Added tar.gz support for folder upload. - #31
Conversation
coderanger
commented
Dec 24, 2016
How does this compare to rsync and what kind of latency is there on your connection? |
AdallomRoy
commented
Dec 25, 2016
Hi, I haven't compared it to rsync, since rsync is required to be installed @ the remote, while I'm using the base Azure Linux image and it's not installed there (as opposed to tar which comes with the basic Linux image), so it's irrelevant for me. Roy. |
amontalban
commented
Feb 10, 2017
Would love to have this merged, +1 |
AdallomRoy
commented
Mar 7, 2017
Hi @coderanger, Thanks |
moshezvi
commented
Apr 12, 2017
Any update on this? |
AdallomRoy
commented
May 16, 2017
1 similar comment
AdallomRoy
commented
Jul 12, 2017
AdallomRoy
commented
Oct 17, 2017
@coderanger ?????? |
When first uploading files (no directory @ remote), it's MUCH more efficient to tar.gz files @ local, upload the archive and unzip it @ the remote.
For comparison, some 170 seconds uploads cut down to 1-2 seconds during my tests. (more than x100)
It still falls back to using parallel upload for single files or if it fails in one of the steps.