test: verify TLS management - #204

Open
mtojek wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
test/tls-coverage-issue-52
Open

test: verify TLS management#204
mtojek wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
test/tls-coverage-issue-52

Conversation

@mtojek

@mtojekmtojek commented May 26, 2026•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fixes: #52.

Adds real coverage for the TLS certificate manager and replaces the stub tls package test.

This exercises CA creation and reuse, expired CA regeneration, on-demand server certificate generation, cache reuse, and concurrent access.

Coder Agents generated

This PR was generated with Coder Agents.

@mtojekmtojek changed the title test(tls): add issue 52 coveragetest: cover TLS managementMay 26, 2026
@mtojekmtojek changed the title test: cover TLS managementtest: verify TLS managementMay 26, 2026
mtojek added 3 commits May 26, 2026 12:03
@mtojek
chore: trigger CI for draft PR
0af849a
@mtojek
test(tls): expand coverage with error paths, permissions, and edge cases
bd40faa
Add tests for:
- loadExistingCA error paths: corrupted key PEM, corrupted cert PEM,
missing cert file with existing key
- CA file permissions: key 0600, cert 0644
- Nested config directory creation via MkdirAll
- CA certificate properties: key usage, ext key usage,
BasicConstraintsValid, Organization
- Server cert IPv6 SAN
- Server cert hostname produces no IP SAN
- Server cert 24h validity period and key usage
- Concurrent getCertificate with different hostnames
- getCACertPEM round-trip serialization
Generated by Coder Agents on behalf of mtojek.
@mtojek
ci: retrigger CodeQL analysis
680e2d4
@mtojek
mtojek requested a review from SasSwartMay 26, 2026 13:41
@mtojek
mtojek marked this pull request as ready for review May 26, 2026 13:41
@SasSwart

SasSwart commented May 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review request acknowledged

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@SasSwartSasSwartAwaiting requested review from SasSwart

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Test tls package

2 participants

@mtojek@SasSwart
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

Skip to content
test: verify TLS management - #204
Open
mtojek wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom 
test/tls-coverage-issue-52
Open
test: verify TLS management#204
mtojek wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom 
test/tls-coverage-issue-52
Conversation
@mtojek
@mtojekmtojek
commented
May 26, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Fixes: #52.
Adds real coverage for the TLS certificate manager and replaces the stub tls package test.
This exercises CA creation and reuse, expired CA regeneration, on-demand server certificate generation, cache reuse, and concurrent access.
Coder Agents generated
This PR was generated with Coder Agents.
@mtojekmtojek
changed the title
test(tls): add issue 52 coveragetest: cover TLS managementMay 26, 2026
@mtojekmtojek
changed the title
test: cover TLS managementtest: verify TLS managementMay 26, 2026
mtojek
added 3 commits
May 26, 2026 12:03
@mtojek
chore: trigger CI for draft PR
0af849a
@mtojek
test(tls): expand coverage with error paths, permissions, and edge cases
bd40faa
Add tests for:
- loadExistingCA error paths: corrupted key PEM, corrupted cert PEM,
missing cert file with existing key
- CA file permissions: key 0600, cert 0644
- Nested config directory creation via MkdirAll
- CA certificate properties: key usage, ext key usage,
BasicConstraintsValid, Organization
- Server cert IPv6 SAN
- Server cert hostname produces no IP SAN
- Server cert 24h validity period and key usage
- Concurrent getCertificate with different hostnames
- getCACertPEM round-trip serialization
Generated by Coder Agents on behalf of mtojek.
@mtojek
ci: retrigger CodeQL analysis
680e2d4
@mtojek
mtojek
requested a review
from SasSwartMay 26, 2026 13:41
@mtojek
mtojek
marked this pull request as ready for review
May 26, 2026 13:41
@SasSwart
SasSwart
commented
May 27, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Review request acknowledged
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@SasSwartSasSwartAwaiting requested review from SasSwart

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Test tls package


2 participants

@mtojek@SasSwart

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
test: verify TLS management - #204
Open
mtojek wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom 
test/tls-coverage-issue-52
Open
test: verify TLS management#204
mtojek wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom 
test/tls-coverage-issue-52
Conversation
@mtojek
@mtojekmtojek
commented
May 26, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Fixes: #52.
Adds real coverage for the TLS certificate manager and replaces the stub tls package test.
This exercises CA creation and reuse, expired CA regeneration, on-demand server certificate generation, cache reuse, and concurrent access.
Coder Agents generated
This PR was generated with Coder Agents.
@mtojekmtojek
changed the title
test(tls): add issue 52 coveragetest: cover TLS managementMay 26, 2026
@mtojekmtojek
changed the title
test: cover TLS managementtest: verify TLS managementMay 26, 2026
mtojek
added 3 commits
May 26, 2026 12:03
@mtojek
chore: trigger CI for draft PR
0af849a
@mtojek
test(tls): expand coverage with error paths, permissions, and edge cases
bd40faa
Add tests for:
- loadExistingCA error paths: corrupted key PEM, corrupted cert PEM,
missing cert file with existing key
- CA file permissions: key 0600, cert 0644
- Nested config directory creation via MkdirAll
- CA certificate properties: key usage, ext key usage,
BasicConstraintsValid, Organization
- Server cert IPv6 SAN
- Server cert hostname produces no IP SAN
- Server cert 24h validity period and key usage
- Concurrent getCertificate with different hostnames
- getCACertPEM round-trip serialization
Generated by Coder Agents on behalf of mtojek.
@mtojek
ci: retrigger CodeQL analysis
680e2d4
@mtojek
mtojek
requested a review
from SasSwartMay 26, 2026 13:41
@mtojek
mtojek
marked this pull request as ready for review
May 26, 2026 13:41
@SasSwart
SasSwart
commented
May 27, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Review request acknowledged
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@SasSwartSasSwartAwaiting requested review from SasSwart

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Test tls package


2 participants

@mtojek@SasSwart

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
test: verify TLS management - #204
Open
mtojek wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom 
test/tls-coverage-issue-52
Open
test: verify TLS management#204
mtojek wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom 
test/tls-coverage-issue-52
Conversation
@mtojek
@mtojekmtojek
commented
May 26, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Fixes: #52.
Adds real coverage for the TLS certificate manager and replaces the stub tls package test.
This exercises CA creation and reuse, expired CA regeneration, on-demand server certificate generation, cache reuse, and concurrent access.
Coder Agents generated
This PR was generated with Coder Agents.
@mtojekmtojek
changed the title
test(tls): add issue 52 coveragetest: cover TLS managementMay 26, 2026
@mtojekmtojek
changed the title
test: cover TLS managementtest: verify TLS managementMay 26, 2026
mtojek
added 3 commits
May 26, 2026 12:03
@mtojek
chore: trigger CI for draft PR
0af849a
@mtojek
test(tls): expand coverage with error paths, permissions, and edge cases
bd40faa
Add tests for:
- loadExistingCA error paths: corrupted key PEM, corrupted cert PEM,
missing cert file with existing key
- CA file permissions: key 0600, cert 0644
- Nested config directory creation via MkdirAll
- CA certificate properties: key usage, ext key usage,
BasicConstraintsValid, Organization
- Server cert IPv6 SAN
- Server cert hostname produces no IP SAN
- Server cert 24h validity period and key usage
- Concurrent getCertificate with different hostnames
- getCACertPEM round-trip serialization
Generated by Coder Agents on behalf of mtojek.
@mtojek
ci: retrigger CodeQL analysis
680e2d4
@mtojek
mtojek
requested a review
from SasSwartMay 26, 2026 13:41
@mtojek
mtojek
marked this pull request as ready for review
May 26, 2026 13:41
@SasSwart
SasSwart
commented
May 27, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Review request acknowledged
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@SasSwartSasSwartAwaiting requested review from SasSwart

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Test tls package


2 participants

@mtojek@SasSwart

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

Skip to content
test: verify TLS management - #204
Open
mtojek wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom 
test/tls-coverage-issue-52
Open
test: verify TLS management#204
mtojek wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom 
test/tls-coverage-issue-52
Conversation
@mtojek
@mtojekmtojek
commented
May 26, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Fixes: #52.
Adds real coverage for the TLS certificate manager and replaces the stub tls package test.
This exercises CA creation and reuse, expired CA regeneration, on-demand server certificate generation, cache reuse, and concurrent access.
Coder Agents generated
This PR was generated with Coder Agents.
@mtojekmtojek
changed the title
test(tls): add issue 52 coveragetest: cover TLS managementMay 26, 2026
@mtojekmtojek
changed the title
test: cover TLS managementtest: verify TLS managementMay 26, 2026
mtojek
added 3 commits
May 26, 2026 12:03
@mtojek
chore: trigger CI for draft PR
0af849a
@mtojek
test(tls): expand coverage with error paths, permissions, and edge cases
bd40faa
Add tests for:
- loadExistingCA error paths: corrupted key PEM, corrupted cert PEM,
missing cert file with existing key
- CA file permissions: key 0600, cert 0644
- Nested config directory creation via MkdirAll
- CA certificate properties: key usage, ext key usage,
BasicConstraintsValid, Organization
- Server cert IPv6 SAN
- Server cert hostname produces no IP SAN
- Server cert 24h validity period and key usage
- Concurrent getCertificate with different hostnames
- getCACertPEM round-trip serialization
Generated by Coder Agents on behalf of mtojek.
@mtojek
ci: retrigger CodeQL analysis
680e2d4
@mtojek
mtojek
requested a review
from SasSwartMay 26, 2026 13:41
@mtojek
mtojek
marked this pull request as ready for review
May 26, 2026 13:41
@SasSwart
SasSwart
commented
May 27, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Review request acknowledged
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@SasSwartSasSwartAwaiting requested review from SasSwart

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Test tls package


2 participants

@mtojek@SasSwart

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
test: verify TLS management - #204
Open
mtojek wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom 
test/tls-coverage-issue-52
Open
test: verify TLS management#204
mtojek wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom 
test/tls-coverage-issue-52
Conversation
@mtojek
@mtojekmtojek
commented
May 26, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Fixes: #52.
Adds real coverage for the TLS certificate manager and replaces the stub tls package test.
This exercises CA creation and reuse, expired CA regeneration, on-demand server certificate generation, cache reuse, and concurrent access.
Coder Agents generated
This PR was generated with Coder Agents.
@mtojekmtojek
changed the title
test(tls): add issue 52 coveragetest: cover TLS managementMay 26, 2026
@mtojekmtojek
changed the title
test: cover TLS managementtest: verify TLS managementMay 26, 2026
mtojek
added 3 commits
May 26, 2026 12:03
@mtojek
chore: trigger CI for draft PR
0af849a
@mtojek
test(tls): expand coverage with error paths, permissions, and edge cases
bd40faa
Add tests for:
- loadExistingCA error paths: corrupted key PEM, corrupted cert PEM,
missing cert file with existing key
- CA file permissions: key 0600, cert 0644
- Nested config directory creation via MkdirAll
- CA certificate properties: key usage, ext key usage,
BasicConstraintsValid, Organization
- Server cert IPv6 SAN
- Server cert hostname produces no IP SAN
- Server cert 24h validity period and key usage
- Concurrent getCertificate with different hostnames
- getCACertPEM round-trip serialization
Generated by Coder Agents on behalf of mtojek.
@mtojek
ci: retrigger CodeQL analysis
680e2d4
@mtojek
mtojek
requested a review
from SasSwartMay 26, 2026 13:41
@mtojek
mtojek
marked this pull request as ready for review
May 26, 2026 13:41
@SasSwart
SasSwart
commented
May 27, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Review request acknowledged
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@SasSwartSasSwartAwaiting requested review from SasSwart

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Test tls package


2 participants

@mtojek@SasSwart

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
test: verify TLS management - #204
Open
mtojek wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom 
test/tls-coverage-issue-52
Open
test: verify TLS management#204
mtojek wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom 
test/tls-coverage-issue-52
Conversation
@mtojek
@mtojekmtojek
commented
May 26, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Fixes: #52.
Adds real coverage for the TLS certificate manager and replaces the stub tls package test.
This exercises CA creation and reuse, expired CA regeneration, on-demand server certificate generation, cache reuse, and concurrent access.
Coder Agents generated
This PR was generated with Coder Agents.
@mtojekmtojek
changed the title
test(tls): add issue 52 coveragetest: cover TLS managementMay 26, 2026
@mtojekmtojek
changed the title
test: cover TLS managementtest: verify TLS managementMay 26, 2026
mtojek
added 3 commits
May 26, 2026 12:03
@mtojek
chore: trigger CI for draft PR
0af849a
@mtojek
test(tls): expand coverage with error paths, permissions, and edge cases
bd40faa
Add tests for:
- loadExistingCA error paths: corrupted key PEM, corrupted cert PEM,
missing cert file with existing key
- CA file permissions: key 0600, cert 0644
- Nested config directory creation via MkdirAll
- CA certificate properties: key usage, ext key usage,
BasicConstraintsValid, Organization
- Server cert IPv6 SAN
- Server cert hostname produces no IP SAN
- Server cert 24h validity period and key usage
- Concurrent getCertificate with different hostnames
- getCACertPEM round-trip serialization
Generated by Coder Agents on behalf of mtojek.
@mtojek
ci: retrigger CodeQL analysis
680e2d4
@mtojek
mtojek
requested a review
from SasSwartMay 26, 2026 13:41
@mtojek
mtojek
marked this pull request as ready for review
May 26, 2026 13:41
@SasSwart
SasSwart
commented
May 27, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Review request acknowledged
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@SasSwartSasSwartAwaiting requested review from SasSwart

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Test tls package


2 participants

@mtojek@SasSwart

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

Skip to content
test: verify TLS management - #204
Open
mtojek wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom 
test/tls-coverage-issue-52
Open
test: verify TLS management#204
mtojek wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom 
test/tls-coverage-issue-52
Conversation
@mtojek
@mtojekmtojek
commented
May 26, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Fixes: #52.
Adds real coverage for the TLS certificate manager and replaces the stub tls package test.
This exercises CA creation and reuse, expired CA regeneration, on-demand server certificate generation, cache reuse, and concurrent access.
Coder Agents generated
This PR was generated with Coder Agents.
@mtojekmtojek
changed the title
test(tls): add issue 52 coveragetest: cover TLS managementMay 26, 2026
@mtojekmtojek
changed the title
test: cover TLS managementtest: verify TLS managementMay 26, 2026
mtojek
added 3 commits
May 26, 2026 12:03
@mtojek
chore: trigger CI for draft PR
0af849a
@mtojek
test(tls): expand coverage with error paths, permissions, and edge cases
bd40faa
Add tests for:
- loadExistingCA error paths: corrupted key PEM, corrupted cert PEM,
missing cert file with existing key
- CA file permissions: key 0600, cert 0644
- Nested config directory creation via MkdirAll
- CA certificate properties: key usage, ext key usage,
BasicConstraintsValid, Organization
- Server cert IPv6 SAN
- Server cert hostname produces no IP SAN
- Server cert 24h validity period and key usage
- Concurrent getCertificate with different hostnames
- getCACertPEM round-trip serialization
Generated by Coder Agents on behalf of mtojek.
@mtojek
ci: retrigger CodeQL analysis
680e2d4
@mtojek
mtojek
requested a review
from SasSwartMay 26, 2026 13:41
@mtojek
mtojek
marked this pull request as ready for review
May 26, 2026 13:41
@SasSwart
SasSwart
commented
May 27, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Review request acknowledged
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@SasSwartSasSwartAwaiting requested review from SasSwart

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Test tls package


2 participants

@mtojek@SasSwart