feat(hooks): support interactive hook scripts

[PhilipNelson5]

Description

When a pre/post bump hook needs user input it fails because stdin, stdout, and stderr are redirected. This feature adds a new cmd utility to run a command without capturing/redirecting input or output to the subprocess. This allows interactive hooks to request input and display output to the user interactively.

Checklist

• I have read the contributing guidelines

Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?

• Yes (please specify the tool below)

Code Changes

• Add test cases to all the changes you introduce
• Run uv run poe all locally to ensure this change passes linter check and tests
• Manually test the changes:
  • Verify the feature/bug fix works as expected in real-world scenarios
  • Test edge cases and error conditions
  • Ensure backward compatibility is maintained
  • Document any manual testing steps performed
• Update the documentation for the changes

Documentation Changes

• Run uv run poe doc locally to ensure the documentation pages renders correctly
• Check and fix any broken links (internal or external)

Expected Behavior

When a pre/post bump hook tries to get user input, it successfully does so.

Steps to Test This Pull Request

1. configure a pre/post bump hook which prompts the user for input.
2. run cz bump.
3. the hook successfully requests user input and is able to capture it without issue.

Additional Context

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 98.23%. Comparing base (efb1a7d) to head (47f3372).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #1925 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 98.23% 98.23% =======================================
Files 61 61 Lines 2772 2779 +7 =======================================
+ Hits 2723 2730 +7 
Misses 49 49 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[bearomorphism]

Please fix the coverage pipeline, thanks

[PhilipNelson5]

@bearomorphism I added tests for cmd.run and cmd.run_interactive.

[bearomorphism]

Thank you for fixing the pipeline failures! @PhilipNelson5

@woile please review this feature

[PhilipNelson5]

@bearomorphism I've brought in the changes you made in #1941 and mirrored them in this feature.

[bearomorphism]

Thanks! will review when I have bandwidth

[bearomorphism]

LGTM. I see some duplicated test code but it's non-blocking.

Wait for @woile to do the final review

[woile]

thanks 🎉 🚀