Skip to content

Matched values in FakeResponse.text to return from json - #382

Open
ZRexshima wants to merge 1 commit into
cs50:2022/pythonfrom
ZRexshima:bugfix_text_json_mismatch
Open

Matched values in FakeResponse.text to return from json#382
ZRexshima wants to merge 1 commit into
cs50:2022/pythonfrom
ZRexshima:bugfix_text_json_mismatch

Conversation

@ZRexshima

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The text in the FakeResonse was not matching the json returned by the mocked json method. Live response from the API shows that these values match. A student with some Python experience was using the json library to convert the text into the data for their solution. Check50 showed the slightly differing results vs the expected data from the FakeResponse. This gave little direction to fix the issue, beyond "follow the hints", which solved the issue.

I changed the values in the text section to match the response. To be thorough, I copied both to files and used python to compare. I ran a check50 test on a new version of bitcoin.py that uses the json library to verify.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ZRexshima
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Matched values in FakeResponse.text to return from json by ZRexshima · Pull Request #382 · cs50/problems · GitHub
Skip to content

Matched values in FakeResponse.text to return from json - #382

Open
ZRexshima wants to merge 1 commit into
cs50:2022/pythonfrom
ZRexshima:bugfix_text_json_mismatch
Open

Matched values in FakeResponse.text to return from json#382
ZRexshima wants to merge 1 commit into
cs50:2022/pythonfrom
ZRexshima:bugfix_text_json_mismatch

Conversation

@ZRexshima

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The text in the FakeResonse was not matching the json returned by the mocked json method. Live response from the API shows that these values match. A student with some Python experience was using the json library to convert the text into the data for their solution. Check50 showed the slightly differing results vs the expected data from the FakeResponse. This gave little direction to fix the issue, beyond "follow the hints", which solved the issue.

I changed the values in the text section to match the response. To be thorough, I copied both to files and used python to compare. I ran a check50 test on a new version of bitcoin.py that uses the json library to verify.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ZRexshima
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Matched values in FakeResponse.text to return from json by ZRexshima · Pull Request #382 · cs50/problems · GitHub
Skip to content

Matched values in FakeResponse.text to return from json - #382

Open
ZRexshima wants to merge 1 commit into
cs50:2022/pythonfrom
ZRexshima:bugfix_text_json_mismatch
Open

Matched values in FakeResponse.text to return from json#382
ZRexshima wants to merge 1 commit into
cs50:2022/pythonfrom
ZRexshima:bugfix_text_json_mismatch

Conversation

@ZRexshima

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The text in the FakeResonse was not matching the json returned by the mocked json method. Live response from the API shows that these values match. A student with some Python experience was using the json library to convert the text into the data for their solution. Check50 showed the slightly differing results vs the expected data from the FakeResponse. This gave little direction to fix the issue, beyond "follow the hints", which solved the issue.

I changed the values in the text section to match the response. To be thorough, I copied both to files and used python to compare. I ran a check50 test on a new version of bitcoin.py that uses the json library to verify.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ZRexshima
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Matched values in FakeResponse.text to return from json by ZRexshima · Pull Request #382 · cs50/problems · GitHub
Skip to content

Matched values in FakeResponse.text to return from json - #382

Open
ZRexshima wants to merge 1 commit into
cs50:2022/pythonfrom
ZRexshima:bugfix_text_json_mismatch
Open

Matched values in FakeResponse.text to return from json#382
ZRexshima wants to merge 1 commit into
cs50:2022/pythonfrom
ZRexshima:bugfix_text_json_mismatch

Conversation

@ZRexshima

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The text in the FakeResonse was not matching the json returned by the mocked json method. Live response from the API shows that these values match. A student with some Python experience was using the json library to convert the text into the data for their solution. Check50 showed the slightly differing results vs the expected data from the FakeResponse. This gave little direction to fix the issue, beyond "follow the hints", which solved the issue.

I changed the values in the text section to match the response. To be thorough, I copied both to files and used python to compare. I ran a check50 test on a new version of bitcoin.py that uses the json library to verify.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ZRexshima
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' Matched values in FakeResponse.text to return from json by ZRexshima · Pull Request #382 · cs50/problems · GitHub
Skip to content

Matched values in FakeResponse.text to return from json - #382

Open
ZRexshima wants to merge 1 commit into
cs50:2022/pythonfrom
ZRexshima:bugfix_text_json_mismatch
Open

Matched values in FakeResponse.text to return from json#382
ZRexshima wants to merge 1 commit into
cs50:2022/pythonfrom
ZRexshima:bugfix_text_json_mismatch

Conversation

@ZRexshima

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The text in the FakeResonse was not matching the json returned by the mocked json method. Live response from the API shows that these values match. A student with some Python experience was using the json library to convert the text into the data for their solution. Check50 showed the slightly differing results vs the expected data from the FakeResponse. This gave little direction to fix the issue, beyond "follow the hints", which solved the issue.

I changed the values in the text section to match the response. To be thorough, I copied both to files and used python to compare. I ran a check50 test on a new version of bitcoin.py that uses the json library to verify.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ZRexshima
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Matched values in FakeResponse.text to return from json by ZRexshima · Pull Request #382 · cs50/problems · GitHub
Skip to content

Matched values in FakeResponse.text to return from json - #382

Open
ZRexshima wants to merge 1 commit into
cs50:2022/pythonfrom
ZRexshima:bugfix_text_json_mismatch
Open

Matched values in FakeResponse.text to return from json#382
ZRexshima wants to merge 1 commit into
cs50:2022/pythonfrom
ZRexshima:bugfix_text_json_mismatch

Conversation

@ZRexshima

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The text in the FakeResonse was not matching the json returned by the mocked json method. Live response from the API shows that these values match. A student with some Python experience was using the json library to convert the text into the data for their solution. Check50 showed the slightly differing results vs the expected data from the FakeResponse. This gave little direction to fix the issue, beyond "follow the hints", which solved the issue.

I changed the values in the text section to match the response. To be thorough, I copied both to files and used python to compare. I ran a check50 test on a new version of bitcoin.py that uses the json library to verify.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ZRexshima
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Matched values in FakeResponse.text to return from json by ZRexshima · Pull Request #382 · cs50/problems · GitHub
Skip to content

Matched values in FakeResponse.text to return from json - #382

Open
ZRexshima wants to merge 1 commit into
cs50:2022/pythonfrom
ZRexshima:bugfix_text_json_mismatch
Open

Matched values in FakeResponse.text to return from json#382
ZRexshima wants to merge 1 commit into
cs50:2022/pythonfrom
ZRexshima:bugfix_text_json_mismatch

Conversation

@ZRexshima

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The text in the FakeResonse was not matching the json returned by the mocked json method. Live response from the API shows that these values match. A student with some Python experience was using the json library to convert the text into the data for their solution. Check50 showed the slightly differing results vs the expected data from the FakeResponse. This gave little direction to fix the issue, beyond "follow the hints", which solved the issue.

I changed the values in the text section to match the response. To be thorough, I copied both to files and used python to compare. I ran a check50 test on a new version of bitcoin.py that uses the json library to verify.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ZRexshima
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); Matched values in FakeResponse.text to return from json by ZRexshima · Pull Request #382 · cs50/problems · GitHub
Skip to content

Matched values in FakeResponse.text to return from json - #382

Open
ZRexshima wants to merge 1 commit into
cs50:2022/pythonfrom
ZRexshima:bugfix_text_json_mismatch
Open

Matched values in FakeResponse.text to return from json#382
ZRexshima wants to merge 1 commit into
cs50:2022/pythonfrom
ZRexshima:bugfix_text_json_mismatch

Conversation

@ZRexshima

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The text in the FakeResonse was not matching the json returned by the mocked json method. Live response from the API shows that these values match. A student with some Python experience was using the json library to convert the text into the data for their solution. Check50 showed the slightly differing results vs the expected data from the FakeResponse. This gave little direction to fix the issue, beyond "follow the hints", which solved the issue.

I changed the values in the text section to match the response. To be thorough, I copied both to files and used python to compare. I ran a check50 test on a new version of bitcoin.py that uses the json library to verify.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ZRexshima