chore: bump transitive @xmldom/xmldom to resolve dependabot alert - #162

Merged
ThomasK33 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
security-xmldom-bump
Sep 3, 2026
Merged

chore: bump transitive @xmldom/xmldom to resolve dependabot alert#162
ThomasK33 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
security-xmldom-bump

Conversation

@ThomasK33

@ThomasK33ThomasK33 commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Lockfile-only bump of the transitive dependency @xmldom/xmldom from 0.8.14 → 0.8.15 to resolve Dependabot alert #11. Dependabot's own update job failed on pnpm, hence the manual fix.

Alert

Alert#11
AdvisoryGHSA-6gmq-8vp8-gcm6 / CVE-2026-83610
Severitymedium
Summaryxmldom: XML fragment injection via invalid EntityReference.nodeName during requireWellFormed serialization
Vulnerable range>= 0.7.0, <= 0.8.14
First patched0.8.15
Manifestpnpm-lock.yaml

Dependency chain

packages/release-please-ai (private, unpublished) → release-please@17.11.2 → @xmldom/xmldom (declared range ^0.8.4)

@xmldom/xmldom is not in the dependency graph of any published package (@coder/ai-sdk-agent, @coder/ai-sdk-provider, @coder/ai-sdk-sandbox); it is only reachable through the private release tooling.

What changed

Only pnpm-lock.yaml, via pnpm update -r @xmldom/xmldom (release-please's declared range ^0.8.4 already admits 0.8.15, so no overrides entry was needed and no package.json manifest was touched):

  • packages entry @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.14 → @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.15 (new integrity hash verified against npm view @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.15 dist.integrity; the deprecated: marker on 0.8.14 goes away)
  • snapshots entry @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.14 → @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.15
  • release-please@17.11.2 snapshot dependency '@xmldom/xmldom': 0.8.14 → 0.8.15

Nothing else in the lockfile changed (+4/−5 lines). No @xmldom/xmldom version <= 0.8.14 remains anywhere in the lockfile.

Validation

All via mise exec -- on the pushed head:

  • pnpm install --frozen-lockfile ✅
  • pnpm check (oxfmt + oxlint + typecheck) ✅
  • pnpm -r build ✅
  • pnpm -r test ✅ (provider 22, release-please-ai 13, agent 326, effect 45, sandbox 191 tests passed)
  • pnpm publint ✅
  • pnpm attw ✅

Live e2e intentionally skipped: this is a lockfile-only change to a transitive dependency of the private release tooling; no published package's runtime or the Coder transport code path is affected.

Generated with mux • Model: anthropic:claude-fable-5-1 • Thinking: xhigh

@ThomasK33
chore: bump transitive @xmldom/xmldom to resolve dependabot alert
5b07cf8
Lockfile-only bump of @xmldom/xmldom 0.8.14 -> 0.8.15 (transitive dep of
release-please@17.11.2 in the private release-please-ai package).
Resolves Dependabot alert #11 (GHSA-6gmq-8vp8-gcm6 / CVE-2026-83610,
medium, vulnerable >=0.7.0 <=0.8.14, first patched 0.8.15).
Change-Id: I715341073f469245f25f73bdf2163f95760012db
Signed-off-by: Thomas Kosiewski <tk@coder.com>
@ThomasK33

ThomasK33 commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@codex review

@ThomasK33

ThomasK33 commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@codex security review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connectorBot commented Sep 3, 2026•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

ReviewStatusCommitReview trigger
📝 Code Review✅ Completed2026-09-03T05:46:26.209121Z5b07cf8Manual request
🔒 Security Review✅ Completed2026-09-03T05:48:37.732312Z5b07cf8Manual request
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connectorBot commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 🎉

Reviewed commit:5b07cf8324

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connectorBot commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit:5b07cf8324

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

  • You comment "@codex security review"
  • A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.

@ThomasK33
ThomasK33 added this pull request to the merge queueSep 3, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 2fb4a18Sep 3, 2026
6 checks passed
@ThomasK33
ThomasK33 deleted the security-xmldom-bump branch September 3, 2026 05:52
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ThomasK33
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

Skip to content
chore: bump transitive @xmldom/xmldom to resolve dependabot alert - #162
Merged
ThomasK33 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
security-xmldom-bump
Sep 3, 2026
Merged
chore: bump transitive @xmldom/xmldom to resolve dependabot alert#162
ThomasK33 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
security-xmldom-bump
Conversation
@ThomasK33
@ThomasK33ThomasK33
commented
Sep 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Lockfile-only bump of the transitive dependency @xmldom/xmldom from 0.8.14 → 0.8.15 to resolve Dependabot alert #11. Dependabot's own update job failed on pnpm, hence the manual fix.
Alert
Alert#11
AdvisoryGHSA-6gmq-8vp8-gcm6 / CVE-2026-83610
Severitymedium
Summaryxmldom: XML fragment injection via invalid EntityReference.nodeName during requireWellFormed serialization
Vulnerable range>= 0.7.0, <= 0.8.14
First patched0.8.15
Manifestpnpm-lock.yaml
Dependency chain
packages/release-please-ai (private, unpublished) → release-please@17.11.2 → @xmldom/xmldom (declared range ^0.8.4)
@xmldom/xmldom is not in the dependency graph of any published package (@coder/ai-sdk-agent, @coder/ai-sdk-provider, @coder/ai-sdk-sandbox); it is only reachable through the private release tooling.
What changed
Only pnpm-lock.yaml, via pnpm update -r @xmldom/xmldom (release-please's declared range ^0.8.4 already admits 0.8.15, so no overrides entry was needed and no package.json manifest was touched):
  • packages entry @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.14 → @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.15 (new integrity hash verified against npm view @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.15 dist.integrity; the deprecated: marker on 0.8.14 goes away)
  • snapshots entry @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.14 → @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.15
  • release-please@17.11.2 snapshot dependency '@xmldom/xmldom': 0.8.14 → 0.8.15
Nothing else in the lockfile changed (+4/−5 lines). No @xmldom/xmldom version <= 0.8.14 remains anywhere in the lockfile.
Validation
All via mise exec -- on the pushed head:
  • pnpm install --frozen-lockfile ✅
  • pnpm check (oxfmt + oxlint + typecheck) ✅
  • pnpm -r build ✅
  • pnpm -r test ✅ (provider 22, release-please-ai 13, agent 326, effect 45, sandbox 191 tests passed)
  • pnpm publint ✅
  • pnpm attw ✅
Live e2e intentionally skipped: this is a lockfile-only change to a transitive dependency of the private release tooling; no published package's runtime or the Coder transport code path is affected.
Generated with mux • Model: anthropic:claude-fable-5-1 • Thinking: xhigh
@ThomasK33
chore: bump transitive @xmldom/xmldom to resolve dependabot alert
5b07cf8
Lockfile-only bump of @xmldom/xmldom 0.8.14 -> 0.8.15 (transitive dep of
release-please@17.11.2 in the private release-please-ai package).
Resolves Dependabot alert #11 (GHSA-6gmq-8vp8-gcm6 / CVE-2026-83610,
medium, vulnerable >=0.7.0 <=0.8.14, first patched 0.8.15).
Change-Id: I715341073f469245f25f73bdf2163f95760012db
Signed-off-by: Thomas Kosiewski <tk@coder.com>
@ThomasK33
ThomasK33
commented
Sep 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
@codex review
@ThomasK33
ThomasK33
commented
Sep 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
@codex security review
@chatgpt-codex-connector
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
commented
Sep 3, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary
This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ReviewStatusCommitReview trigger
📝 Code Review✅ Completed2026-09-03T05:46:26.209121Z5b07cf8Manual request
🔒 Security Review✅ Completed2026-09-03T05:48:37.732312Z5b07cf8Manual request
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.
@chatgpt-codex-connector
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
commented
Sep 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 🎉
Reviewed commit:5b07cf8324
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
@chatgpt-codex-connector
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
commented
Sep 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.
Reviewed commit:5b07cf8324
View security finding report
Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.
ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub
This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:
  • You comment "@codex security review"
  • A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review
Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.
@ThomasK33
ThomasK33
added this pull request to the merge queueSep 3, 2026

Merged
via the queue into
main
with commit 2fb4a18Sep 3, 2026

6 checks passed

@ThomasK33
ThomasK33
deleted the

security-xmldom-bump

branch
September 3, 2026 05:52
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ThomasK33

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
chore: bump transitive @xmldom/xmldom to resolve dependabot alert - #162
Merged
ThomasK33 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
security-xmldom-bump
Sep 3, 2026
Merged
chore: bump transitive @xmldom/xmldom to resolve dependabot alert#162
ThomasK33 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
security-xmldom-bump
Conversation
@ThomasK33
@ThomasK33ThomasK33
commented
Sep 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Lockfile-only bump of the transitive dependency @xmldom/xmldom from 0.8.14 → 0.8.15 to resolve Dependabot alert #11. Dependabot's own update job failed on pnpm, hence the manual fix.
Alert
Alert#11
AdvisoryGHSA-6gmq-8vp8-gcm6 / CVE-2026-83610
Severitymedium
Summaryxmldom: XML fragment injection via invalid EntityReference.nodeName during requireWellFormed serialization
Vulnerable range>= 0.7.0, <= 0.8.14
First patched0.8.15
Manifestpnpm-lock.yaml
Dependency chain
packages/release-please-ai (private, unpublished) → release-please@17.11.2 → @xmldom/xmldom (declared range ^0.8.4)
@xmldom/xmldom is not in the dependency graph of any published package (@coder/ai-sdk-agent, @coder/ai-sdk-provider, @coder/ai-sdk-sandbox); it is only reachable through the private release tooling.
What changed
Only pnpm-lock.yaml, via pnpm update -r @xmldom/xmldom (release-please's declared range ^0.8.4 already admits 0.8.15, so no overrides entry was needed and no package.json manifest was touched):
  • packages entry @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.14 → @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.15 (new integrity hash verified against npm view @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.15 dist.integrity; the deprecated: marker on 0.8.14 goes away)
  • snapshots entry @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.14 → @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.15
  • release-please@17.11.2 snapshot dependency '@xmldom/xmldom': 0.8.14 → 0.8.15
Nothing else in the lockfile changed (+4/−5 lines). No @xmldom/xmldom version <= 0.8.14 remains anywhere in the lockfile.
Validation
All via mise exec -- on the pushed head:
  • pnpm install --frozen-lockfile ✅
  • pnpm check (oxfmt + oxlint + typecheck) ✅
  • pnpm -r build ✅
  • pnpm -r test ✅ (provider 22, release-please-ai 13, agent 326, effect 45, sandbox 191 tests passed)
  • pnpm publint ✅
  • pnpm attw ✅
Live e2e intentionally skipped: this is a lockfile-only change to a transitive dependency of the private release tooling; no published package's runtime or the Coder transport code path is affected.
Generated with mux • Model: anthropic:claude-fable-5-1 • Thinking: xhigh
@ThomasK33
chore: bump transitive @xmldom/xmldom to resolve dependabot alert
5b07cf8
Lockfile-only bump of @xmldom/xmldom 0.8.14 -> 0.8.15 (transitive dep of
release-please@17.11.2 in the private release-please-ai package).
Resolves Dependabot alert #11 (GHSA-6gmq-8vp8-gcm6 / CVE-2026-83610,
medium, vulnerable >=0.7.0 <=0.8.14, first patched 0.8.15).
Change-Id: I715341073f469245f25f73bdf2163f95760012db
Signed-off-by: Thomas Kosiewski <tk@coder.com>
@ThomasK33
ThomasK33
commented
Sep 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
@codex review
@ThomasK33
ThomasK33
commented
Sep 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
@codex security review
@chatgpt-codex-connector
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
commented
Sep 3, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary
This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ReviewStatusCommitReview trigger
📝 Code Review✅ Completed2026-09-03T05:46:26.209121Z5b07cf8Manual request
🔒 Security Review✅ Completed2026-09-03T05:48:37.732312Z5b07cf8Manual request
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.
@chatgpt-codex-connector
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
commented
Sep 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 🎉
Reviewed commit:5b07cf8324
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
@chatgpt-codex-connector
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
commented
Sep 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.
Reviewed commit:5b07cf8324
View security finding report
Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.
ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub
This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:
  • You comment "@codex security review"
  • A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review
Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.
@ThomasK33
ThomasK33
added this pull request to the merge queueSep 3, 2026

Merged
via the queue into
main
with commit 2fb4a18Sep 3, 2026

6 checks passed

@ThomasK33
ThomasK33
deleted the

security-xmldom-bump

branch
September 3, 2026 05:52
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ThomasK33

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
chore: bump transitive @xmldom/xmldom to resolve dependabot alert - #162
Merged
ThomasK33 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
security-xmldom-bump
Sep 3, 2026
Merged
chore: bump transitive @xmldom/xmldom to resolve dependabot alert#162
ThomasK33 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
security-xmldom-bump
Conversation
@ThomasK33
@ThomasK33ThomasK33
commented
Sep 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Lockfile-only bump of the transitive dependency @xmldom/xmldom from 0.8.14 → 0.8.15 to resolve Dependabot alert #11. Dependabot's own update job failed on pnpm, hence the manual fix.
Alert
Alert#11
AdvisoryGHSA-6gmq-8vp8-gcm6 / CVE-2026-83610
Severitymedium
Summaryxmldom: XML fragment injection via invalid EntityReference.nodeName during requireWellFormed serialization
Vulnerable range>= 0.7.0, <= 0.8.14
First patched0.8.15
Manifestpnpm-lock.yaml
Dependency chain
packages/release-please-ai (private, unpublished) → release-please@17.11.2 → @xmldom/xmldom (declared range ^0.8.4)
@xmldom/xmldom is not in the dependency graph of any published package (@coder/ai-sdk-agent, @coder/ai-sdk-provider, @coder/ai-sdk-sandbox); it is only reachable through the private release tooling.
What changed
Only pnpm-lock.yaml, via pnpm update -r @xmldom/xmldom (release-please's declared range ^0.8.4 already admits 0.8.15, so no overrides entry was needed and no package.json manifest was touched):
  • packages entry @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.14 → @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.15 (new integrity hash verified against npm view @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.15 dist.integrity; the deprecated: marker on 0.8.14 goes away)
  • snapshots entry @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.14 → @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.15
  • release-please@17.11.2 snapshot dependency '@xmldom/xmldom': 0.8.14 → 0.8.15
Nothing else in the lockfile changed (+4/−5 lines). No @xmldom/xmldom version <= 0.8.14 remains anywhere in the lockfile.
Validation
All via mise exec -- on the pushed head:
  • pnpm install --frozen-lockfile ✅
  • pnpm check (oxfmt + oxlint + typecheck) ✅
  • pnpm -r build ✅
  • pnpm -r test ✅ (provider 22, release-please-ai 13, agent 326, effect 45, sandbox 191 tests passed)
  • pnpm publint ✅
  • pnpm attw ✅
Live e2e intentionally skipped: this is a lockfile-only change to a transitive dependency of the private release tooling; no published package's runtime or the Coder transport code path is affected.
Generated with mux • Model: anthropic:claude-fable-5-1 • Thinking: xhigh
@ThomasK33
chore: bump transitive @xmldom/xmldom to resolve dependabot alert
5b07cf8
Lockfile-only bump of @xmldom/xmldom 0.8.14 -> 0.8.15 (transitive dep of
release-please@17.11.2 in the private release-please-ai package).
Resolves Dependabot alert #11 (GHSA-6gmq-8vp8-gcm6 / CVE-2026-83610,
medium, vulnerable >=0.7.0 <=0.8.14, first patched 0.8.15).
Change-Id: I715341073f469245f25f73bdf2163f95760012db
Signed-off-by: Thomas Kosiewski <tk@coder.com>
@ThomasK33
ThomasK33
commented
Sep 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
@codex review
@ThomasK33
ThomasK33
commented
Sep 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
@codex security review
@chatgpt-codex-connector
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
commented
Sep 3, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary
This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ReviewStatusCommitReview trigger
📝 Code Review✅ Completed2026-09-03T05:46:26.209121Z5b07cf8Manual request
🔒 Security Review✅ Completed2026-09-03T05:48:37.732312Z5b07cf8Manual request
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.
@chatgpt-codex-connector
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
commented
Sep 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 🎉
Reviewed commit:5b07cf8324
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
@chatgpt-codex-connector
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
commented
Sep 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.
Reviewed commit:5b07cf8324
View security finding report
Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.
ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub
This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:
  • You comment "@codex security review"
  • A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review
Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.
@ThomasK33
ThomasK33
added this pull request to the merge queueSep 3, 2026

Merged
via the queue into
main
with commit 2fb4a18Sep 3, 2026

6 checks passed

@ThomasK33
ThomasK33
deleted the

security-xmldom-bump

branch
September 3, 2026 05:52
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ThomasK33

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

Skip to content
chore: bump transitive @xmldom/xmldom to resolve dependabot alert - #162
Merged
ThomasK33 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
security-xmldom-bump
Sep 3, 2026
Merged
chore: bump transitive @xmldom/xmldom to resolve dependabot alert#162
ThomasK33 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
security-xmldom-bump
Conversation
@ThomasK33
@ThomasK33ThomasK33
commented
Sep 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Lockfile-only bump of the transitive dependency @xmldom/xmldom from 0.8.14 → 0.8.15 to resolve Dependabot alert #11. Dependabot's own update job failed on pnpm, hence the manual fix.
Alert
Alert#11
AdvisoryGHSA-6gmq-8vp8-gcm6 / CVE-2026-83610
Severitymedium
Summaryxmldom: XML fragment injection via invalid EntityReference.nodeName during requireWellFormed serialization
Vulnerable range>= 0.7.0, <= 0.8.14
First patched0.8.15
Manifestpnpm-lock.yaml
Dependency chain
packages/release-please-ai (private, unpublished) → release-please@17.11.2 → @xmldom/xmldom (declared range ^0.8.4)
@xmldom/xmldom is not in the dependency graph of any published package (@coder/ai-sdk-agent, @coder/ai-sdk-provider, @coder/ai-sdk-sandbox); it is only reachable through the private release tooling.
What changed
Only pnpm-lock.yaml, via pnpm update -r @xmldom/xmldom (release-please's declared range ^0.8.4 already admits 0.8.15, so no overrides entry was needed and no package.json manifest was touched):
  • packages entry @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.14 → @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.15 (new integrity hash verified against npm view @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.15 dist.integrity; the deprecated: marker on 0.8.14 goes away)
  • snapshots entry @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.14 → @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.15
  • release-please@17.11.2 snapshot dependency '@xmldom/xmldom': 0.8.14 → 0.8.15
Nothing else in the lockfile changed (+4/−5 lines). No @xmldom/xmldom version <= 0.8.14 remains anywhere in the lockfile.
Validation
All via mise exec -- on the pushed head:
  • pnpm install --frozen-lockfile ✅
  • pnpm check (oxfmt + oxlint + typecheck) ✅
  • pnpm -r build ✅
  • pnpm -r test ✅ (provider 22, release-please-ai 13, agent 326, effect 45, sandbox 191 tests passed)
  • pnpm publint ✅
  • pnpm attw ✅
Live e2e intentionally skipped: this is a lockfile-only change to a transitive dependency of the private release tooling; no published package's runtime or the Coder transport code path is affected.
Generated with mux • Model: anthropic:claude-fable-5-1 • Thinking: xhigh
@ThomasK33
chore: bump transitive @xmldom/xmldom to resolve dependabot alert
5b07cf8
Lockfile-only bump of @xmldom/xmldom 0.8.14 -> 0.8.15 (transitive dep of
release-please@17.11.2 in the private release-please-ai package).
Resolves Dependabot alert #11 (GHSA-6gmq-8vp8-gcm6 / CVE-2026-83610,
medium, vulnerable >=0.7.0 <=0.8.14, first patched 0.8.15).
Change-Id: I715341073f469245f25f73bdf2163f95760012db
Signed-off-by: Thomas Kosiewski <tk@coder.com>
@ThomasK33
ThomasK33
commented
Sep 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
@codex review
@ThomasK33
ThomasK33
commented
Sep 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
@codex security review
@chatgpt-codex-connector
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
commented
Sep 3, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary
This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ReviewStatusCommitReview trigger
📝 Code Review✅ Completed2026-09-03T05:46:26.209121Z5b07cf8Manual request
🔒 Security Review✅ Completed2026-09-03T05:48:37.732312Z5b07cf8Manual request
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.
@chatgpt-codex-connector
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
commented
Sep 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 🎉
Reviewed commit:5b07cf8324
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
@chatgpt-codex-connector
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
commented
Sep 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.
Reviewed commit:5b07cf8324
View security finding report
Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.
ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub
This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:
  • You comment "@codex security review"
  • A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review
Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.
@ThomasK33
ThomasK33
added this pull request to the merge queueSep 3, 2026

Merged
via the queue into
main
with commit 2fb4a18Sep 3, 2026

6 checks passed

@ThomasK33
ThomasK33
deleted the

security-xmldom-bump

branch
September 3, 2026 05:52
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ThomasK33

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
chore: bump transitive @xmldom/xmldom to resolve dependabot alert - #162
Merged
ThomasK33 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
security-xmldom-bump
Sep 3, 2026
Merged
chore: bump transitive @xmldom/xmldom to resolve dependabot alert#162
ThomasK33 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
security-xmldom-bump
Conversation
@ThomasK33
@ThomasK33ThomasK33
commented
Sep 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Lockfile-only bump of the transitive dependency @xmldom/xmldom from 0.8.14 → 0.8.15 to resolve Dependabot alert #11. Dependabot's own update job failed on pnpm, hence the manual fix.
Alert
Alert#11
AdvisoryGHSA-6gmq-8vp8-gcm6 / CVE-2026-83610
Severitymedium
Summaryxmldom: XML fragment injection via invalid EntityReference.nodeName during requireWellFormed serialization
Vulnerable range>= 0.7.0, <= 0.8.14
First patched0.8.15
Manifestpnpm-lock.yaml
Dependency chain
packages/release-please-ai (private, unpublished) → release-please@17.11.2 → @xmldom/xmldom (declared range ^0.8.4)
@xmldom/xmldom is not in the dependency graph of any published package (@coder/ai-sdk-agent, @coder/ai-sdk-provider, @coder/ai-sdk-sandbox); it is only reachable through the private release tooling.
What changed
Only pnpm-lock.yaml, via pnpm update -r @xmldom/xmldom (release-please's declared range ^0.8.4 already admits 0.8.15, so no overrides entry was needed and no package.json manifest was touched):
  • packages entry @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.14 → @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.15 (new integrity hash verified against npm view @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.15 dist.integrity; the deprecated: marker on 0.8.14 goes away)
  • snapshots entry @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.14 → @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.15
  • release-please@17.11.2 snapshot dependency '@xmldom/xmldom': 0.8.14 → 0.8.15
Nothing else in the lockfile changed (+4/−5 lines). No @xmldom/xmldom version <= 0.8.14 remains anywhere in the lockfile.
Validation
All via mise exec -- on the pushed head:
  • pnpm install --frozen-lockfile ✅
  • pnpm check (oxfmt + oxlint + typecheck) ✅
  • pnpm -r build ✅
  • pnpm -r test ✅ (provider 22, release-please-ai 13, agent 326, effect 45, sandbox 191 tests passed)
  • pnpm publint ✅
  • pnpm attw ✅
Live e2e intentionally skipped: this is a lockfile-only change to a transitive dependency of the private release tooling; no published package's runtime or the Coder transport code path is affected.
Generated with mux • Model: anthropic:claude-fable-5-1 • Thinking: xhigh
@ThomasK33
chore: bump transitive @xmldom/xmldom to resolve dependabot alert
5b07cf8
Lockfile-only bump of @xmldom/xmldom 0.8.14 -> 0.8.15 (transitive dep of
release-please@17.11.2 in the private release-please-ai package).
Resolves Dependabot alert #11 (GHSA-6gmq-8vp8-gcm6 / CVE-2026-83610,
medium, vulnerable >=0.7.0 <=0.8.14, first patched 0.8.15).
Change-Id: I715341073f469245f25f73bdf2163f95760012db
Signed-off-by: Thomas Kosiewski <tk@coder.com>
@ThomasK33
ThomasK33
commented
Sep 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
@codex review
@ThomasK33
ThomasK33
commented
Sep 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
@codex security review
@chatgpt-codex-connector
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
commented
Sep 3, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary
This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ReviewStatusCommitReview trigger
📝 Code Review✅ Completed2026-09-03T05:46:26.209121Z5b07cf8Manual request
🔒 Security Review✅ Completed2026-09-03T05:48:37.732312Z5b07cf8Manual request
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.
@chatgpt-codex-connector
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
commented
Sep 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 🎉
Reviewed commit:5b07cf8324
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
@chatgpt-codex-connector
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
commented
Sep 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.
Reviewed commit:5b07cf8324
View security finding report
Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.
ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub
This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:
  • You comment "@codex security review"
  • A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review
Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.
@ThomasK33
ThomasK33
added this pull request to the merge queueSep 3, 2026

Merged
via the queue into
main
with commit 2fb4a18Sep 3, 2026

6 checks passed

@ThomasK33
ThomasK33
deleted the

security-xmldom-bump

branch
September 3, 2026 05:52
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ThomasK33

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
chore: bump transitive @xmldom/xmldom to resolve dependabot alert - #162
Merged
ThomasK33 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
security-xmldom-bump
Sep 3, 2026
Merged
chore: bump transitive @xmldom/xmldom to resolve dependabot alert#162
ThomasK33 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
security-xmldom-bump
Conversation
@ThomasK33
@ThomasK33ThomasK33
commented
Sep 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Lockfile-only bump of the transitive dependency @xmldom/xmldom from 0.8.14 → 0.8.15 to resolve Dependabot alert #11. Dependabot's own update job failed on pnpm, hence the manual fix.
Alert
Alert#11
AdvisoryGHSA-6gmq-8vp8-gcm6 / CVE-2026-83610
Severitymedium
Summaryxmldom: XML fragment injection via invalid EntityReference.nodeName during requireWellFormed serialization
Vulnerable range>= 0.7.0, <= 0.8.14
First patched0.8.15
Manifestpnpm-lock.yaml
Dependency chain
packages/release-please-ai (private, unpublished) → release-please@17.11.2 → @xmldom/xmldom (declared range ^0.8.4)
@xmldom/xmldom is not in the dependency graph of any published package (@coder/ai-sdk-agent, @coder/ai-sdk-provider, @coder/ai-sdk-sandbox); it is only reachable through the private release tooling.
What changed
Only pnpm-lock.yaml, via pnpm update -r @xmldom/xmldom (release-please's declared range ^0.8.4 already admits 0.8.15, so no overrides entry was needed and no package.json manifest was touched):
  • packages entry @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.14 → @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.15 (new integrity hash verified against npm view @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.15 dist.integrity; the deprecated: marker on 0.8.14 goes away)
  • snapshots entry @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.14 → @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.15
  • release-please@17.11.2 snapshot dependency '@xmldom/xmldom': 0.8.14 → 0.8.15
Nothing else in the lockfile changed (+4/−5 lines). No @xmldom/xmldom version <= 0.8.14 remains anywhere in the lockfile.
Validation
All via mise exec -- on the pushed head:
  • pnpm install --frozen-lockfile ✅
  • pnpm check (oxfmt + oxlint + typecheck) ✅
  • pnpm -r build ✅
  • pnpm -r test ✅ (provider 22, release-please-ai 13, agent 326, effect 45, sandbox 191 tests passed)
  • pnpm publint ✅
  • pnpm attw ✅
Live e2e intentionally skipped: this is a lockfile-only change to a transitive dependency of the private release tooling; no published package's runtime or the Coder transport code path is affected.
Generated with mux • Model: anthropic:claude-fable-5-1 • Thinking: xhigh
@ThomasK33
chore: bump transitive @xmldom/xmldom to resolve dependabot alert
5b07cf8
Lockfile-only bump of @xmldom/xmldom 0.8.14 -> 0.8.15 (transitive dep of
release-please@17.11.2 in the private release-please-ai package).
Resolves Dependabot alert #11 (GHSA-6gmq-8vp8-gcm6 / CVE-2026-83610,
medium, vulnerable >=0.7.0 <=0.8.14, first patched 0.8.15).
Change-Id: I715341073f469245f25f73bdf2163f95760012db
Signed-off-by: Thomas Kosiewski <tk@coder.com>
@ThomasK33
ThomasK33
commented
Sep 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
@codex review
@ThomasK33
ThomasK33
commented
Sep 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
@codex security review
@chatgpt-codex-connector
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
commented
Sep 3, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary
This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ReviewStatusCommitReview trigger
📝 Code Review✅ Completed2026-09-03T05:46:26.209121Z5b07cf8Manual request
🔒 Security Review✅ Completed2026-09-03T05:48:37.732312Z5b07cf8Manual request
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.
@chatgpt-codex-connector
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
commented
Sep 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 🎉
Reviewed commit:5b07cf8324
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
@chatgpt-codex-connector
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
commented
Sep 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.
Reviewed commit:5b07cf8324
View security finding report
Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.
ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub
This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:
  • You comment "@codex security review"
  • A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review
Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.
@ThomasK33
ThomasK33
added this pull request to the merge queueSep 3, 2026

Merged
via the queue into
main
with commit 2fb4a18Sep 3, 2026

6 checks passed

@ThomasK33
ThomasK33
deleted the

security-xmldom-bump

branch
September 3, 2026 05:52
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ThomasK33

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

Skip to content
chore: bump transitive @xmldom/xmldom to resolve dependabot alert - #162
Merged
ThomasK33 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
security-xmldom-bump
Sep 3, 2026
Merged
chore: bump transitive @xmldom/xmldom to resolve dependabot alert#162
ThomasK33 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
security-xmldom-bump
Conversation
@ThomasK33
@ThomasK33ThomasK33
commented
Sep 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Lockfile-only bump of the transitive dependency @xmldom/xmldom from 0.8.14 → 0.8.15 to resolve Dependabot alert #11. Dependabot's own update job failed on pnpm, hence the manual fix.
Alert
Alert#11
AdvisoryGHSA-6gmq-8vp8-gcm6 / CVE-2026-83610
Severitymedium
Summaryxmldom: XML fragment injection via invalid EntityReference.nodeName during requireWellFormed serialization
Vulnerable range>= 0.7.0, <= 0.8.14
First patched0.8.15
Manifestpnpm-lock.yaml
Dependency chain
packages/release-please-ai (private, unpublished) → release-please@17.11.2 → @xmldom/xmldom (declared range ^0.8.4)
@xmldom/xmldom is not in the dependency graph of any published package (@coder/ai-sdk-agent, @coder/ai-sdk-provider, @coder/ai-sdk-sandbox); it is only reachable through the private release tooling.
What changed
Only pnpm-lock.yaml, via pnpm update -r @xmldom/xmldom (release-please's declared range ^0.8.4 already admits 0.8.15, so no overrides entry was needed and no package.json manifest was touched):
  • packages entry @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.14 → @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.15 (new integrity hash verified against npm view @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.15 dist.integrity; the deprecated: marker on 0.8.14 goes away)
  • snapshots entry @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.14 → @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.15
  • release-please@17.11.2 snapshot dependency '@xmldom/xmldom': 0.8.14 → 0.8.15
Nothing else in the lockfile changed (+4/−5 lines). No @xmldom/xmldom version <= 0.8.14 remains anywhere in the lockfile.
Validation
All via mise exec -- on the pushed head:
  • pnpm install --frozen-lockfile ✅
  • pnpm check (oxfmt + oxlint + typecheck) ✅
  • pnpm -r build ✅
  • pnpm -r test ✅ (provider 22, release-please-ai 13, agent 326, effect 45, sandbox 191 tests passed)
  • pnpm publint ✅
  • pnpm attw ✅
Live e2e intentionally skipped: this is a lockfile-only change to a transitive dependency of the private release tooling; no published package's runtime or the Coder transport code path is affected.
Generated with mux • Model: anthropic:claude-fable-5-1 • Thinking: xhigh
@ThomasK33
chore: bump transitive @xmldom/xmldom to resolve dependabot alert
5b07cf8
Lockfile-only bump of @xmldom/xmldom 0.8.14 -> 0.8.15 (transitive dep of
release-please@17.11.2 in the private release-please-ai package).
Resolves Dependabot alert #11 (GHSA-6gmq-8vp8-gcm6 / CVE-2026-83610,
medium, vulnerable >=0.7.0 <=0.8.14, first patched 0.8.15).
Change-Id: I715341073f469245f25f73bdf2163f95760012db
Signed-off-by: Thomas Kosiewski <tk@coder.com>
@ThomasK33
ThomasK33
commented
Sep 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
@codex review
@ThomasK33
ThomasK33
commented
Sep 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
@codex security review
@chatgpt-codex-connector
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
commented
Sep 3, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary
This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ReviewStatusCommitReview trigger
📝 Code Review✅ Completed2026-09-03T05:46:26.209121Z5b07cf8Manual request
🔒 Security Review✅ Completed2026-09-03T05:48:37.732312Z5b07cf8Manual request
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.
@chatgpt-codex-connector
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
commented
Sep 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 🎉
Reviewed commit:5b07cf8324
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
@chatgpt-codex-connector
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
commented
Sep 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.
Reviewed commit:5b07cf8324
View security finding report
Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.
ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub
This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:
  • You comment "@codex security review"
  • A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review
Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.
@ThomasK33
ThomasK33
added this pull request to the merge queueSep 3, 2026

Merged
via the queue into
main
with commit 2fb4a18Sep 3, 2026

6 checks passed

@ThomasK33
ThomasK33
deleted the

security-xmldom-bump

branch
September 3, 2026 05:52
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ThomasK33