Fields in the site info box are in an illogical order

[Robinlovelace]

Example from Handforth:

It seems we're just showing all the fields, may be worth filtering. Is that easy to do @mvl22 ? Looking at the names, I think we only need to keep the first 6. Could the others be in a 'further information' link, that could just link to the GeoJSON? https://github.com/cyipt/actdev/blob/main/data-small/handforth/site.geojson

names(sf::read_sf("https://github.com/cyipt/actdev/raw/main/data-small/all-sites.geojson"))
#> [1] "site_name" "full_name" 
#> [3] "main_local_authority" "is_complete" 
#> [5] "dwellings_when_complete" "planning_url" 
#> [7] "percent_commute_active_base" "percent_drive_convertable" 
#> [9] "percent_mapped_drive_convertable" "percent_commute_active_scenario" 
#> [11] "median_commute_distance" "distance_to_town" 
#> [13] "crossing_points" "percent_commute_walk_base" 
#> [15] "percent_commute_cycle_base" "percent_commute_drive_base" 
#> [17] "percent_commute_bus_base" "percent_commute_rail_base" 
#> [19] "percent_commute_other_base" "circuity_fast_cycle" 
#> [21] "circuity_walk" "busyness_fast_cycle" 
#> [23] "in_site_walk_circuity" "in_site_cycle_circuity" 
#> [25] "in_site_drive_circuity" "percent_commute_drive_scenario" 
#> [27] "percent_commute_walk_scenario" "percent_commute_cycle_scenario" 
#> [29] "walk_base_rating" "cycle_base_rating" 
#> [31] "drive_base_rating" "geometry"

^{Created on 2021-05-19 by the reprex package (v2.0.0)}