Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I dont understand the purpose of this, as ctest will already run the tests in the testrunner and it will run faster. Can we name this
run-testrunnerinstead?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
First I want to align
Makefilewith CMake so there's an easy transition when moving to CMake. TheMakefileshould be completely deprecated or stripped down a bit.There's lots of more things in CMake which can be simplified and consolidated.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think only @danmar uses the Makefile(and he seems more focused on cppcheck premium recently too). As far as I know, most other developers and contributors use cmake.
We can definitely provide targets to do the same functionality as in the makefile, but I dont see the need to name them exactly the same, especially when the name already overlaps with targets developers are already using in cmake.