Template/e2e/testing#1167

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
NiallJoeMaher merged 2 commits into from
Oct 22, 2024
Merged

Template/e2e/testing #1167

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
4027f1d
add settings template
John-Paul-Larkin Oct 22, 2024
46a7116
add my-posts template
John-Paul-Larkin Oct 22, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
14 changes: 14 additions & 0 deletions e2e/my-posts.spec.ts
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
import test from "@playwright/test";

test.describe("Unauthenticated my-posts Page", () => {
test.beforeEach(async ({ page }) => {

@JohnAllenTechJohnAllenTechOct 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! Ill implement this with some other tests also

await page.context().clearCookies();
});
//
// Replace with tests for unauthenticated users
});

test.describe("Authenticated my-posts Page", () => {
//
// Replace with tests for authenticated users
});
Comment on lines +11 to +14

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBotOct 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider adding a beforeEach hook for authenticated users.

The test suite for authenticated users is structured correctly, but it could benefit from a beforeEach hook to set up the authenticated state before each test. This would ensure consistency and a proper testing environment for authenticated user scenarios.

Consider adding a beforeEach hook similar to the unauthenticated suite, but instead of clearing cookies, it should set up the authenticated state. For example:

test.describe("Authenticated my-posts Page",()=>{test.beforeEach(async({ page })=>{// TODO: Set up authenticated state// This might involve setting specific cookies or using a custom command to log in});// Replace with tests for authenticated users});

Remember to replace the placeholder comment with actual test implementations for authenticated users.

Comment on lines +1 to +14

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBotOct 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Inconsistent test suite structures across e2e files.

The e2e/my-posts.spec.ts includes both "Unauthenticated" and "Authenticated" test suites, whereas other e2e test files only contain "Unauthenticated" test suites. To maintain consistency, consider standardizing the structure across all e2e test files.

🔗 Analysis chain

LGTM: Well-structured template for 'my-posts' e2e tests.

This file provides an excellent foundation for end-to-end testing of the 'my-posts' page. It aligns well with the PR objectives by:

  1. Creating a template file for e2e testing.
  2. Covering both authenticated and unauthenticated user scenarios.
  3. Following Playwright's recommended practices.

The structure allows for easy addition of specific tests in the future, which is in line with the author's intention to create related issues for these e2e tests.

To ensure consistency across e2e test files, let's verify if a similar structure is used in other e2e test files:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash# Description: Check for similar structure in other e2e test files# Test: Search for test suites in other e2e files
rg -A 5 'test.describe\("(Un)?authenticated' e2e/

Length of output: 1761

14 changes: 14 additions & 0 deletions e2e/settings.spec.ts
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
import test from "@playwright/test";

test.describe("Unauthenticated setttings Page", () => {
test.beforeEach(async ({ page }) => {
await page.context().clearCookies();
});
//
// Replace with tests for unauthenticated users
});
Comment on lines +3 to +9

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBotOct 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix typo and implement tests for unauthenticated users.

  1. There's a typo in the test suite description. "setttings" should be "settings".
  2. The beforeEach hook correctly clears cookies, which is good for maintaining a clean state.
  3. Implement actual tests for unauthenticated users as indicated by the placeholder comment.

Here's a suggested fix for the typo:

-test.describe("Unauthenticated setttings Page", () => {+test.describe("Unauthenticated settings Page", () => {

Would you like assistance in generating some example tests for unauthenticated users?

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
test.describe("Unauthenticated setttings Page",()=>{
test.beforeEach(async({ page })=>{
awaitpage.context().clearCookies();
});
//
// Replace with tests for unauthenticated users
});
test.describe("Unauthenticated settings Page",()=>{
test.beforeEach(async({ page })=>{
awaitpage.context().clearCookies();
});
//
// Replace with tests for unauthenticated users
});


test.describe("Authenticated settings Page", () => {
//
// Replace with tests for authenticated users
});
Comment on lines +11 to +14

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBotOct 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Implement tests and consider adding a beforeEach hook for authenticated users.

  1. The test suite structure is correct, but it lacks actual test implementations.
  2. Consider adding a beforeEach hook to set up the authenticated state for each test.

Here's a suggested structure for the authenticated users test suite:

test.describe("Authenticated settings Page",()=>{test.beforeEach(async({ page })=>{// TODO: Set up authenticated state// For example: // await page.goto('/login');// await page.fill('#email', 'user@example.com');// await page.fill('#password', 'password123');// await page.click('button[type="submit"]');});test('should display user settings when authenticated',async({ page })=>{// TODO: Implement test});// Add more tests as needed});

Would you like assistance in generating some example tests for authenticated users?

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all \u003cpre\u003e\u003ccode\u003e blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "github.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Template/e2e/testing#1167

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
NiallJoeMaher merged 2 commits into from
Oct 22, 2024
Merged

Template/e2e/testing #1167

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
4027f1d
add settings template
John-Paul-Larkin Oct 22, 2024
46a7116
add my-posts template
John-Paul-Larkin Oct 22, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
14 changes: 14 additions & 0 deletions e2e/my-posts.spec.ts
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
import test from "@playwright/test";

test.describe("Unauthenticated my-posts Page", () => {
test.beforeEach(async ({ page }) => {

@JohnAllenTechJohnAllenTechOct 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! Ill implement this with some other tests also

await page.context().clearCookies();
});
//
// Replace with tests for unauthenticated users
});

test.describe("Authenticated my-posts Page", () => {
//
// Replace with tests for authenticated users
});
Comment on lines +11 to +14

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBotOct 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider adding a beforeEach hook for authenticated users.

The test suite for authenticated users is structured correctly, but it could benefit from a beforeEach hook to set up the authenticated state before each test. This would ensure consistency and a proper testing environment for authenticated user scenarios.

Consider adding a beforeEach hook similar to the unauthenticated suite, but instead of clearing cookies, it should set up the authenticated state. For example:

test.describe("Authenticated my-posts Page",()=>{test.beforeEach(async({ page })=>{// TODO: Set up authenticated state// This might involve setting specific cookies or using a custom command to log in});// Replace with tests for authenticated users});

Remember to replace the placeholder comment with actual test implementations for authenticated users.

Comment on lines +1 to +14

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBotOct 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Inconsistent test suite structures across e2e files.

The e2e/my-posts.spec.ts includes both "Unauthenticated" and "Authenticated" test suites, whereas other e2e test files only contain "Unauthenticated" test suites. To maintain consistency, consider standardizing the structure across all e2e test files.

🔗 Analysis chain

LGTM: Well-structured template for 'my-posts' e2e tests.

This file provides an excellent foundation for end-to-end testing of the 'my-posts' page. It aligns well with the PR objectives by:

  1. Creating a template file for e2e testing.
  2. Covering both authenticated and unauthenticated user scenarios.
  3. Following Playwright's recommended practices.

The structure allows for easy addition of specific tests in the future, which is in line with the author's intention to create related issues for these e2e tests.

To ensure consistency across e2e test files, let's verify if a similar structure is used in other e2e test files:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash# Description: Check for similar structure in other e2e test files# Test: Search for test suites in other e2e files
rg -A 5 'test.describe\("(Un)?authenticated' e2e/

Length of output: 1761

14 changes: 14 additions & 0 deletions e2e/settings.spec.ts
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
import test from "@playwright/test";

test.describe("Unauthenticated setttings Page", () => {
test.beforeEach(async ({ page }) => {
await page.context().clearCookies();
});
//
// Replace with tests for unauthenticated users
});
Comment on lines +3 to +9

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBotOct 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix typo and implement tests for unauthenticated users.

  1. There's a typo in the test suite description. "setttings" should be "settings".
  2. The beforeEach hook correctly clears cookies, which is good for maintaining a clean state.
  3. Implement actual tests for unauthenticated users as indicated by the placeholder comment.

Here's a suggested fix for the typo:

-test.describe("Unauthenticated setttings Page", () => {+test.describe("Unauthenticated settings Page", () => {

Would you like assistance in generating some example tests for unauthenticated users?

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
test.describe("Unauthenticated setttings Page",()=>{
test.beforeEach(async({ page })=>{
awaitpage.context().clearCookies();
});
//
// Replace with tests for unauthenticated users
});
test.describe("Unauthenticated settings Page",()=>{
test.beforeEach(async({ page })=>{
awaitpage.context().clearCookies();
});
//
// Replace with tests for unauthenticated users
});


test.describe("Authenticated settings Page", () => {
//
// Replace with tests for authenticated users
});
Comment on lines +11 to +14

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBotOct 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Implement tests and consider adding a beforeEach hook for authenticated users.

  1. The test suite structure is correct, but it lacks actual test implementations.
  2. Consider adding a beforeEach hook to set up the authenticated state for each test.

Here's a suggested structure for the authenticated users test suite:

test.describe("Authenticated settings Page",()=>{test.beforeEach(async({ page })=>{// TODO: Set up authenticated state// For example: // await page.goto('/login');// await page.fill('#email', 'user@example.com');// await page.fill('#password', 'password123');// await page.click('button[type="submit"]');});test('should display user settings when authenticated',async({ page })=>{// TODO: Implement test});// Add more tests as needed});

Would you like assistance in generating some example tests for authenticated users?

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Template/e2e/testing#1167

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
NiallJoeMaher merged 2 commits into from
Oct 22, 2024
Merged

Template/e2e/testing #1167

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
4027f1d
add settings template
John-Paul-Larkin Oct 22, 2024
46a7116
add my-posts template
John-Paul-Larkin Oct 22, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
14 changes: 14 additions & 0 deletions e2e/my-posts.spec.ts
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
import test from "@playwright/test";

test.describe("Unauthenticated my-posts Page", () => {
test.beforeEach(async ({ page }) => {

@JohnAllenTechJohnAllenTechOct 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! Ill implement this with some other tests also

await page.context().clearCookies();
});
//
// Replace with tests for unauthenticated users
});

test.describe("Authenticated my-posts Page", () => {
//
// Replace with tests for authenticated users
});
Comment on lines +11 to +14

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBotOct 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider adding a beforeEach hook for authenticated users.

The test suite for authenticated users is structured correctly, but it could benefit from a beforeEach hook to set up the authenticated state before each test. This would ensure consistency and a proper testing environment for authenticated user scenarios.

Consider adding a beforeEach hook similar to the unauthenticated suite, but instead of clearing cookies, it should set up the authenticated state. For example:

test.describe("Authenticated my-posts Page",()=>{test.beforeEach(async({ page })=>{// TODO: Set up authenticated state// This might involve setting specific cookies or using a custom command to log in});// Replace with tests for authenticated users});

Remember to replace the placeholder comment with actual test implementations for authenticated users.

Comment on lines +1 to +14

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBotOct 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Inconsistent test suite structures across e2e files.

The e2e/my-posts.spec.ts includes both "Unauthenticated" and "Authenticated" test suites, whereas other e2e test files only contain "Unauthenticated" test suites. To maintain consistency, consider standardizing the structure across all e2e test files.

🔗 Analysis chain

LGTM: Well-structured template for 'my-posts' e2e tests.

This file provides an excellent foundation for end-to-end testing of the 'my-posts' page. It aligns well with the PR objectives by:

  1. Creating a template file for e2e testing.
  2. Covering both authenticated and unauthenticated user scenarios.
  3. Following Playwright's recommended practices.

The structure allows for easy addition of specific tests in the future, which is in line with the author's intention to create related issues for these e2e tests.

To ensure consistency across e2e test files, let's verify if a similar structure is used in other e2e test files:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash# Description: Check for similar structure in other e2e test files# Test: Search for test suites in other e2e files
rg -A 5 'test.describe\("(Un)?authenticated' e2e/

Length of output: 1761

14 changes: 14 additions & 0 deletions e2e/settings.spec.ts
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
import test from "@playwright/test";

test.describe("Unauthenticated setttings Page", () => {
test.beforeEach(async ({ page }) => {
await page.context().clearCookies();
});
//
// Replace with tests for unauthenticated users
});
Comment on lines +3 to +9

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBotOct 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix typo and implement tests for unauthenticated users.

  1. There's a typo in the test suite description. "setttings" should be "settings".
  2. The beforeEach hook correctly clears cookies, which is good for maintaining a clean state.
  3. Implement actual tests for unauthenticated users as indicated by the placeholder comment.

Here's a suggested fix for the typo:

-test.describe("Unauthenticated setttings Page", () => {+test.describe("Unauthenticated settings Page", () => {

Would you like assistance in generating some example tests for unauthenticated users?

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
test.describe("Unauthenticated setttings Page",()=>{
test.beforeEach(async({ page })=>{
awaitpage.context().clearCookies();
});
//
// Replace with tests for unauthenticated users
});
test.describe("Unauthenticated settings Page",()=>{
test.beforeEach(async({ page })=>{
awaitpage.context().clearCookies();
});
//
// Replace with tests for unauthenticated users
});


test.describe("Authenticated settings Page", () => {
//
// Replace with tests for authenticated users
});
Comment on lines +11 to +14

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBotOct 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Implement tests and consider adding a beforeEach hook for authenticated users.

  1. The test suite structure is correct, but it lacks actual test implementations.
  2. Consider adding a beforeEach hook to set up the authenticated state for each test.

Here's a suggested structure for the authenticated users test suite:

test.describe("Authenticated settings Page",()=>{test.beforeEach(async({ page })=>{// TODO: Set up authenticated state// For example: // await page.goto('/login');// await page.fill('#email', 'user@example.com');// await page.fill('#password', 'password123');// await page.click('button[type="submit"]');});test('should display user settings when authenticated',async({ page })=>{// TODO: Implement test});// Add more tests as needed});

Would you like assistance in generating some example tests for authenticated users?

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length \u003e 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Template/e2e/testing#1167

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
NiallJoeMaher merged 2 commits into from
Oct 22, 2024
Merged

Template/e2e/testing #1167

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
4027f1d
add settings template
John-Paul-Larkin Oct 22, 2024
46a7116
add my-posts template
John-Paul-Larkin Oct 22, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
14 changes: 14 additions & 0 deletions e2e/my-posts.spec.ts
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
import test from "@playwright/test";

test.describe("Unauthenticated my-posts Page", () => {
test.beforeEach(async ({ page }) => {

@JohnAllenTechJohnAllenTechOct 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! Ill implement this with some other tests also

await page.context().clearCookies();
});
//
// Replace with tests for unauthenticated users
});

test.describe("Authenticated my-posts Page", () => {
//
// Replace with tests for authenticated users
});
Comment on lines +11 to +14

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBotOct 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider adding a beforeEach hook for authenticated users.

The test suite for authenticated users is structured correctly, but it could benefit from a beforeEach hook to set up the authenticated state before each test. This would ensure consistency and a proper testing environment for authenticated user scenarios.

Consider adding a beforeEach hook similar to the unauthenticated suite, but instead of clearing cookies, it should set up the authenticated state. For example:

test.describe("Authenticated my-posts Page",()=>{test.beforeEach(async({ page })=>{// TODO: Set up authenticated state// This might involve setting specific cookies or using a custom command to log in});// Replace with tests for authenticated users});

Remember to replace the placeholder comment with actual test implementations for authenticated users.

Comment on lines +1 to +14

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBotOct 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Inconsistent test suite structures across e2e files.

The e2e/my-posts.spec.ts includes both "Unauthenticated" and "Authenticated" test suites, whereas other e2e test files only contain "Unauthenticated" test suites. To maintain consistency, consider standardizing the structure across all e2e test files.

🔗 Analysis chain

LGTM: Well-structured template for 'my-posts' e2e tests.

This file provides an excellent foundation for end-to-end testing of the 'my-posts' page. It aligns well with the PR objectives by:

  1. Creating a template file for e2e testing.
  2. Covering both authenticated and unauthenticated user scenarios.
  3. Following Playwright's recommended practices.

The structure allows for easy addition of specific tests in the future, which is in line with the author's intention to create related issues for these e2e tests.

To ensure consistency across e2e test files, let's verify if a similar structure is used in other e2e test files:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash# Description: Check for similar structure in other e2e test files# Test: Search for test suites in other e2e files
rg -A 5 'test.describe\("(Un)?authenticated' e2e/

Length of output: 1761

14 changes: 14 additions & 0 deletions e2e/settings.spec.ts
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
import test from "@playwright/test";

test.describe("Unauthenticated setttings Page", () => {
test.beforeEach(async ({ page }) => {
await page.context().clearCookies();
});
//
// Replace with tests for unauthenticated users
});
Comment on lines +3 to +9

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBotOct 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix typo and implement tests for unauthenticated users.

  1. There's a typo in the test suite description. "setttings" should be "settings".
  2. The beforeEach hook correctly clears cookies, which is good for maintaining a clean state.
  3. Implement actual tests for unauthenticated users as indicated by the placeholder comment.

Here's a suggested fix for the typo:

-test.describe("Unauthenticated setttings Page", () => {+test.describe("Unauthenticated settings Page", () => {

Would you like assistance in generating some example tests for unauthenticated users?

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
test.describe("Unauthenticated setttings Page",()=>{
test.beforeEach(async({ page })=>{
awaitpage.context().clearCookies();
});
//
// Replace with tests for unauthenticated users
});
test.describe("Unauthenticated settings Page",()=>{
test.beforeEach(async({ page })=>{
awaitpage.context().clearCookies();
});
//
// Replace with tests for unauthenticated users
});


test.describe("Authenticated settings Page", () => {
//
// Replace with tests for authenticated users
});
Comment on lines +11 to +14

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBotOct 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Implement tests and consider adding a beforeEach hook for authenticated users.

  1. The test suite structure is correct, but it lacks actual test implementations.
  2. Consider adding a beforeEach hook to set up the authenticated state for each test.

Here's a suggested structure for the authenticated users test suite:

test.describe("Authenticated settings Page",()=>{test.beforeEach(async({ page })=>{// TODO: Set up authenticated state// For example: // await page.goto('/login');// await page.fill('#email', 'user@example.com');// await page.fill('#password', 'password123');// await page.click('button[type="submit"]');});test('should display user settings when authenticated',async({ page })=>{// TODO: Implement test});// Add more tests as needed});

Would you like assistance in generating some example tests for authenticated users?

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Template/e2e/testing#1167

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
NiallJoeMaher merged 2 commits into from
Oct 22, 2024
Merged

Template/e2e/testing #1167

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
4027f1d
add settings template
John-Paul-Larkin Oct 22, 2024
46a7116
add my-posts template
John-Paul-Larkin Oct 22, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
14 changes: 14 additions & 0 deletions e2e/my-posts.spec.ts
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
import test from "@playwright/test";

test.describe("Unauthenticated my-posts Page", () => {
test.beforeEach(async ({ page }) => {

@JohnAllenTechJohnAllenTechOct 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! Ill implement this with some other tests also

await page.context().clearCookies();
});
//
// Replace with tests for unauthenticated users
});

test.describe("Authenticated my-posts Page", () => {
//
// Replace with tests for authenticated users
});
Comment on lines +11 to +14

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBotOct 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider adding a beforeEach hook for authenticated users.

The test suite for authenticated users is structured correctly, but it could benefit from a beforeEach hook to set up the authenticated state before each test. This would ensure consistency and a proper testing environment for authenticated user scenarios.

Consider adding a beforeEach hook similar to the unauthenticated suite, but instead of clearing cookies, it should set up the authenticated state. For example:

test.describe("Authenticated my-posts Page",()=>{test.beforeEach(async({ page })=>{// TODO: Set up authenticated state// This might involve setting specific cookies or using a custom command to log in});// Replace with tests for authenticated users});

Remember to replace the placeholder comment with actual test implementations for authenticated users.

Comment on lines +1 to +14

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBotOct 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Inconsistent test suite structures across e2e files.

The e2e/my-posts.spec.ts includes both "Unauthenticated" and "Authenticated" test suites, whereas other e2e test files only contain "Unauthenticated" test suites. To maintain consistency, consider standardizing the structure across all e2e test files.

🔗 Analysis chain

LGTM: Well-structured template for 'my-posts' e2e tests.

This file provides an excellent foundation for end-to-end testing of the 'my-posts' page. It aligns well with the PR objectives by:

  1. Creating a template file for e2e testing.
  2. Covering both authenticated and unauthenticated user scenarios.
  3. Following Playwright's recommended practices.

The structure allows for easy addition of specific tests in the future, which is in line with the author's intention to create related issues for these e2e tests.

To ensure consistency across e2e test files, let's verify if a similar structure is used in other e2e test files:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash# Description: Check for similar structure in other e2e test files# Test: Search for test suites in other e2e files
rg -A 5 'test.describe\("(Un)?authenticated' e2e/

Length of output: 1761

14 changes: 14 additions & 0 deletions e2e/settings.spec.ts
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
import test from "@playwright/test";

test.describe("Unauthenticated setttings Page", () => {
test.beforeEach(async ({ page }) => {
await page.context().clearCookies();
});
//
// Replace with tests for unauthenticated users
});
Comment on lines +3 to +9

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBotOct 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix typo and implement tests for unauthenticated users.

  1. There's a typo in the test suite description. "setttings" should be "settings".
  2. The beforeEach hook correctly clears cookies, which is good for maintaining a clean state.
  3. Implement actual tests for unauthenticated users as indicated by the placeholder comment.

Here's a suggested fix for the typo:

-test.describe("Unauthenticated setttings Page", () => {+test.describe("Unauthenticated settings Page", () => {

Would you like assistance in generating some example tests for unauthenticated users?

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
test.describe("Unauthenticated setttings Page",()=>{
test.beforeEach(async({ page })=>{
awaitpage.context().clearCookies();
});
//
// Replace with tests for unauthenticated users
});
test.describe("Unauthenticated settings Page",()=>{
test.beforeEach(async({ page })=>{
awaitpage.context().clearCookies();
});
//
// Replace with tests for unauthenticated users
});


test.describe("Authenticated settings Page", () => {
//
// Replace with tests for authenticated users
});
Comment on lines +11 to +14

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBotOct 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Implement tests and consider adding a beforeEach hook for authenticated users.

  1. The test suite structure is correct, but it lacks actual test implementations.
  2. Consider adding a beforeEach hook to set up the authenticated state for each test.

Here's a suggested structure for the authenticated users test suite:

test.describe("Authenticated settings Page",()=>{test.beforeEach(async({ page })=>{// TODO: Set up authenticated state// For example: // await page.goto('/login');// await page.fill('#email', 'user@example.com');// await page.fill('#password', 'password123');// await page.click('button[type="submit"]');});test('should display user settings when authenticated',async({ page })=>{// TODO: Implement test});// Add more tests as needed});

Would you like assistance in generating some example tests for authenticated users?

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Template/e2e/testing#1167

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
NiallJoeMaher merged 2 commits into from
Oct 22, 2024
Merged

Template/e2e/testing #1167

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
4027f1d
add settings template
John-Paul-Larkin Oct 22, 2024
46a7116
add my-posts template
John-Paul-Larkin Oct 22, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
14 changes: 14 additions & 0 deletions e2e/my-posts.spec.ts
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
import test from "@playwright/test";

test.describe("Unauthenticated my-posts Page", () => {
test.beforeEach(async ({ page }) => {

@JohnAllenTechJohnAllenTechOct 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! Ill implement this with some other tests also

await page.context().clearCookies();
});
//
// Replace with tests for unauthenticated users
});

test.describe("Authenticated my-posts Page", () => {
//
// Replace with tests for authenticated users
});
Comment on lines +11 to +14

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBotOct 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider adding a beforeEach hook for authenticated users.

The test suite for authenticated users is structured correctly, but it could benefit from a beforeEach hook to set up the authenticated state before each test. This would ensure consistency and a proper testing environment for authenticated user scenarios.

Consider adding a beforeEach hook similar to the unauthenticated suite, but instead of clearing cookies, it should set up the authenticated state. For example:

test.describe("Authenticated my-posts Page",()=>{test.beforeEach(async({ page })=>{// TODO: Set up authenticated state// This might involve setting specific cookies or using a custom command to log in});// Replace with tests for authenticated users});

Remember to replace the placeholder comment with actual test implementations for authenticated users.

Comment on lines +1 to +14

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBotOct 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Inconsistent test suite structures across e2e files.

The e2e/my-posts.spec.ts includes both "Unauthenticated" and "Authenticated" test suites, whereas other e2e test files only contain "Unauthenticated" test suites. To maintain consistency, consider standardizing the structure across all e2e test files.

🔗 Analysis chain

LGTM: Well-structured template for 'my-posts' e2e tests.

This file provides an excellent foundation for end-to-end testing of the 'my-posts' page. It aligns well with the PR objectives by:

  1. Creating a template file for e2e testing.
  2. Covering both authenticated and unauthenticated user scenarios.
  3. Following Playwright's recommended practices.

The structure allows for easy addition of specific tests in the future, which is in line with the author's intention to create related issues for these e2e tests.

To ensure consistency across e2e test files, let's verify if a similar structure is used in other e2e test files:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash# Description: Check for similar structure in other e2e test files# Test: Search for test suites in other e2e files
rg -A 5 'test.describe\("(Un)?authenticated' e2e/

Length of output: 1761

14 changes: 14 additions & 0 deletions e2e/settings.spec.ts
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
import test from "@playwright/test";

test.describe("Unauthenticated setttings Page", () => {
test.beforeEach(async ({ page }) => {
await page.context().clearCookies();
});
//
// Replace with tests for unauthenticated users
});
Comment on lines +3 to +9

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBotOct 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix typo and implement tests for unauthenticated users.

  1. There's a typo in the test suite description. "setttings" should be "settings".
  2. The beforeEach hook correctly clears cookies, which is good for maintaining a clean state.
  3. Implement actual tests for unauthenticated users as indicated by the placeholder comment.

Here's a suggested fix for the typo:

-test.describe("Unauthenticated setttings Page", () => {+test.describe("Unauthenticated settings Page", () => {

Would you like assistance in generating some example tests for unauthenticated users?

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
test.describe("Unauthenticated setttings Page",()=>{
test.beforeEach(async({ page })=>{
awaitpage.context().clearCookies();
});
//
// Replace with tests for unauthenticated users
});
test.describe("Unauthenticated settings Page",()=>{
test.beforeEach(async({ page })=>{
awaitpage.context().clearCookies();
});
//
// Replace with tests for unauthenticated users
});


test.describe("Authenticated settings Page", () => {
//
// Replace with tests for authenticated users
});
Comment on lines +11 to +14

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBotOct 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Implement tests and consider adding a beforeEach hook for authenticated users.

  1. The test suite structure is correct, but it lacks actual test implementations.
  2. Consider adding a beforeEach hook to set up the authenticated state for each test.

Here's a suggested structure for the authenticated users test suite:

test.describe("Authenticated settings Page",()=>{test.beforeEach(async({ page })=>{// TODO: Set up authenticated state// For example: // await page.goto('/login');// await page.fill('#email', 'user@example.com');// await page.fill('#password', 'password123');// await page.click('button[type="submit"]');});test('should display user settings when authenticated',async({ page })=>{// TODO: Implement test});// Add more tests as needed});

Would you like assistance in generating some example tests for authenticated users?

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Template/e2e/testing#1167

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
NiallJoeMaher merged 2 commits into from
Oct 22, 2024
Merged

Template/e2e/testing #1167

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
4027f1d
add settings template
John-Paul-Larkin Oct 22, 2024
46a7116
add my-posts template
John-Paul-Larkin Oct 22, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
14 changes: 14 additions & 0 deletions e2e/my-posts.spec.ts
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
import test from "@playwright/test";

test.describe("Unauthenticated my-posts Page", () => {
test.beforeEach(async ({ page }) => {

@JohnAllenTechJohnAllenTechOct 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! Ill implement this with some other tests also

await page.context().clearCookies();
});
//
// Replace with tests for unauthenticated users
});

test.describe("Authenticated my-posts Page", () => {
//
// Replace with tests for authenticated users
});
Comment on lines +11 to +14

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBotOct 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider adding a beforeEach hook for authenticated users.

The test suite for authenticated users is structured correctly, but it could benefit from a beforeEach hook to set up the authenticated state before each test. This would ensure consistency and a proper testing environment for authenticated user scenarios.

Consider adding a beforeEach hook similar to the unauthenticated suite, but instead of clearing cookies, it should set up the authenticated state. For example:

test.describe("Authenticated my-posts Page",()=>{test.beforeEach(async({ page })=>{// TODO: Set up authenticated state// This might involve setting specific cookies or using a custom command to log in});// Replace with tests for authenticated users});

Remember to replace the placeholder comment with actual test implementations for authenticated users.

Comment on lines +1 to +14

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBotOct 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Inconsistent test suite structures across e2e files.

The e2e/my-posts.spec.ts includes both "Unauthenticated" and "Authenticated" test suites, whereas other e2e test files only contain "Unauthenticated" test suites. To maintain consistency, consider standardizing the structure across all e2e test files.

🔗 Analysis chain

LGTM: Well-structured template for 'my-posts' e2e tests.

This file provides an excellent foundation for end-to-end testing of the 'my-posts' page. It aligns well with the PR objectives by:

  1. Creating a template file for e2e testing.
  2. Covering both authenticated and unauthenticated user scenarios.
  3. Following Playwright's recommended practices.

The structure allows for easy addition of specific tests in the future, which is in line with the author's intention to create related issues for these e2e tests.

To ensure consistency across e2e test files, let's verify if a similar structure is used in other e2e test files:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash# Description: Check for similar structure in other e2e test files# Test: Search for test suites in other e2e files
rg -A 5 'test.describe\("(Un)?authenticated' e2e/

Length of output: 1761

14 changes: 14 additions & 0 deletions e2e/settings.spec.ts
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
import test from "@playwright/test";

test.describe("Unauthenticated setttings Page", () => {
test.beforeEach(async ({ page }) => {
await page.context().clearCookies();
});
//
// Replace with tests for unauthenticated users
});
Comment on lines +3 to +9

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBotOct 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix typo and implement tests for unauthenticated users.

  1. There's a typo in the test suite description. "setttings" should be "settings".
  2. The beforeEach hook correctly clears cookies, which is good for maintaining a clean state.
  3. Implement actual tests for unauthenticated users as indicated by the placeholder comment.

Here's a suggested fix for the typo:

-test.describe("Unauthenticated setttings Page", () => {+test.describe("Unauthenticated settings Page", () => {

Would you like assistance in generating some example tests for unauthenticated users?

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
test.describe("Unauthenticated setttings Page",()=>{
test.beforeEach(async({ page })=>{
awaitpage.context().clearCookies();
});
//
// Replace with tests for unauthenticated users
});
test.describe("Unauthenticated settings Page",()=>{
test.beforeEach(async({ page })=>{
awaitpage.context().clearCookies();
});
//
// Replace with tests for unauthenticated users
});


test.describe("Authenticated settings Page", () => {
//
// Replace with tests for authenticated users
});
Comment on lines +11 to +14

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBotOct 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Implement tests and consider adding a beforeEach hook for authenticated users.

  1. The test suite structure is correct, but it lacks actual test implementations.
  2. Consider adding a beforeEach hook to set up the authenticated state for each test.

Here's a suggested structure for the authenticated users test suite:

test.describe("Authenticated settings Page",()=>{test.beforeEach(async({ page })=>{// TODO: Set up authenticated state// For example: // await page.goto('/login');// await page.fill('#email', 'user@example.com');// await page.fill('#password', 'password123');// await page.click('button[type="submit"]');});test('should display user settings when authenticated',async({ page })=>{// TODO: Implement test});// Add more tests as needed});

Would you like assistance in generating some example tests for authenticated users?

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Template/e2e/testing#1167

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
NiallJoeMaher merged 2 commits into from
Oct 22, 2024
Merged

Template/e2e/testing #1167

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
4027f1d
add settings template
John-Paul-Larkin Oct 22, 2024
46a7116
add my-posts template
John-Paul-Larkin Oct 22, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
14 changes: 14 additions & 0 deletions e2e/my-posts.spec.ts
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
import test from "@playwright/test";

test.describe("Unauthenticated my-posts Page", () => {
test.beforeEach(async ({ page }) => {

@JohnAllenTechJohnAllenTechOct 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! Ill implement this with some other tests also

await page.context().clearCookies();
});
//
// Replace with tests for unauthenticated users
});

test.describe("Authenticated my-posts Page", () => {
//
// Replace with tests for authenticated users
});
Comment on lines +11 to +14

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBotOct 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider adding a beforeEach hook for authenticated users.

The test suite for authenticated users is structured correctly, but it could benefit from a beforeEach hook to set up the authenticated state before each test. This would ensure consistency and a proper testing environment for authenticated user scenarios.

Consider adding a beforeEach hook similar to the unauthenticated suite, but instead of clearing cookies, it should set up the authenticated state. For example:

test.describe("Authenticated my-posts Page",()=>{test.beforeEach(async({ page })=>{// TODO: Set up authenticated state// This might involve setting specific cookies or using a custom command to log in});// Replace with tests for authenticated users});

Remember to replace the placeholder comment with actual test implementations for authenticated users.

Comment on lines +1 to +14

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBotOct 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Inconsistent test suite structures across e2e files.

The e2e/my-posts.spec.ts includes both "Unauthenticated" and "Authenticated" test suites, whereas other e2e test files only contain "Unauthenticated" test suites. To maintain consistency, consider standardizing the structure across all e2e test files.

🔗 Analysis chain

LGTM: Well-structured template for 'my-posts' e2e tests.

This file provides an excellent foundation for end-to-end testing of the 'my-posts' page. It aligns well with the PR objectives by:

  1. Creating a template file for e2e testing.
  2. Covering both authenticated and unauthenticated user scenarios.
  3. Following Playwright's recommended practices.

The structure allows for easy addition of specific tests in the future, which is in line with the author's intention to create related issues for these e2e tests.

To ensure consistency across e2e test files, let's verify if a similar structure is used in other e2e test files:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash# Description: Check for similar structure in other e2e test files# Test: Search for test suites in other e2e files
rg -A 5 'test.describe\("(Un)?authenticated' e2e/

Length of output: 1761

14 changes: 14 additions & 0 deletions e2e/settings.spec.ts
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
import test from "@playwright/test";

test.describe("Unauthenticated setttings Page", () => {
test.beforeEach(async ({ page }) => {
await page.context().clearCookies();
});
//
// Replace with tests for unauthenticated users
});
Comment on lines +3 to +9

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBotOct 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix typo and implement tests for unauthenticated users.

  1. There's a typo in the test suite description. "setttings" should be "settings".
  2. The beforeEach hook correctly clears cookies, which is good for maintaining a clean state.
  3. Implement actual tests for unauthenticated users as indicated by the placeholder comment.

Here's a suggested fix for the typo:

-test.describe("Unauthenticated setttings Page", () => {+test.describe("Unauthenticated settings Page", () => {

Would you like assistance in generating some example tests for unauthenticated users?

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
test.describe("Unauthenticated setttings Page",()=>{
test.beforeEach(async({ page })=>{
awaitpage.context().clearCookies();
});
//
// Replace with tests for unauthenticated users
});
test.describe("Unauthenticated settings Page",()=>{
test.beforeEach(async({ page })=>{
awaitpage.context().clearCookies();
});
//
// Replace with tests for unauthenticated users
});


test.describe("Authenticated settings Page", () => {
//
// Replace with tests for authenticated users
});
Comment on lines +11 to +14

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBotOct 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Implement tests and consider adding a beforeEach hook for authenticated users.

  1. The test suite structure is correct, but it lacks actual test implementations.
  2. Consider adding a beforeEach hook to set up the authenticated state for each test.

Here's a suggested structure for the authenticated users test suite:

test.describe("Authenticated settings Page",()=>{test.beforeEach(async({ page })=>{// TODO: Set up authenticated state// For example: // await page.goto('/login');// await page.fill('#email', 'user@example.com');// await page.fill('#password', 'password123');// await page.click('button[type="submit"]');});test('should display user settings when authenticated',async({ page })=>{// TODO: Implement test});// Add more tests as needed});

Would you like assistance in generating some example tests for authenticated users?