Fix brand regex

[SylvainCorlay]

Fixes#194

I would really advocate from completely removing the brand_python.py though. I don't think that modifying _sys_version is a clean way of changing the banner.

Checklist

• Used a fork of the feedstock to propose changes
• Bumped the build number (if the version is unchanged)
• Reset the build number to 0 (if the version changed)
• Re-rendered with the latest conda-smithy (Use the phrase @conda-forge-admin, please rerender in a comment in this PR for automated rerendering)
• Ensured the license file is being packaged.

[conda-forge-linter]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipe:

• License is not an SPDX identifier (or Other) nor an SPDX license expression.

[isuruf]

@conda-forge-admin, rerender

[SylvainCorlay]

Even if this works, I think we should consider completely removing that patch.

[jjhelmus]

I'm fine removing this patch entirely. It was in conda-forge before I started working on the python recipe so I kept it.

[mingwandroid]

What about using the anaconda branding mechanism instead? We change the c code. I can template the patch and apply the correct replacement at build time if that's acceptable?

Branding is kinda useful if you change things significantly and I think, for better or worse we do that. But I don't mind if we remove it entirely for conda-forge either really.

[jakirkham]

Having some kind of branding is useful I think. Though I don't know if we are discussing removing it or just some minor tweaks at this point.

[SylvainCorlay]

What about using the anaconda branding mechanism instead? We change the c code. I can template the patch and apply the correct replacement at build time if that's acceptable?

I don't know where to find that recipe?

[SylvainCorlay]

Having some kind of branding is useful I think. Though I don't know if we are discussing removing it or just some minor tweaks at this point.

This PR does a minor tweak but I was suggesting we should consider removing it completely.

[SylvainCorlay]

For your information, I opened #332 completely removing the patching of sys.version - and which I think preferable over this approach.

[SylvainCorlay]

Any interest in getting this in?

[isuruf]

Can you bump the build number?

[SylvainCorlay]

Can you bump the build number?

Done

[conda-forge-linter]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipe:

• License is not an SPDX identifier (or a custom LicenseRef) nor an SPDX license expression.

[SylvainCorlay]

@isuruf I bumped the build number - and did some more testing locally.

[SylvainCorlay]

The rerender seems to be problematic. I don't see why there should be a linux_python3.7 build of Python 3.8...

[isuruf]

One build in linux-64 passing is enough