ci: restrict benchmark workflow to bench/ branches only - #77

Merged
ammario merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
ci-bench
Oct 3, 2025
Merged

ci: restrict benchmark workflow to bench/ branches only#77
ammario merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
ci-bench

Conversation

@ammario

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • Change benchmark workflow to only run on bench/** branches or manual workflow dispatch
  • Remove automatic benchmark runs on all PRs to main

Motivation

Benchmarks are resource-intensive (use 8-core runners) and don't need to run on every PR. This change ensures benchmarks only run when explicitly needed:

  • On branches prefixed with bench/ (e.g., bench/optimize-rules)
  • Via manual workflow dispatch

Test Plan

  • Verify benchmarks don't run on regular PRs
  • Verify benchmarks run on bench/ prefixed branches
  • Verify workflow_dispatch still works for manual triggers

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

ammarioand others added 2 commits October 3, 2025 10:50
Only run benchmarks on bench/ prefixed branches or manual workflow dispatch
to avoid running expensive benchmarks on all PRs.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
@ammario
ammario enabled auto-merge (squash) October 3, 2025 15:51

@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connectorBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting

Comment on lines 3 to +10
on:
workflow_dispatch:
push:
branches:
- 'bench/**'
pull_request:
branches: [main]
paths:
- 'src/rules/**'
- 'benches/**'
- '.github/workflows/benchmark.yml'
branches:
- 'bench/**'

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Misconfigured pull_request filter prevents benchmarks from running

The new trigger filters pull_request.branches to bench/**, but on GitHub Actions this key matches the base branch, not the source branch. Typical benchmark PRs will target main from branches like bench/foo, so this workflow will never trigger for those PRs. The change therefore disables benchmark runs for the very branches it is meant to cover. Consider keeping branches: [main] and adding an if: startsWith(github.head_ref, 'bench/') or a similar condition to gate on the PR’s head branch instead.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@ammario
ammario merged commit 3b01075 into mainOct 3, 2025
6 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ammario
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

ci: restrict benchmark workflow to bench/ branches only - #77

Merged
ammario merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
ci-bench
Oct 3, 2025
Merged

ci: restrict benchmark workflow to bench/ branches only#77
ammario merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
ci-bench

Conversation

@ammario

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • Change benchmark workflow to only run on bench/** branches or manual workflow dispatch
  • Remove automatic benchmark runs on all PRs to main

Motivation

Benchmarks are resource-intensive (use 8-core runners) and don't need to run on every PR. This change ensures benchmarks only run when explicitly needed:

  • On branches prefixed with bench/ (e.g., bench/optimize-rules)
  • Via manual workflow dispatch

Test Plan

  • Verify benchmarks don't run on regular PRs
  • Verify benchmarks run on bench/ prefixed branches
  • Verify workflow_dispatch still works for manual triggers

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

ammarioand others added 2 commits October 3, 2025 10:50
Only run benchmarks on bench/ prefixed branches or manual workflow dispatch
to avoid running expensive benchmarks on all PRs.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
@ammario
ammario enabled auto-merge (squash) October 3, 2025 15:51

@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connectorBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting

Comment on lines 3 to +10
on:
workflow_dispatch:
push:
branches:
- 'bench/**'
pull_request:
branches: [main]
paths:
- 'src/rules/**'
- 'benches/**'
- '.github/workflows/benchmark.yml'
branches:
- 'bench/**'

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Misconfigured pull_request filter prevents benchmarks from running

The new trigger filters pull_request.branches to bench/**, but on GitHub Actions this key matches the base branch, not the source branch. Typical benchmark PRs will target main from branches like bench/foo, so this workflow will never trigger for those PRs. The change therefore disables benchmark runs for the very branches it is meant to cover. Consider keeping branches: [main] and adding an if: startsWith(github.head_ref, 'bench/') or a similar condition to gate on the PR’s head branch instead.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@ammario
ammario merged commit 3b01075 into mainOct 3, 2025
6 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ammario
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

ci: restrict benchmark workflow to bench/ branches only - #77

Merged
ammario merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
ci-bench
Oct 3, 2025
Merged

ci: restrict benchmark workflow to bench/ branches only#77
ammario merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
ci-bench

Conversation

@ammario

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • Change benchmark workflow to only run on bench/** branches or manual workflow dispatch
  • Remove automatic benchmark runs on all PRs to main

Motivation

Benchmarks are resource-intensive (use 8-core runners) and don't need to run on every PR. This change ensures benchmarks only run when explicitly needed:

  • On branches prefixed with bench/ (e.g., bench/optimize-rules)
  • Via manual workflow dispatch

Test Plan

  • Verify benchmarks don't run on regular PRs
  • Verify benchmarks run on bench/ prefixed branches
  • Verify workflow_dispatch still works for manual triggers

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

ammarioand others added 2 commits October 3, 2025 10:50
Only run benchmarks on bench/ prefixed branches or manual workflow dispatch
to avoid running expensive benchmarks on all PRs.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
@ammario
ammario enabled auto-merge (squash) October 3, 2025 15:51

@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connectorBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting

Comment on lines 3 to +10
on:
workflow_dispatch:
push:
branches:
- 'bench/**'
pull_request:
branches: [main]
paths:
- 'src/rules/**'
- 'benches/**'
- '.github/workflows/benchmark.yml'
branches:
- 'bench/**'

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Misconfigured pull_request filter prevents benchmarks from running

The new trigger filters pull_request.branches to bench/**, but on GitHub Actions this key matches the base branch, not the source branch. Typical benchmark PRs will target main from branches like bench/foo, so this workflow will never trigger for those PRs. The change therefore disables benchmark runs for the very branches it is meant to cover. Consider keeping branches: [main] and adding an if: startsWith(github.head_ref, 'bench/') or a similar condition to gate on the PR’s head branch instead.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@ammario
ammario merged commit 3b01075 into mainOct 3, 2025
6 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ammario
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

ci: restrict benchmark workflow to bench/ branches only - #77

Merged
ammario merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
ci-bench
Oct 3, 2025
Merged

ci: restrict benchmark workflow to bench/ branches only#77
ammario merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
ci-bench

Conversation

@ammario

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • Change benchmark workflow to only run on bench/** branches or manual workflow dispatch
  • Remove automatic benchmark runs on all PRs to main

Motivation

Benchmarks are resource-intensive (use 8-core runners) and don't need to run on every PR. This change ensures benchmarks only run when explicitly needed:

  • On branches prefixed with bench/ (e.g., bench/optimize-rules)
  • Via manual workflow dispatch

Test Plan

  • Verify benchmarks don't run on regular PRs
  • Verify benchmarks run on bench/ prefixed branches
  • Verify workflow_dispatch still works for manual triggers

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

ammarioand others added 2 commits October 3, 2025 10:50
Only run benchmarks on bench/ prefixed branches or manual workflow dispatch
to avoid running expensive benchmarks on all PRs.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
@ammario
ammario enabled auto-merge (squash) October 3, 2025 15:51

@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connectorBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting

Comment on lines 3 to +10
on:
workflow_dispatch:
push:
branches:
- 'bench/**'
pull_request:
branches: [main]
paths:
- 'src/rules/**'
- 'benches/**'
- '.github/workflows/benchmark.yml'
branches:
- 'bench/**'

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Misconfigured pull_request filter prevents benchmarks from running

The new trigger filters pull_request.branches to bench/**, but on GitHub Actions this key matches the base branch, not the source branch. Typical benchmark PRs will target main from branches like bench/foo, so this workflow will never trigger for those PRs. The change therefore disables benchmark runs for the very branches it is meant to cover. Consider keeping branches: [main] and adding an if: startsWith(github.head_ref, 'bench/') or a similar condition to gate on the PR’s head branch instead.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@ammario
ammario merged commit 3b01075 into mainOct 3, 2025
6 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ammario
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

ci: restrict benchmark workflow to bench/ branches only - #77

Merged
ammario merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
ci-bench
Oct 3, 2025
Merged

ci: restrict benchmark workflow to bench/ branches only#77
ammario merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
ci-bench

Conversation

@ammario

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • Change benchmark workflow to only run on bench/** branches or manual workflow dispatch
  • Remove automatic benchmark runs on all PRs to main

Motivation

Benchmarks are resource-intensive (use 8-core runners) and don't need to run on every PR. This change ensures benchmarks only run when explicitly needed:

  • On branches prefixed with bench/ (e.g., bench/optimize-rules)
  • Via manual workflow dispatch

Test Plan

  • Verify benchmarks don't run on regular PRs
  • Verify benchmarks run on bench/ prefixed branches
  • Verify workflow_dispatch still works for manual triggers

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

ammarioand others added 2 commits October 3, 2025 10:50
Only run benchmarks on bench/ prefixed branches or manual workflow dispatch
to avoid running expensive benchmarks on all PRs.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
@ammario
ammario enabled auto-merge (squash) October 3, 2025 15:51

@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connectorBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting

Comment on lines 3 to +10
on:
workflow_dispatch:
push:
branches:
- 'bench/**'
pull_request:
branches: [main]
paths:
- 'src/rules/**'
- 'benches/**'
- '.github/workflows/benchmark.yml'
branches:
- 'bench/**'

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Misconfigured pull_request filter prevents benchmarks from running

The new trigger filters pull_request.branches to bench/**, but on GitHub Actions this key matches the base branch, not the source branch. Typical benchmark PRs will target main from branches like bench/foo, so this workflow will never trigger for those PRs. The change therefore disables benchmark runs for the very branches it is meant to cover. Consider keeping branches: [main] and adding an if: startsWith(github.head_ref, 'bench/') or a similar condition to gate on the PR’s head branch instead.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@ammario
ammario merged commit 3b01075 into mainOct 3, 2025
6 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ammario
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

ci: restrict benchmark workflow to bench/ branches only - #77

Merged
ammario merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
ci-bench
Oct 3, 2025
Merged

ci: restrict benchmark workflow to bench/ branches only#77
ammario merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
ci-bench

Conversation

@ammario

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • Change benchmark workflow to only run on bench/** branches or manual workflow dispatch
  • Remove automatic benchmark runs on all PRs to main

Motivation

Benchmarks are resource-intensive (use 8-core runners) and don't need to run on every PR. This change ensures benchmarks only run when explicitly needed:

  • On branches prefixed with bench/ (e.g., bench/optimize-rules)
  • Via manual workflow dispatch

Test Plan

  • Verify benchmarks don't run on regular PRs
  • Verify benchmarks run on bench/ prefixed branches
  • Verify workflow_dispatch still works for manual triggers

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

ammarioand others added 2 commits October 3, 2025 10:50
Only run benchmarks on bench/ prefixed branches or manual workflow dispatch
to avoid running expensive benchmarks on all PRs.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
@ammario
ammario enabled auto-merge (squash) October 3, 2025 15:51

@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connectorBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting

Comment on lines 3 to +10
on:
workflow_dispatch:
push:
branches:
- 'bench/**'
pull_request:
branches: [main]
paths:
- 'src/rules/**'
- 'benches/**'
- '.github/workflows/benchmark.yml'
branches:
- 'bench/**'

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Misconfigured pull_request filter prevents benchmarks from running

The new trigger filters pull_request.branches to bench/**, but on GitHub Actions this key matches the base branch, not the source branch. Typical benchmark PRs will target main from branches like bench/foo, so this workflow will never trigger for those PRs. The change therefore disables benchmark runs for the very branches it is meant to cover. Consider keeping branches: [main] and adding an if: startsWith(github.head_ref, 'bench/') or a similar condition to gate on the PR’s head branch instead.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@ammario
ammario merged commit 3b01075 into mainOct 3, 2025
6 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ammario
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

ci: restrict benchmark workflow to bench/ branches only - #77

Merged
ammario merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
ci-bench
Oct 3, 2025
Merged

ci: restrict benchmark workflow to bench/ branches only#77
ammario merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
ci-bench

Conversation

@ammario

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • Change benchmark workflow to only run on bench/** branches or manual workflow dispatch
  • Remove automatic benchmark runs on all PRs to main

Motivation

Benchmarks are resource-intensive (use 8-core runners) and don't need to run on every PR. This change ensures benchmarks only run when explicitly needed:

  • On branches prefixed with bench/ (e.g., bench/optimize-rules)
  • Via manual workflow dispatch

Test Plan

  • Verify benchmarks don't run on regular PRs
  • Verify benchmarks run on bench/ prefixed branches
  • Verify workflow_dispatch still works for manual triggers

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

ammarioand others added 2 commits October 3, 2025 10:50
Only run benchmarks on bench/ prefixed branches or manual workflow dispatch
to avoid running expensive benchmarks on all PRs.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
@ammario
ammario enabled auto-merge (squash) October 3, 2025 15:51

@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connectorBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting

Comment on lines 3 to +10
on:
workflow_dispatch:
push:
branches:
- 'bench/**'
pull_request:
branches: [main]
paths:
- 'src/rules/**'
- 'benches/**'
- '.github/workflows/benchmark.yml'
branches:
- 'bench/**'

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Misconfigured pull_request filter prevents benchmarks from running

The new trigger filters pull_request.branches to bench/**, but on GitHub Actions this key matches the base branch, not the source branch. Typical benchmark PRs will target main from branches like bench/foo, so this workflow will never trigger for those PRs. The change therefore disables benchmark runs for the very branches it is meant to cover. Consider keeping branches: [main] and adding an if: startsWith(github.head_ref, 'bench/') or a similar condition to gate on the PR’s head branch instead.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@ammario
ammario merged commit 3b01075 into mainOct 3, 2025
6 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ammario
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

ci: restrict benchmark workflow to bench/ branches only - #77

Merged
ammario merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
ci-bench
Oct 3, 2025
Merged

ci: restrict benchmark workflow to bench/ branches only#77
ammario merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
ci-bench

Conversation

@ammario

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • Change benchmark workflow to only run on bench/** branches or manual workflow dispatch
  • Remove automatic benchmark runs on all PRs to main

Motivation

Benchmarks are resource-intensive (use 8-core runners) and don't need to run on every PR. This change ensures benchmarks only run when explicitly needed:

  • On branches prefixed with bench/ (e.g., bench/optimize-rules)
  • Via manual workflow dispatch

Test Plan

  • Verify benchmarks don't run on regular PRs
  • Verify benchmarks run on bench/ prefixed branches
  • Verify workflow_dispatch still works for manual triggers

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

ammarioand others added 2 commits October 3, 2025 10:50
Only run benchmarks on bench/ prefixed branches or manual workflow dispatch
to avoid running expensive benchmarks on all PRs.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
@ammario
ammario enabled auto-merge (squash) October 3, 2025 15:51

@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connectorBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting

Comment on lines 3 to +10
on:
workflow_dispatch:
push:
branches:
- 'bench/**'
pull_request:
branches: [main]
paths:
- 'src/rules/**'
- 'benches/**'
- '.github/workflows/benchmark.yml'
branches:
- 'bench/**'

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Misconfigured pull_request filter prevents benchmarks from running

The new trigger filters pull_request.branches to bench/**, but on GitHub Actions this key matches the base branch, not the source branch. Typical benchmark PRs will target main from branches like bench/foo, so this workflow will never trigger for those PRs. The change therefore disables benchmark runs for the very branches it is meant to cover. Consider keeping branches: [main] and adding an if: startsWith(github.head_ref, 'bench/') or a similar condition to gate on the PR’s head branch instead.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@ammario
ammario merged commit 3b01075 into mainOct 3, 2025
6 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ammario