Add several spelling corrections + fix some pre-existing

[luzpaz]

No description provided.

[c72578]

The word finish is mentioned twice. Did you mean Finnish in one of the cases (language in Finland)?

[peternewman]

This was caught by the tests (although the error message isn't very clear):

codespell/codespell_lib/tests/test_dictionary.py

Line 118 in bd79d99

assertlen(set(reps)) ==len(reps), 'entries are not (lower-case) unique'

[peternewman]

Message improved in #1493

[peternewman]

This is in now, so would you mind doing a Git update first @luzpaz before you fix this, so I can confirm it worked fine in Travis before you commit the fix?

Edit, I realised I could test it another way, confirmed working here: https://travis-ci.org/github/peternewman/codespell/jobs/681564319#L570

[luzpaz]

@peternewman result: https://travis-ci.org/github/codespell-project/codespell/jobs/698171480#L738

E AssertionError: E error finisch: corrections "finish, finish," are not (lower-case) unique

[peternewman]

A few more comments

[peternewman]

Not a typo:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Practice_(learning_method)

Possibly could go in the BE to AmE dictionary:

In English, practice is the noun and practise is the verb, but in American-English, the historically erroneous confusion of cases in America means it is now common for practice to be used both as a noun and a verb

[peternewman]

Please undo this change as above, although you could add ractice->practice too

[peternewman]

Also suggest turn.

[luzpaz]

Not sure what the problem is: https://travis-ci.org/github/codespell-project/codespell/jobs/698172331#L656

[peternewman]

Not sure what the problem is: https://travis-ci.org/github/codespell-project/codespell/jobs/698172331#L656

You've added:
ractise->practice

It's complaining that ractise isn't a valid word in Aspell, which doesn't surprise me. This correction doesn't need to be in this dictionary as you've already added practise->practice as I suggested.

[luzpaz]

I'm confused since they look like separate typos to me? does aspell recognize ractise as a typo ?

[peternewman]

I'm confused since they look like separate typos to me? does aspell recognize ractise as a typo ?

The key thing is aspell doesn't recognise ractise as a valid word.

The GB to US dictionary is currently expected to consist of valid words on both sides (this slightly falls down as some more niche words, such as #1562, aren't in the dictionary). They should just be things like colour->color not coolour->color.

[luzpaz]

Can we have a dictionary of non-recognizable aspell words then ?
Or we make an upstream push to aspell to add certain words ?

[larsoner]

I don't think ractise is a real word, even in British English?

[luzpaz]

practise is a real word and is the variant of practicebut the British and Australian spelling of it. ractise is just a typo of practise

[sebweb3r]

yeah, but the dictionary_en-GB_to_en-US.txt wants
valid Be->valid AE

you want to add the typo to the regular dictionary.