Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
✨ enable support for logical expressions in EXPECT and ASSERT - #98
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Problem: - logical expressions fail in EXPECT() and ASSERT() because of operator precedence Solution: - wrap __VA_ARGS__ use in macros with an extra set of parens
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem:
EXPECT()andASSERT()because of operator precedenceSolution:
__VA_ARGS__use in macros with an extra set of parens