refactor: AuthToken/AuthJWT Config Loading by Initializing in Constructor

[datamweb]

Description
AuthToken and AuthJWT Config Loading by Initializing in Constructor

Checklist:

• Securely signed commits
• Component(s) with PHPDoc blocks, only if necessary or adds value
• Unit testing, with >80% coverage
• User guide updated
• Conforms to style guide

[paulbalandan]

Do you have a benchmark for this change?

[datamweb]

Do you have a benchmark for this change?

The presence of Optimize probably led to this question. It seems I made a mistake in choosing it, as my main goal in this configuration was to prevent the repeated use of config('AuthToken') and config('AuthJWT'), nothing more.

But now I’m curious—does this change actually impact performance or not? Your benchmark results could be really helpful! @paulbalandan If possible, please share them so we can analyze them together.

[paulbalandan]

Yes, the word Optimize in your PR title made me curious about the impact to performance since we will now be loading the configs everytime a class is instantiated. I just remembered one time when I did a similar change to the Seeder class instantiating Faker's Generator everytime in the constructor caused a massive slowdown.

[michalsn]

Are we actually calling an attempt method multiple times per request?

[datamweb]

Are we actually calling an attempt method multiple times per request?

I didn't quite understand your question, and I'm not sure how it relates to this PR. Could you please clarify?

[michalsn]

Sorry, your reason for this change was described as:

my main goal in this configuration was to prevent the repeated use of config('AuthToken') and config('AuthJWT')

So my question is. is this really the case? Are we actually calling these configs multiple times, or only once per request?

[datamweb]

is this really the case? Are we actually calling these configs multiple times, or only once per request?

In fact, the configuration is only called once per request. Therefore, it seems this change wouldn’t have a significant impact on performance. 100%

Which one do you find more suitable and why?"

First method:

<?phpdeclare(strict_types=1);
class MyClass
{
publicfunction__construct() {
$this->config = config('Xconfig');
}
publicfunctionY()
{
$this->config;
}
publicfunctionX()
{
$this->config;
}
}

Second method:

<?phpdeclare(strict_types=1);
class MyClass
{
publicfunction__construct() {}
publicfunctionY()
{
$config = config('Xconfig); } public function X() { $config = config('Xconfig);
}
}

[michalsn]

Ok, sorry - that was my mistake. I thought we call this config only in one method. But now I see we call it several times.