
if (empty($userAgent)) {
thrownewInvalidArgumentException('You must supply the parameters: uri, userAgent.');
}
$this->uri = $uri ?? URI::createFromRequest($this);

Or something similar.

@kenjiskenjis closed this Feb 14, 2023
This was referenced Feb 14, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancementPRs that improve existing functionalities

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@kenjis@iRedds
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

feat: add URIFactory - #7239

Closed
kenjis wants to merge 17 commits into
codeigniter4:4.4from
kenjis:feat-URIFactory
Closed

feat: add URIFactory#7239
kenjis wants to merge 17 commits into
codeigniter4:4.4from
kenjis:feat-URIFactory

Conversation

@kenjis

@kenjiskenjis commented Feb 10, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Needs #7232

Description
Add URIFactory to create the current URI object.

To create the current URI object before the Request object. Also, to remove all URI adjustment processing currently performed in the constructor of the Request object.

This PR does not change any existing features yet.

  • add URIFactory::createFromGlobals()
  • add URI::setRoutePath() and URI::getRoutePath()

Checklist:

  • Securely signed commits
  • Component(s) with PHPDoc blocks, only if necessary or adds value
  • Unit testing, with >80% coverage
  • User guide updated
  • Conforms to style guide

@kenjiskenjis added enhancement PRs that improve existing functionalities 4.4 labels Feb 10, 2023
@kenjis
kenjisforce-pushed the feat-URIFactory branch 2 times, most recently from 816dbcc to 516a76aCompareFebruary 10, 2023 06:36
Comment on lines +34 to +37
public function __construct(array &$server, array &$get, App $appConfig)
{
$this->server = &$server;
$this->get = &$get;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think passing by reference, which means modifying superglobal arrays, is the right approach.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is the right approach?

@iRedds

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

In my opinion, two factories are needed
\CodeIgniter\HTTP\URI::createFromRequest(Request $request) and \CodeIgniter\HTTP\URI::createFromString(string $url)

To create a separate class that works directly with _SERVER and _GET, and even created before the request object, this is not correct in my opinion.

@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

How do you create Request object without URI object?

@iRedds

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

How do you create Request object without URI object?

Say hello to the framework architects for the URI class in the Request constructor.
For the same reason, in other classes, _SERVER is also directly accessed.

@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Say hello to the framework architects for the URI class in the Request constructor.
For the same reason, in other classes, _SERVER is also directly accessed.

Sorry, I don't get what you say at all.
Who are the framework architects?
What do you mean by say hello?

@iRedds

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The URI class depends on the Request class for incoming requests because the Request class must provide access to a copy of _SERVER.

Therefore, making the Request class dependent on the URI is a framework architecture error.

I don't know who designed these classes.
I meant that the question "How do you create Request object without URI object?" should be forwarded to those who designed.

@kenjis
kenjis marked this pull request as draft February 10, 2023 10:22
@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

The URI class depends on the Request class for incoming requests because the Request class must provide access to a copy of _SERVER.

Indeed.

I meant that the question "How do you create Request object without URI object?" should be forwarded to those who designed.

Who designed does not matter.
The only question is how do we redesign.

@iRedds

iRedds commented Feb 10, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Who designed does not matter. The only question is how do we redesign.

I don't know.
There are two abstract options.

  1. Qualitatively, but this is BC at the level of major versions.
publicfunction__constructor (protectedarray$query = [], protectedarray$request = [], protectedarray$server = []) {}
// and factorypublicstaticfunctioncreateFromGlobals(): Request {
$request = newstatic($_GET, $_REQUEST, $_SERVER);
return$request->withUri(Uri::createFromRequest($request));
}
  1. Remove the restriction on $uri = null in the IncomingRequest constructor. And when null, use a request-based factory.
    if (empty($uri) || empty($userAgent)) {
    thrownewInvalidArgumentException('You must supply the parameters: uri, userAgent.');
    }
if (empty($userAgent)) {
thrownewInvalidArgumentException('You must supply the parameters: uri, userAgent.');
}
$this->uri = $uri ?? URI::createFromRequest($this);

Or something similar.

@kenjiskenjis closed this Feb 14, 2023
This was referenced Feb 14, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancementPRs that improve existing functionalities

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@kenjis@iRedds
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

feat: add URIFactory - #7239

Closed
kenjis wants to merge 17 commits into
codeigniter4:4.4from
kenjis:feat-URIFactory
Closed

feat: add URIFactory#7239
kenjis wants to merge 17 commits into
codeigniter4:4.4from
kenjis:feat-URIFactory

Conversation

@kenjis

@kenjiskenjis commented Feb 10, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Needs #7232

Description
Add URIFactory to create the current URI object.

To create the current URI object before the Request object. Also, to remove all URI adjustment processing currently performed in the constructor of the Request object.

This PR does not change any existing features yet.

  • add URIFactory::createFromGlobals()
  • add URI::setRoutePath() and URI::getRoutePath()

Checklist:

  • Securely signed commits
  • Component(s) with PHPDoc blocks, only if necessary or adds value
  • Unit testing, with >80% coverage
  • User guide updated
  • Conforms to style guide

@kenjiskenjis added enhancement PRs that improve existing functionalities 4.4 labels Feb 10, 2023
@kenjis
kenjisforce-pushed the feat-URIFactory branch 2 times, most recently from 816dbcc to 516a76aCompareFebruary 10, 2023 06:36
Comment on lines +34 to +37
public function __construct(array &$server, array &$get, App $appConfig)
{
$this->server = &$server;
$this->get = &$get;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think passing by reference, which means modifying superglobal arrays, is the right approach.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is the right approach?

@iRedds

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

In my opinion, two factories are needed
\CodeIgniter\HTTP\URI::createFromRequest(Request $request) and \CodeIgniter\HTTP\URI::createFromString(string $url)

To create a separate class that works directly with _SERVER and _GET, and even created before the request object, this is not correct in my opinion.

@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

How do you create Request object without URI object?

@iRedds

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

How do you create Request object without URI object?

Say hello to the framework architects for the URI class in the Request constructor.
For the same reason, in other classes, _SERVER is also directly accessed.

@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Say hello to the framework architects for the URI class in the Request constructor.
For the same reason, in other classes, _SERVER is also directly accessed.

Sorry, I don't get what you say at all.
Who are the framework architects?
What do you mean by say hello?

@iRedds

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The URI class depends on the Request class for incoming requests because the Request class must provide access to a copy of _SERVER.

Therefore, making the Request class dependent on the URI is a framework architecture error.

I don't know who designed these classes.
I meant that the question "How do you create Request object without URI object?" should be forwarded to those who designed.

@kenjis
kenjis marked this pull request as draft February 10, 2023 10:22
@kenjis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

The URI class depends on the Request class for incoming requests because the Request class must provide access to a copy of _SERVER.

Indeed.

I meant that the question "How do you create Request object without URI object?" should be forwarded to those who designed.

Who designed does not matter.
The only question is how do we redesign.

@iRedds

iRedds commented Feb 10, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Who designed does not matter. The only question is how do we redesign.

I don't know.
There are two abstract options.

  1. Qualitatively, but this is BC at the level of major versions.
publicfunction__constructor (protectedarray$query = [], protectedarray$request = [], protectedarray$server = []) {}
// and factorypublicstaticfunctioncreateFromGlobals(): Request {
$request = newstatic($_GET, $_REQUEST, $_SERVER);
return$request->withUri(Uri::createFromRequest($request));
}
  1. Remove the restriction on $uri = null in the IncomingRequest constructor. And when null, use a request-based factory.
    if (empty($uri) || empty($userAgent)) {
    thrownewInvalidArgumentException('You must supply the parameters: uri, userAgent.');
    }
if (empty($userAgent)) {
thrownewInvalidArgumentException('You must supply the parameters: uri, userAgent.');
}
$this->uri = $uri ?? URI::createFromRequest($this);

Or something similar.

@kenjiskenjis closed this Feb 14, 2023
This was referenced Feb 14, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancementPRs that improve existing functionalities

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@kenjis@iRedds